Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07125 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/31/2025

                     
Researcher: MHF 	Page 1 	3/31/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 7125  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING REFERENDA ON REVISIONS TO 
MUNICIPAL CHARTERS AND HOME RULE ORDINANCES.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill establishes requirements for ballot designations (i.e. 
questions) for proposed changes to municipal charters and home rule 
ordinances that must be submitted to a municipality’s voters at an 
election (whether required by the statutes or a special act, charter, or 
ordinance). It also explicitly allows complaints regarding the 
preparation of these referenda to be brought in state court. 
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
BALLOT DESIGNATION R EQUIREMENTS 
Question Format and Explanation 
Under the bill, similar to existing law for referendum questions, the 
ballot designation for a proposed charter or home rule ordinance 
amendment must be “Shall (here insert the question, in a form requiring 
a “Yes” or “No” response, followed by a question mark).” If the 
designation as presented does not adequately explain the proposed 
change or changes, the bill requires the inclusion of a precise and fair 
explanation that does not advocate for or against the amendment. The 
bill requires that both the designation and the explanation use simple, 
precise, clear, unambiguous, and plain language.   
Existing law allows municipalities, generally by vote of their 
legislative bodies, to authorize similar explanatory texts or other printed 
materials for referendum questions. For regional school district 
referenda, only the regional board of education can authorize 
explanatory text.  2025HB-07125-R000365-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MHF 	Page 2 	3/31/25 
 
Proposed Amendments on Certain Subjects 
Under the bill, proposed charter or home rule ordinance amendments 
addressing the following subjects must appear and be described 
separately on the ballot: 
1. any change in election method for the municipality’s legislative 
or governing body; 
2. any changes on whether a municipal official is elected or 
appointed; 
3. any changes on a municipal official’s term length; 
4. any changes regarding residency requirements for municipal 
department heads; 
5. the creation or elimination of a municipal board or commission, 
with specific reference to each board or commission, and a 
description of its authority if being created; and 
6. any changes regarding public notice requirements for public 
hearings related to the municipal budget process. 
The bill requires the question to specifically identify each affected 
position for any changes regarding (1) whether a municipal official is 
appointed or elected, (2) a municipal official’s term length, or (3) 
municipal department head residency requirements. For each category, 
the changes may be presented as a single item if the same change applies 
to multiple officials or department heads, as applicable. 
SUMMARIES OF FAVORAB LE AND OPPOSING ARGU MENTS 
The bill allows municipalities to prepare, print, and distribute concise 
summaries of arguments for and against the proposed charter or home 
rule ordinance amendment, and requires these summaries to comply 
with existing law’s requirements for summaries for referendum 
questions. (But unlike existing law for referendum questions, it allows 
them to do this without passing an ordinance to that effect.) 
The existing law authorizes municipalities, by ordinance, to provide  2025HB-07125-R000365-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: MHF 	Page 3 	3/31/25 
 
for concise summaries of favorable and opposing arguments for 
approved local proposals or questions at a referendum for which 
explanatory texts are prepared. The ordinance must provide for the 
establishment or designation of a committee, whose members must 
represent various viewpoints, to prepare the summaries. 
To the extent practicable, the committee must provide an opportunity 
for public comment on the prepared summaries. The summaries must 
be approved by the municipality’s legislative body, or any other 
municipal body designated by the ordinance, and be posted and 
distributed in the same way as explanatory texts. Each summary must 
contain language clearly stating that the printing of the summary does 
not constitute an endorsement by, or represent the official position of, 
the municipality. 
COMPLAINTS 
Existing law allows citizens to file a complaint with any Superior 
Court judge if he or she claims to have been aggrieved in connection 
with a referendum by, among other things, an election official’s ruling. 
The bill specifies that for the purposes of a referendum held on a 
charter or home rule ordinance amendment, an “election official” 
includes the appointing authority that prepared the amendment and its 
preparation is considered a “ruling.” 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Government Administration and Elections Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 19 Nay 0 (03/12/2025)