Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07204 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/02/2025

                     
Researcher: DC 	Page 1 	4/2/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
HB 7204 
 
AN ACT CONCERNING LIGHTS ON VEHICLES, PENALTIES FOR 
VIOLATIONS OF CERTAIN STATUTES, STOPS AND SEARCHES, A 
PHLEBOTOMY PROGRAM STUDY, INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN 
VEHICLES, TRAFFIC SAFETY CORRIDORS AND A PILOT 
PROGRAM TO EQUIP POLICE VEHICLES WITH CERTAIN 
DEVICES.  
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
SUMMARY 
§ 1 — FLASHING AND STEADY LIGHTS 
Allows wreckers to use steady blue lights and any combination of steady or flashing yellow and 
amber lights; limits the use of these lights to times while the wrecker is stationary; allows fire 
and emergency medical service personnel to use steady lights in the colors they can use under 
existing law for flashing lights 
§§ 2-6 — INCREASED PENALTIES 
Increases the penalties for various motor vehicle-related violations, including by increasing 
the maximum fine amounts, criminalizing certain violations, and requiring mandatory 
minimums for others 
§ 7 — CANNABIS ODOR 
Allows certain circumstances (e.g., odor of cannabis) to be used to support a stop or search of 
a person or motor vehicle 
§ 8 — PHLEBOTOMY FEASIBILITY STUDY 
Requires the DESPP and DOT commissioners to jointly conduct a feasibility study on 
implementing a permanent statewide law enforcement phlebotomy program to combat impaired 
driving 
§ 9 — SAFETY VEHICLE INSPECTIONS 
Requires the DMV to annually conduct safety inspections on vehicles used by Connecticut law 
enforcement units 
§ 10 — TRAFFIC SAFETY CORRIDORS 
Requires the (1) DOT commissioner to establish and designate parts of a highway with high 
rates of motor vehicle accidents as traffic safety corridors and (2) Superior Court to double the 
base fine of certain violations 
§ 11 — POLICE USE OF GPS PILOT PROGRAM  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 2 	4/2/25 
 
Requires DESPP to establish a one-year pilot program to allow three municipal police 
departments to install a device on their police vehicles that allows a police officer to launch a 
GPS onto another vehicle 
BACKGROUND 
 
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes various unrelated changes to motor vehicle-related 
laws. It also requires annual inspection of certain law enforcement 
vehicles and establishes a pilot program to allow police officers to 
launch a global positioning system (GPS) on another vehicle. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025, unless otherwise noted 
§ 1 — FLASHING AND STEADY LIGHTS 
Allows wreckers to use steady blue lights and any combination of steady or flashing 
yellow and amber lights; limits the use of these lights to times while the wrecker is 
stationary; allows fire and emergency medical service personnel to use steady lights in the 
colors they can use under existing law for flashing lights 
By law, registered wreckers may use steady or flashing yellow or 
amber lights while operating on the road or while stationary. The bill 
additionally allows them to use steady blue lights and specifies that they 
may use a combination of yellow and amber lights. However, it limits 
the use of all of these lights (yellow, amber, and blue) to times when the 
vehicle is stationary. 
It also allows fire and emergency medical service personnel who are 
authorized to use flashing blue or red lights under existing law to also 
use steady lights in those colors. Under current law, only police officers 
and Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) inspectors operating a state 
or local police vehicle may use steady red, blue, or red and blue lights, 
visible from the vehicle’s front; the bill eliminates this restriction.  
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes.  
§§ 2-6 — INCREASED PENALTIES 
Increases the penalties for various motor vehicle-related violations, including by 
increasing the maximum fine amounts, criminalizing certain violations, and requiring 
mandatory minimums for others 
The bill increases the penalties for various motor vehicle-related  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 3 	4/2/25 
 
violations. It increases the maximum fine amounts, criminalizes certain 
violations, and requires mandatory minimums for others. 
Obstructed or Tinted Windows (§ 2) 
The bill criminalizes the following violations by subjecting them to 
the penalties for reckless driving: 
1. operating a vehicle with an object obstructing the operator’s view 
of the road or with a tinted windshield in violation of state law;  
2. selling, offering for sale, or delivering a motor vehicle in 
Connecticut with a tinted windshield or window in violation of 
state law; and  
3. failing to present a vehicle to DMV by July 1, 2026, to receive and 
put a sticker on any aftermarket tinted window to indicate 
compliance with the law. 
The penalty for reckless driving is (1) a fine of between $100 and $300, 
up to 30 days imprisonment, or both, for a first offense, and (2) a fine of 
up to $600, up to one year imprisonment, or both, for subsequent 
offenses. Under current law, these obstructed or tinted window 
violations are infractions. 
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes. 
Negligent Operation of a Vehicle (§ 3) 
The bill increases the maximum penalty for negligently operating a 
motor vehicle that causes the death of another person. It does so by 
increasing the penalty from a fine of up to $3,000, up to three years 
imprisonment, or both, to a class C felony, which is punishable by up to 
10 years imprisonment, up to a $10,000 fine, or both. 
Failure to Stop for and Evading a Police Officer (§ 4) 
The bill also increases the maximum penalties for failing to stop for 
or obey a police officer and attempting to evade a police officer. 
It increases, from an infraction to a class A misdemeanor (punishable 
by up to 364 days imprisonment, up to a $2,000 fine, or both), the penalty  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 4 	4/2/25 
 
for failing to stop a motor vehicle upon a uniformed officer’s signal or 
disobeying the officer about operating the vehicle. 
It also increases, from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony 
(punishable by up to five years imprisonment, up to a $5,000 fine, or 
both), the penalty for increasing a vehicle’s speed in an attempt to 
escape or elude a police officer after being signaled to stop. 
Evasion of Responsibility in Operating Motor Vehicle (§ 5)  
Under existing law, a driver knowingly involved in an accident that 
causes serious physical injury to or the death of another person must 
immediately stop; render necessary aid; and give his or her name, 
address, and driver’s license and registration information to the injured 
person, a police officer, or a person who witnessed the death or serious 
injury. If unable to do so for any reason, the driver must immediately 
report the death or serious injury and provide the required information 
to law enforcement along with the location and circumstances of the 
accident. 
Under current law, anyone who violates these requirements is guilty 
of a class B felony, which is punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment, 
up to a $15,000 fine, or both. The bill imposes a mandatory minimum 
sentence of five years for violations. 
Existing law imposes substantially similar requirements for 
operators who cause any physical injury, whether or not it is serious. 
Currently violations of these requirements are a class D felony. The bill 
imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of two years for these 
violations.  
Misconduct with a Motor Vehicle (§6) 
The bill increases the penalty for misconduct with a motor vehicle 
from a class D felony to a class C felony, with a (1) five-year mandatory 
minimum sentence or (2) 10-year mandatory minimum sentence if the 
person causes the death of a police officer. 
By law and for this provision, “police officers” are sworn members of 
an organized local police department or the State Police; appointed  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 5 	4/2/25 
 
constables who perform criminal law enforcement duties; special police 
officers appointed under law (e.g., public assistance fraud 
investigators); or any members of a law enforcement unit who perform 
police duties (CGS § 7-294a(9)). 
§ 7 — CANNABIS ODOR 
Allows certain circumstances (e.g., odor of cannabis) to be used to support a stop or search 
of a person or motor vehicle 
The bill eliminates the provision in current law prohibiting the 
following circumstances from constituting probable cause or reasonable 
suspicion or being used as the basis to support any stop or search of a 
person or motor vehicle: 
1. the possession or suspected possession of up to five ounces of 
cannabis plant material (or an equivalent amount of cannabis 
products or combination of cannabis and cannabis products);  
2. the presence of cash or currency near the cannabis, unless there 
is evidence that the cash or currency exceeds $500; or  
3. the odor of cannabis or burnt cannabis. 
The bill retains a provision in existing law explicitly allowing law 
enforcement officers to conduct a test for impairment based on cannabis 
odor if the officer reasonably suspects that a motor vehicle’s operator or 
passenger is violating the impaired driving laws. The bill also makes a 
conforming change. 
§ 8 — PHLEBOTOMY FEA SIBILITY STUDY 
Requires the DESPP and DOT commissioners to jointly conduct a feasibility study on 
implementing a permanent statewide law enforcement phlebotomy program to combat 
impaired driving 
The bill requires the Department of Emergency Services and Public 
Protection (DESPP) and Department of Transportation (DOT) 
commissioners to jointly study the feasibility of implementing a 
permanent statewide law enforcement phlebotomy program to combat 
impaired driving.  
The study must include an examination of:  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 6 	4/2/25 
 
1. best practices for (a) making phlebotomy training available to police 
officers and (b) providing educational materials to and answering 
questions from police officers on the training and police liability; 
and  
2. phlebotomy programs and procedures law enforcement units use in 
other states. 
Under the bill, DESPP and DOT must report the study’s findings and 
any legislative recommendations to the Public Safety and 
Transportation committees by January 1, 2026. 
§ 9 — SAFETY VEHICLE INSPECTIONS 
Requires the DMV to annually conduct safety inspections on vehicles used by 
Connecticut law enforcement units 
The bill requires the DMV, annually by July 1, 2026, and in 
consultation with DESPP, to conduct safety inspections on vehicles used 
by Connecticut law enforcement units to ensure each vehicle’s safety 
and functionality. DMV must randomly select law enforcement units for 
the inspections. When the inspection is complete, DMV must report the 
inspection results to the law enforcement units whose vehicles were 
inspected. 
By law and for this provision, a “law enforcement unit” is any state 
or municipal agency or department (or tribal agency or department 
created and governed under a memorandum of agreement) whose 
primary functions include enforcing criminal or traffic laws; preserving 
public order; protecting life and property; or preventing, detecting, or 
investigating crime (CGS § 7-294a(8)). 
§ 10 — TRAFFIC SAFETY CORRIDORS 
Requires the (1) DOT commissioner to establish and designate parts of a highway with 
high rates of motor vehicle accidents as traffic safety corridors and (2) Superior Court to 
double the base fine of certain violations 
The bill requires the DOT commissioner, in consultation with the 
DESPP commissioner, to establish a traffic safety corridor program to 
(1) designate parts of a highway (i.e. public road) with high rates of 
motor vehicle accidents as traffic safety corridors, and (2) coordinate  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 7 	4/2/25 
 
motor vehicle enforcement in these corridors. 
Under the bill, the Superior Court must double the base fine 
established or imposed for the violations listed in the table below. Most 
of the violations are infractions, which carry a base fine of between $50 
and $90. Several of them have base fines greater than $1,000. The highest 
fine is $10,000 (for operating a school bus while impaired, or for 
negligent homicide with a motor vehicle, as amended by the bill).  
Table: Motor Vehicle Violations with Additional Fines 
Statute 	Brief Description 
14-213 Failure to carry a driver’s license 
14-213b 
Operation of a motor vehicle without the statutorily 
required car insurance 
14-214 
Improper instruction of an unlicensed person in motor 
vehicle operation 
14-215 
Operation of a motor vehicle while registration or 
license is suspended 
14-216 
Operation of a motor vehicle by a person under age 18 
without insurance 
14-218a Operation at unreasonable rate of speed 
14-219 Speeding  
14-220 
Slow speed, impeding traffic; failure to use flashing 
lights 
14-221 
Operation of a low-speed vehicle carrying passengers 
for hire without a permit 
14-222 Reckless driving 
14-222a Negligent homicide with a motor vehicle 
14-223 Failure to obey signal of officer 
14-224 
Evading responsibility after a motor vehicle accident; 
operating a motor vehicle for racing contests, 
demonstrations of speed or skill, or street takeovers; 
not moving a vehicle after an accident 
14-225 
Evading responsibility for injury or damage when 
operating other vehicles 
14-227a Driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs 
14-227m DUI with a child passenger 
14-227n DUI in a school bus 
14-230 Failure to drive on the right 
14-230a 
Improper usage of left lane by commercial motor 
vehicles, school buses, buses, or vehicles with trailers 
14-231 Failure to keep to right when meeting opposing traffic  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 8 	4/2/25 
 
Statute 	Brief Description 
14-232 Improper passing or failure to yield to passing vehicle 
14-233 Passing on right 
14-235 
Failure to keep to right on curve or grade, or when 
approaching intersection 
14-236 Failure to drive in proper lane on multiple-lane highway 
14-237 Driving the wrong way on divided highway 
14-238 
Improper entry to or exit from controlled access 
highway 
14-238a Improper entry to limited access highway 
14-239 
Driving the wrong way on one-way highway or rotaries; 
failure to grant right of way to vehicle in rotary 
14-240 Failure to drive a reasonable distance apart  
14-240a 
Failure to drive a reasonable distance apart with intent 
to harass or intimidate 
14-241 Improper turn 
14-242 
Failure to give proper signal for a turn; failure to grant 
rights of way 
14-243 Unsafe starting or backing of vehicle 
14-244 Improper signaling for turns or stopping 
14-245 Failure to grant right of way at an intersection 
14-246a Failure to grant right of way at a highway junction 
14-247 
Failure to yield when emerging from driveway or 
private road 
14-247a 
Failure to grant right of way when emerging from alley, 
driveway, or building 
14-248a Failure to reduce speed or stop at cattle crossing 
14-249 Failure to obey signal at railroad crossing 
14-250 
Failure of commercial or public service motor vehicle 
to stop at railroad crossing 
14-250a Improper operation of motor vehicle on sidewalk 
14-257 Improper seating of passengers 
14-261 
Improper distance between wrecker and towed 
vehicle; improper pushing of a vehicle 
14-266 
Operation of a vehicle of over four tons’ capacity on 
restricted highway 
14-271 
Operation of a vehicle improperly loaded or 
constructed to carry load 
14-273 
Improper seating of passengers on a vehicle for which 
a passenger endorsement or passenger and school 
endorsement is required; exceeding capacity of said 
vehicle 
14-279 Improper passing of a standing school bus  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 9 	4/2/25 
 
Statute 	Brief Description 
14-281a 
Operation of school bus at excessive speed; failure to 
display lighted headlamps while transporting school 
children 
14-283(e) Failure to stop on right side of road 
14-283(h) Obstruction of an emergency vehicle 
14-289a Improper seating of self or passengers on motorcycle 
14-289b Improper operation of a motorcycle or autocycle 
14-296aa Distracted driving 
 
Under the bill, DOT must post a sign at the beginning of each traffic 
safety corridor stating the fines are doubled and at the end stating the 
corridor has ended. 
The bill also requires the State Police to enhance its enforcement 
efforts in each corridor. 
§ 11 — POLICE USE OF GPS PILOT PROGRAM 
Requires DESPP to establish a one-year pilot program to allow three municipal police 
departments to install a device on their police vehicles that allows a police officer to launch 
a GPS onto another vehicle 
By October 1, 2025, the bill requires DESPP to establish a one-year 
pilot program to allow three municipal police departments to install a 
device on their police vehicles that allows a police officer to launch a 
GPS (presumably, a GPS tracking device) onto another vehicle (see 
BACKGROUND) . DESPP may provide grants-in-aid to implement the 
program. 
Each participating police department must submit a report on the 
utilization of the devices to DESPP. By January 1, 2027, DESPP must 
submit a report to the Public Safety and Security and Judiciary 
committees. The report must include a summary of the pilot program 
results and any recommendations for future utilization of the device. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Court Cases 
In U.S. v. Jones, the U.S. Supreme Court held that placing a GPS 
tracking device on someone’s vehicle constitutes a “search” within the  2025HB-07204-R000476-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 10 	4/2/25 
 
meaning of the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable 
searches (565 U.S. 400 (2012)). Although the Court in that case did not 
rule on whether a warrant is required for police to place a GPS on a 
person, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals subsequently held that law 
enforcement agents must have a warrant based on probable cause to 
attach a GPS to a car to track its movements (U.S. v. Katzin, 769 F.3d 163 
(3d Cir. 2014)).  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Public Safety and Security Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 29 Nay 0 (03/18/2025)