Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07206 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/14/2025

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-7206 
AN ACT CONCERNING PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITING COUNCIL 
AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING CERTAIN UTILITY 
EXPENDITURES.  
 
Primary Analyst: SB 	4/14/25 
Contributing Analyst(s): ME, LG   
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
Consumer Counsel
1
 CC&PUCF - Cost 766,641 516,641 
Note: CC&PUCF=Consumer Counsel and Public Utility Control Fund  
Municipal Impact: None  
Explanation 
The bill results in an additional cost to the Office of Consumer 
Counsel (OCC) of $766,641 in FY 26 and $516,641 annually thereafter. 
The bill requires the Siting Council to make the OCC a party in certain 
Siting Council proceedings that the OCC determines may significantly 
impact electric rates. The bill also requires that any OCC staff hired as a 
party for Siting Council proceedings, be funded by the systems benefit 
charge.  
OCC would require three new full-time staff to complete the 
expanded duties within the bill. The new positions would include: a 
Utilities Examiner (annual salary of $97,141), a Staff Attorney (annual 
salary of $97,141), and a Policy Research Analyst (annual salary of 
$87,635). The corresponding fringe benefits associated with the new 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for employees funded out of other appropriated funds are 
budgeted within the fringe benefit account of those funds, as opposed to the fringe 
benefit accounts within the Office of the State Comptroller. The estimated active 
employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes for other 
appropriated fund employees is 83.26% of payroll in FY 26.  2025HB-07206-R000687-FN.DOCX 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
positions would total $234,724 annually. Additionally, OCC would 
require $250,000 in other expenses to conduct the transmission analysis 
and hire consultants to complete requirements contained within the bill. 
The $250,000 in other expenses would be a one-time cost.  
The bill makes other procedural and administrative changes to the 
Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) and the Siting Council 
that are not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact as they have the staff 
and expertise necessary to implement the changes.  
Rate Payer Impact 
The rate payer impact of the bill is indeterminate and would be 
dependent upon decisions made by electric distribution companies 
(EDC) outside of the immediate scope of the bill. 
Costs associated with OCC participation in Siting Council 
proceedings and discretionary OCC appeals from Siting Council 
proceedings are both passed on to customers and electric ratepayers, 
which could increase costs. 
The bill also encourages grid enhancing technologies, which can 
reduce costs to rate payers. Grid enhancing technologies can reduce 
utility capital investment and reduce distribution system costs, which 
can be reflected as savings to rate payers. Additionally, grid enhancing 
technologies lower energy costs and improve the benefits of updating 
and investing in various capital projects by EDCs.    
It is anticipated, that approved projects for grid enhancing 
technologies, would yield savings to rate payers that would outweigh 
any additional consulting or capital costs
2
.  However, the extent of the 
savings would be dependent upon the specific project and various EDC 
decisions, that are outside the immediate scope of the bill.   
The bill makes other changes that could yield savings to rate payers, 
including prohibiting EDCs or gas companies to recover for certain 
                                                
2
 PURA’s Decision dated November 9, 2022, Docket No. 17-12-03RE07  2025HB-07206-R000687-FN.DOCX 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
advertising expenses, including internet as well as prohibiting EDCs 
from recovering the costs of promoting an application before the Siting 
Council and preparing for a council proceeding.  
The net impact to rate payers is indeterminate and would be 
dependent upon a variety of decisions that are outside the immediate 
scope of the bill.  
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to inflation.