Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07212 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/23/2025

                    OFFICE OF FISCAL ANALYSIS 
Legislative Office Building, Room 5200 
Hartford, CT 06106  (860) 240-0200 
http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa 
sHB-7212 
AN ACT CONCERNING THE TRUST ACT AND PROHIBITED 
STATE CONTRACTS.  
 
Primary Analyst: BP 	4/23/25 
Contributing Analyst(s): DD, ME, CF, LG, WL, RP   
Reviewer: PR 
 
 
 
OFA Fiscal Note 
 
State Impact: 
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential 
Revenue Gain 
See Below See Below 
Judicial Dept. (Probation) GF - Potential 
Cost 
Minimal Minimal 
Department of Administrative 
Services 
GF - Cost 250,000 100,000 
State Comptroller - Fringe 
Benefits
1
 
GF - Cost 40,710 40,710 
Various State Agencies GF - Potential 
Cost 
See Below See Below 
Note: GF=General Fund 
Municipal Impact: 
Municipalities Effect FY 26 $ FY 27 $ 
All Municipalities 	Potential 
Cost 
See Below See Below 
  
Explanation 
The bill, which expands the state’s civil immigration detainer laws in 
various ways, results in 1) a potential revenue gain to the General Fund 
for fines and civil causes of action, 2) a potential cost to municipalities 
for penalties related to violations, 3) a cost to the Department of 
Administrative Services (DAS) of $250,000 in FY 26 and $100,000 in FY 
                                                
1
The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts 
administered by the Comptroller. The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost 
associated with most personnel changes is 40.71% of payroll in FY 26.  2025HB-07212-R000757-FN.docx 	Page 2 of 3 
 
 
27 for expenses related to contract changes and $40,710 annually to the 
Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) for associated fringe benefits, and 
4) a potential cost to various state agencies related to contract changes. 
These impacts are detailed by section below. 
Section 1 prohibits the civil arrest or detention of anyone pursuant to 
a civil immigration detainer in a courthouse or while the person is 
traveling to or from a courthouse. Violations will be considered 
contempt of court which results in a potential cost to the Judicial 
Department for probation and a potential revenue gain to the General 
Fund from fines.
2
  On average, the marginal cost for supervision in the 
community is less than $600
3
 each year for adults. 
This section also allows the Office of the Attorney General to file a 
civil cause of action for violations resulting in a potential revenue gain 
to the state to the extent violations occur. 
This section also may result in a potential cost to municipalities 
beginning in FY 26 to the extent they violate the Trust Act as the bill 
would subject them to civil action.   
Section 2 requires state contracts to include a representation that the 
principals and key personnel of the person seeking the contract will not 
cooperate with any federal immigration authority. Adding this 
requirement to state contracts results in a one-time cost of $150,000 in 
FY 26 to the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) to develop 
the specific requirement and add this requirement to contracts. It also 
results in an ongoing cost of $140,710 ($100,000 base salary with $40,710 
in associated fringe benefits) in FY 26 and FY 27 for an additional 
contract specialist to answer questions from prospective contractors and 
provide appropriate training to various state agencies concerning the 
                                                
2
 From FY 20 – FY 24, 9 charges were recorded under CGS § 51-33. 
3
 Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only 
includes costs that increase with each additional participant.  This does not include a 
cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is 
anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation 
officers.  2025HB-07212-R000757-FN.docx 	Page 3 of 3 
 
 
requirement.  
This section also results in a potential cost to various state agencies to 
the extent these requirements increase the administrative burden to 
manage contracts, delay the signing of contracts, or result in higher 
contract bids being accepted.     
The Out Years 
The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would 
continue into the future subject to inflation and the number of 
violations.