Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00001 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/10/2025

                     
Researcher: JM 	Page 1 	4/10/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 1  
AN ACT INCREASING RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS, SCHOOLS 
AND SPECIAL EDUCATION.  
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 
SUMMARY 
§§ 1-11 — UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL TRUST 
Establishes the Universal Preschool Trust, funds it with transfers of unappropriated surplus, 
and requires the state treasurer to administer and invest the trust’s funds; creates the Universal 
Preschool Trust Board; allows funds in the trust to be used for expenses for early care and 
education programs, the eligible categories of which expand in phases based on the trust’s rate 
of return 
§ 12 — ONLINE ENROLLMENT PORTAL 
Requires OEC to develop a centralized portal to allow families to find early care and education 
programs, determine eligibility, and apply for available government financial assistance 
§ 13 — UPDATES TO SBE’S FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROCESS 
Requires the education commissioner to make semiannual presentations on the progress of 
SBE’s five-year plan, SBE to use these presentations to inform the plan’s implementation, and 
these progress reports to be published online 
§ 14 — SUPERINTENDENTS’ ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORT TO 
THEIR BOARD OF EDUCATION (BOE) 
Requires all superintendents to submit information regarding the district’s contracts, students, 
staff, and savings annually to their BOE 
§ 15 — POSTING DISCONNECTED YOUTH REPORT ONLINE 
Requires any state agency that contributes data to the disconnected youth report to post the 
report on their website 
§ 16 — ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL EDUCATION 
ACCOUNTABILITY REVIE W BOARDS 
Establishes regional education accountability review boards for the purpose of supporting 
priority school districts 
§ 17 — UPDATES TO ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REP ORT PROCESS 
BETWEEN SCHOOL BOARD S AND SDE 
Requires SDE to publish the penalties for BOEs failing to submit an expenditure report that 
aligns with SDE’s criteria and for SDE to provide BOEs with an online application to assist 
them in uploading their report’s data  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 2 	4/10/25 
 
§ 18 — UPDATES TO SDE’S CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM PREVENTION 
AND INTERVENTION PLAN 
Expands on SDE’s chronic absenteeism prevention and intervention plan by incorporating 
additional required and permissible components and requiring SDE to review the plan 
biannually 
§§ 19-21 — UNSPENT FUND ACCOUNT AND EDUC ATIONAL 
EXPENDITURES RESERVE FUND UPDATES 
Requires local BOEs to create a report on nonlapsing, unspent funds and include similar 
information in an existing report; similarly updates requirements related to regional BOE 
educational expenditures reserve funds 
§ 22 — POSTING CLASSROOM AND STA FFING DATE 
Requires school boards, RESCs, and charter schools to post on their websites information on 
class size, student-teacher ratios and other staffing, and the nonprofits that provide student 
support services to their students; requires SDE to also post this information on its website 
§ 23 — CONTACTING LOCAL HOMELESS EDUCATI ON LIAISONS 
BEFORE EXPULSION HEARINGS 
Requires districts to contact their local homeless education liaisons prior to an expulsion 
hearing to determine if the student is homeless 
§ 24 — STUDENT SUCCESS COACH PILOT PROGRAM 
Requires SDE to administer a three-year student success coach pilot program in select school 
districts 
§§ 25 & 56 — HVAC GRANTS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT 
Repeals the school construction HVAC grant and instead merges it with an existing DAS school 
construction grant that provides grants for a broader range of school building projects; merges 
most of the existing law’s grant provisions, such as the application and eligibility criteria, into 
the existing grant but leaves out some aspects, such requiring applicants to go through the 
annual priority list process with legislative approval 
§§ 26, 27 & 56 — NETWORK OF SCHOOLS PROGRAM RE PEALED 
Repeals the SDE commissioner’s Network of Schools program aimed at improving academic 
achievement in low-performing schools 
§§ 28-56 — REPEALS ALLIANCE DISTRICT PROGRAM AND 
RELATED CHANGES 
Repeals the alliance district program, which places certain requirements on the lowest 
performing 36 school districts in order for them to receive a portion of their ECS grant 
§ 34 — EARLY CHILDHOOD CABINET MEMBERSHI P 
Adds a library consortium member to the Early Childhood Cabinet 
§ 56 — REPEALERS 
Repeals provisions on the SDE commissioner’s network of schools, alliance districts, minority 
candidate retention and residency program, and allowing limited reemployment of retired 
teachers; makes related technical and conforming changes 
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes numerous changes to the education statutes as  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 3 	4/10/25 
 
described in the section-by-section analysis below.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: Various, see below. 
§§ 1-11 — UNIVERSAL PRESCHOOL TRUST 
Establishes the Universal Preschool Trust, funds it with transfers of unappropriated 
surplus, and requires the state treasurer to administer and invest the trust’s funds; creates 
the Universal Preschool Trust Board; allows funds in the trust to be used for expenses for 
early care and education programs, the eligible categories of which expand in phases based 
on the trust’s rate of return 
The bill establishes the Universal Preschool Trust, funds it with 
transfers of unappropriated surplus, and requires the state treasurer to 
administer and invest the money in it. It also creates the Universal 
Preschool Trust Board and charges it with administering the fund.  
Under the bill, the trust may be used to reimburse boards of 
education and child care providers for early care and education 
program eligible expenses. It expands the categories of expenses that 
may be reimbursed from the trust in phases, generally based on the 
fund’s rate of return.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage, except the changes to the tri-share 
program (§ 11) and a conforming change (§ 10) are effective July 1, 2025. 
Transfers to the Fund (§ 3) 
Each fiscal year, after the General Fund accounts have been closed 
and the comptroller has determined the amount of any unappropriated 
surplus, the bill requires the treasurer to transfer to the Universal 
Preschool Trust the unappropriated surplus as follows: 
1. For FY 25, up to $300 million and 
2. For FY 26 and beyond, the entire amount of the surplus, except 
that if the Budget Reserve Fund is below its maximum threshold 
(i.e. 18% of net General Fund appropriations for the current fiscal 
year), the transfer amount must be reduced and an amount equal 
to the reduction must be transferred to the budget reserve fund. 
The bill requires the amounts the bill transfers to the trust to be 
deducted when determining the amount of unappropriated surplus to  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 4 	4/10/25 
 
be transferred to the Budget Reserve Fund as required by law. The state 
constitution requires any unappropriated surplus to be used (1) to fund 
a budget reserve fund; (2) to reduce bonded indebtedness; or (3) for any 
other purpose authorized by at least three-fifths of the members of each 
chamber (Conn. Const., art. III, § 18 (c)). 
Fund Expenditures and Reimbursements (§§ 4, 5 & 11) 
Starting with FY 26, the bill requires the treasurer to authorize 
spending from the trust in phases.  
Under the bill, early care and education programs offered by eligible 
boards of education and licensed child care providers (i.e. “designated 
beneficiaries”) may apply for reimbursement from the trust for eligible 
expenses. An “eligible board of education” is a local or regional board 
of education that (1) is eligible for a Connecticut Smart Start competitive 
grant; (2) offers full-day preschool; and (3) does not charge tuition for 
the program, unless the tuition is required as part of a state or federal 
grant or subsidy program.  
The bill phases in categories of eligible expenses, as shown in the 
table below. Generally, the trust must achieve a certain rate of return 
before moving to the next phase. The main expense the trust covers is 
the “unpaid portion” of tuition for eligible early care and education 
programs, the scope of which broadens as the various phases are 
implemented. The “unpaid portion” equals the tuition charged for a 
child’s enrollment in the program minus (1) state and federal child care 
subsidies the program received for the child and (2) an amount that does 
not exceed 7% of the annual household income for the child’s family. 
Table: Eligible Expenses for Reimbursement From the  
Universal Preschool Trust, Phases I to IV 
Phase Begins When 	Eligible Expenses 
Phase I FY 27, and operates when 
the trust’s rate of return 
meets or exceeds the amount 
necessary to fund all covered 
children as of July 1, 2025 
• The unpaid portion of a child’s tuition for a 
preschool program offered by a designated 
beneficiary through the tri-share program 
(see below) 
• The costs charged to a family for a 
preschool program operated by an eligible 
board of education (presumably, this would  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 5 	4/10/25 
 
Phase Begins When 	Eligible Expenses 
cover tuition required under state or federal 
law) 
Phase II When the two-year annual 
rate of return meets or 
exceeds the amount 
necessary to fund Phase I 
plus Phase II expenses 
• Phase I expenses 
• Costs associated with expanding slots 
offered by existing designated beneficiaries 
(e.g., transportation costs, capital costs, and 
accreditation costs) 
Phase III At least one year after Phase 
II begins and when the two-
year annual rate of return 
meets or exceeds the amount 
necessary to fund Phase I 
and the first year of phase II 
• Phase I & II expenses 
• The unpaid portion of a child’s tuition for a 
preschool program operated by a 
designated beneficiary who is a private child 
care services provider 
Phase IV At least one year after Phase 
III begins and when the two-
year annual rate of return 
meets or exceeds the amount 
necessary to fund Phases I, 
II, and III 
• Phase I, II, & III expenses 
• The unpaid portion of a child’s tuition for an 
infant and toddler program operated by a 
designated beneficiary 
 
Tri-Share Program. Under current law, the Office of Early 
Childhood (OEC) must administer a tri-share pilot program in New 
London county, under which child care costs are shared equally 
between employees, employers, and the state. The bill makes this 
program statewide and permanent. It also requires that costs for child 
care be split as follows: 
1. a participating employer must pay at least one-third of an 
employee’s full-day child care costs for a program offered by a 
designated beneficiary, 
2. an employee must be responsible for child care costs in an 
amount that does not exceed 7% of the employee’s annual 
household income, and 
3. the remaining balance (i.e. the “unpaid portion”) must be paid 
from the Universal Preschool Trust. 
The bill also eliminates a provision in current law that made 
employees ineligible for the pilot program if they were receiving other 
public assistance for child care.  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 6 	4/10/25 
 
Reimbursement. Under the bill, designated beneficiaries seeking 
reimbursement from the trust must submit a claim by the 15th of each 
month to the child care resource and referral agency designated by the 
OEC commissioner. The child care resource and referral agency must 
give the treasurer the claims. After review and approval, the treasurer 
must disburse an amount equal to the total sum of claims to the child 
care resource and referral agency, who must distribute the funds to 
designated beneficiaries in the amount the treasurer approved for the 
claim. 
Universal Preschool Trust Board (§ 6) 
The bill establishes the Universal Preschool Trust Board, places it 
within the treasurer’s office for administrative purposes only, and 
makes it responsible for administering the trust. It consists of (1) the 
OEC commissioner, the treasurer, and the Office of Policy and 
Management (OPM) secretary, or their designees and (2) seven 
appointed members meeting certain qualifications, as shown in the table 
below. 
Table: Appointed Board Members 
Appointing Authority 	Qualification 
House Speaker Early childhood workforce employee 
Senate President Pro Tempore Representative from the Service Employees’ 
International Union, Local 2001 
House Majority Leader Parent or guardian of a child enrolled in an eligible board 
of education-provided preschool program  
Senate Majority Leader Member of the Connecticut Early Childhood Alliance 
House Minority Leader Eligible board of education member 
Senate Minority Leader Member of OEC’s parent cabinet 
Governor 	Representative of a corporation with a significant 
physical presence in the state whose employees may 
benefit from early childhood education and state child 
care initiatives 
 
Appointments and Meetings. The bill requires the various 
appointing authorities to make appointments to ensure representation 
for all geographic regions in the state, to the extent practicable, and to 
make initial appointments by September 1, 2025. Members serve at the 
pleasure of the appointing authority, but no longer than the appointing  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 7 	4/10/25 
 
authority’s term of office or until the member’s successor is appointed 
and qualified, whichever is longer. Vacancies must be filled by the 
appointing authority, and any vacancy that occurs other than by a term 
expiring must be filled for the balance of the unexpired term. 
Under the bill, the treasurer (or his designee) serves as the board’s 
chairperson and must schedule and hold the first meeting by October 1, 
2025. The board must meet at least quarterly and upon the treasurer’s 
request. At the first meeting, and semiannually after that, the treasurer 
(or his designee) must give the board an actuarial chart that includes a 
review of the total amount of funds in the trust, the health of the trust’s 
investments, the trust’s anticipated growth, and any recommended 
models for the timing and rate of drawing down from the trust. 
Annual Report. Starting by January 1, 2026, the board must annually 
report to the Education, Children, and Appropriations committees on 
the trust’s actuarial future, its current phase and the anticipated date of 
advancing to the next phase (if any), and an assessment of the trust’s 
success and efficacy.  
Trust Requirements (§§ 2 & 7-10)  
Under the bill, the trust is an instrumentality of the state performing 
essential governmental functions. It receives and holds all deposits, 
contributions, gifts, bequests, endowments, government grants, and 
other sources of funds, and the earnings on those funds, until disbursed 
as the bill requires. 
The bill requires that deposits be made in cash and specifies that 
funds in the trust are not the property of the state and cannot be 
combined with state funds. The bill also specifies that the trust is not a 
state department, institution, or agency, and the state has no claim on 
funds in the trust. The trust must continue to exist as long as it has 
deposits or obligations and until terminated by law. Unclaimed assets 
escheat to the state upon the trust’s termination, and the bill exempts 
the trust’s property from the law for determining when property held 
by a fiduciary is considered abandoned.   2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 8 	4/10/25 
 
Under the bill, any contract entered into by the trust, or any 
obligation of the trust, is not a state debt or obligation, and the state has 
no obligation on account of the trust. Amounts that must be paid from 
the trust are limited to the amount deposited in the trust available for 
the payments. The trust’s deposits may be disbursed only in accordance 
with the bill. 
Treasurer’s Authority and Powers. Under the bill, the state 
treasurer must receive, maintain, administer, invest, and disburse the 
trust’s money. On behalf of the trust and to carry out its purposes, he 
may:  
1. receive and invest the trust’s money as described below;  
2. enter into contractual agreements for services for the trust (e.g., 
legal, actuarial, administrative, and consulting) and pay for them 
with the trusts’ assets;  
3.  get insurance in connection with the trust’s property, assets, 
activities, or deposits;  
4. apply for, accept, and spend public or private gifts, grants, or 
donations;  
5. adopt regulations;  
6. sue and be sued;  
7. establish funds within the trust; and  
8. take other necessary action to carry out the bill’s purposes and 
incidental to the treasurer’s duties under the bill. 
Memorandums of Understanding. The bill requires the treasurer, 
on the trust’s behalf and for its purposes, to enter into memorandums 
of understanding (MOUs) with the OEC commissioner and the child 
care resource and referral agency to establish information sharing 
practices for the purpose of implementing the bill’s provision on trust 
expenditures. These MOUs must comply with all applicable state and  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 9 	4/10/25 
 
federal laws. 
Investment. The bill requires the state treasurer to (1) invest the 
trust’s funds in a reasonable way to achieve its objectives; (2) exercise a 
prudent person’s care and discretion; and (3) consider things like rate of 
return, risk, maturity, portfolio diversification, liquidity, projected 
disbursements and expenditures, and expected deposits and other gifts. 
Under the bill, these requirements apply regardless of existing state 
laws on the treasurer’s investment authority, including the (1) 
requirement that the treasurer’s trust fund investments be reviewed by 
the Investment Advisory Council and (2) statutory constraints that limit 
the percentage of state funds invested in common stock and investments 
in companies doing business in specified countries.  
The treasurer need not require that the trust invest in government 
bonds or other funds he administers. The bill requires that the trust’s 
assets be continuously invested and reinvested, consistent with the 
trust’s objectives, until they are disbursed for eligible expenditures or 
spent on the trust’s operational expenses. 
It also explicitly subjects the treasurer’s trust investments to the same 
oversight and requirements that the law establishes for other treasurer-
administered funds, such as the Teachers’ Pension Fund, the State 
Employees Retirement Fund, and the Connecticut Municipal 
Employees’ Retirement Fund. 
Tax Exemption. The bill provides that the trust’s property and 
earnings are exempt from all state and local taxes. 
§ 12 — ONLINE ENROLLMENT PORTAL 
Requires OEC to develop a centralized portal to allow families to find early care and 
education programs, determine eligibility, and apply for available government financial 
assistance 
The bill requires OEC to develop a centralized online enrollment 
portal that allows families to find early care and education programs, 
determine eligibility, and apply for available government financial 
assistance. Specifically, the portal must allow designated beneficiaries  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 10 	4/10/25 
 
to apply for payments from the Universal Preschool Trust and families 
to apply for subsidies or financial assistance under: 
1. a Head Start or Early Head Start program,  
2. Care 4 Kids, 
3. early care and education programs receiving financial assistance 
under Early Start CT, 
4. preschool programs under the Connecticut Smart Start grant 
programs, 
5. temporary family assistance program,  
6. foster care placements or certified relative foster care placements 
through the Department of Children and Families (DCF), or 
7. any other state or federal child care assistance program. 
The portal must also (1) help families identify early care and 
education programs in their area, (2) determine a family’s eligibility for 
a subsidy and allow families to apply for a subsidy they are eligible for, 
and (3) estimate the amount of tuition a family would pay after 
deducting subsidies and the amount covered by the Universal Preschool 
Trust. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 13 — UPDATES TO SBE’S FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROCESS 
Requires the education commissioner to make semiannual presentations on the progress of 
SBE’s five-year plan, SBE to use these presentations to inform the plan’s implementation, 
and these progress reports to be published online 
By law, the State Board of Education (SBE) must prepare a five-year 
plan (every five years) with long-term goals and short-term objectives 
related to elementary, secondary, vocational, career, and adult 
education and specific steps to achieve them. Additionally, SBE is 
required to annually report the progress made implementing the plan 
to the governor and Education Committee.   2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 11 	4/10/25 
 
The bill requires the education commissioner to make semiannual 
presentations at regularly scheduled SBE meetings to give updates on 
the priorities, actions, and outcomes outlined in the five-year plan. 
Additionally, under the bill, SBE must use the information provided in 
the presentations in the plan’s implementation and their annual 
progress report and make these progress reports available on the State 
Department of Education’s (SDE’s) website.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 14 — SUPERINTENDEN TS’ ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORT TO 
THEIR BOARD OF EDUCA TION (BOE)  
Requires all superintendents to submit information regarding the district’s contracts, 
students, staff, and savings annually to their BOE 
Annually, between June 1 and September 29, the bill requires each 
school district’s superintendent to provide the following information at 
a regularly scheduled board of education (BOE) meeting: 
1. the number and names of all community-based organizations in 
which the district is in a formal MOU, memorandum of 
agreement, or contract that pertains to providing student support 
services (by school and type of support service); 
2. the number of students in credit and non-credit internships and 
workforce development programs (by type and duration); 
3. classroom sizes and student-teacher ratios during the previous 
school year (by school and subject); 
4. certified and noncertified staff turnover, other than same-district 
transfers (by school and subject); and 
5. any savings earned through vacancies in approved budgeted 
positions for the academic year.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 15 — POSTING DISCONNECTED YOUTH REPORT ONLINE 
Requires any state agency that contributes data to the disconnected youth report to post 
the report on their website   2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 12 	4/10/25 
 
The bill requires any state agency that contributes data for the 
Connecticut Preschool through Twenty and Workforce Information 
Network’s (P20 WIN) disconnected youth report to post the report on 
their website.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: Upon passage 
Background — Disconnected Youth Report  
By law, the P20 WIN executive board is required to annually report 
on disconnected youth using the data model established through the 
data-sharing agreement 0043 regarding Research on Disengaged and 
Disconnected Youth in Connecticut (i.e. a 2023 agreement between 
various state agencies (including SDE, DCF, the Department of Labor, 
and Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services), a nonprofit, 
and a private consulting firm to share certain data from P20 WIN).  
A “disconnected youth” is an individual age 14-26 who is (1) an at-
risk student (in danger of not graduating due to certain factors) or (2) 
not enrolled in high school and (a) does not have a high school diploma 
or its equivalent; (b) has a diploma or equivalent but is unemployed and 
not enrolled in an adult education program, higher education 
institution, or a workforce training or certification program, including 
an apprenticeship program, or otherwise pursuing postsecondary 
education; or (c) is incarcerated. 
§ 16 — ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL EDUCATI ON 
ACCOUNTABILITY REVIE W BOARDS 
Establishes regional education accountability review boards for the purpose of supporting 
priority school districts 
The bill establishes a regional education accountability review board 
for each planning region within the state (see BACKGROUND ). Each 
board must (1) provide technical, financial, and other assistance, and 
related accountability, to their priority school districts (see 
BACKGROUND ); (2) develop budgeting and expenditure guidelines 
for their priority school districts; and (3) analyze these districts’ 
educational spending. The boards are within SDE for administrative 
purposes only.   2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 13 	4/10/25 
 
Each regional education accountability review board must be chaired 
by the education commissioner and state treasurer or their designees. 
Each board must also include the following members:  
1. a professional in children’s health and wellbeing, the chief 
elected official of a community within the board’s planning 
region, and a third individual (appointed by the Governor); 
2. a second professional in children’s health and wellbeing 
(appointed by the Senate minority leader); 
3. one individual who is an experienced member of an organization 
that is in a collective bargaining agreement with a school district 
within the planning region, chosen from a list recommended by 
specified unions (appointed by the Senate president pro 
tempore); 
4. one active superintendent (appointed by the House speaker); and 
5. one current or former education law attorney (appointed by the 
House minority leader).  
Under the bill, each regional education accountability review board 
must submit to SBE an annual expenditure report for each priority 
district located in their planning region. SDE must make the reports 
available on the department’s website.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Background — Planning Regions  
Planning regions are geographic areas of Connecticut that consist of 
unified municipalities for the purpose of collaborating on common 
interests. By law, OPM designates the boundaries of planning regions. 
Currently, Connecticut is composed of nine planning regions.  
Background — Priority School Districts 
Priority school districts are districts (1) whose students receive low 
standardized test scores, (2) that have high levels of poverty, or (3) in 
the eight towns with the largest population in the state (CGS § 10-  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 14 	4/10/25 
 
266p(a)). There are 16 priority districts in the 2024-25 school year. 
§ 17 — UPDATES TO ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REP ORT PROCESS 
BETWEEN SCHOOL BOARD S AND SDE 
Requires SDE to publish the penalties for BOEs failing to submit an expenditure report 
that aligns with SDE’s criteria and for SDE to provide BOEs with an online application 
to assist them in uploading their report’s data  
By law, BOEs must have their school superintendents annually report 
returns of the school district’s receipts, expenditures, and statistics to 
SDE, who must then post on its website this data by education program 
type, expense function, expense object, and funding source. 
Additionally, the department must publish an online guide defining 
each expenditure and funding source category. The bill requires this 
publication to also include the corrective actions or penalties SDE can 
impose on a BOE if the data in their reports fails to align with these 
definitions.  
Furthermore, in existing law, SDE must publish the data from the 
reports in a format allowing for financial comparisons between districts 
and schools. The bill requires that SDE provide each BOE an application 
program interface (through SDE’s education data portal or an 
alternative method) to assist the board in posting their report’s data on 
SDE’s website.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 18 — UPDATES TO SDE’S CH RONIC ABSENTEEISM 
PREVENTION AND INTER VENTION PLAN 
Expands on SDE’s chronic absenteeism prevention and intervention plan by 
incorporating additional required and permissible components and requiring SDE to 
review the plan biannually 
By law, SDE was required to develop, in consultation with the 
Interagency Council for Ending the Achievement Gap, a chronic 
absenteeism prevention and intervention plan to be used by BOEs.  
The bill requires SDE to review, and revise as needed, the plan 
biannually. When making revisions, SDE must incorporate the findings 
from the disconnected youth report (see Background — Disconnected 
Youth Report in § 15 of this analysis). The bill also specifically requires  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 15 	4/10/25 
 
the plan to include the truancy policies and procedures that school 
boards must adopt by law (e.g., requiring a meeting with parents or 
guardians after a student’s fourth unexcused absence in a month or 10th 
in a school year).  
In existing law, the plan must include, among other things, a way to 
collect and analyze data on chronic absenteeism that allows for the data 
to be separated into various subgroups, including race, gender, free or 
reduced lunch eligibility, disability status, and primary language other 
than English. The bill adds housing status as an additional category. 
Additionally, it requires that the plan include using an early indication 
tool to identify students who are at risk for becoming chronically absent 
or disconnected from school, such as students who may not be able to 
graduate, have a history of behavioral or disciplinary issues, or are 
homeless. This tool can be provided by SDE or a third party.  
By law, SDE may include a research-based and data-driven 
mentorship model to address chronic absenteeism in their plan. These 
mentors can be students, teachers, administrators, athletic coaches, 
school resource officers, and community partners. The bill allows for 
SDE to also use a home visiting model. Under the bill, both home 
visiting and mentorship models are subject to the same list of mentors, 
and the bill adds family navigators and student success coaches to this 
list.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§§ 19-21 — UNSPENT FUND ACCOUNT AND EDUC ATIONAL 
EXPENDITURES RESERVE FUND UPDATES 
Requires local BOEs to create a report on nonlapsing, unspent funds and include similar 
information in an existing report; similarly updates requirements related to regional BOE 
educational expenditures reserve funds  
Addition to an Existing Cost Report 
By law, local BOEs are allowed to deposit unspent education funds 
into a nonlapsing account. The deposit may be up to 2% of the previous 
fiscal year’s budgeted appropriation for education, and account 
expenditures must be only for educational purposes.  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 16 	4/10/25 
 
Under existing law, each BOE must publish an annual report with a 
summary showing the (1) total cost of maintaining the schools, (2) 
amount received from the state and other sources for this purpose, and 
(3) net cost to the municipality of the school budget. The bill adds that 
the report must also include the balance of any nonlapsing, unspent 
funds account.  
New Report on Nonlapsing, Unspent Funds 
Beginning for FY 26, the bill requires each local BOE to create an 
annual report on their nonlapsing, unspent fund account. This report 
must include the following information: 
1. the total balance of the account,  
2. the amount deposited into the account in a fiscal year, and  
3. an accounting of the expenditures made from the account.  
The report must be submitted to SDE and the exclusive bargaining 
representative for certified employees.  
Updating Exclusive Bargaining Representatives on Nonlapsing, 
Unspent Funds 
Under the bill, starting for FY 26, each local BOE must annually notify 
the exclusive bargaining representative for certified employees of the: 
1. establishment of a nonlapsing, unspent funds account; or  
2. board’s intended uses for any funds in the account during the 
next fiscal year.  
This notification must be made no later than 30 days from the 
adoption of the board’s budget. 
Requirements Regarding Educational Expenditures Reserve Fund 
By law, a regional BOE, by a majority vote of its members, can create 
an educational expenditures reserve fund (limited to 2% of the district’s 
budget, to be used for educational purposes). These boards must 
annually report to member towns on the condition of the fund.  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 17 	4/10/25 
 
Under the bill, beginning FY 26, each board must annually: 
1. make available and annually update information regarding the 
fund, including the fund’s total balance, the amount deposited 
into the fund in a fiscal year, and an accounting of the 
expenditures made from it; and  
2. notify the exclusive bargaining representative for certified 
employees of the educational expenditure reserve ’s 
establishment or the board’s intended uses for the funds during 
the next fiscal year (this notification must be made no later than 
30 days from the adoption of the board’s budget). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 22 — POSTING CLASSROOM AND STAFFING DA TE  
Requires school boards, RESCs, and charter schools to post on their websites information 
on class size, student-teacher ratios and other staffing, and the nonprofits that provide 
student support services to their students; requires SDE to also post this information on 
its website 
By law, school boards, regional education service centers (RESC), and 
state charter school governing authorities (i.e. governing boards) must 
annually post on their websites aggregate spending on items for each 
school such as salaries, benefits, instructional supplies and equipment, 
and special education tuition, among other things. The bill requires the 
same entities, beginning with FY 26, to quarterly post information on 
their websites about:  
1. actual class size and student-teacher ratios, disaggregated by 
school; 
2. the number of full-time equivalent staff positions, disaggregated 
by SDE categories; 
3. the number of staffing vacancies, and any accrued savings from 
the vacancies during the current fiscal year; and 
4. the nonprofit organizations with which they have an agreement 
or contract to provide support services, including to youth at risk  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 18 	4/10/25 
 
of becoming disconnected from school (leaving school) and the 
scope of services they provide.  
For school boards and charter school governing authorities, they 
must also include any agreements they have with RESCs and the scope 
of services the RESC provides, including for at-risk youth. 
School boards and RESCs must submit this information to the 
applicable town legislative body or board of selectmen, if the legislative 
body is a town meeting, and the teachers’ union. Charter school 
governing authorities are only required to submit it to the teachers’ 
union. 
By January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, SDE must make the 
required information available on its website. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§ 23 — CONTACTING LOCAL HOMELESS EDUCATI ON LIAISONS 
BEFORE EXPULSION HEARINGS 
Requires districts to contact their local homeless education liaisons prior to an expulsion 
hearing to determine if the student is homeless 
Under the bill, before a school expulsion hearing, a school 
administrator, counselor, or social worker must contact the local 
homeless education liaison designated by the local or regional BOE to 
determine if the student is homeless (see Background). If the student is 
found to be homeless, the entity conducting the hearing (the BOE or the 
impartial hearing board) must consider the impact of homelessness on 
the student’s behavior, and the student cannot be expelled without a 
plan to alleviate this impact. 
The bill also requires the BOE to provide a meeting with the local 
homeless education liaison for any child who is determined to be 
homeless and is expelled two times. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025  
Background — School Expulsion Hearings 
By law, a school board must hold a hearing before expelling a  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 19 	4/10/25 
 
student, except in an emergency (i.e. the student’s continued presence 
would be so disruptive or dangerous as to allow the student’s removal 
before the hearing). In the latter instance, the expulsion hearing must 
take place as soon as possible after the student’s removal. 
Background — Homeless Youth and Homeless Education 
Liaisons 
Federal law defines “homeless children and youths” as individuals 
who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, and 
includes those sharing the housing of others due to loss of housing, 
economic hardship, or a similar reason (42 U.S.C. § 11434a).  
The federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act requires 
every school district in the country to designate a homeless liaison, who 
is a local educational agency staff person. This liaison is responsible for 
identifying and supporting homeless students across the district (42 
U.S.C. § 11431 et seq.). 
§ 24 — STUDENT SUCCESS COACH PILOT PROGR AM 
Requires SDE to administer a three-year student success coach pilot program in select 
school districts 
The bill requires SDE to administer a student success coach pilot 
program in the Bridgeport, Hartford, New Britain, New Haven, New 
London, Norwich, Waterbury, and Windham school districts for FYs 26 
through 28. The program must utilize evidence-based strategies shown 
to effectively support students with attendance, behavioral, or credit 
attainment challenges and other risk factors making them more likely to 
become disconnected from school and misuse drugs (including 
opioids).  
Under the bill, a participating local BOE can apply for a grant of up 
to $2,000,000 from SDE, and SDE must award grants in line with the law 
on the Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. To be eligible for a 
grant, the BOE must: 
1. utilize an early indicator tool from SDE to identify students with 
the greatest need for a student success coach, and  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 20 	4/10/25 
 
2. be evaluated by SDE’s Center for Connecticut Education 
Research Collaboration, or a third party selected by SDE. 
Under the bill, by February 15, 2029, SDE must: 
1. evaluate the program’s implementation and effectiveness, and 
2. report findings and recommendations to SBE, the Opioid 
Settlement Advisory Committee, the Education Committee, and 
the Committee on Children.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
§§ 25 & 56 — HVAC GRANTS TO SCHOOL DISTR ICT  
Repeals the school construction HVAC grant and instead merges it with an existing DAS 
school construction grant that provides grants for a broader range of school building 
projects; merges most of the existing law’s grant provisions, such as the application and 
eligibility criteria, into the existing grant but leaves out some aspects, such requiring 
applicants to go through the annual priority list process with legislative approval  
The bill repeals the existing school construction heating, ventilation, 
and air conditioning systems (HVAC) grant and instead merges it with 
an existing school construction grant law that provides grants for a 
broader range of school building projects (such as roof replacements 
and addressing building code violations). The bill subjects the new 
HVAC grants to the same application and eligibility criteria as for 
existing non-priority school building projects (see Inspection and 
Maintenance Requirements). 
Under the bill, current law’s provisions are generally added to the 
existing Department of Administrative Services (DAS) school 
construction grant that authorizes the commissioner to award grants 
without going through the annual priority list process, which the 
legislature approves annually in a bill (these projects are often referred 
to as the “non-priority list projects”). The priority list includes major 
projects such as building new schools or complete renovations of 
existing schools. 
Under current law, the DAS commissioner may approve grants to 
reimburse school districts for project costs to install, replace, or upgrade  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 21 	4/10/25 
 
HVAC systems or related improvements. Under the bill, the 
commissioner may approve grants to upgrade HVAC systems or make 
other improvements to indoor air quality in school buildings. The bill 
language does not include installing or replacing systems.  
While the statutes for each of these grants do not include a dollar 
limit, the non-priority list projects tend to be smaller than the priority 
list projects, ranging from $100,000 to $5 million. Priority list projects 
commonly range from $1 million to, in some cases, $200 million.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Inspection and Maintenance Requirements 
The bill maintains the following current law requirements: 
1. prohibiting awarding grants for HVAC or indoor air quality 
improvements to recipients unless they have certified 
compliance with the uniform inspection and evaluation of their 
school buildings’ HVAC systems as required by law (CGS § 10-
220(d)), 
2. deeming the following expenses as ineligible for reimbursement: 
(a) routine maintenance and cleaning of the HVAC system and 
(b) work performed at or on a public school administrative or 
service facility that is not located or housed within a public school 
building, and 
3. requiring grant recipients to (a) be responsible for the routine 
maintenance and cleaning of the HVAC system and (b) provide 
training to school personnel and maintenance staff concerning 
the system’s proper use and maintenance. 
Repealed HVAC Grant Provisions 
The bill repeals the following provisions: 
1. grant eligibility for charter schools; 
2. specific grant eligibility criteria including (a) the age and 
condition of the current HVAC system or equipment being  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 22 	4/10/25 
 
replaced or upgraded in the school, (b) current air quality issues 
at the school, (c) the age and condition of the overall school 
building, (d) the school district’s master plan, (e) the availability 
of maintenance records, (f) the school’s routine HVAC 
maintenance contract or plan, and (g) the applicant’s ability to 
finance the remaining costs;  
3. requiring DAS to reconsider grant applications it has denied 
through the end of FY 26 and provide technical assistance to the 
denied school board to help the board gain approval of the grant; 
4. requiring DAS, if there is not enough grant funding, to prioritize 
schools with the greatest need based on the eligibility criteria; 
and 
5. requiring an HVAC project to be completed by the end of the next 
calendar year after the grant was awarded unless extended by 
DAS for good cause. 
§§ 26, 27 & 56 — NETWORK OF SCHOOLS PROG RAM REPEALED 
Repeals the SDE commissioner’s Network of Schools program aimed at improving 
academic achievement in low-performing schools 
The bill repeals the education commissioner’s Network of Schools 
program through which she selects up to 25 low-achieving schools each 
school year that receive intensified SBE supervision and direction (CGS 
§ 10-223h).  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Currently, the program sets steps the commissioner, school district 
turnaround committees, and local and regional boards of education 
must take to improve academic achievement. Each school’s turnaround 
committee must create and implement a turnaround plan, based on a 
turnaround model it chooses. The law requires the commissioner to give 
participating schools funding and technical and operational support. 
Schools remain in the network for three years with an option for an 
additional two.   2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 23 	4/10/25 
 
The bill does not specify what happens to the schools currently 
participating in the program that have not completed their designated 
time. 
The bill also repeals a related law that addresses contracts between 
school boards and non-profit educational management organizations 
selected as part of a participating school’s turnaround plan to manage 
the school (CGS § 10-223i).  
Among other things, these contracts must require the management 
organizations to annually report to the education commissioner on (1) 
the educational progress of the school’s students; (2) its financial 
relationship with the school, including a certified audit statement of all 
revenues from public and private sources and expenditures; and (3) the 
time their employees and consultants devoted to the school. 
The bill also makes related technical and conforming changes to 
various statutes.  
§§ 28-56 — REPEALS ALLIANCE DISTRICT PRO GRAM AND 
RELATED CHANGES 
Repeals the alliance district program, which places certain requirements on the lowest 
performing 36 school districts in order for them to receive a portion of their ECS grant  
The bill repeals the alliance district program, and in doing so (1) 
updates terminology in several statutes, replacing “alliance districts” 
with “priority school districts,” (PSD) ”literary districts,” or “eligible 
communities,” as described below; (2) narrows eligibility for certain 
programs from alliance districts to PSDs; (3) expands eligibility for 
certain education programs to all school districts instead of only alliance 
districts; and (4) expands eligibility for several programs to primary 
school districts instead of education reform districts as under current 
law.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Alliance District Program Repeal  
The bill repeals the alliance district program, which requires each of 
the state’s 36 lowest performing school districts (as measured by the  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 24 	4/10/25 
 
accountability index; see Background — Accountability Index Scores) to 
submit an improvement plan to SDE for approval before the department 
releases the district’s alliance funding (i.e. a portion of the annual 
education cost sharing (ECS) grant that these districts receive). The plan 
must detail how a district will use its alliance funding to improve 
student achievement. In addition to the plan, the law permits the 
alliance district funding to be spent according to SDE’s minority 
candidate certification, retention, or residency year program (see below) 
and with any SBE guidelines (CGS § 10-262u).  
Current law specifies improvement plan components, such as (1) a 
tiered intervention system for the district’s schools based on their needs; 
(2) ways to strengthen reading programs to ensure reading mastery in 
grades K-3; (3) additional learning time, including extended school day 
or year programs run by school personnel or external partners; and (4) 
a talent strategy that includes teacher and school leader recruitment and 
assignment and career ladder policies that draw on district-approved 
guidelines for a teacher evaluation. 
The program also includes SDE interventions and oversight to help 
districts carry out their plans.  
The bill also makes related minor, technical and conforming changes 
to various statutes (§§ 28, 35, 39, 42, 48, 54 & 56).  
Terminology Changes 
The bill changes terminology in various education statutes by 
replacing the term “alliance district” with the following: 
1. PSDs, which are districts that meet certain town population, 
student performance, and poverty measures and receive state 
grants for certain programs (e.g., reading, afterschool, and 
dropout prevention programs); 
2. “literacy districts,” which are districts the education 
commissioner identified as needing literacy assistance based on 
their students’ performance on the state reading mastery exam; 
and  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 25 	4/10/25 
 
3. “eligible communities,” which are one of the 50 towns in the state 
with the lowest equalized net grand list. 
Additionally, the bill substitutes the term “education reform district” 
(i.e. the lowest scoring 10 districts within the state’s 36 alliance districts) 
with PSD. 
Currently, there are 36 alliance districts and 16 PSDs. By substituting 
alliance districts with PSDs the bill makes 20 districts no longer eligible 
for certain programs or subject to alliance district statutory provisions, 
as described below. 
ECS Grant (§§ 40, 41 & 43). The bill applies to PSDs, instead of 
alliance districts, the following ECS grant provisions: 
1. a “hold harmless” provision that guarantees PSDs receive a grant 
amount that is at least as much as they received in the previous 
fiscal year; 
2. the “base aid ratio” used to calculate ECS grants that sets a 
minimum floor of 10% for a PSD’s wealth factor, instead of 1% 
for non-PSDs (districts with higher ratios receive higher per 
student grant amounts); and 
3. a minimum budget requirement (MBR) provision that generally 
prohibits PSDs from lowering their MBR for education from one 
year to the next. 
By law, the state ECS grant is calculated annually based on the 
number and demographics of students enrolled in a district (those 
eligible for free and reduced meals and English language learners are 
weighted more in the grant calculation) and the town’s property wealth 
(towns with higher property wealth receive less per student than those 
with less property wealth).  
Additional Grant Programs for PSDs (§§ 37, 38, 44, 45, 49 & 52). 
The bill replaces alliance districts with PSDs in the following six grant 
programs:  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 26 	4/10/25 
 
1. CT Grown for CT Kids Grant Program, which helps education 
boards develop farm-to-school program to increase availability 
of local foods in child nutrition programs (CGS § 10-215l); 
2. Local Food for Schools Incentive Program, which reimburses 
education boards for purchasing locally- and regionally-sourced 
food to use in its school meal program (CGS § 10-215m); 
3. School Building Improvements Grant Program, which helps 
districts pay for general improvements to school buildings 
(generally for projects that are smaller than those that are part of 
the school construction annual priority lists process) (CGS § 10-
265h); 
4. Municipal Aid for New Educators Grant Program, which gives 
grants to education boards to hire certain students enrolled in 
teacher preparation programs (CGS § 10-265o);  
5. Preparation for Academic Transition to Higher Education 
(PATH) Grant Program, which gives grants to nonprofit 
organizations that assist high school students with the college 
application and financial aid process (CGS § 10a-11k); and 
6. state grants in lieu of taxes to certain properties, for purposes of 
determining which towns will be considered a Tier I municipality 
(i.e. those with an equalized net grand list per capita of under 
$100,000) (CGS § 12-18b(d)). 
Literacy Districts (§§ 31-33). The bill applies the following 
programs to literacy districts instead of alliance districts, as under 
current law: (1) state grants for new curricula and related training, 
textbooks, and materials; (2) the intensive reading instruction program 
for students in grades kindergarten to grade three; and (3) the reading 
readiness program.  
Eligible Communities (§ 29). The bill applies the following 
programs to eligible communities instead of alliance districts, as under 
current law: (1) the Housing Environmental Revolving Loan and Grant  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 27 	4/10/25 
 
Program and (2) the pilot program for energy efficiency projects for 
multifamily residences located in environmental justice communities or 
eligible communities. 
Expanding Certain Programs to All School Districts (§§ 36, 51, 52 
& 55) 
The bill expands eligibility for several programs currently available 
only to alliance districts by instead making them available to any school 
district. These programs include the following: 
1. the aspiring educator diversity scholarship program, which gives 
annual scholarships to diverse students who graduated from a 
public high school in an alliance district and are enrolled in a 
teacher preparation program at a four-year higher education 
institution (CGS § 10-156ii); 
2. the alliance districts educator and counselor loan subsidy 
program, which subsidizes interest rates on loans to teachers, 
paraeducators and school counselors employed in alliance 
districts (CGS §§ 10a-247 &-247a); and 
3. probate court truancy clinics in alliance districts (CGS § 45a-8c). 
Expanding Certain Programs for Educational Reform Districts (§§ 
30, 46, 47 & 53) 
The bill also applies several programs to PSDs, instead of educational 
reform districts, as under current law. In doing so, it expands access to 
these programs by making 16 districts, instead of 10, eligible. 
Specifically, these programs include the following: 
1. mortgage assistance for certain teachers (CGS § 8-265pp), 
2. the wraparound services grant program (CGS § 10-265p), 
3. the educational reform district science grant program (CGS § 10-
265q), and 
4. the Neighborhood Assistance Act tax credit (GS § 12-635).  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 28 	4/10/25 
 
Background — Accountability Index Scores  
The “accountability index” for a school district or an individual 
school is the score resulting from multiple weighted measures that (1) 
include the mastery test scores (i.e. performance index) and, if 
appropriate, high school graduation rates, and (2) may include 
academic growth over time, attendance and chronic absenteeism, 
postsecondary education and career readiness, enrollment in and 
graduation from institutions of higher education and postsecondary 
education programs, civics and arts education, and physical fitness 
(CGS § 10-223e(a)). 
§ 34 — EARLY CHILDHOOD CABINET MEMBERSHI P 
Adds a library consortium member to the Early Childhood Cabinet 
The bill increases the Early Childhood Cabinet’s membership, from 
31 to 32, by adding the executive director of the Connecticut Library 
Consortium or a cooperating library service unit, or his or her designee. 
The bill does not indicate how it will be decided whether the new board 
member is the director of the library consortium or of a library service 
unit.  
The bill also makes conforming changes by substituting the term 
“alliance district” with “primary school district” for two existing cabinet 
members (one school board member and one parent of a student in an 
educational reform district) to reflect the bills’ repeal of the alliance 
district program (see §§ 28-56 above).  
By law, the Early Childhood Cabinet (1) advises OEC, (2) develops 
an annual action plan that assigns state agencies certain tasks specified 
in the federal Head Start Act, and (3) submits an annual statewide 
strategic report that addresses agencies’ progress in meeting the action 
plan’s requirements.  
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Background — Related Bills 
sSB 6, § 8 (File 199), favorably reported by the Committee on 
Children, adds the Connecticut Library Consortium’s executive director  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 29 	4/10/25 
 
to the Early Childhood Cabinet’s membership.  
HB 5003, §§ 1 & 2 (File 198), favorably reported by the Committee on 
Children, transfers unappropriated surplus funds into a fund dedicated 
to early childhood care and education programs, and the treasurer 
manages the fund and invests its assets. 
SB 1458, favorably reported by the Education Committee, repeals the 
Network of Schools program and revamps the Alliance District program 
by reducing, from 36 to 15, the number of districts and renames them 
opportunity districts.  
HB 6922 (File 311), favorably reported by the Education Committee, 
repeals the existing school construction HVAC grant and merges it with 
an existing school construction grant law that gives grants for a broader 
range of school building projects. 
§ 56 — REPEALERS  
Repeals provisions on the SDE commissioner’s network of schools, alliance districts, 
minority candidate retention and residency program, and allowing limited reemployment 
of retired teachers; makes related technical and conforming changes 
In addition to repealing provisions on the (1) DAS HVAC system 
grant program for school boards (see § 25 above); (2) SDE 
commissioner’s Network of Schools program (see §§ 26, 27 & 56 above); 
and (3) alliance district program (see §§ 28-56 above), the bill 
additionally repeals the following provisions and makes related 
technical and conforming changes: 
1. requiring SDE to administer the Minority Candidate Certification 
Retention or Residency Year Program (“Retention or Residency 
Program”) (CGS § 10-156gg), and 
2. allowing limited reemployment of retired teachers (CGS § 10-
183v). 
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2025 
Teacher Candidate Retention or Residency Program  
Current law requires SDE to administer the Retention or Residency  2025SB-00001-R000637-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: JM 	Page 30 	4/10/25 
 
program in coordination with a RESC or a private, nonprofit 
certification program. It also requires each school district designated as 
an alliance district to partner with a residency program operator to 
enroll minority candidates and place them in the district for their 10-
month teacher candidate residency. SDE must (1) withhold from each 
alliance district 10% of any increase in alliance aid and (2) use the funds 
for grant payments to cover program-related costs (CGS § 10-156gg).  
Reemployment of Retired Teachers  
Under current law, retired teachers are allowed to be reemployed for 
certain periods of time under specified conditions and still receive their 
pension benefit (they do not contribute to their pension during this 
time). Generally, they are reemployed (1) under the “45% rule” (earning 
up to 45% of the position’s maximum salary and returning any payment 
received over that amount) or (2) in a shortage area or at a PSD for up 
to two years with no salary limit. (An existing third option for those who 
retired after at least 34 years of teaching and are now reemployed with 
an alliance district expired in 2024 (CGS § 10-183v).)  
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Education Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 30 Nay 15 (03/24/2025)