Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01356 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/09/2025

                     
Researcher: DC 	Page 1 	4/9/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 1356  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING DATA PRIVACY, ONLINE MONITORING, 
SOCIAL MEDIA, DATA BROKERS AND CONNECTED VEHICLE 
SERVICES.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill expands various aspects of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act 
(CTDPA). Among other things, the bill: 
1. expands who is covered under the CTDPA, by lowering the 
applicability threshold and including those who (a) control or 
process a consumer’s sensitive data or (b) offer a consumer’s 
personal data for sale in trade or commerce; 
2. removes current CTDPA exemptions, thus applying its 
requirements and restrictions to certain additional entities (e.g., 
nonprofit organizations); 
3. expands various aspects of the CTDPA, including what is 
considered sensitive data and prohibits controllers (entities that 
determine the purpose and means of processing personal data) 
from selling a consumer’s sensitive data without the consumer’s 
consent; 
4. changes the standard for establishing knowledge of a consumer’s 
minor-status as it pertains to certain requirements and 
restrictions by creating a new “fairly implied knowledge” 
standard (see below); and 
5. prohibits controllers that offer online services, products, or 
features to minors from performing certain actions (e.g., 
processing a minor’s personal data for targeted advertising and 
personal data sales) by eliminating the provision that currently 
allows them to do so with consent.  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 2 	4/9/25 
 
Additionally, the bill generally requires a data broker to be actively 
registered with the Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) before 
selling or licensing brokered personal data in Connecticut. 
It also creates a process by which a survivor of certain crimes (e.g., 
domestic violence) can submit a request to the motor vehicle 
manufacturer with a connected vehicle services account to take certain 
actions to prevent the abuser from remotely obtaining data from, or 
sending commands to, the survivor’s vehicle or one that is under the 
survivor’s exclusive possession or control legally. 
Lastly, it makes various minor, technical, and conforming changes. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025, except the motor vehicle data 
privacy provision is effective January 1, 2026. 
§§ 1-9 — CTDPA 
Expansion of Applicability  
The bill expands the individuals and entities covered by the CTDPA’s 
requirements by lowering certain thresholds and adding additional 
qualifications. 
Under current law, the CTDPA applies to individuals and entities 
that do business in Connecticut or produce products or services 
targeting Connecticut residents and, during the preceding calendar 
year, controlled or processed personal data of at least: 
1. 100,000 consumers, excluding personal data controlled or 
processed solely for completing a payment transaction, or 
2. 25,000 consumers and derived more than 25% of their gross 
revenue from selling personal data. 
The bill lowers these thresholds to (1) 35,000 consumers, excluding 
personal data controlled or processed solely for completing a payment 
transaction, or (2) 10,000 consumers and derived more than 20% of their 
gross revenue from selling personal data. 
The bill also extends the CTDPA to cover those that (1) control or  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 3 	4/9/25 
 
process a consumer’s sensitive data (see below) or (2) offer a consumer’s 
personal data for sale in trade or commerce. 
Sensitive Data 
Existing law prohibits controllers from processing sensitive data 
about a consumer (1) without consent, or (2) if the consumer is known 
to be a child under age 13, without following the federal Children’s 
Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) (15 U.S.C. § 6501 et seq.). 
Controllers must also conduct and document a data protection 
assessment for each of their processing activities that presents a 
heightened risk of harm to consumers, including the processing of 
sensitive data. 
The bill prohibits a controller from selling a consumer’s sensitive data 
without the consumer’s consent. 
Under current law, “sensitive data” is personal data that includes, 
among other things, (1) data revealing a mental or physical health 
condition or diagnosis, (2) processing genetic or biometric data to 
uniquely identify an individual, and (3) personal data collected from 
someone known to be a child.  
The act expands the “sensitive data” covered by the law by: 
1. including data revealing (a) a mental or physical disability or 
treatment or (b) nonbinary or transgender status; 
2. specifying that it includes genetic or biometric data or 
information derived from the data, rather than only the data 
processing, to uniquely identify an individual; and 
3. including personal data collected from an individual the 
controller has knowledge, fairly implied on the basis of objective 
circumstances, is a child, rather than just actual knowledge as 
required under current law. 
The bill also includes the following as sensitive data: 
1. neural data (any information generated by measuring the activity  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 4 	4/9/25 
 
of an individual’s central or peripheral nervous system);  
2. financial information that reveals a consumer’s financial account 
number, financial account log-in information, or credit or debit 
card numbers that, in combination with any required access or 
security code, password, or credential, would allow access to a 
consumer’s financial account; or  
3. government-issued identification number, including Social 
Security number, passport number, state identification card 
number, or driver’s license number, that applicable law does not 
require to be publicly displayed. 
Under current law, “biometric data” is data generated by automatic 
measurements of an individual’s biological characteristics that are used 
to identify a specific individual. The bill expands this to include data 
that can be associated with a specific individual.  
Publicly Available Information 
Under current law, “publicly available information” is information 
that (1) is lawfully available through federal, state, or municipal 
government records or widely distributed media and (2) a controller has 
a reasonable basis to believe the consumer has lawfully made available 
to the general public. Under the bill, either condition is enough for the 
information to be considered publicly available. 
Under existing law, “personal data” does not include publicly 
available information. Thus, publicly available information is not 
subject to the CTDPA. 
The bill specifies the following are not considered publicly available 
information: 
1. information compiled and combined to create a consumer profile 
made available to a user of a publicly available Internet website 
either for payment or free of charge,  
2. information that is made available for sale, or  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 5 	4/9/25 
 
3. any inference generated from the information described above. 
Consumer Health Data 
The CTDPA sets standards on accessing and sharing consumer health 
data and places various specific limitations on consumer health data 
controllers. The bill expands what is considered “consumer health data” 
by including personal data that a controller uses to identify a 
consumer’s physical or mental health status. Current law includes 
personal data used to identify such a condition or diagnosis. 
Exemption Removal 
The bill removes the following from current law’s list of exempted 
entities, thus subjecting them to CTDPA requirements: 
1. nonprofit organizations; 
2. financial institutions or data subject to certain provisions of the 
federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.); and  
3. covered entities or business associates, as defined under HIPAA 
regulations (e.g., health plans, health care clearinghouses, and 
health care providers). 
Consumer Rights 
Under current law, a consumer has the right to confirm whether or 
not a controller is processing the consumer’s personal data and access 
the data. The bill specifies that this includes any inferences about the 
consumer that is derived from the personal data. As under existing law, 
this right is available unless the confirmation or access would require 
the controller to reveal a trade secret. 
The bill also expands a consumer’s right to opt out of personal data 
processing when the data is used for profiling to advance any, rather 
than only, automated decisions that produce legal or similarly 
significant effects concerning the consumer.  
The bill also gives a consumer the right to obtain from the controller 
(1) a list of the third parties to whom the controller has sold the  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 6 	4/9/25 
 
consumer’s personal data or (2) if the controller does not maintain such 
a list, a list of all third parties to whom the controller has sold personal 
data. 
Controller Requirement 
Under current law, a controller must limit the collection of personal 
data to what is adequate, relevant, and reasonably necessary for data 
processing, as disclosed to the consumer. The bill instead requires the 
collection to be reasonably necessary and proportionate to providing or 
maintaining a product or service the consumer specifically requests. 
§§ 1 & 4-9 — KNOWLEDGE FAIRLY IMPLIED 
The bill changes the knowledge element needed for several CTDPA 
requirements to apply, specifically in instances regarding knowledge of 
a consumer’s minor status. Under current law, actual knowledge is 
required. The bill expands this to include instances where the 
knowledge is fairly implied based on objective circumstances. The new 
fairly implied knowledge standard applies to provisions: 
1. allowing a parent or legal guardian to exercise consumer rights 
on a child’s behalf for personal data processing and 
2. prohibiting controllers from processing sensitive data concerning 
a child in accordance with COPPA. 
Under the CTDPA, several requirements and prohibitions require 
actual knowledge or the willful disregard of knowing the consumer is a 
minor. The bill changes the willfully disregards standard to the 
knowledge fairly implied standard described above for provisions: 
1. prohibiting controllers from processing a consumer’s personal 
data for targeted advertising, or selling the data without the 
consumer’s consent, for consumers ages 13-15; 
2. requiring controllers that offer any online service, product, or 
feature to consumers who are minors to use reasonable care to 
avoid any heightened risk of harm to them;  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 7 	4/9/25 
 
3. prohibiting controllers that offer online services, products, or 
features to consumers who are minors from (a) taking certain 
actions (e.g., processing a minor’s data for certain purposes); (b) 
collecting precise geolocation data; and (c) providing certain 
consent mechanisms that are designed to impair user autonomy, 
among other things; and 
4. requiring controllers that offer online services, products, or 
features to consumers who are minors to conduct a data 
protection assessment for the online service, product, or feature. 
Under current law, controllers, consumer health data controllers, or 
processors that disclose personal data to a third party under the law’s 
requirements are not responsible for third party violations if at the time 
of disclosure, the original controllers or processors did not have actual 
knowledge that the recipient would violate the law. The bill also limits 
liability in instances when the controllers and processors did not have 
knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances that 
the recipient would violate the law. 
§§ 6 & 10 — INTERNAL OPERATIONS 
The CTDPA specifies that the obligations it imposes on controllers, 
processors, and consumer health data controllers do not restrict their 
ability to collect, use, or retain data for internal use to, among other 
things, perform internal operations such as those that are reasonably 
aligned with the consumer’s expectations. The bill narrows the internal 
operation performances under these provisions to instances where the 
controllers and processors perform solely internal operations. 
§§ 7-10 — MINORS AND ONLINE SE RVICES, PRODUCTS, AN D 
FEATURES 
Social Media Platform 
Under current law, a “social media platform” is a public or semi-
public Internet-based service or application that:  
1. is used by a Connecticut consumer;  
2. is primarily intended to connect and allow users to socially  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 8 	4/9/25 
 
interact within the service or application; and  
3. enables a user to (a) construct a public or semi-public profile for 
signing into and using the service or application; (b) populate a 
public list of other users with whom the user shares a social 
connection within the service or application; and (c) create or post 
content that is viewable by other users, including on message 
boards, in chat rooms, or through a landing page or main feed 
that presents the user with content generated by other users. 
The bill limits what features platforms must enable users to do to be 
considered a social media platform. Specifically, it eliminates the 
requirement that they must also enable users to (1) populate other users’ 
public lists and (2) create or post content that is viewable to others. In 
doing this, the bill expands what is considered a social media platform 
under the law. 
Prohibition on Requiring Social Media Account for Request 
The bill prohibits social media platforms from requiring a minor’s 
parent or legal guardian to create a social media account to submit a 
request to unpublish the minor’s social media platform account. But the 
platform may require the parent or legal guardian to use an existing 
account to submit the request, as long as the parent or legal guardian 
has access to the existing account.  
Rebuttable Presumption 
In enforcement actions that the attorney general takes, the bill 
removes current law’s rebuttable presumption that the controller used 
reasonable care as required under the law. 
Consent Provision Eliminated 
Under current law, controllers that offer online services, products, or 
features to minors may perform certain actions if they receive the 
minor’s consent or, if the minor is younger than age 13, that of the 
minor’s parent or legal guardian. The bill prohibits these actions by 
eliminating the ability for anyone to consent to them. 
The following actions are prohibited under current law unless the  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 9 	4/9/25 
 
requisite consent is received, but under the bill no one can consent to 
them:  
1. processing a minor’s personal data for targeted advertising and 
personal data sales, profiling to further certain automated 
decisions (see below), or collecting the minor’s precise 
geolocation and 
2. using a system design feature to significantly increase, sustain, or 
extend a minor’s use of the online service, product, or feature. 
Automated Decisions 
The bill prohibits controllers that offer any online service, product, or 
feature to a minor from profiling to advance any automated decisions 
that produce legal or similarly significant effects concerning the 
consumer. Current law limits this to apply only when the decision being 
advance is fully automated.  
Precise Geolocation 
The bill further limits when a controller that offers an online service, 
product, or feature to minors may collect a minor’s precise geolocation 
data to circumstances under which it is strictly, rather than reasonably, 
needed for the controller to provide the online service, product, or 
feature.  
§ 11 — BROKERED PERSONAL D ATA 
The bill generally requires a data broker to be actively registered with 
DCP before selling or licensing brokered personal data in Connecticut. 
Under the bill, a “data broker” is any business or, if the business is an 
entity, any portion of the business that sells or licenses brokered 
personal data to another person.  
A “business” is (1) a person (i.e. individual or entity) that regularly 
engages in commercial activities to generate income; (2) a bank, 
Connecticut credit union, federal credit union, out-of-state bank, out-of-
state trust company, or out-of-state credit union; and (3) any other 
person that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 10 	4/9/25 
 
a person described above. A business does not include any state body, 
authority, board, bureau, commission, district, or agency of the state or 
its political subdivisions. 
“Brokered personal data” is personal data categorized or organized 
to enable a data broker to sell or license it to another person. 
“Personal data” is any consumer-related data that, either alone or in 
combination with any other data that a data broker sells or licenses to 
another person, can reasonably be associated with the consumer. It 
includes the consumer’s: 
1. name or address, or that of his or her household or immediate 
family member;  
2. birth date or place of birth;  
3. mother’s maiden name;  
4. biometric data as under the CTDPA (see above); and  
5. Social Security number or any other government -issued 
identification number issued to the consumer. 
Application 
Under the bill, a data broker who wants to sell or license brokered 
personal data in Connecticut must apply for registration as a data broker 
to DCP in a form and manner the commissioner prescribes. Each 
registration application must be accompanied by a $600 registration fee. 
A registration expires on December 31 of the year in which it was issued 
and may be annually renewed for a $600 fee under a renewal application 
procedure that is the same as the initial application procedure. 
Except for registrations that DCP approves or renews based on a data 
broker complying with an agreement between DCP and the Nationwide 
Multistate Licensing System, the following must be included in each 
application:  
1. the applicant’s name, mailing address, email address, telephone  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 11 	4/9/25 
 
number, and primary Internet website address and 
2. a statement by the applicant disclosing the measures he or she 
must take to ensure that no personal data is sold or licensed in 
violation of the CTDPA. 
DCP must make all the application information described above 
publicly available on its website.  
Data Sale Prohibition 
Under the bill, data brokers are prohibited from selling or licensing 
personal data in violation of the CTDPA and must implement 
safeguards to prevent these actions. 
Exemptions 
The bill exempts the following entities from its data broker 
provisions: 
1. consumer reporting agencies, as defined under federal law (15 
U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.);  
2. financial institutions, affiliates, or nonaffiliated third parties, to 
the extent that they are involved in activities regulated under 
Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, (15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.);  
3. businesses that collect information about consumers who are (a) 
customers, subscribers, or users of goods or services they sell or 
offer; (b) in a contractual relationship with them; (c) business 
investors; (d) business donors; or (e) in any similar relationship 
with them; or  
4. businesses that perform services for, or act as agents or on behalf 
of, a business described above. 
Unregistered Data Broker’s Permitted Actions 
The bill specifies that it does not prohibit an unregistered data broker 
from selling or licensing brokered personal data if the sale or license 
exclusively involves:  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 12 	4/9/25 
 
1. publicly available information (a) concerning a consumer’s 
business or profession or (b) sold or licensed as part of a service 
that provides health or safety alerts; 
2. lawfully available information from any federal, state, or local 
government record;  
3. providing digital access to any (a) journal, book, periodical, 
newspaper, magazine, or news media or (b) educational, 
academic, or instructional work;  
4. developing or maintaining an electronic commerce service or 
software;  
5. providing directory assistance or directory information services 
as, or on behalf of, a telecommunications carrier; or  
6. a one-time or occasional disposition of business assets as part of 
a transfer of control over the assets that is not part of the 
business’s ordinary conduct. 
Regulations 
The bill allows the DCP commissioner to adopt implementing 
regulations for the bill’s data broker provisions. 
Penalties 
Under the bill, the DCP commissioner, after providing notice and 
holding a hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act, may impose 
maximum civil penalties of $500 per day for each data broker violation, 
up to $10,000 per calendar year. 
§ 12 — MOTOR VEHICLE DATA P RIVACY FOR SURVIVORS OF 
CERTAIN CRIMES 
The bill allows survivors of certain crimes (e.g., domestic violence) to 
submit a connected vehicle service request to a covered provider (i.e. 
motor vehicle manufacturer, or an entity acting on its behalf, that 
provides a connected vehicle service) to take certain actions to prevent 
an abuser (see definition below) from remotely obtaining data from, or  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 13 	4/9/25 
 
sending commands to, a vehicle. 
Definitions 
Under the bill, a “survivor” is an adult (age 18 or older) against whom 
a covered act was committed or allegedly committed. 
A “covered act” is an action that constitutes: 
1. a crime under the federal Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 
such as domestic violence, dating violence, economic abuse, and 
stalking (34 U.S.C. § 12291(a)); 
2. severe forms of trafficking in persons or sex trafficking under 
federal law (22 U.S.C. § 7102(11) & (12)); or  
3. a crime, act, or practice that is (a) similar to those described above 
and (b) prohibited under federal, state, or tribal law. 
A “connected vehicle service request” is a survivor’s request to 
terminate or disable the abuser’s access to a connected vehicle service. 
An “abuser” is an individual who (1) a survivor identifies in a 
connected vehicle service request, and (2) has committed, or allegedly 
committed, a covered act against the survivor who made the service 
request. 
A “connected vehicle service” is any capability a motor vehicle 
manufacturer provides that allows a person to remotely obtain data 
from, or send commands to, a covered vehicle, including through a 
mobile device software application. 
A “covered vehicle” is one that is (1) the subject of a connected vehicle 
request and (2) identified by a survivor under the bill’s provisions. 
Survivor’s Connected Vehicle Service Request  
Under the bill, survivors requesting that a connected vehicle service 
be terminated or disabled must include the vehicle identification 
number (VIN), the abuser’s name, and certain proof of ownership or 
possession over the vehicle. Proof of ownership or possession must  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 14 	4/9/25 
 
include at least the following, as applicable:  
1. proof that the survivor is the vehicle’s sole owner;  
2. if the survivor is not the sole owner, proof that the survivor is 
legally entitled to exclusively possess the vehicle, such as a court 
order awarding exclusive possession of the vehicle to the 
survivor; or  
3. if the abuser owns the vehicle, in whole or in part, a dissolution 
of marriage decree, restraining order, or temporary restraining 
order that names the abuser, and (a) gives the survivor exclusive 
possession of the vehicle or (b) restricts the use of a vehicle 
service by the abuser against the survivor. 
Covered Provider Required Actions 
Within two business days after a survivor submits a connected 
vehicle service request, the covered provider must take one or more of 
the following actions, whether or not the abuser is an account holder:  
1. terminate or disable the covered connected vehicle services 
account associated with the abuser;  
2. terminate or disable the covered connected vehicle services or 
services account associated with the covered vehicle, including 
by resetting or deleting its data or wireless connection, and 
giving the survivor instructions on how to reestablish the 
services or account; or 
3. if the motor vehicle has an in-vehicle interface, informing the 
survivor about the interface’s availability, and providing 
information on how to use it to terminate or disable the 
connected vehicle services. 
Denial of Abuser Request 
After the covered provider has acted, the provider must deny any 
request the abuser makes to obtain data (1) generated by the connected 
vehicle service after the abuser’s access to the service was terminated or  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 15 	4/9/25 
 
disabled due to the survivor’s request and (2) that the covered provider 
maintains. 
Covered Provider’s Requirement to Act 
Other than for a service request lacking the required information, the 
bill prohibits a covered provider from refusing to take the actions listed 
above based on other requirements not being satisfied, including any 
requirement for: 
1. paying any fee, penalty, or other charge; 
2. maintaining or extending the term of the covered connected 
vehicle services account;  
3. obtaining approval from any account holder other than the 
survivor; or  
4. increasing the rate charged for the connected vehicle service. 
Notice to Survivor Required Before Notifying Abuser 
If the covered provider intends to give the abuser any formal notice 
about any of the actions above, the provider must first notify the 
survivor about when it intends to do so. 
The bill requires the covered provider to take reasonable steps to 
ensure that it only gives the abuser formal notice (1) at least three days 
after the provider notified the survivor and (2) after the provider has 
terminated or disabled the abuser’s access to the connected vehicle 
service. 
When Action is Not Operationally or Technically Feasible 
Under the bill, covered providers are not required to take any of the 
actions above if the provider cannot operationally or technically 
perform them. If that is the case, the provider must promptly notify the 
survivor who submitted the request. The notice must at least disclose 
whether the covered provider’s inability to perform the action 
operationally or technically can be remedied and any steps the survivor 
can take to assist the provider in doing so.  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 16 	4/9/25 
 
Confidentially of Request-Related Information 
The covered provider and its officers, directors, employees, vendors, 
or agents must treat all information the survivor submits as confidential 
and must securely dispose the information within 90 days after the 
survivor’s submission. A covered provider is prohibited from disclosing 
connected vehicle service request-related information to a third party 
unless the (1) survivor affirmatively consents or (2) disclosure is 
necessary to perform the connected vehicle service request. 
The bill specifically allows covered providers to maintain certain 
records for longer than 90 days if the records are reasonably necessary 
and proportionate to verify that the survivor fulfilled the conditions. 
Material Change Notifications  
The survivor must take reasonable steps to notify the covered 
provider about any change in the ownership or possession of the 
covered vehicle that materially affects the need for the covered provider 
to take the required actions listed above. 
Emergency Situations 
Regardless of the requirements above, the bill does not prohibit or 
prevent a covered provider from terminating or disabling an abuser’s 
access to a connected vehicle service in an emergency situation after 
receiving a connected vehicle service request. 
Website Instructions  
The bill requires each covered provider to publicly post on its website 
a statement describing how a survivor may submit a connected vehicle 
service request to the provider. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Bills 
sSB 1295, favorably reported by the General Law Committee, among 
other things, has similar provisions to the ones in this bill that (1) change 
the knowledge standard for determining whether a consumer is a minor 
and (2) eliminate the option for anyone to consent to allow controllers 
that offer online services, products, or features to minors to perform  2025SB-01356-R000609-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: DC 	Page 17 	4/9/25 
 
certain actions, thus prohibiting the controllers from taking such 
actions. 
HB 5474 (File 184), favorably reported by the Committee on Children, 
among other things, adds additional protection for minors using social 
media platforms by (1) requiring social media platform owners to 
incorporate an online safety center and establish a cyberbullying policy 
for handling cyber bullying reports on the platform and (2) expanding 
the CTDPA to include additional safeguards (e.g., avoiding harm to a 
minor’s physical or mental health). 
sHB 6002, favorably reported by the Government Administration 
and Elections Committee, removes provisions that exempt the state 
from the CTDPA. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
General Law Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 16 Nay 5 (03/21/2025)