Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01430 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 03/27/2025

                     
Researcher: LRH 	Page 1 	3/27/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
SB 1430  
 
AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE 
OFFICE OF STATE ETHICS FOR REVISIONS TO THE STATE CODE 
OF ETHICS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill primarily makes two changes to the state Code of Ethics for 
Public Officials (see BACKGROUND). It (1) expands what constitutes a 
conflict of interest under the code to include actions that a public official 
or state employee has reason to believe or expect will result in a direct 
monetary gain or loss to his or her nonstate employer or spouse’s 
nonstate employer and (2) expands the range of officials who must file 
a statement of financial interests with the Office of State Ethics (OSE) to 
include members of any Executive Department board, commission, 
committee, or council authorized to enter into or approve a large state 
construction or procurement contract. 
The code generally places certain limits on how public officials 
(including elected state officials) may take official action on a matter for 
which they have a conflict of interest (depending on whether it is a 
substantial or potential conflict). Under existing law, unchanged by the 
bill, a substantial conflict of interest exists if the official or employee has 
reason to believe or expect that their actions will result in a direct 
monetary gain or loss to themselves or a business with which they are 
associated.  
For elected state officials, the bill also limits the circumstances when 
a substantial conflict of interest could arise. It does so by specifying that 
in matters concerning a business the official, or their or their spouse’s 
nonstate employer, is associated with, the official must have actual 
knowledge (rather than reason to believe or expect) that the business or 
nonstate employer will get a direct monetary gain or loss due to their 
actions.  2025SB-01430-R000295-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: LRH 	Page 2 	3/27/25 
 
As under existing law, a substantial conflict does not exist if the 
monetary gain or loss to the nonstate employer is no greater than the 
gain or loss realized by any other member of the same profession, 
occupation, or group. 
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025 
CONFLICTS OF INTERES T 
Substantial Conflicts of Interest (§ 1) 
Current law prohibits public officials and state employees from 
taking official action on a matter for which they have a substantial 
conflict of interest. By deeming actions a public official (including an 
elected state official) or state employee has reason to believe will, or 
expects to, result in a direct monetary gain or loss to their or their 
spouse’s nonstate employer as a substantial conflict of interest, the bill 
generally prohibits officials and employees from taking these actions. 
For elected state officials under the bill, however, a substantial 
conflict of interest only exists if the official has actual knowledge that 
either a business the official is associated with, or their or their spouse’s 
nonstate employer, will get a direct monetary gain or loss due to their 
actions. Under the bill, a business the official is associated with generally 
includes any business entity in which the official or a member of his or 
her immediate family is a director, officer, owner, limited or general 
partner, beneficiary of a trust, or holder of stock constituting at least 5% 
of the total outstanding stock (excluding nonprofit entities for which 
they are unpaid directors or officers). 
If elected state officials have a substantial conflict of interest due to 
their or their spouse’s nonstate employer, the bill requires them to either 
(1) recuse themselves from the matter or (2) prepare a written statement 
under penalty of false statement before acting on it. The statement must 
describe the matter requiring action, the potential conflict, and why, 
despite the conflict, the official is able to vote or otherwise participate 
fairly, objectively, and in the public interest. The official must submit the 
statement to OSE and enter a copy of it into his or her agency’s journal 
or minutes (or submit it to the agency if it does not have a journal or  2025SB-01430-R000295-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: LRH 	Page 3 	3/27/25 
 
minutes). By law, a false statement is a class A misdemeanor, punishable 
by up to 364 days in prison, a fine of up to $2,000, or both (CGS § 53a-
157b). 
Potential Conflicts of Interest (§ 2) 
Under current law, a public official or state employee has a potential 
conflict of interest if their official duties require them to take action that 
would affect their own financial interest or that of their spouse, parent, 
sibling, child, or child’s spouse (other than one of a minimal nature or 
that is not distinct from that of a substantial segment of the general 
public). The bill expands a potential conflict of interest to include those 
actions involving their or their spouse’s nonstate employer.  
As under the existing law for addressing potential conflicts of 
interest, if the official or employee is a member of a state regulatory 
agency, he or she must either (1) recuse himself or herself from the 
matter or (2) prepare a written statement as described above. The bill 
further requires that this statement be (1) prepared before taking official 
action and (2) submitted to the agency if it does not have a journal or 
minutes. 
By law, officials and employees who are not members of a regulatory 
agency must prepare a written statement under penalty of false 
statement that describes the matter requiring action and the potential 
conflict. They must deliver a copy to (1) their immediate supervisor, 
who must reassign the matter, or (2) OSE if they do not have an 
immediate supervisor. In this case, the official or employee must take 
steps that OSE prescribes or advises. 
STATEMENTS OF FINANC IAL INTERESTS 
The bill expands the range of officials who must file a statement of 
financial interests with OSE to include members of any Executive 
Department board, commission, committee, or council authorized to 
enter into or approve a large state construction or procurement contract. 
Current law requires all state-wide elected officers, General Assembly 
members, department heads and deputies, quasi-public agency 
members or directors, Investment Advisory Council members, and  2025SB-01430-R000295-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: LRH 	Page 4 	3/27/25 
 
other governor-designated officials to file these statements with OSE. 
Under the bill, a “large state construction or procurement contract” 
is a contract for more than $500,000 to (1) remodel, alter, repair, or 
enlarge any real asset; (2) construct, alter, reconstruct, improve, relocate, 
widen, or change the grade of a section of a state highway or a bridge; 
(3) buy or lease supplies, materials, or equipment; or (4) construct, 
reconstruct, alter, remodel, repair, or demolish any public building. 
By law, the statement of financial interests must include, among other 
things, the name of securities with a fair market value over $5,000 
owned by the official or his or her spouse or dependent children, or held 
in the name of a corporation, partnership, or trust for their benefit. 
Under the bill, if these securities are a tax-sheltered annuity retirement 
plan under federal tax law (i.e. a “403(b) plan”), then only the name of 
the retirement savings plan must be disclosed and not the name of the 
securities. Current law makes a similar allowance for other savings 
plans allowed under federal tax law (e.g., 401(k) retirement savings 
plans, 529 education savings plans). 
BACKGROUND 
“Public Officials” Under the Code of Ethics 
Under the state Code of Ethics for Public Officials, a “public official” 
is any: 
1. state-wide elected officer or officer-elect; 
2. member or member-elect of the General Assembly; 
3. person appointed to an office of the state government’s 
legislative, judicial, or executive branch by the governor or his 
appointee, with or without the legislature’s advice and consent;  
4. public member or representative of the teachers’ unions or state 
employees’ unions appointed to the Investment Advisory 
Council;  
5. person appointed or elected by the General Assembly or by any  2025SB-01430-R000295-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: LRH 	Page 5 	3/27/25 
 
member of either legislative chamber;  
6. member or director of a quasi-public agency; or 
7. spouse of the governor. 
Public officials under the code do not include advisory board 
members, judges of any court either elected or appointed, or senators or 
representatives in Congress (CGS § 1-79(11)). 
Related Bills 
HB 6931 (File 85), reported favorably by the Government Oversight 
Committee, has identical provisions on conflicts of interest (§§ 1 & 2 of 
this bill). 
SB 1296 (File 78), reported favorably by the Government Oversight 
Committee, has identical provisions on statements of financial interest 
(§ 3 of this bill). 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Government Administration and Elections Committee 
Joint Favorable 
Yea 19 Nay 0 (03/12/2025)