Connecticut 2025 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01437 Comm Sub / Analysis

Filed 04/23/2025

                     
Researcher: ND 	Page 1 	4/23/25 
 
 
 
OLR Bill Analysis 
sSB 1437  
 
AN ACT CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR HEALTH RECORDS AND 
THE FEES CHARGED FOR ACCESS TO SUCH RECORDS.  
 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes changes to penalties, deadlines, and fees related to 
certain patient health records requests. First, it authorizes workers’ 
compensation administrative law judges to penalize physicians, or 
third-party vendors acting on their behalf, who fail to submit medical 
reports for workers’ compensation cases within 30 days after they are 
completed. 
Second, the bill sets deadlines and fees for certain licensed health care 
institutions to transfer an electronic copy of a patient’s medical records 
to the patient’s attorney upon receiving a medical records request 
directed by the patient or the patient’s representative. It generally 
requires the transfer to occur within 20 business days after receiving the 
request and does not require the institution to get specific written 
consent from the patient before doing so. 
The bill also limits the fees for these records requests to the greater of 
(1) $250, plus postage and reasonable costs for imaging and materials 
(e.g., slides or tissue blocks) or (2) the fees allowed under federal law. 
(Federal law allows charging reasonable, cost-based fees that include 
only the cost of related labor, supplies, and postage.)  
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2025 
WORKERS’ COMPENSATIO N MEDICAL REPORTS 
The bill authorizes workers’ compensation administrative law judges 
to penalize practicing physicians, or third-party vendors acting on their 
behalf, who fail to submit medical reports for workers’ compensation 
cases within 30 days after they are completed as required under existing 
law. Under the bill, penalties must include the following:  2025SB-01437-R000738-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 2 	4/23/25 
 
1. a written noncompliance notice to the physician or third-party 
vendor or 
2. an order requiring the physician or third-party vendor to appear 
at a hearing and explain the reasons for not meeting the report 
deadline.  
Additionally, the bill subjects physicians, or third-party vendors 
acting on their behalf, who fail to appear for these hearings to a fine of 
up to $500 payable to the workers’ compensation claimant.  
Existing law requires workers’ compensation claimants, when 
seeking or receiving compensation, to submit to a physician evaluation 
when an administrative law judge orders it or an employer reasonably 
requests it. Physicians must submit all medical reports for these 
claimants within 30 days after the date they are completed to the 
employer and the employee (claimant) or the employee’s attorney.  
TRANSFER OF MEDICAL RE CORDS TO PATIENTS’ ATTORNEYS 
The bill sets deadlines and fees for licensed health care institutions to 
transfer an electronic copy of a patient’s medical records to the patient’s 
attorney upon receiving a medical records request directed by the 
patient or the patient’s representative. Under the bill, the transfer must 
occur within 20 business days after receiving the request and the 
institution does not need specific written consent from the patient before 
doing so.  
The bill exempts from these requirements (1) Department of Mental 
Health and Addiction Services-operated facilities and (2) the hospital 
and psychiatric residential treatment facility units of the Albert J. Solnit 
Children’s Center.  
The bill requires a patient or his or her representative (e.g., attorney) 
to pay reasonable fees to get copies of these patient records but sets new 
limits on them. Under current law, a health care institution may charge 
up to 65 cents per page, including any applicable research or handling 
fees, related costs, and first-class postage, to supply a patient’s health 
record. Patients may also be charged an additional amount needed to  2025SB-01437-R000738-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 3 	4/23/25 
 
cover the cost of material for (1) x-ray copies or (2) furnishing an original 
retained slide or tissue block or a new section cut from a retained tissue 
block (CGS § 19a-490b). 
The bill instead limits these fees to the greater of (1) $250, plus postage 
and reasonable costs for imaging and materials, or (2) the fees allowed 
under federal law. (Federal law allows charging reasonable, cost-based 
fees that include only the cost of related labor, supplies, and postage.) 
Payment is due after the patient or representative receives the records.  
(A separate law, unchanged by the bill, sets a limit of 65 cents per 
page (including fees, costs, and postage) for medical records requests to 
individual licensed health care providers (CGS § 20-7c).) 
Additionally, the bill specifies that its provisions do not require 
institutions to transfer records in the following circumstances:  
1. if doing so would violate the federal Health Insurance Portability 
and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or related regulations, which set 
limits and rules on disclosing protected health information;  
2. in response to a direct request from another provider unless the 
provider can validate that he or she has a health provider 
relationship with the patient; or  
3. in response to a third-party request. 
BACKGROUND 
Related Bill 
SB 1508 (File 711), favorably reported by the Public Health 
Committee, changes the fees related to patient health records requests 
by replacing current law’s fee of 65 cents per page with fees that vary 
based on who requests the records, the type of records, and the number 
of pages. 
HB 7227 (File 635), favorably reported by the Government 
Administration and Elections Committee, generally caps how much 
licensed health care providers can charge a patient or the patient’s  2025SB-01437-R000738-BA.DOCX 
 
Researcher: ND 	Page 4 	4/23/25 
 
attorney for copies of the patient’s medical records at the lesser of (1) the 
fees allowed under federal regulations or (2) $250, plus first-class 
postage and certain reasonable costs, if applicable. It makes those that 
do not comply with the fee limits ineligible for certain state contracts. 
COMMITTEE ACTION 
Judiciary Committee 
Joint Favorable Substitute 
Yea 41 Nay 0 (04/04/2025)