Delaware Senate Bill SR2

Delaware 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Engrossed: 1/10/23

Caption

Relating To The Rules Of The Delaware State Senate.

Impact

The enactment of SR2 has implications for state law by directly impacting how legislative sessions are conducted within the Delaware Senate. By providing a clear structure for legislative procedures, it aims to streamline decision-making and enhance the efficiency of the Senate's operations. This resolution reinforces the importance of maintaining an orderly legislative environment, which is critical for the effective functioning of the state government.

Summary

Senate Resolution 2 (SR2) addresses the rules governing the operations of the Delaware State Senate. It outlines the procedural guidelines required for the functioning of the Senate, including the requirements for introducing bills and resolutions, the duties of Senate officers, and the roles of different committees. As a resolution, it serves to establish a framework that governs the legislative processes, ensuring that sessions are conducted in an orderly manner and uphold standards of legislative conduct.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR2 appears to be supportive, as it received a unanimous vote of 21-0 during the Senate's third reading on January 10, 2023. This consensus indicates a general agreement among members of the Senate on the necessity of these procedural rules, reflecting a commitment to legislative integrity and effective governance. The bipartisan support suggests that the members recognize the importance of having established rules to guide their operations.

Contention

While SR2 was met with broad support, there could be potential contention related to specific rule amendments or proposals that may arise in the future as the legislative body seeks to adapt to changing needs. For instance, any challenge to the established procedures or proposals to further amend the rules might provoke debate about local governance versus legislative control. As legislative practices evolve, ongoing discussions may emerge around balancing procedural efficiency with the need for transparency and public participation in the legislative process.