Delaware Senate Bill SB189

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/19/25
• Refer: 6/19/25

Caption

Act To Amend Title 18 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Unfair Practices In The Insurance Business.

Impact

The bill is expected to make significant changes to how settlements are handled in personal injury cases within the automotive context. By allowing a rescission period of 60 days, the legislation promotes informed decision-making among individuals who might not fully understand the implications of settling without legal guidance. Additionally, it mandates that any release of liability executed within 30 days of an accident must include clear notices regarding the right to rescind, thus increasing transparency in the settlement process.

Summary

Senate Bill 189 aims to amend Title 18 of the Delaware Code concerning unfair practices in the insurance business, specifically focusing on the rights of individuals involved in automobile accidents. The legislation allows individuals who have signed a release of claim for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, without the assistance of an attorney, to rescind that release within 60 days. This gives unrepresented individuals greater power to withdraw from settlements if they feel inadequate information or pressure influenced their decision to settle prematurely.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards SB189 seems to be positive among consumer advocacy groups who appreciate the increased protections for individuals in vulnerable situations. They argue that the bill will help prevent inequities in the legal system where unrepresented individuals might otherwise be coerced into unfavorable settlements. However, some concerns have been raised by insurance companies about the potential for increased claims and the complexity it might introduce in the settlement process, indicating a divide in perceptions between consumer protection and the insurance industry's interests.

Contention

While most discussions around SB189 appear supportive of protecting unrepresented individuals, there are notable points of contention regarding the balance between consumer rights and insurance industry regulations. Critics argue that extended rescission periods may lead to complications in claims processing and could inadvertently incentivize individuals to delay settlements. This could burden insurance companies with longer settlement timelines and increased operational costs, highlighting the ongoing tension between consumer rights advocacy and the practical challenges faced by insurers.