This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0269e.COM
DATE: 1/19/2022
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: HB 269 Natural Gas and Public Utility Petitions for Rate Relief
SPONSOR(S): Byrd and others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 350
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy Subcommittee 16 Y, 0 N Neuffer Keating
2) State Administration & Technology
Appropriations Subcommittee
14 Y, 0 N Lee Topp
3) Commerce Committee 19 Y, 0 N Neuffer Hamon
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
The bill increases the threshold under which investor-owned electric utilities (IOUs) are eligible to have a
petition for rate relief considered by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) under informal procedures
referred to as proposed agency action (PAA) procedures. Under current law, only IOUs with less than 500
gigawatt hours (GWh) in annual electricity sales are eligible to request use of these PAA procedures for rate
cases. No Florida IOU currently has annual sales below this threshold. The bill increases the annual sales
threshold to 1,000 GWh, which will make one IOU, Florida Public Utilities Company (FPUC), eligible to request
use of PAA procedures for a rate case.
The bill may have an insignificant positive impact on state government expenditures. The bill will not impact
state government revenues or local government revenues or expenditures.
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2022. STORAGE NAME: h0269e.COM PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/19/2022
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Present Situation
The Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) is an arm of the Legislature, created to oversee utility
services to the people of Florida.
1
Among its powers, the PSC has broad jurisdiction over the rates and
service of investor-owned electric utilities (IOUs) in Florida.
2
As required by law, the PSC sets base
rates that are designed to allow each IOU to recover its legitimate costs of providing service,
3
including
a return on the IOU’s prudent capital investments.
4
Base rates are changed through “rate case” proceedings on an as-needed basis. When an IOU aims to
change its base rates, it must petition the PSC and file documents that satisfy the minimum filing
requirements (MFRs) established by the PSC for a rate case.
5
A formal hearing process ensues,
including a discovery process, an evidentiary hearing, customer service hearings, and post-hearing
brief submissions. The PSC must take final action and issue its final order on the IOU’s petition within
twelve months of the IOU’s completed MFR filing,
6
though the PSC typically takes final action and
issues its final order within eight months. This rate case process is typically resource intensive.
Because an IOU’s rate case expenses are considered a legitimate cost of providing service, these
expenses are recovered through customer rates.
Under current law, an IOU with less than 500 gigawatt hours (GWh) in annual sales may request that
its rate case be handled by the PSC under informal procedures referred to as proposed agency action
(PAA) procedures. PAA procedures require less time and resources than the formal hearing process.
Under PAA procedures, the IOU still must file documents that satisfy the MFRs, and customer service
hearings are still held in the IOU’s service territory. PSC staff may request data from the IOU, and the
Office of Public Counsel
7
may appear as a party in the case and conduct discovery. Discovery from
third parties is not permitted under PAA procedures. After the PSC hears input from its staff, the IOU,
and any other interested persons, it votes on the IOU’s rate request and memorializes its vote in writing
as a PAA order. The order must be issued within five months of the IOU’s completed filing of the
MFRs.
8
Any person whose substantial interests are affected by the PAA order may protest the order
and initiate the formal hearing process with respect to the specific matters protested. If no such protest
is filed, the order shall be entered and become final agency action, subject only to appeal.
9
At present, no IOU has annual sales below the 500 GWh threshold. When the threshold was enacted,
Florida Public Utilities Company (FPUC), an IOU, operated two separate divisions, one in Marianna
and one in Fernandina Beach. Each division was regulated as a separate entity for the purpose of
setting rates. In 2004, the PSC approved a rate settlement agreement consolidating the rates and
charges of the two divisions into one entity. From the time that the 500 GWh threshold was enacted
until FPUC’s consolidation in 2004, the two independent divisions of FPUC were the only IOUs eligible
1
S. 350.001, F.S.
2
See, e.g., ss. 366.01, 366.04(1), 366.041, 366.05(1), and 366.06, F.S. There are four IOUs in Florida: Florida Power &
Light Company, Duke Energy Florida, Tampa Electric Company, and Florida Public Utilities Company. The former Gulf
Power Company merged into Florida Power & Light Company as of January 1, 2021.
3
Base rates make up just one component of an IOU’s rates. Other mechanisms are established by statute or PSC rule or
order to allow IOUs to recover specific types of costs not included in base rates, such as fuel costs and certain
environmental compliance costs.
4
Ss. 366.041(1) and 366.06(1), F.S.
5
See Rr. 25-6.043 and 25-6.140, F.A.C.
6
S. 366.06(3), F.S.
7
See S. 350.0611, F.S. (tasking the Office of the Public Counsel with providing legal representation for the general public
of Florida in proceedings before the PSC and in other utility related matters).
8
See S. 366.06(4), F.S.
9
See Order Nos. PSC-08-0436-PAA-GU (PAA Order) and PSC-08-0849-CO-GU (Consummating Order), issued July 8
and August 1, 2008, in Docket No. 20070592-GU, In re: Petition for rate increase by St. Joe Natural Gas Company, Inc. STORAGE NAME: h0269e.COM PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/19/2022
to request use of PAA procedures for rate cases. After the consolidation, FPUC’s annual sales
surpassed the 500 GWh threshold, and it became ineligible to request use of PAA procedures for its
rate cases.
10
As shown in the following table, FPUC’s annual electricity sales are substantially less than any other
IOU within the state:
2020 Florida IOU Electricity Sales
IOU Sales (GWh)
Florida Power & Light 113,531
Duke Energy Florida 39,230
Tampa Electric 19,954
Gulf Power 10,635
FPUC 650
Effect of Proposed Changes
The bill increases the eligibility threshold under which an IOU may request that its rate case be handled
informally through PAA procedures, from 500 GWh to 1,000 GWh. Under this change, Florida Public
Utilities Company (FPUC) would regain its eligibility to use the PAA procedures.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1. Amends s. 366.06, F.S., relating to the procedures for fixing and changing rates.
Section 2. Provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
The bill will likely have an insignificant positive fiscal impact on PSC expenditures due to potential
cost savings realized by utilizing a proposed agency action (PAA) procedure, which is a more
expedited disposition of a petition for rate relief, instead of a lengthy direct-to-hearing rate case that
requires more time and staffing resources.
11
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
None.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
10
Email from Kaley Slattery, Legislative Director, Florida Public Service Commission, RE: Recorded year that FPUC
exceeded 500 GWh in annual sales (Oct. 27, 2021).
11
Florida Public Service Commission, Agency Analysis of 2022 House Bill 269, pg. 3 (Oct. 21, 2021). STORAGE NAME: h0269e.COM PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/19/2022
To the extent that FPUC is able to reduce its rate case expenses through the use of PAA procedures,
these savings will be passed along to its ratepayers. The bill could also offer potential benefits to
newly-qualifying utilities resulting from a PAA instead of a direct-to-hearing rate case.
12
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
None.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not applicable. This bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
The bill does not require or authorize rulemaking.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
None.
12
Id.