This document does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0287z.DOCX
DATE: 3/8/2022
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF FINAL BILL ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/HB 287 Tampering with or Fabricating Physical Evidence
SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice & Public Safety Subcommittee, Garrison and others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 796
FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: 111 Y’s
1 N’s GOVERNOR’S ACTION: Pending
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
CS/HB 287 passed the House on February 24, 2022, and subsequently passed the Senate on March 2, 2022.
After committing a criminal offense, a suspect’s primary focus is often on concealing or destroying evidence
that a crime was committed. In some criminal cases, such as drug offenses or murder, it is difficult, if not
impossible, to successfully prosecute a suspect without introducing certain evidence at trial, such as the drugs
or murder weapon.
Section 918.13, F.S., prohibits a person, knowing that a criminal trial or proceeding, or an investigation by a
prosecuting authority, law enforcement agency, grand jury, or legislative committee is pending or about to be
instituted, from tampering with or fabricating physical evidence by:
Altering, destroying, concealing, or removing any record, document, or thing with the purpose to impair
its verity or availability in the proceeding or investigation; or
Making, presenting, or using any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false.
A person convicted of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence commits a third degree felony. Under
current law, the criminal penalty does not vary based on the severity of the underlying crime that is being
investigated or prosecuted, so a person convicted of tampering with evidence in a murder investigation is
subject to the same penalty as a person that tampers with evidence in a case involving misdemeanor
marijuana possession.
The bill amends s. 918.13, F.S., to increase the penalty if a person tampers with or fabricates physical
evidence in a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation relating to a capital felony from a third degree felony to
a second degree felony. Examples of a capital felony include first degree murder, capital sexual battery, and
specified drug trafficking offenses. The bill ranks the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence
relating to a capital felony as a Level 6 offense on the Criminal Punishment Code’s offense severity ranking
chart (OSRC).
A conviction for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in an investigation or court proceeding
involving any other crime remains a third degree felony. Tampering with physical evidence remains a Level 3
offense on the OSRC. The bill ranks the previously unranked offense of fabricating physical evidence as a
Level 3 offense on the OSRC.
The bill will likely have a positive indeterminate impact on prison beds by increasing the felony degree and
penalty for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation
relating to a capital felony.
Subject to the Governor’s veto powers, the effective date of this bill is October 1, 2022.
STORAGE NAME: h0287z.DOCX PAGE: 2
DATE: 3/8/2022
I. SUBSTANTIVE INFORMATION
A. EFFECT OF CHANGES:
Background
Tampering With or Fabricating Physical Evidence
After committing a criminal offense, a suspect’s primary focus is often on concealing or destroying
evidence that a crime was committed. In some criminal cases, such as drug offenses or murder, it is
difficult, if not impossible, to successfully prosecute a suspect without introducing certain evidence at
trial, such as the drugs or murder weapon.
Section 918.13, F.S., prohibits a person, knowing that a criminal trial or proceeding, or an investigation
by a prosecuting authority, law enforcement agency, grand jury, or legislative committee is pending or
about to be instituted, from tampering with or fabricating physical evidence by:
Altering, destroying, concealing, or removing any record, document, or thing with the purpose to
impair its verity or availability in the proceeding or investigation, or
Making, presenting, or using any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false.
A person convicted of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence commits a third degree felony.
1,2
Under current law, the criminal penalty does not vary based on the severity of the underlying crime that
is being investigated or prosecuted, so a person convicted of tampering with physical evidence in a
murder investigation is subject to the same penalty as a person that tampers with physical evidence in
a case involving misdemeanor marijuana possession.
Courts have held that a person may be convicted of tampering with physical evidence only in
circumstances where the person has the specific intent to destroy or conceal evidence to such an
extent that it is unavailable for trial or investigation.
3
For example, a person who is approached by a law
enforcement officer for suspicion of possession of an illegal drug can be convicted of tampering with
evidence where the person swallows the drug before law enforcement can seize it
4
or where a person
tosses cocaine out of a moving vehicle during a police chase while continuing to flee.
5
Courts have held
that discarding evidence in the presence of a law enforcement officer during an investigation, without
additional evidence of intent, is insufficient to maintain a conviction for tampering with physical
evidence. For example, courts have held that a suspect who was confronted by a law enforcement
officer and tossed a piece of crack cocaine on the ground while in view of the officer merely abandoned
the evidence because it could be easily recovered and was not altered in any manner.
6
Perjury
The crimes of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and perjury are similar offenses in that
both involve attempts to mislead an investigation or court proceeding by deceit. Section 837.02, F.S.,
relating to perjury, prohibits a person from making a false statement which he or she does not believe
to be true, under oath in an official proceeding.
7
A person convicted of perjury commits a third degree
1
A third degree felony is punishable by up to five years imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. Ss. 775.082 and 775.083, F.S.
2
S. 918.13(2), F.S.
3
“[T]he offense of tampering is committed only when the defendant takes some action that is designed to actually alter or destroy the
evidence rather than just removing it from his or her person.” E.I. v. State, 25 So.3d 625, 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
4
State v. Jennings, 666 So.2d 131 (Fla.1995).
5
Chapman v. State, 36 So.3d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
6
Evans v. State, 997 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Thomas v. State, 581 So.2d 993 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
7
“Official proceeding” means a proceeding heard, or which may be or is required to be heard, before any legislative, judicial,
administrative, or other governmental agency or official authorized to take evidence under oath, including any referee, general or
special magistrate, administrative law judge, hearing officer, hearing examiner, commissioner, notary, or other person taking testimony
or a deposition in connection with any such proceeding. S. 837.011(1), F.S.
STORAGE NAME: h0287z.DOCX PAGE: 3
DATE: 3/8/2022
felony.
8
If a person commits perjury in an official proceeding that relates to the prosecution of a capital
felony, the person commits a second degree felony.
9,10
Capital Felony Offenses
In Florida, a capital felony is the most serious classification of felony offenses. A capital felony is a
crime that is punishable by either death or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
11
Examples of a capital felony offense include first degree murder,
12
capital sexual battery,
13
and
specified drug trafficking offenses.
14
Offense Severity Ranking Chart
Felony offenses subject to the Criminal Punishment Code (CPC) are listed in a single offense severity
ranking chart (OSRC), which uses 10 offense levels to rank felonies from least severe (Level 1) to most
severe (Level 10). Each felony offense is assigned to a level according to the severity of the offense,
commensurate with the harm or potential for harm to the community that is caused by the offense, as
determined by statute. A person’s primary offense, any other current offenses, and prior offenses are
scored using the points designated for the offense severity level of each offense. The final calculation,
following the scoresheet formula, determines the lowest permissible sentence that the trial court may
impose, absent a valid reason for departure.
15
If an offense is unranked, the CPC specifies a default
level on the OSRC depending on the felony degree of the offense.
The criminal offense of altering, destroying, or concealing physical evidence is ranked as a Level 3
offense on the OSRC.
16
The criminal offense of making, presenting, or using physical evidence while
knowing it is false is not ranked on the OSRC and defaults to a Level 1 offense.
17
Effect of the Bill
The bill amends s. 918.13, F.S., to increase the penalty if a person tampers with or fabricates physical
evidence in a criminal trial, proceeding, or investigation relating to a capital felony from a third degree
felony to a second degree felony, mirroring the penalties for the similar offense of perjury. The bill ranks
the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence relating to a capital felony as a Level 6
offense on the OSRC.
A conviction for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in an investigation or court proceeding
involving any other crime remains a third degree felony. Tampering with physical evidence remains a
Level 3 offense on the OSRC. The bill ranks the previously unranked crime of fabricating physical
evidence as a Level 3 offense on the OSRC.
Subject to the Governor’s veto powers, the effective date of this bill is October 1, 2022.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
8
S. 837.02(1), F.S.
9
A second degree felony is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. Ss. 775.082 and 775.083, F.S.
10
S. 837.02(2), F.S.
11
S. 775.082(1)(a), F.S.
12
S. 782.04(1)(a), F.S.
13
S. 794.011(2)(a), F.S.
14
S. 893.135, F.S.
15
S. 921.0022, F.S.
16
Id.
17
S. 921.0023, F.S.
STORAGE NAME: h0287z.DOCX PAGE: 4
DATE: 3/8/2022
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
The Criminal Justice Impact Conference (CJIC) reviewed the identical Senate bill, CS/SB 796, and
determined the bill would have a positive indeterminate impact on prison beds by increasing the
felony degrees and penalties for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in specified
cases.
18
The Department of Corrections reported that there were 68 new commitments to prison for
tampering with evidence in Fiscal Year 2018-19, 57 new commitments in Fiscal Year 2019-20, and
28 new commitments in Fiscal Year 2020-21. There were no new commitments for fabricating
physical evidence during these years, however, current law does not distinguish between tampering
with or fabricating physical evidence in a capital case and in any other criminal offense, so it is not
known how many additional offenders this new penalty created by the bill could impact.
19
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
None.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
None.
18
Criminal Justice Impact Conference, CS/SB 796 – Tampering With or Fabricating Physical Evidence, February 7, 2022,
http://edr.state.fl.us/content/conferences/criminaljusticeimpact/CSSB796.pdf (last visited Mar. 8, 2022).
19
Id.