Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0337 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/10/2022

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: HB 337    Administrative Procedures 
SPONSOR(S): McClain 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 536 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Government Operations Subcommittee 	Skinner Toliver 
2) Appropriations Committee    
3) State Affairs Committee    
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) sets forth a uniform set of procedures agencies must follow when 
exercising delegated rulemaking authority. A rule is an agency statement of general applicability that interprets, 
implements, or prescribes law or policy, including the procedure and practice requirements of an agency as 
well as certain types of forms. Agencies do not have the discretion in and of themselves to engage in 
rulemaking. To adopt a rule, an agency must have a general grant of authority to implement a specific law.  
 
The bill amends the APA rulemaking process and provides a mechanism for agencies to reduce unnecessary 
rules. Specifically, the bill:  
 Requires each agency to review its rules for consistency with the powers and duties granted by the 
agency’s enabling statutes. If, after reviewing a rule, the agency determines substantive changes to 
update a rule are not required, the agency must repromulgate the rule;  
 Specifies the economic impacts and compliance costs an agency must consider in creating a statement 
of estimated regulatory costs (SERC). Each agency is required to have a website where each of its 
SERCs may be viewed in their entirety;  
 Requires an agency, in all notices of rulemaking that include material incorporated by reference, to 
submit the incorporated material in the prescribed electronic format to the Department of State with the 
full text available for free public access through an electronic hyperlink;   
 Requires changes to material incorporated by reference to be in a strike-through and underline format.  
 Requires the annual regulatory plan to identify and describe each rule, by rule number or proposed rule 
number, which the agency expects to develop, adopt, or repeal for the 12-month period beginning 
October 1 and ending September 30. The bill also requires the annual regulatory plan to contain a 
declaration that the agency head and the general counsel understand that regulatory accountability is 
necessary to ensure public confidence in the integrity of state government and to that end the agency is 
diligently working toward lowering the total number of rules adopted;  
 Specifies that an adverse impact on small business exists if certain specific criteria is met;  
 Specifies that a lower cost regulatory alternative may be submitted after a notice of proposed rule or a 
notice of change;  
 Defines the term “technical change” and requires technical changes to be documented in the history of 
the rule; 
 Requires a notice of rule development and a notice of proposed rule to include the proposed rule 
number;  
 Requires a period of at least seven days between the publication of a notice of rule development and a 
notice of proposed rule; and  
 Requires the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee to review all existing rules.  
 
The bill may have a negative fiscal impact on state government. See Fiscal Comments.    STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Rulemaking  
 
Background 
The Legislature, as the sole branch of government with the inherent power to create laws,
1
 may 
delegate to agencies in the executive branch the quasi-legislative ability, or authority, to create rules.
2
 
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
3
 sets forth a uniform set of procedures agencies must follow 
when exercising delegated rulemaking authority. A rule is an agency statement of general applicability 
that interprets, implements, or prescribes law or policy, including the procedure and practice 
requirements of an agency as well as certain types of forms.
4
 Rulemaking authority is delegated by the 
Legislature through statute and authorizes agencies to “adopt, develop, establish, or otherwise create”
5
 
rules. Usually, the Legislature delegates rulemaking authority to a given agency because an agency 
has “expertise in a particular area for which they are charged with oversight.”
6
 Agencies do not have 
the discretion in and of themselves to engage in rulemaking.
7
 To adopt a rule, an agency must have a 
general grant of authority to implement a specific law by rulemaking.
8
 The grant of rulemaking authority 
itself need not be detailed. The specific statute being interpreted or implemented through rulemaking 
must provide specific standards and guidelines to preclude the administrative agency from exercising 
unbridled discretion in creating policy or applying the law.
9
 
 
An agency begins the formal rulemaking process
10
 by filing a notice of rule development of proposed 
rules in the Florida Administrative Register (FAR) indicating the subject area to be addressed by the 
rule development and including a short, plain explanation of the purpose and effect of the proposed 
rule.
11
 The notice may include the preliminary text of the proposed rule, but it is not necessary. Such 
notice is required for all rulemaking, except for rule repeals. Next, an agency must file, upon approval of 
the agency head, a notice of proposed rule.
12
 The notice of proposed rule is published by the 
Department of State (DOS) in the FAR
13
 and must contain the full text of the proposed rule or 
amendment and a summary thereof.
14
 Prior to 2012, the FAR was published weekly, resulting in a 
period of at least seven days between the publication of a notice of rule development and a notice of 
proposed rule.
15
 In 2012, the Legislature passed HB 541 (2012) that changed the FAR from a weekly 
publication to a publication that is continuously revised and, as a result, eliminated the seven day 
period between the two notices.
16
 
 
After publication of a notice of proposed rule, an agency must hold a hearing on the proposed rule if a 
person requests a hearing within 21 days.
17
 If, after the hearing is held or after the time for requesting a 
hearing has expired, the agency does not change the rule, other than a technical change, the agency 
                                                
1
 Article III, s. 1, FLA. CONST.; see also art. II, s. 3, FLA. CONST. 
2
 See Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702, 710 (Fla. 2011), stating “[r]ulemaking is a derivative of lawmaking.”  
3
 Chapter 120, F.S.  
4
 Section 120.52(16), F.S.  
5
 Section 120.52(17), F.S.  
6
 Whiley v. Scott, 79 So. 3d 702, 711 (Fla. 2011).  
7
 Section 120.54(1)(a), F.S.  
8
 Sections 120.52(8) and 120.536(1), F.S.  
9
 Sloban v. Fla. Bd. of Pharmacy, 982 So. 2d 26, 29-30 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Bd. of Trustees of the Internal Improvement 
Trust Fund v. Day Cruise Assoc., Inc., 794 So. 2d 696, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).  
10
 Alternatively, a person regulated by an agency or having a substantial interest in an agency rule may petition the 
agency to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule. Section 120.54(7)(a), F.S.  
11
 Section 120.54(2)(a), F.S. 
12
 Section 120.54(3), F.S.  
13
 Section 120.55(1)(b), F.S.  
14
 Section 120.54(3)(a)1., F.S.  
15
 Chapter 2012-63, L.O.F.  
16
 Id. 
17
 Section 120.54(3)(c), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
must file a notice stating no changes have been made to the rule with the Joint Administrative 
Procedures Committee (JAPC) at least seven days before filing the rule for adoption.
18
 However, if a 
hearing is requested, the agency may, based upon the comments received at the hearing, publish a 
notice of change.
19
 
 
As an alternative to the agency initiated process delineated above, a person regulated by the agency or 
having a substantial interest in an agency rule may petition the agency to adopt, amend, or repeal a 
rule.
20
 The petitioner must specify the proposed rule and action requested.
21
 The agency can either 
initiate rulemaking or decline to do so; however, if the agency chooses the latter, it must issue a written 
statement of the reasons for the denial.
22
 
 
Once an agency has completed the steps of rulemaking, the agency may file for rule adoption with 
DOS and the rule becomes effective 20 days later, unless a different date is indicated in the rule.
23
 
Most adopted rules are published in the Florida Administrative Code (FAC).
24
 
 
The validity of a rule or a proposed rule may be challenged at the Division of Administrative Hearings 
(DOAH)
25
 as an invalid delegation of legislative authority.
26
 An invalid delegation of legislative authority 
is an action that goes beyond the powers, functions, and duties delegated by the Legislature.
27
 A rule 
or proposed rule is an invalid delegation of legislative authority if:  
 The agency has materially failed to follow the rulemaking procedures in the APA;  
 The agency has exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority;  
 The rule enlarges, modifies, or contravenes the specific provisions of the law implemented;  
 The rule is vague, fails to establish adequate standards for agency decisions, or vests the 
agency with unbridled discretion;  
 The rule is arbitrary or capricious; or  
 The rule imposes regulatory costs on the regulated person, county, or municipality that could 
have been reduced by the adoption of less costly alternatives that substantially accomplish the 
statutory objectives.
28
 
 
An administrative law judge (ALJ) at DOAH hears the rule challenge in a de novo proceeding and, 
within 30 days of the hearing, makes a determination on the rule’s validity based upon a preponderance 
of the evidence standard.
29
 The ALJ’s decision constitutes final agency action, which means an agency 
may not alter the decision after its issuance,
30
 but an agency may appeal the decision to the District 
Court of Appeal where the agency maintains its headquarters.
31
 
 
Effect of the Bill  
 
The bill requires a notice of proposed rule to be filed within 12 months of a notice of rule development. 
If a notice of proposed rule is not filed within 12 months of the notice of rule development, the agency 
                                                
18
 Section 120.54(3)(d)1., F.S.  
19
 Id.  
20
 Section 120.54(7)(a), F.S.  
21
 Id.  
22
 Id.  
23
 Section 120.54(3)(e)6., F.S.  
24
 Rules general in form but applicable to only one school district, community college district, or county, or a part thereof, 
or a state university rules relating to internal personnel or business and finance are not published in the FAC. Forms are 
not published in the FAC. Section 120.55(1)(a), F.S. Emergency rules are also not published in the FAC.  
25
 DOAH is an agency in the executive branch, administratively housed under the Department of Management Services 
but not subject to its control. DOAH employs ALJs who serve as neutral arbiters presiding over disputes arising under the 
APA. Section 120.65, F.S. 
26
 Section 120.56(1), F.S.  
27
 Section 120.52(8), F.S.  
28
 Section 120.52(8)(a)-(f), F.S.  
29
 Section 120.56(1)(e), F.S.  
30
 Id.  
31
 Section 120.68(2)(a), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
must withdraw the rule and give notice of the withdrawal in the next issue of the FAR. The bill also 
reestablishes the mandatory seven day period between the publication of a notice of rule development 
and the publication of a notice of proposed rule in the FAR.  
 
The bill further requires that a proposed rule be withdrawn if, after issuing a notice of proposed rule, the 
agency fails to adopt it within the prescribed timeframes in the APA. Once an agency has exceeded the 
timeframe to adopt the rule, the bill requires JAPC to notify the agency of the failure. If the agency has 
not withdrawn the rule within 30 days following the notice, JAPC must notify DOS that the date for 
adoption of the rule has expired. DOS must then publish a notice of withdrawal of the proposed rule. 
 
The bill requires a notice of rule development and a notice of proposed rule to include the proposed rule 
number. 
 
The bill requires an agency to file a copy of a petition to initiate rulemaking with JAPC.  
 
The bill defines the term “technical change” to mean a change limited to correcting grammatical, 
typographical, and similar errors not affecting the substance of the rule. 
 
Joint Administrative Procedures Committee (JAPC) 
 
Background 
JAPC is a standing committee of the Legislature established by joint rule and created to maintain a 
continuous review of administrative rules, the statutory authority upon which those rules are based, and 
the administrative rulemaking process.
32
 Specifically, JAPC may examine existing rules and must 
examine each proposed rule to determine whether:  
 The rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority;  
 The statutory authority for the rule has been repealed;  
 The rule reiterates or paraphrases statutory material; 
 The rule is in proper form;  
 The notice given prior to adoption was sufficient;  
 The rule is consistent with expressed legislative intent;  
 The rule is necessary to accomplish the apparent or expressed objectives of the specific 
provision of law that the rule implements;  
 The rule is a reasonable implementation of the law as it affects the convenience of the general 
public or persons particularly affected by the rule;  
 The rule could be made less complex or more easily comprehensible to the general public;  
 The rule’s statement of estimated regulatory cost complies with the requirements of the APA 
and whether the rule does not impose regulatory costs on the regulated person, county, or 
municipality that could be reduced by the adoption of less costly alternatives that substantially 
accomplish the statutory objectives; or  
 The rule will require additional appropriations.
33
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill removes the permissive authority of JAPC to examine existing rules and makes such 
examination mandatory to align with JAPC’s mandate to examine proposed rules.    
 
 
Agency Review of Rules 
 
Background 
The APA requires each agency to annually review its rules.
34
 Although an agency may amend or repeal 
the rule, rules generally do not expire or sunset and many agencies have adopted rules that have not 
been updated in years.  
                                                
32
 Fla. Leg. J. Rule 4.6; see also s. 120.545, F.S.  
33
 Section 120.545(1), F.S.  
34
 See 120.74, F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill creates a process called “repromulgation,” whereby each agency is required to review its rules 
for consistency with the powers and duties granted by the agency’s enabling statutes. If, after reviewing 
the rule, the agency determines that substantive changes are not required, the agency must 
repromulgate the rule to reflect the date of the review. The bill defines the term “repromulgation” to 
mean the publication and adoption of an existing rule following an agency’s review of the rule for 
consistency with the powers and duties granted by its enabling statute. Each agency must review its 
rules according to the following schedule: 
 If the rule was adopted before January 1, 2014, within five years after July 1, 2022; or 
 If the rule was adopted after January 1, 2014, within 10 years after the rule is adopted.  
 
An agency, before repromulgation of a rule and upon approval of its agency head, must: 
 Publish a notice of repromulgation in the FAR, which is not required to include the text of the 
rule; and 
 File the rule with DOS. The rule may not be filed for repromulgation less than 28 days before or 
more than 90 days after the publication of the notice. 
 
An agency must file a notice of repromulgation with JAPC at least 14 days before filing the rule with 
DOS. JAPC must certify at the time of filing whether the agency has responded to all of JAPC’s 
material or written inquiries. The bill specifies that a repromulgated rule is not subject to the hearing 
requirements of the APA nor is it subject to challenge as a proposed rule.  
 
The bill requires each agency, upon approval of the agency head, to submit three certified copies of the 
repromulgated rule it proposes to adopt with DOS and one certified copy of any material incorporated 
by reference in the rule. The repromulgated rule is adopted upon its filing with DOS and becomes 
effective 20 days later. DOS must then update the history of the rule in the FAC to reflect the new 
effective date. The bill requires DOS to adopt rules to implement the bill’s repromulgation provision by 
December 31, 2022.    
 
If either an agency fails to meet the deadline to review the rule or the timeframe to file the rule for 
repromulgation, the rule is deemed repealed. After such a failure, JAPC notifies DOS that the agency 
has elected to repeal the rule. Thereafter, DOS must publish a notice of the repeal in the next issue of 
the FAR and the rule is then stricken from the files of DOS and the agency. 
 
Statement of Estimated Regulatory Cost 
 
Background 
A statement of estimated regulatory cost (SERC) is an agency estimate of the potential impact of a 
proposed rule on the public, particularly the potential costs to the public of complying with the rule as 
well as to the agency and other governmental entities to implement the rule.
35
 Agencies are 
encouraged to prepare a SERC before adopting, amending, or repealing any rule.
36
 However, a SERC 
is required if the proposed rule will have an adverse impact on small businesses or increase regulatory 
costs by more than $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after implementation of the rule.
37
 If the 
agency revises a rule before adoption and the revision increases the regulatory costs of the rule, the 
agency must revise the SERC to reflect that alteration.
38
  
 
A SERC must include:  
 A good faith estimate of the number of people and entities affected by the proposed rule;  
 A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency and other governmental entities to implement the 
proposed rule;  
                                                
35
 Section 120.541(2), F.S.  
36
 Section 120.54(3)(b)1., F.S.  
37
 Id.  
38
 Section 120.541(1)(c), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
 A good faith estimate of transactional costs likely to be incurred by people, entities, and 
governmental agencies for compliance; and  
 An analysis of the proposed rule’s impact on small businesses, counties, and municipalities.
39
 
 
The SERC must also include an economic analysis on the likelihood that the proposed rule will have an 
adverse impact in excess of $1 million within the first five years of implementation on:  
 Economic growth, private-sector job creation or employment, or private-sector investment;  
 Business competitiveness, productivity, or innovation; or  
 Regulatory costs, including any transactional costs.
40
 
 
If the economic analysis results in an adverse impact or regulatory costs in excess of $1 million within 
five years after implementation of the rule, then the rule must be ratified by the Legislature in order to 
take effect.
41
 
 
An agency’s failure to prepare a SERC can be raised in a proceeding at DOAH to invalidate a rule as 
an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, if it is raised within one year of the effective date of 
the rule and is raised by a person whose substantial interests are affected by the regulatory costs of the 
rule.
42
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill requires each agency to have a website where each of its SERCs may be viewed in their 
entirety. DOS must include on the FAR website the agency website addresses where the SERCs can 
be viewed. An agency must provide in its notice of proposed rule the agency website address where 
the SERC can be viewed. If an agency revises a SERC, it must provide a notice that a revision has 
been made and include an agency website address where the revision can be viewed for publication on 
the FAR website.  
 
The bill clarifies the elements an agency must consider in a SERC when evaluating the economic 
impacts of the rule. Specifically, the bill requires agency estimates of economic, market, and small 
business impacts likely to result from compliance with the proposed rule to consider elements such as: 
 Increased or decreased consumer prices or value of goods and services;  
 Increased costs due to obtaining substitute or alternative products or services;  
 The value of time expended by business owners and other business personnel to comply with 
the proposed rule;  
 Capital costs incurred to comply with the proposed rule; and  
 Other impacts suggested by the rules ombudsman or interested persons.  
 
In addition, the bill replaces the term “transactional costs” with “compliance costs,” requires agencies to 
consider all direct and indirect costs of compliance, and provides 18 specific types of compliance costs 
as examples for agencies to consider in their evaluation, including: 
 Filing fees; 
 Costs of obtaining a license;  
 Costs to obtain, install, and maintain equipment necessary for compliance; 
 Costs related to accounting, financial, and information management processes, as well as other 
administrative processes;  
 Labor costs;  
 Costs of education, training, and testing necessary for compliance; and  
 Allocation of administrative and other overhead costs.  
 
The bill allows agencies to survey individuals, businesses, business organizations, counties, and 
municipalities to collect data helpful to estimate and analyze the costs and impacts of the proposed 
rule. Each notice of proposed rule must also contain a summary of the SERC describing the regulatory 
                                                
39
 Section 120.541(2)(b)-(e), F.S.  
40
 Section 120.541(2)(a), F.S.  
41
 Section 120.541(3), F.S.  
42
 Section 120.541(1)(f), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
impact of the proposed rule in readable language. Additionally, if an agency holds a hearing on a 
proposed rule, the bill requires the agency to ensure that the person responsible for preparing the 
SERC be made available to respond to questions or comments.  
 
Lower Cost Regulatory Alternative 
 
Background 
A person substantially affected by a proposed rule may, within 21 days after the publication of a notice 
of adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule, submit a lower cost regulatory alternative (LCRA).
43
 The 
LCRA must be a written proposal, made in good faith, that substantially accomplishes the objectives of 
the law being implemented.
44
 A LCRA may recommend that a rule not be adopted at all, if it explains 
how the “lower costs and objectives of the law will be achieved by not adopting any rule.”
45
 If a LCRA is 
submitted to an agency, the agency must prepare a SERC if one has not been previously prepared, or 
revise its prior SERC, and either adopt the LCRA or provide a statement to explain the reasons for 
rejecting the LCRA.
46
 Additionally, if a LCRA is submitted, the 90-day period for filing a rule is extended 
an additional 21 days.
47
 At least 21 days before filing a rule for adoption, an agency that is required to 
revise a SERC in response to a LCRA must provide the SERC to the person who submitted the LCRA 
and to JAPC and must provide notice on the agency’s website that it is available to the public.
48
 
 
Just as in the case of an agency’s failure to prepare a SERC, an agency’s failure to respond to a LCRA 
may be raised in a proceeding at DOAH to invalidate a rule as an invalid delegation of legislative 
authority if it is raised within one year of the effective date of the rule and is raised by a person whose 
substantial interests are affected by the regulatory costs of the rule.
49
 
 
Effect of the Bill  
The bill specifies that a LCRA may be submitted after a notice of proposed rule or a notice of change. If 
submitted after the latter, the LCRA is deemed to have been made in good faith only if the person 
reasonably believes, and the proposal states the reasons for believing, that the proposed rule as 
changed by the notice of change increases the regulatory costs or creates an adverse impact on small 
business.  
 
The bill allows an agency receiving a LCRA to have the choice of modifying the proposed rule to reduce 
regulatory costs in addition to either adopting the LCRA or stating its reasons for rejecting it in favor of 
the proposed rule. If the rule is modified, the agency must revise its SERC, if one has been prepared. If 
the agency rejects the LCRA or modifies the proposed rule, the agency must state its reasons for 
rejecting the LCRA in favor of the proposed or modified rule. When a SERC is revised because a 
change to a proposed rule increases the projected regulatory costs or the agency modified the rule in 
response to a LCRA, a summary of the revised SERC must be included in subsequent published 
rulemaking notices. Under the bill, the revised SERC must be provided to the rules ombudsman, the 
party that submitted the LCRA, and JAPC, and must be published in the same manner as the original 
SERC.  
 
The bill requires an agency to provide a copy of a LCRA to JAPC at least 21 days prior to filing the rule 
for adoption.    
 
Emergency Rules 
 
Background 
                                                
43
 Section 120.541(1)(a), F.S.  
44
 Id.  
45
 Id.  
46
 Id.  
47
 Id.  
48
 Section 120.541(1)(d), F.S.  
49
 Section 120.541(1)(f), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 8 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
Agencies are authorized to respond to immediate dangers to the public health, safety, or welfare by 
adopting emergency rules.
50
 Emergency rules are not adopted using the same procedures required of 
other rules.
51
 The notice of the emergency rule and the text of the rule is published in the first available 
issue of the FAR, however, there is no requirement that an emergency rule be published in the FAC.
52
 
The agency must publish prior to, or contemporaneous with, the rule’s promulgation the specific facts 
and reasons for finding an immediate danger to the public health, safety, or welfare.
53
 The agency’s 
findings of immediate danger are judicially reviewable.
54
 Emergency rules are effective immediately, or 
on a date less than 20 days after filing if specified in rule,
55
 but are only effective for a period of no 
longer than 90 days.
56
 An emergency rule is not renewable, except when the agency has initiated 
rulemaking to adopt rules relating to the subject of the emergency rule and a challenge to the proposed 
rules has been filed and remains pending or the proposed rules are awaiting ratification by the 
Legislature.
57
  
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill requires emergency rules to be published in the FAC. The bill also allows an agency to make 
technical changes to the emergency rule within the first seven days after adoption and prohibits an 
agency from superseding an emergency rule currently in effect. The bill clarifies that an emergency rule 
is not subject to the legislative ratification process.
58
 
 
Small Business Impact in Rulemaking 
 
Background 
Each agency, before the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a rule, must consider the impact of the rule 
on small businesses.
59
 If the agency determines that the proposed action will affect small businesses, 
the agency must send written notice to the rules ombudsman
60
 in the Executive Office of the Governor 
at least 28 days before the intended action.
61
 The agency must adopt the regulatory alternatives offered 
by the rules ombudsman if it finds the alternatives are feasible and consistent with the stated objectives 
of the proposed rule and would reduce the impact on small businesses.
62
  
 
If the agency does not adopt the alternatives offered, before rule adoption or amendment, the agency 
must file a detailed written statement with JAPC explaining the reasons for failure to adopt such 
alternatives.
63
 
                                                
50
 Section 120.54(4), F.S.  
51
 Section 120.54(4)(a), F.S.  
52
 Section 120.54(4)(a)3., F.S.  
53
 Id.  
54
 Id.  
55
 Section 120.54(4)(d), F.S.  
56
 Section 120.54(4)(c), F.S.  
57
 Id.  
58
 In 2011, the Legislature passed two bills, CS/CS/CS/HB 993 (2011) and CS/CS/CS/HB 849 (2011) that contained 
conflicting provisions concerning the exemption of emergency rules from the legislative ratification process. In one bill, 
CS/CS/CS/HB 993 (2011), the provision exempting emergency rules in s. 120.541(4), F.S., from the legislative ratification 
process was expressly included in the bill. In the other, CS/CS/CS/HB 849 (2011), the provision was erroneously deleted, 
leading to a statutory conflict. In 2013, the Legislature passed CS/CS/SB 1410 (2013), which amended s. 120.541(4), 
F.S., to correct a cross reference and in the process the bill erroneously continued the omission of the provision 
exempting emergency rules. This bill corrects those previous errors by reinstating the provision exempting emergency 
rules from the legislative ratification process.  
59
 Section 120.54(3)(b)2., F.S.  
60
 The Governor must appoint a rules ombudsman in the Executive Office of the Governor for purposes of considering the 
impact of agency rules on the state citizens and businesses. The rules ombudsman must carry out the duties related to 
rule adoption procedures with respect to small businesses; review agency rules that adversely or disproportionately 
impact businesses, particularly those relating to small and minority businesses; and make recommendations on any 
existing or proposed rules to alleviate unnecessary or disproportionate adverse effects to business. Each agency must 
cooperate fully with the rules ombudsman in identifying such rules and take the necessary steps to waive, modify, or 
otherwise minimize the adverse effects of any such rules. Section 288.7015, F.S 
61
 Section 120.54(3)(b)2.b.(I), F.S.  
62
 Section 120.54(3)(b)2.b.(II), F.S.  
63
 Section 120.54(3)(b)2.b.(III), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 9 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill requires an adverse impact on small business to be found if:  
 An owner, officer, operator, or manager of a small business must complete any education, 
training, or testing to comply with the proposed rule in the first year;  
 An owner, officer, operator, or manager of a small business is likely to expend 10 hours or 
purchase professional advice to understand and comply with the rule in the first year;  
 Taxes or fees assessed on transactions are likely to increase by $500 or more in the aggregate 
in one year because of the rule;  
 Prices charged for goods and services are restricted or are likely to increase because of the 
rule;  
 Specially trained, licensed, or tested employees will be required;  
 Operating costs are expected to increase by at least $1,000 annually; or 
 Capital expenditures in excess of $1,000 are necessary to comply with the rule.  
 
If the rules ombudsman of the Executive Office of the Governor provides a regulatory alternative to the 
agency to lessen the impact of the rule on small businesses, the bill requires the agency to provide the 
regulatory alternative to JAPC at least 21 days before filing the rule for adoption.  
 
Incorporation by Reference 
 
Background 
The APA allows an agency to incorporate material external to the text of the rule by reference.
64
 The 
material to be incorporated must exist on the date the rule is adopted.
65
 If after the rule has been 
adopted the agency wishes to alter the material incorporated by reference, the rule itself must be 
amended for the change to be effective.
66
 However, an agency rule that incorporates another rule by 
reference automatically incorporates subsequent amendments to the referenced rule.
67
 A rule cannot 
be amended by reference only.
68
 An agency may not incorporate a rule by reference unless:  
 The material has been submitted in the prescribed electronic format to DOS and the full text of 
the material can be made available for free public access through an electronic hyperlink from 
the rule making the reference in the FAC; or 
 The agency has determined that posting the material publicly on the internet would constitute a 
violation of federal copyright law, in which case a statement stating such, along with the address 
of locations at DOS and the agency at which the material is available for public inspection and 
examination, must be included in the notice.
69
 
 
DOS has adopted a rule governing the requirements for materials incorporated by reference through an 
adopted rule.
70
 The rule requires each agency incorporating material by reference in an administrative 
rule to certify that the materials incorporated have been filed with DOS electronically or, if the agency 
claims the posting of the material would constitute a violation of federal copyright law, the location 
where the public may view the material.
71
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
Beginning July 1, 2022, the bill requires an agency, in all notices of rulemaking, repromulgated rules, or 
rule modifications that include material incorporated by reference, to submit the incorporated material in 
the prescribed electronic format to DOS with the full text available for free public access through an 
electronic hyperlink. Alternatively, if an agency determines that posting the incorporated material on the 
internet would constitute a violation of federal copyright law, the agency must include in the notice a 
                                                
64
 Section 120.54(1)(i)1., F.S.; see also r. 1-1.013, F.A.C.  
65
 Section 120.54(1)(i)1., F.S.  
66
 Id.  
67
 Section 120.54(1)(i)2., F.S.  
68
 Section 120.54(1)(i)4., F.S.  
69
 Section 120.54(1)(i)3., F.S.  
70
 Rule 1-1.013, F.A.C.  
71
 Rule 1-1.013(5)(d), F.A.C.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 10 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
statement to that effect, along with the addresses of locations at DOS and the agency at which the 
material is available for public inspection and examination.  
 
The bill requires DOS to prescribe by rule that material incorporated by reference included in a notice of 
proposed rule and a notice of change be formatted in such a way that additions to the text appear 
underlined and deletions appear as text stricken through.  
 
Annual Regulatory Review 
 
Background 
Annually, each agency must prepare a regulatory plan that includes a list of each law enacted during 
the previous 12 months, which creates or modifies the duties or authority of the agency, and state 
whether the agency must adopt rules to implement the newly adopted laws.
72
 The plan must also 
include a list of each additional law not otherwise listed that the agency expects to implement by 
rulemaking before the following July 1, except emergency rules.
73
 The plan must include a certification 
by the agency head or, if the agency head is a collegial body, the presiding officer, and the individual 
acting as principal legal advisor to the agency verifying the persons have reviewed the plan, verifying 
the agency regularly reviews all of its rules, and identifying the period during which all rules have most 
recently been reviewed to determine if the rules remain consistent with the agency’s rulemaking 
authority and the laws implemented.
74
 By October 1 of each year, the plan must be published on the 
agency’s website or on another state website established for publication of administrative law records 
with a hyperlink to the plan.
75
 The agency must also deliver a copy of the certification to JAPC and 
publish a notice in the FAR identifying the date of publication of the agency’s regulatory plan.
76
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill replaces the requirement that the annual regulatory plan include a listing of each law it expects 
to implement with rulemaking with the requirement that the plan identify and describe each rule, by rule 
number or proposed rule number, that the agency expects to develop, adopt, or repeal for the 12 month 
period beginning October 1 and ending September 30. The annual regulatory plan must identify any 
rules required to be repromulgated for the 12-month period.  
 
The bill also requires that the annual regulatory plan contain a declaration that the agency head and the 
general counsel understand that regulatory accountability is necessary to ensure public confidence in 
the integrity of state government and to that end the agency is diligently working toward lowering the 
total number of rules adopted. The bill requires the declaration to contain the total number of rules 
adopted and repealed during the previous 12 months.  
 
Florida Administrative Code 
 
Background 
The FAC is an electronic compilation of all rules adopted by each agency and maintained by DOS.
77
 
DOS retains the copyright over the FAC.
78
 
 
Each rule in the FAC must cite the grant of rulemaking authority and the specific law implemented.
79
 
Rules applicable to only one school district, community college district, or county or state university 
rules relating to internal personnel or business and finance are not required to be included in the FAC.
80
 
DOS is required to publish the following information at the beginning of each section of the code 
concerning an agency: 
                                                
72
 Section 120.74(1)(a), F.S.  
73
 Section 120.74(1)(b), F.S.  
74
 Section 120.74(1)(d), F.S.  
75
 Section 120.74(2)(a)1., F.S. 
76
 Sections 120.74(2)(a)2. and 120.74(2)(a)3., F.S.  
77
 Section 120.55(1)(a)1., F.S.  
78
 Id.  
79
 Id.  
80
 Section 120.55(1)(a)2., F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 11 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
 The address and telephone number of the executive offices of the agency;  
 The manner by which the agency indexes its rules; and  
 A listing of all rules of that agency excluded from publication in the FAC and a statement as to 
where those rules may be inspected.
81
 
 
DOS is required to adopt rules allowing adopted rules and materials incorporated by reference to be 
filed in electronic form.
82
 Further, DOS is required to prescribe by rule the style and form required for 
rules, notices, and other materials submitted for filing in the FAC.
83
 The rule DOS has adopted requires 
rules that are being amended to be coded by underlining new text and by striking through deleted 
text.
84
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill requires the FAC be published once daily, by no later than 8 a.m. If, after publication, a rule is 
corrected and replaced, the FAC must indicate the rule has been republished and indicate DOS has 
corrected it. The bill also requires the history note appended to each rule include the date of any 
technical changes to the rule and provides such change does not affect the rule’s effective date.  
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1 amends s. 120.52, F.S., relating to definitions applicable to the APA.  
 
Section 2 amends s. 120.54, F.S., relating to rulemaking procedures.  
 
Section 3 amends s. 120.541, F.S., relating to SERCs.  
 
Section 4 creates s. 120.5435, F.S., relating to the repromulgation of rules.  
 
Section 5 amends s. 120.545, F.S., relating to JAPC review of agency rules.  
 
Section 6 amends s. 120.55, F.S., relating to publication requirements in the APA.  
 
Section 7 amends s. 120.74, F.S., relating to agency annual rulemaking and regulatory plans.  
 
Section 8 amends s. 120.80, F.S., relating to agency exceptions and special requirements.  
 
Section 9 amends s. 120.81, F.S., relating to general area exceptions and special requirements.  
 
Section 10 amends s. 420.9072, F.S., relating to the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program.  
 
Section 11 amends s. 420.9075, F.S., relating to local housing assistance plans.  
 
Section 12 amends s. 443.091, F.S., relating to reemployment benefit eligibility conditions.  
 
Section 13 provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.  
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
                                                
81
 Section 120.55(1)(a)3., F.S.  
82
 Section 120.55(1)(a)5., F.S.  
83
 Section 120.55(1)(c), F.S.  
84
 Rule 1-1.010(5)(a), F.A.C. referencing r. 1-1.011(3)(c), F.A.C.   STORAGE NAME: h0337.GOS 	PAGE: 12 
DATE: 1/10/2022 
  
 
2. Expenditures: 
See Fiscal Comments.  
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None.  
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None.  
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
The bill requires each agency to review and repromulgate its rules, includes additional requirements to 
comply with notice, publication, and hearing requirements of rules, and includes additional 
requirements for SERCs. Agencies may be required to expend funds to implement requirements of the 
bill. It is unclear whether these new requirements could be absorbed within each agencies existing 
resources. For example, regulatory agencies such as the Department of Business and Professional 
Regulation and the Department of Health may need additional resources to comply with repromulgation 
of rules. However, the bill specifies that agencies have to complete rule review within five years for 
rules adopted before January 1, 2014 and within 10 years for rules adopted after January 1, 2014. 
Agencies should have sufficient time to request additional resources through the Legislative Budget 
Request process should it be determined additional resources will be required to implement the 
provisions of the bill.  
 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. The bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments.  
 
 2. Other: 
None.  
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The bill requires DOS to adopt rules to implement the provisions of the bill concerning repromulgation. 
The bill gives DOS until December 31, 2022, to adopt such rules. The bill’s provisions regarding 
repromulgation provide DOS with sufficient direction to guide the department in the creation of the 
rules.  
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None.  
 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/ COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
Not applicable.