Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0791 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/23/2022

                     
This document does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0791z.HHS.DOCX 
DATE: 3/4/2022 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF FINAL BILL ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: HM 791    Organ Harvesting Practices of the People's Republic of China 
SPONSOR(S): Fischer and others 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SM 1108 
 
 
 
 
FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: N/A Y’s 
 
N/A  N’s  GOVERNOR’S ACTION: Pending 
 
 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
HM 791 was adopted by the House on February 22, 2022, and subsequently adopted by the Senate on March 
2, 2022. 
 
Organ donation is the process of surgically removing an organ or tissue from a donor and transplanting it into 
a recipient. Transplanting in such cases is necessary because the recipient’s organ has failed or has been 
damaged by disease or injury. Transplantable organs include the liver, kidneys, pancreas, heart, lung, and 
intestine. Forced organ harvesting is removing a person’s organ, or part of an organ, without their consent, 
which can cause the death of the ‘donor’. 
 
Before 2005, the People’s Republic of China (China) relied on organ procurement from executed prisoners. 
China publicly admitted to the use of organs from executed prisoners for transplants in 2005, with up to 95 
percent of the organ transplants in China deriving from prisoner executions. In 2010, China began developing 
a voluntary organ donation and allocation infrastructure, and announced that hospital-based voluntary 
donations would be the sole source of organs beginning in 2015; however, no changes to laws or regulations 
accompanied such announcement. The use of prisoner organs remains legal in China. An independent 
tribunal documented that more organ transplants take place than the voluntary donations would support, and 
concluded that forced organ harvesting continues in China. 
 
HM 791 urges the President and Congress to: 
 
 Condemn China for the practice of forcibly removing human organs for transplants; 
 Pass legislation and measures that prohibit collaboration between U.S. pharmaceutical and medical 
companies and any Chinese counterparts linked to forced organ harvesting; and 
 Ban people who have participated in forced organ harvesting from entering the U.S. and provide for 
the prosecution of such people. 
 
This memorial has no fiscal impact on state or local governments. 
 
The memorial is not subject to the Governor’s veto powers.    
STORAGE NAME: h0791z.HHS.DOCX 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 3/4/2022 
  
I. SUBSTANTIVE INFORMATION 
 
A. EFFECT OF CHANGES:  
 
Background 
 
Organ and Tissue Donation in the United States 
 
Organ and tissue donation is the process of surgically removing an organ or tissue from one person 
(the donor) and transplanting it into another person (the recipient). Transplanting in such cases is 
necessary because the recipient’s organ has failed or has been damaged by disease or injury.
1
 
Transplantable organs include the liver, kidneys, pancreas, heart, lung, and intestine.
2
 Transplantable 
tissue includes skin, used as a temporary dressing for burns, serious abrasions, and other exposed 
areas; bone is used in orthopedic surgery to facilitate healing of fractures or prevent amputation; heart 
valves are used to replace defective valves; tendons are used to repair torn ligaments on knees or 
other joints; veins are used in cardiac by-pass surgery; and corneas can restore sight.
3
 A single organ 
donor can save up to eight lives and over 75 more can be improved through organ donation.
4
  
 
Despite advances in medicine and technology, and increased awareness of organ donation and 
transplantation, more donors are needed to meet the demand for transplants.
5
 As of January 2022, 
120,000 children and adults are waiting for a life-saving organ transplant, including 5,000 Floridians.
6
 In 
2021, 41,354 organ transplants were performed in the United States, reflecting an increase of 5.9 
percent from 2020.
7
 Living donor transplants on the other hand significantly decreased in 2020 due to 
COVID-19.
8
 While they increased in 2021, the numbers remain lower than in previous years. In 2021, a 
total of 6,541 living donor transplants were performed nationwide.
9
   
 
Forced organ harvesting is removing a person’s organ, or part of an organ, without their consent, which 
can cause the death of the ‘donor.’
10
 Under federal law, it is unlawful for any person to knowingly 
acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration for use in human 
transplantation if the transfer affects interstate commerce.
11
 Additionally, Florida, s. 787.06, F.S., 
prohibits the transporting, soliciting, recruiting, harboring, providing, enticing, maintaining, purchasing, 
patronizing, procuring, or obtaining of persons for the removal of organs as human trafficking.
12,13
 
 
 
 
 
Forced Organ Harvesting in China 
                                                
1
 Cleveland Clinic, Organ Donation and Transplantation, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/11750-organ-donation-and-
transplantation#:~:text=Organ%20donation%20is%20the%20process%20of%20surgically%20removing,one%20of%20the%20great%2
0advances%20in%20modern%20medicine (last visited March 8, 2022).  
2
 Id.  
3
 Donate Life Florida, Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.donatelifeflorida.org/categories/donation/ (last visited March 8, 2022).  
4
 Health Resources and Services Administration, What Can Be Donated, https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/what-can-be-donated (last 
visited March 8, 2022). https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/ (last visited Jan. 28, 2022).  
5
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, 
https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/news/all-time-records-again-set-in-2021-for-organ-transplants-organ-donation-from-deceased-donors/ 
(last visited March 8, 2022).  
6
 Supra, note 3.  
7
 Supra, note 5.  
8
 Id. 
9
 Id. 
10
 The Independent Tribunal into Forced Organ Harvesting from Prisoners of Conscience in China, Judgment, March 1, 2020, 
https://chinatribunal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ChinaTribunal_JUDGMENT_1stMarch_2020.pdf (last visited March 8, 2022).  
11
 42 U.S.C. s.274(e) 
12
 S. 787.06(2)(d), F.S. 
13
 In Florida’s human trafficking law, the removal of organs is included in the definition of “services,” among forced marriage, servitude, 
and other acts. S.787.06(2)(h), F.S.   
STORAGE NAME: h0791z.HHS.DOCX 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 3/4/2022 
  
 
Before 2005, the People’s Republic of China’s (China) organ transplant practices relied on forced organ 
harvesting and organ procurement from executed prisoners. The rate of voluntary donation of organs 
was low due to a lack of a cadaver organ donation system and overall donation system. Between 1977 
and 2009, a total of 130 voluntary deceased organ donations were reported, however approximately 
120,000 total organs were reported as transplanted in China during the same period. China publicly 
admitted to the use of organs from executed prisoners for transplants in 2005, with up to 95 percent of 
the organ transplants in China deriving from prisoner executions.
14
 
 
Beginning in 2010, China began reforming its organ transplantation system by developing a voluntary 
organ donation and allocation infrastructure, and requiring all organ transplants to be allocated solely 
through the China Organ Transplant Response System (COTRS).
15
 The organ procurement, 
transplant, and allocation data contained in COTRS is not publicly available.
16
 China’s practice of organ 
procurement shifted from prisons to hospital-based voluntary donors declared dead by physicians.
17
 
Chinese officials announced that hospital-based voluntary donations would be the sole source of 
organs beginning in 2015, however no changes to laws or regulations accompanied such 
announcement, meaning the use of prisoner organs remains legal.
18
 
 
United Nations Concerns 
 
In June, 2021, a group of United Nations (U.N.) human rights experts raised concerns over China 
carrying out forced organ harvesting on detainees from ethnic, linguistic, or religious minorities, 
including Falun Gong practitioners, Uyghurs, Tibetans, Muslims, and Christians. Such detainees may 
be forcibly subjected to blood tests and organ examinations through ultrasounds and x-rays, without 
informed consent, the results of which are entered into COTRS. The U.N. reports detainees are held 
without explanation of or warrants for their arrest. The most common organs removed from prisoners 
are hearts, kidneys, livers, and corneas.
19
 
 
The Chinese Government responded to the U.N. in September, 2021, stating that the allegations of 
organ harvesting came from “actors” who “repeatedly engage in slander and rumor-mongering on the 
issue of human rights in China.”
20
 
 
  
                                                
14
 Kirk, Allison C., et al, BMC Med Ethics 16, Article number 85 (2015), “Historical development and current status of organ 
procurement from death-row prisoners in China,” https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-015-0074-0 (last 
visited March 8, 2022) 
15
 Id. 
16
 Robertson, Matthew P., et al, BMC Medical Ethics 20, Article number 79 (2019), “Analysis of official deceased organ donation data 
casts doubt on the credibility of China’s organ transplant reform,” https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-
019-0406-6 (last visited March 8, 2022). 
17
 Supra, note 14 
18
 Paul, Norbert W, et al, BMC Med Ethics 18, Article number 11 (2017), “Human rights violations in organ procurement practice in 
China,” https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-017-0169-x (last visited March 8, 2022). 
19
 United Nations Human Rights – Office of the High Commissioner, China: UN human rights experts alarmed by ‘organ harvesting’ 
allegations, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=27167&LangID=E (last visited March 8, 2022). 
20
 Permanent Mission of the People’s republic of China, Reply from China dated 9 August 2021 to the Office of the High Commissioner 
for Human rights, published Oct. 9, 2021, https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadFile?gId=36489 (last visited 
March 8, 2022)   
STORAGE NAME: h0791z.HHS.DOCX 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 3/4/2022 
  
China Tribunal 
 
The China Tribunal (Tribunal) is an independent body established by the International Coalition to End 
Transplant Abuse in China
21
 to look into forced organ harvesting from individuals and prisoners of 
conscience in China and to investigate what criminal offenses, if any, have been committed by state or 
state-approved organizations or individuals in China who may have been engaged in forced organ 
harvesting.
22
 The Tribunal has seven members from various countries outside of China, including 
England, the U.S., Iran, and Malaysia. Members include multiple human rights attorneys, a medical 
school professor, a historian, and a businessman. The focus of the Tribunal was on forced harvesting 
that results in death, as no evidence exists of forced harvesting where the ‘donor’ survives.
23
  
 
The Tribunal analyzed witness statements, publicly available information and admissions from the 
Chinese government, and telephone calls to Chinese hospitals and government officials.
24
 The Tribunal 
reported that:
25
 
 
 Wait times promised by Chinese doctors and hospitals for organs to be available were 
extraordinarily short; 
 Minority populations, including Falun Gong and Uyghurs were tortured; 
 The number of transplants performed were much greater than the number of eligible, voluntary 
donors; and 
 A massive infrastructure development of facilities and medical personnel for organ transplant 
operations was underway before a voluntary donor system was planned. 
 
The Tribunal concluded that there must have been another unidentified source of organs other than 
voluntary donors and that there is no evidence the practice of forced harvesting has stopped. The 
unidentified sources were likely prisoners of conscience, including Falun Gong practitioners, Tibetan 
Buddhists, House Church Christians, and the Uyghurs.
26
  
 
Legislative Memorials  
 
Legislative memorials are not subject to the Governor’s veto power and are not presented to the 
Governor for review. Memorials have no force of law, as they are mechanisms for formally petitioning 
the federal government to act on a particular subject. 
 
Effect of the Memorial 
 
HM 791 urges the President and Congress to: 
 
 Condemn China for the practice of forcibly removing human organs for transplants; 
 Pass legislation and measures that prohibit collaboration between U.S. pharmaceutical and 
medical companies and any Chinese counterparts linked to forced organ harvesting; and 
 Ban people who have participated in forced organ harvesting from entering the U.S. and provide 
for the prosecution of such people. 
 
                                                
21
 The International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China, established in 2014, is a non-profit, independent, non-partisan coalition 
composed of lawyers, academics, ethicists, medical professionals, researchers, and human rights activists dedicated to ending forced 
organ harvesting ion China. Its Advisory Committee contains members from multiple countries outside of China, including Australia, 
Canada, the United States, New Zealand, and a former surgeon from China who is currently based in the United Kingdom. 
22
 China Tribunal, China Tribunal – Independent Tribunal into Forced Organ Harvesting from Prisoners of Conscience in China, 
https://chinatribunal.com/ (last visited March 8, 2022). A prisoner of conscience is any person who is physically restrained (by 
imprisonment or otherwise) from expressing an opinion which he or she honestly holds and which does not advocate or condone 
personal violence. 
23
 Id. 
24
 Id. 
25
 Id. 
26
 Id.   
STORAGE NAME: h0791z.HHS.DOCX 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 3/4/2022 
  
Legislative memorials are not subject to the Governor’s veto power and are not presented to the 
Governor for review. Memorials have no force of law, as they are mechanisms for formally petitioning 
the federal government to act on a particular subject. 
 
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
 
  
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None.