This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0861.PPH
DATE: 1/24/2022
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: HB 861 Medical Specialty Designations
SPONSOR(S): Massullo
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1192
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Professions & Public Health Subcommittee Morris McElroy
2) Health & Human Services Committee
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
The Division of Medical Quality Assurance (MQA), within the Department of Health (DOH), has general
regulatory authority over health care practitioners. The MQA works in conjunction with 22 boards and four
councils to license and regulate seven types of health care facilities and more than 40 health care professions.
An unlicensed individual may be subject to administrative action or criminal penalties if the individual states or
otherwise implies that he or she is a licensed medical professional. This may include the use of certain terms
or titles that the public generally associates with a specific medical profession. DOH does not license a health
care practitioner’s specialty or sub-specialty based upon board certification, but does limit who can hold
themselves out as board-certified specialists.
HB 861 makes using a term designating a medical specialty grounds for discipline of a practitioner unless the
practitioner has completed a residency or fellowship program accredited or recognized by the Accreditation
Council for Graduate Medical Education in such specialty. The bill also requires DOH to discipline a
practitioner who violates the bill’s provisions and grants DOH the same enforcement authority as the applicable
board.
The bill has an indeterminate, negative fiscal impact on DOH, which current resources are adequate to absorb.
The bill has no fiscal impact on local governments.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2022. STORAGE NAME: h0861.PPH PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/24/2022
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Present Situation
Licensure and Regulation of Health Care Practitioners
The Division of Medical Quality Assurance (MQA), within the Department of Health (DOH), has general
regulatory authority over health care practitioners.
1
The MQA works in conjunction with 22 boards and
four councils to license and regulate seven types of health care facilities and more than 40 health care
professions.
2
Each profession is regulated by an individual practice act and by ch. 456, F.S., which
provides general regulatory and licensure authority for the MQA. MQA is statutorily responsible for the
following boards and professions established within the division:
3
The Board of Acupuncture, created under ch. 457, F.S.;
The Board of Medicine, created under ch. 458, F.S.;
The Board of Osteopathic Medicine, created under ch. 459, F.S.;
The Board of Chiropractic Medicine, created under ch. 460, F.S.;
The Board of Podiatric Medicine, created under ch. 461, F.S.;
Naturopathy, as provided under ch. 462, F.S.;
The Board of Optometry, created under ch. 463, F.S.;
The Board of Nursing, created under part I of ch. 464, F.S.;
Nursing assistants, as provided under part II of ch. 464, F.S.;
The Board of Pharmacy, created under ch. 465, F.S.;
The Board of Dentistry, created under ch. 466, F.S.;
Midwifery, as provided under ch. 467, F.S.;
The Board of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, created under part I of ch. 468, F.S.;
The Board of Nursing Home Administrators, created under part II of ch. 468, F.S.;
The Board of Occupational Therapy, created under part III of ch. 468, F.S.;
Respiratory therapy, as provided under part V of ch. 468, F.S.;
Dietetics and nutrition practice, as provided under part X of ch. 468, F.S.;
The Board of Athletic Training, created under part XIII of ch. 468, F.S.;
The Board of Orthotists and Prosthetists, created under part XIV of ch. 468, F.S.;
Electrolysis, as provided under ch. 478, F.S.;
The Board of Massage Therapy, created under ch. 480, F.S.;
The Board of Clinical Laboratory Personnel, created under part III of ch. 483, F.S.;
Medical physicists, as provided under part IV of ch. 483, F.S.;
The Board of Opticianry, created under part I of ch. 484, F.S.;
The Board of Hearing Aid Specialists, created under part II of ch. 484, F.S.;
The Board of Physical Therapy Practice, created under ch. 486, F.S.;
The Board of Psychology, created under ch. 490, F.S.;
School psychologists, as provided under ch. 490, F.S.;
The Board of Clinical Social Work, Marriage and Family Therapy, and Mental Health
Counseling, created under ch. 491, F.S.; and
Emergency medical technicians and paramedics, as provided under part III of ch. 401, F.S.
1
Pursuant to s. 456.001(4), F.S., health care practitioners are defined to include acupuncturists, physicians, physician assistants,
chiropractors, podiatrists, naturopaths, dentists, dental hygienists, optometrists, nurses, nursing assistants, pharmacists, midwives,
speech language pathologists, nursing home administrators, occupational therapists, respiratory therapists, dieticians, athletic trainers,
orthotists, prosthetists, electrologists, massage therapists, clinical laboratory personnel, medical physicists, dispensers of optical
devices or hearing aids, physical therapists, psychologists, social workers, counselors, and psychotherapists, among others.
2
Florida Department of Health, Division of Medical Quality Assurance, Annual Report and Long-Range Plan, Fiscal Year 2019-2020, p.
5, http://www.floridahealth.gov/licensing-and-regulation/reports-and-publications/_documents/2019-2020-annual-report.pdf (last visited
April 16, 2021).
3
Section 456.001(4), F.S; Id. STORAGE NAME: h0861.PPH PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/24/2022
Board Certification and Florida Licensure
DOH does not license health care practitioners by specialty or subspecialty; however, current law limits
which health care practitioners may hold themselves out as board-certified specialists. An allopathic
physician may not hold himself or herself out as a board-certified specialist unless he or she has
received formal recognition as a specialist from a specialty board of the American Board of Medical
Specialties (ABMS) or other recognizing agency
4
approved by the allopathic board.
5
Additionally, an
allopathic physician may not hold himself or herself out as a board-certified specialist in dermatology
unless the recognizing agency, whether authorized in statute or by rule, is triennially reviewed and
reauthorized by the allopathic board.
6
Similarly, an osteopathic physician may not hold himself or
herself out as a board-certified specialist unless he or she has successfully completed the requirements
for certification by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) or the Accreditation Council on
Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and is certified as a specialist by a certifying agency
7
approved
by the board.
8
A dentist may not hold himself or herself out as a specialist, or advertise membership in or specialty
recognition by an accrediting organization, unless the dentist has completed a specialty education
program approved by the American Dental Association and the Commission on Dental Accreditation
and the dentist is:
9
Eligible for examination by a national specialty board recognized by the American Dental
Association; or
Is a diplomate of a national specialty board recognized by the American Dental Association.
If a dentist announces or advertises a specialty practice for which there is not an approved accrediting
organization, the dentist must clearly state that the specialty is not recognized or that the accrediting
organization has not been approved by the American Dental Association or the Florida Board of
Dentistry.
10
Additionally, advanced practice registered nurses may not advertise or hold themselves out as a
specialist for which he or she has not received certification.
11
Discipline of Health Care Practitioners
Section 456.072, F.S., authorizes a regulatory board or DOH, if there is no board, to discipline a health
care practitioner’s licensure for a number of offenses, including but not limited to:
Making misleading, deceptive, or fraudulent representations in or related to the practice of the
licensee’s profession; or
Failing to identify through writing or orally to a patient the type of license under which the
practitioner is practicing.
Using a term designating a medical specialty unless the practitioner has completed a residency or
fellowship program accredited or recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical
Education in such specialty is not ground for discipline under current law.
If the board or DOH finds that a licensee committed a violation, the board or DOH may:
12
4
The allopathic board has approved the specialty boards of the ABMS as recognizing agencies. Rule 64B8-11.001(1)(f), F.A.C.
5
Section 458.3312, F.S.
6
Id.
7
The osteopathic board has approved the specialty boards of the ABMS and AOA as recognizing agencies. Rule 64B15-14.001(h),
F.A.C.
8
Section 459.0152, F.S.
9
Section 466.0282, F.S. A dentist may also hold himself or herself out as a specialist if the dentist has continuously held himself or
herself out as a specialist since December 31, 1964, in a specialty recognized by the American Dental Association.
10
Section 466.0282(3), F.S.
11
Section 464.018(1)(s), F.S.
12
Section 456.073(1), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h0861.PPH PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/24/2022
Refuse to certify, or to certify with restrictions, an application for a license;
Suspend or permanently revoke a license;
Place a restriction on the licensee’s practice or license;
Impose an administrative fine not to exceed $10,000 for each count or separate offense; if the
violation is for fraud or making a false representation, a fine of $10,000 must be imposed for
each count or separate offense;
Issue a reprimand or letter of concern;
Place the licensee on probation;
Require a corrective action plan;
Refund fees billed and collected from the patient or third party on behalf of the patient; or
Require the licensee to undergo remedial education.
Effect of the Bill
Discipline of Health Care Practitioners
The bill makes using a term designating a medical specialty accredited or recognized by the ACGME
by a practitioner grounds for discipline unless the practitioner has completed a residency or fellowship
program accredited or recognized by the ACGME in such specialty.
The bill requires DOH to discipline a practitioner who violates the bill’s provisions and grants DOH the
same enforcement authority as the applicable board.
The provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1: Amends s. 456.072, F.S., relating to grounds for discipline; penalties; enforcement.
Section 2: Provides an effective date of upon becoming law.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
DOH may experience a recurring increase in workload associated with rulemaking, which can be
absorbed within current resources.
13
DOH may also experience a recurring increase in workload associated with additional complaints,
investigations, and prosecutions resulting from the bill. The extent to which such complaints,
investigations, and prosecutions may materialize is unknown; therefore, the fiscal impact is
indeterminate.
14
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
13
Department of Health, Agency Analysis of 2022 House Bill 861 (Jan. 11, 2022).
14
Id. STORAGE NAME: h0861.PPH PAGE: 5
DATE: 1/24/2022
2. Expenditures:
None.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
Health care practitioners in violation of the restrictions in this bill may be subject to disciplinary actions
and fines.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
None.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not applicable. The bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
The bill provides sufficient rulemaking authority to DOH to implement the provisions of the bill.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
The bill requires DOH to enforce the bill’s provisions. This appears to conflict with several sections of
the statutes which specifically vest disciplinary authority in the appropriate boards. Disciplinary authority
is vested in the department only in the absence of a duly appointed board.
15
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
15
Id. See sections 456.072 and 456.073, F.S.