Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0907 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/17/2022

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 907    Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Council 
SPONSOR(S): Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy Subcommittee, Payne 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1038 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy Subcommittee 15 Y, 0 N, As CS Johnson Keating 
2) Infrastructure & Tourism Appropriations 
Subcommittee 
12 Y, 0 N Davis Davis 
3) Commerce Committee 	17 Y, 0 N Johnson Hamon 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
Florida law designates 15 deepwater seaports: Jacksonville, Port Canaveral, Port Citrus, Fort Pierce, Palm 
Beach, Port Everglades, Miami, Port Manatee, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Port St. Joe, Panama City, Pensacola, 
Key West, and Fernandina. These seaports are represented on the Florida Seaport Transportation Economic 
Development (FSTED) Council, which approves specified types of seaport projects and recommends funding 
under the FSTED program. 
 
The Putnam County Port District operates an inland river port, located along the St. Johns River in Putnam 
County. The county has plans to dredge the channel to the port in order to increase commerce. 
 
The bill adds Putnam County as a member of the FSTED Council. 
 
The bill provides that until July 1, 2024, Putnam County may apply for a grant through the FSTED Council to 
perform a study examining the economic, technical, and operational viability of establishing a port in Putnam 
County. The FSTED Council must evaluate the grant application pursuant to specified requirements in law and 
if approved, the Department of Transportation must include the study in its budget request for FSTED funding. 
Upon completion of the study, the FSTED Council must review the study to determine if a port in Putnam 
County is viable. If the FSTED Council does not approve the study, Putnam County’s membership on the 
council must terminate. 
 
The bill reenacts various statutes that cross-reference the seaports making up the FSTED Council to 
incorporate Putnam County into those statutes. 
 
The bill has an indeterminate fiscal impact on state government expenditures, but costs would be limited to 
available transportation revenues within the Work Program.  See Fiscal Analysis section for details. 
 
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2022. 
   STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Current Situation 
 
Florida is home to 15 deepwater seaports: Jacksonville, Port Canaveral, Port Citrus, Fort Pierce, Palm 
Beach, Port Everglades, Miami, Port Manatee, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Port St. Joe, Panama City, 
Pensacola, Key West, and Fernandina,
1
 which are independently governed and operated.
2
 
 
The Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Seaports Office works with the seaports to assist with 
planning and funding strategic seaport projects, as well as assisting with seaport-related issues. DOT’s 
Seaports Office is responsible for statewide seaport system planning, coordinating with statewide 
freight planning, project management, and coordinating seaport infrastructure projects.
3
 
 
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Program/FSTED Council 
 
Created in 1990,
4
 the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Program 
within DOT finances port transportation or port facilities projects that will improve the movement and 
intermodal transportation of cargo or passengers in commerce and trade and support the interests, 
purposes, and requirements of all 15 seaports.
5
 
 
The FSTED Council is charged with carrying out the state’s economic development mission through 
implementation of seaport capital improvement projects at the local level. The FSTED Council is 
created within DOT and consists of the port directors of the 15 deepwater seaports and representatives 
from DOT and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO).
6
 
 
Under Florida law, a minimum of $25 million per year must be made available from the State 
Transportation Trust Fund for the FSTED Program. The FSTED Council must develop guidelines and 
recommendations for project funding. Council staff, DOT, and DEO must work in cooperation to review 
projects and allocate funds in accordance with the schedule required for DOT to include these projects 
in its tentative work program.
7
 
 
DOT must include FSTED funding in its annual legislative budget request, including funding for FSTED 
Council-approved projects which have been determined by DOT and DEO to be consistent with Florida 
law. DOT must include the approved FSTED projects during the ensuing fiscal year in its tentative work 
program. The total amount of funding to be allocated to the FSTED Program during the successive 4 
fiscal years must also be included in DOT’s tentative work program.
8
 
 
FSTED Program funds must be used to fund approved projects on a 50-50 matching basis with the 
relevant deepwater seaport. However, program funds used to fund projects that involve the 
rehabilitation of wharves, docks, berths, bulkheads, or similar structures require a 25 percent match of 
funds. Program funds may also be used by the FSTED Council for data and analysis that will assist 
Florida's seaports and international trade.
9
 
 
Projects eligible for funding by grants under the FSTED Program are limited to the following port 
facilities or port transportation projects: 
                                                
1
 S. 311.09(1), F.S. 
2
 Department of Transportation (DOT), Agency Analysis of 2022 Senate Bill 1038 p.2. (Dec. 6, 2021). 
3
 Id. 
4
 Ch. 90-136, Laws of Fla. 
5
 S. 311.07(1), F.S. 
6
 S. 311.09(1), F.S. Florida Ports Council, Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development Program, 
https://flaports.org/about/florida-seaport-transportation-and-economic-development-program/ (last visited Dec. 15, 2021). 
7
 S. 311.07(2), F.S. DOT’s work program is developed pursuant to s. 339.135, F.S. 
8
 S. 311.07(9), F.S. 
9
 S. 311.07(3)(a), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
  
 Transportation facilities within the jurisdiction of the port. 
 The dredging or deepening of channels, turning basins, or harbors. 
 The construction or rehabilitation of wharves, docks, structures, jetties, piers, storage facilities, 
cruise terminals, automated people mover systems, or any facilities necessary or useful in 
connection with any of the foregoing. 
 The acquisition of vessel tracking systems, container cranes, or other mechanized equipment 
used in the movement of cargo or passengers in international commerce. 
 The acquisition of land to be used for port purposes. 
 The acquisition, improvement, enlargement, or extension of existing port facilities. 
 Environmental protection projects which are necessary because of requirements imposed by a 
state agency as a condition of a permit or other form of state approval; which are necessary for 
environmental mitigation required as a condition of a state, federal, or local environmental 
permit; which are necessary for the acquisition of spoil disposal sites and improvements to 
existing and future spoil sites; or which result from the funding of eligible projects. 
 Transportation facilities which are not otherwise part of DOT’s adopted work program. 
 Intermodal access projects. 
 Construction or rehabilitation of port facilities, excluding any park or recreational facilities, in 
ports with operating revenues of $5 million or less, provided that such projects create economic 
development opportunities, capital improvements, and positive financial returns to such ports. 
 Seaport master plan or strategic plan development or updates, including the purchase of data to 
support such plans.
10
 
 
To be eligible for consideration by the FSTED Council, a project must be consistent with the port 
comprehensive master plan that is incorporated as part of the approved local government 
comprehensive plan.
11
 
 
Putnam County Port District 
 
Created in 1967 by special act,
12
 the Putnam County Port District is a dependent special district 
consisting of all of Putnam County. Its board consists of the Putnam County Board of County 
Commissioners. The district operates an inland river port, located along the St. Johns River in the 
county. 
 
Putnam County proposes dredging a 5,000-foot branch channel on the St. Johns River from the current 
barge berth to the St. Johns channel and adding a turning basin to enhance both navigability and 
safety. The current depth is 7 feet at low water. The proposed dredging will increase the depth to 12 
feet at low water, allowing the size and capacity of vessels able to visit the port to increase 
substantially.
13
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
 
The bill adds Putnam County as a member the FSTED Council. 
 
The bill provides that until July 1, 2024, Putnam County may apply for a grant through the FSTED 
Council to perform a study examining the economic, technical, and operational viability of establishing a 
port in Putnam County. The FSTED Council must evaluate the grant application pursuant to the 
statutory provisions that govern the council’s review of other proposed port projects.
14
 If approved, DOT 
must include the feasibility study in its budget request for FSTED funding. Upon completion, the FSTED 
                                                
10
 S. 311.07(3)(a), F.S. 
11
 S. 311.07(3)(c), F.S. 
12
 Ch. 67-1961, Laws of Fla. 
13
 Attachment to e-mail from SaraLynn Ard, Legislative Aide to Rep. Payne, FW: PowerPoint (Jan. 21, 2022). 
14
 Sections 311.09(5)-(8), F.S., provide for the review and approval of FSTED projects including reviews for consistency with various 
plans, economic benefit, readiness for construction, noncompetition with other Florida ports, and capacity within the seaport system. 
The FSTED Council’s recommendations are reviewed by DOT for consistency with various state-related transportation plans and by 
DEO for economic benefits and consistency with the state’s economic goals. The council reviews DOT’s and DEO’s findings, and 
projects not found to be consistent may not be funded.  STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
  
Council must review the study to determine if a port in Putnam County is viable. If the FSTED Council 
does not approve the study, Putnam County’s membership on the council must terminate. 
 
The bill reenacts various statutes which cross-reference the seaports making up the FSTED Council to 
incorporate Putnam County into those statutes. These statutes include, but are not limited to, statutes 
relating to coastal management, seaport funding, seaport security, the confidentiality of certain records 
held by deepwater ports, exemptions from certain laws regarding stormwater management, and port 
conceptual permits. 
 
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2022. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1 Amends s. 311.09, F.S., relating to the Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic 
Development Council. 
 
Section 2 Reenacts s. 163.3178, F.S., relating to coastal management. 
 
Section 3 Reenacts s. 189.068, F.S., relating to special districts; authority for oversight; general 
oversight review process. 
 
Section 4 Reenacts s. 311.07, F.S., relating to Florida seaport transportation and economic 
development funding. 
 
Section 5 Reenacts s. 311.091, F.S., relating to entry into public-private infrastructure project 
agreements for port-related public infrastructure projects. 
 
Section 6 Reenacts s. 311.10, F.S., relating to the Strategic Port Investment Initiative. 
 
Section 7 Reenacts s. 311.101, F.S., relating to the Intermodal Logistics Center Infrastructure 
Support Program. 
 
Section 8 Reenacts s. 311.12, F.S., relating to seaport security. 
 
Section 9 Reenacts s. 311.121, .F.S., relating to qualifications, training, and certification of 
licensed security officers at Florida’s seaports. 
 
Section 10 Reenacts s. 311.14, F.S., relating to seaport planning. 
 
Section 11 Reenacts s. 315.18, F.S., relating to the confidentiality of certain records held by 
deepwater ports. 
 
Section 12 Reenacts s. 320.20, F.S., relating to the disposition of license tax moneys. 
 
Section 13 Reenacts s. 334.27, F.S., relating to governmental transportation entities’ property 
acquired for transportation purposes; limitation on soil and groundwater contamination 
liability. 
 
Section 14 Reenacts s. 337.14, F.S., relating to application for qualification; certificate of 
qualification; restrictions; request for hearing. 
 
Section 15 Reenacts s. 373.406, F.S., relating to exemptions regarding the management and 
storage of surface waters. 
 
Section 16 Reenacts s. 373.4133, F.S., relating to port conceptual permits. 
 
Section 17 Reenacts s. 373.4136, F.S., relating to the establishment and operation of mitigation 
banks.  STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
  
 
Section 18 Reenacts s. 403.061, F.S., relating to department; powers and duties. 
 
Section 19 Provides an effective date. 
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
If a study is approved by the FSTED Council, DOT must include the project as part of its Tentative 
Work Program submission to the Legislature in FY 2023-24. The cost of the study is indeterminate 
at this time, but any costs would be limited to available transportation revenues within the confines 
of the Work Program. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. This bill does not appear to require counties or municipalities to spend funds or take 
action requiring the expenditure of funds; reduce the authority that counties or municipalities have to 
raise revenues in the aggregate; or reduce the percentage of state tax shared with counties or 
municipalities. 
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The bill does not require or authorize rulemaking. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
  STORAGE NAME: h0907e.COM 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 2/17/2022 
  
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On January 25, 2022, the Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy Subcommittee adopted one amendment and 
reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The amendment: 
 Clarified that the feasibility study for a port in Putnam County must examine the economic, technical, 
and operational viability of the port. 
 Required the FSTED Council to review the feasibility study and make a determination regarding the 
viability of a port in Putnam County. 
 
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as approved by the Tourism, Infrastructure & Energy 
Subcommittee.