Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H7001 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/27/2022

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/CS/HB 7001          PCB PIE 22-01    Implementation of the Constitutional Prohibition 
Against Lobbying by a Public Officer 
SPONSOR(S): Rules Committee, State Affairs Committee, Public Integrity & Elections Committee, Koster 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS:  
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
Orig. Comm.: Public Integrity & Elections 
Committee 
16 Y, 0 N Rubottom Rubottom 
1) State Affairs Committee 	22 Y, 0 N, As CS Skinner Williamson 
2) Rules Committee 	15 Y, 0 N, As CS Birtman Birtman 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
In 2018, the people of Florida amended the state constitution to prohibit lobbying by certain public officers both 
during public service and for a six-year period following vacation of public office. The prohibitions address 
lobbying on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement before the federal government, the legislature, any 
state government body or agency, or any political subdivision. The amendment takes effect on December 31, 
2022. It expressly authorizes the Legislature to enact implementing legislation to include definitions and 
penalties. Such legislation may deal with no other subject. 
 
Current law provides a number of lobbying restrictions based on public service. The state constitution provides 
that legislators may not represent another for compensation before any state agency while serving in 
legislative office and that legislators and statewide elected officers may not represent another for 
compensation before the government body where they were an officer or member for two years following 
vacation of office. The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees prohibits a broad class of public 
officers and employees from representing another for compensation before their former department or 
employer for two years after leaving public service. Finally, state legislators may not lobby the executive 
branch, as defined by the lobby registration laws, for a period of two years after vacation of office.  
 
Rules of the House of Representatives currently restrict former legislators from lobbying the House of 
Representatives for a period of six years following legislative service, and current members from lobbying local 
governments. 
 
Current law and related rules define lobbying and related terms for the purpose of registration to lobby both in 
the Legislature and in the executive branch. 
 
The bill implements the public officer lobbying prohibitions by providing definitions of terms that have no clear 
constitutional definition. It provides that the prohibitions apply to persons in public office on or after December 
31, 2022. It authorizes the Commission on Ethics (Commission) to investigate and determine violations of the 
new prohibitions. The bill provides a range of penalties for violations and directs the Commission to report 
post-service lobbying violations and recommended punishment to the Governor for imposition of penalties. 
Finally, it authorizes the Chief Financial Officer and Attorney General independently to collect monetary 
penalties imposed. 
 
The bill has an uncertain but likely insignificant fiscal impact on the state. 
 
The bill has an effective date of December 31, 2022.   STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Present situation 
 
In 2018, the people of Florida amended the state constitution to prohibit lobbying by certain public 
officers both during public service and for a six-year period following vacation of public office.
1
 The 
prohibitions address lobbying on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement before the federal 
government, the legislature, any state government body or agency, or any political subdivision. The 
amendment takes effect on December 31, 2022.
2
 The amendment expressly authorizes the Legislature 
to enact implementing legislation to include definitions and penalties.
3
 
 
The prohibitions affect the following officers: 
 Statewide elected officers; 
 Members of the Legislature; 
 County commissioners; 
 Constitutional county officers and county charter officers; 
 School board members; 
 School superintendents; 
 Elected municipal officers, 
 Elected special district officers in special districts with ad valorem taxing authority; and 
 Secretaries, executive directors, and other administrative heads of executive branch 
departments. 
 
Officers Defined in Statute 
 
“Secretaries” and “executive directors”, are not constitutional offices.
4
  A “secretary” is appointed by the 
Governor to head a department and is not otherwise named in the Constitution. An “executive director” 
is the chief administrative employee or officer of a department headed by a board or by the Governor or 
Cabinet. Other departments authorized by the Constitution
5
 may have administrative heads not 
identified as secretaries or executive directors. Moreover, statutory terminology is subject to change 
over time. 
 
Florida has a variety of special districts with ad valorem taxing authority. Some such districts may not 
exercise ad valorem taxing authority without converting their governing board from landowner elected 
to a board elected by all qualified electors residing in the district.
6
 
 
Commission on Ethics 
 
The Commission on Ethics (Commission) was created by the Legislature in 1974 “to serve as guardian 
of the standards of conduct” for state and local public officials and employees.
7
 State law designates 
the Commission as the independent commission provided for in s. 8(f), Art. II of the state constitution.
8
 
Constitutional duties of the Commission consist of conducting investigations and making public reports 
                                                
1
 S. 8(f), Art. II, Fla. Const. (effective 12/31/2022). 
2
 S. 38, Art. XII, Fla. Const. 
3
 S. 8(f), Art. II, Fla. Const. (effective Dec. 31, 2022). 
4
 S. 20.03(5) and (6), F.S. 
5
 S 6, Art. IV, Fl. Const. 
6
 S. 190.006(3), F.S. 
7
 Florida Commission on Ethics, Guide to the Sunshine Amendment and Code of Ethics for Public Officers and 
Employees, available at http://www.ethics.state.fl.us/Documents/Publications/GuideBookletInternet.pdf (last visited 
January 10, 2022); See also S. 112.320, F.S. 
8
 S. 112.320, F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
on all breach of trust complaints towards public officers or employees not governed by the judicial 
qualifications commission.
9
 In addition to its constitutional duties, the Commission, in part: 
 Renders advisory opinions to public officials;
10
 
 Makes recommendations to disciplinary officials when appropriate for violations of ethics and 
disclosure laws;
11
 
 Administers the Executive Branch Lobbying Registration and Reporting Law;
12
  
 Maintains financial disclosure filings of constitutional officers and state officers and 
employees;
13
 and 
 Administers automatic fines for public officers and employees who fail to timely file required 
annual financial disclosure.
14
 
 
Restrictions on lobbying and related representation 
 
The state constitution prohibits members of the Legislature from personally representing another 
person or entity for compensation during a term of office before any state agency other than a judicial 
tribunal. Similarly, it also prohibits statewide elected officers and members of the Legislature from 
personally representing another person or entity for compensation before the government body or 
agency where the individual was an officer or member for two years following vacation of office.
15
 The 
phrase “represent for compensation” appears to involve more activities than “lobbying” as defined by 
current laws. Legal representation in administrative proceedings and representation of a person under 
discipline by the House of Representatives or Senate are examples of representation barred by the 
previous constitutional restrictions but currently excluded from statutory definitions of lobbying. 
 
Certain former local officials are also prohibited from personally representing another person or entity 
for compensation before the government body or agency where the individual was an officer for two 
years after vacating that office. This applies to elected county, municipal, special district, or school 
district officers and appointed school district superintendents.
16
  
 
The Code of Ethics for Public Officer and Employees
17
 prohibits a broad class of public officers and 
employees from representing another for compensation before their former employing agency for a 
period of two years following vacation of office.
18
 In 2013, the statute was amended to prohibit former 
members of the Legislature from lobbying for compensation before the executive branch for a period of 
two years following vacation of office.
19
 That provision incorporates the definitions in the executive 
branch lobbyist registration law.
20
 
 
Under a rule first adopted in 2016, the House of Representatives prohibits a member from accepting 
any compensation to lobby any local government or governmental agency, except for the provision of 
licensed professional services when registration as a lobbyist is required.
21
 Finally, under another 
House of Representatives rule, no one serving in the Legislature after November 8, 2016, is permitted 
to lobby the House of Representatives for a period of six years following vacation of office as a member 
of the Legislature.
22
  
                                                
9
 S. 8(f), Art. II, Fla. Const. 
10
 S. 112.322(3)(a), F.S. 
11
 S. 112.322(2)(b), F.S. 
12
 Ss. 112.3215, 112.32155, F.S.  
13
 S. 112.3144, F.S. 
14
 S. 112.31455, F.S.; see also Florida Commission on Ethics, Guide to the Sunshine Amendment and Code of Ethics for 
Public Officers and Employees, available at http://www.ethics.state.fl.us/Documents/Publications/GuideBookletInternet.pdf 
(last visited January 10, 2022). 
15
 S. 8(e), Art. II, Fla. Const. 
16
 S. 112.313(14), F.S. 
17
 Pt. III, Ch. 112, F.S. 
18
 S. 112.313(9), F.S. 
19
 Ch. 2013-36, Laws of Fla. 
20
 S. 112.3215, F.S. 
21
 Rule 15.4(e), House Rules (Edition 1, 12/5/20). 
22
 Rule 17.1(g), House Rules.  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
 
Lobbyist registration laws 
 
Current law requires registration before lobbying either the Legislature or the executive branch.
23
 Those 
laws and their implementing rules provide definitions of terms applicable in those two divergent 
contexts. Registration is required of everyone who contracts for compensation or is employed for the 
purpose of lobbying or for whom government affairs constitutes a principal responsibility of their 
employment. Lobbying in the legislative context includes seeking the goodwill of a legislator or staff 
member. It also includes any attempt to influence legislative action.
24
 Current law requires every state 
agency, state university, or community college employee who seeks to influence legislative action by 
appearing before or attending a legislative meeting to register as a lobbyist regardless of whether 
lobbying is merely incidental to their employment.
25
 That requirement does not affect communications 
outside of the employer’s normal business hours.
26
 The House of Representatives and Senate enforce 
legislative lobbyist registration requirements. 
 
In the context of the executive branch, lobbying means seeking to influence an agency decision and 
includes attempts to obtain the goodwill of agency officials or employees.
27
 The executive branch 
registration law is limited to lobbying on decisions in the area of policy or procurement.
28
 The 
Commission enforces executive branch lobbyist registration.
29
 The Commission has defined “policy” 
and “procurement” in rules implementing executive branch lobbying registration.
30
 
 
In each context, there are explicit clarifying exceptions. Under legislative lobbying, exceptions include: 
 Responding to a request for information from a legislator, committee, or staff member; 
 Appearing in response to a legislative subpoena; 
 Providing advice or services to the Legislature under a contract that uses public funds; 
 Representing a client in a disciplinary matter in the House of Representatives or Senate; 
 A judicial or other state officer acting in his or her official capacity; and 
 Appearing as a witness to provide information at the written request of the chair of a legislative 
meeting.
31
 
 
Under executive branch lobbying, exceptions include: 
 A person representing a client in a judicial proceeding or a formal administrative proceeding 
under the Administrative Procedure Act
32
 (APA); 
 An employee of an executive branch agency or legislative or judicial branch entity acting in the 
normal course of his or her duties; 
 A confidential informant providing confidential information for law enforcement purposes; and 
 A person lobbying on a procurement in the lowest cost category under state procurement 
laws.
33
 
 
The state ethics laws also regulate gifts of lobbyists or their principals to reporting individuals and 
procurement employees.
34
 There is currently no state law definition of “lobbying” in the context of 
political subdivisions or the federal government. 
 
                                                
23
 Ss. 112.3215(3), 11.045(2), F.S. 
24
 S. 11.045(1), F.S., Joint Rule 1.1(2) (published with the House Rules). 
25
 S. 11.061(1), F.S. 
26
 Id. 
27
 S. 112.3215(1)(f), F.S. 
28
 Id. 
29
 Ss. 112.322, 112.324, F.S. 
30
 R. 34-12.020(9) and (11), F.A.C. Chapter 34-12, F.A.C. also supplies additional definitions and clarifies statutory 
exceptions. 
31
 Joint Rule 1.1(3) and (4). 
32
 Ch. 120, F.S. 
33
 S. 112.3215(1)(h), F.S. 
34
 S. 112.3148, F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
Current law specifies officers with appropriate administrative or constitutional jurisdiction and authorizes 
them to impose penalties for ethics violations committed by particular public officers or employees.
35
  
 
 Effect of proposed changes 
 
The bill implements the constitutional lobbying prohibition for public officers, which is scheduled to go 
into effect on December 31, 2022. The bill defines a number of terms used in the constitutional 
provision and other terms needed for clarity. The bill provides that the prohibition applies to those 
holding public office on or after December 31, 2022. It provides for administrative enforcement of the 
constitutional prohibition and establishes penalties for violating the prohibition.  
 
Definitions 
 
The bill defines terms whose meaning may not be clear from the constitutional context in which they 
are used. The amendment applies to a specific set of public officers, three of which are not 
constitutionally identified offices. The bill defines “secretary” and “executive director” consistent with the 
executive branch organization statutes
36
 and defines “other agency head” in a corresponding manner. 
 
The bill defines “elected special district officer in a special district with ad valorem taxing authority” in a 
manner excluding community development district board members elected by landowners under a law 
that does not allow the board to levy ad valorem taxes until members have been elected by qualified 
electors.
37
 
 
The bill defines “lobby”, “compensation”, and “legislative action” in a manner consistent with current 
lobbying registration laws covering the legislative
38
 and executive
39
 branches. It defines “lobby for 
compensation” in a manner consistent with the definition of “lobbyist” in both registration laws.
40
 The bill 
also defines “issue of policy” and “issue of procurement” consistent with current rules of the 
Commission.
41
  
 
The bill defines “issue of appropriation” in a manner consistent with the appropriation power.  
 
The bill also contextually defines lobbying before the federal government and lobbying before political 
subdivisions. Specifically, lobbying the federal government is limited to influencing a decision of the 
United States’ legislative or executive branch where lobbyist registration is required. Lobbying a 
political subdivision is limited to legislative action or other discretionary decisions; it does not include 
administrative actions.  
 
The bill defines “state government body or agency” in a manner consistent with the breadth of the 
constitutional provision to include any “department, agency, commission, council, board, or 
instrumentality” created by the state constitution or general law and “any official or officer thereof”. 
Further, the bill provides that the term includes each state attorney, public defender, criminal conflict 
and civil regional counsel, and capital collateral regional counsel.  
 
The bill defines “political subdivision” in a manner consistent with other laws but limited to categories 
addressed by the constitutional provision, excluding special districts that do not have ad valorem taxing 
authority. “Federal government” is defined as Congress and any federal executive branch department, 
office, agency, or instrumentality, corporate or otherwise, or any federal independent agency, including 
any unit thereof. 
 
                                                
35
 S. 112.324(4)-(8), F.S. 
36
 S. 20.03, F.S. 
37
 S. 190.006(3), F.S. 
38
 S. 11.045(1), F.S. 
39
 S. 112.3215(1), F.S. 
40
 Ss. 11.045(1)(g), 112.3215(1)(h), F.S. 
41
 R. 34-12.020(9) and (11), F.A.C.  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
The bill defines “administrative action” as a category of decisions exempt from those covered by the 
definition of “lobby”. The definition excludes procurement decisions, which are expressly included in the 
constitutional prohibitions. “Administrative action” includes APA proceedings in state agencies. 
However, the APA applies to neither federal agencies nor political subdivisions. For this reason, the bill 
provides a specific definition of administrative action outside APA proceedings. The definition 
incorporates the following specific examples of administrative matters: 
 Any action or decision on a license, permit, waiver of regulation, development order or permit, 
or development agreement; 
 Any quasi-judicial proceedings under s. 286.0155(2), F.S.; 
 Any decision subject to judicial review; or 
 Any other administrative procedure, except on an issue of procurement. 
 
The explicit definition of administrative action works in conjunction with “a decision or determination of 
any rights, duties, or obligations made on a case-by-case basis,” which is an exclusion provided in the 
definition of “issue of policy”. Also related, the definition of “lobby for compensation” expressly excludes 
representation on a legal claim cognizable in court or other tribunal to include pre-litigation offers, 
demands, and negotiations. Together, these provide broader exemptions than those provided in the 
current lobbying registration laws with respect to administrative representations and settlement 
negotiations. 
 
The definitions of “lobby” and “lobby for compensation” include exceptions consistent with the present 
registration laws. The bill broadens current exemptions for settlement negotiations regarding pending 
lawsuits expressly allowing pre-litigation demands, offers, and negotiations, but expressly excluding 
any claim bill pending in the Legislature. The bill also exempts expert witness testimony and related 
communications. 
 
The definition of “lobby for compensation” departs from current legislative branch lobbying laws in 
treating state employees the same as private sector employees when not employed principally for 
government relations. 
 
Finally, the bill defines “governmental entity” to include the federal government, the Legislature, any 
state government body or agency, or any political subdivision. 
 
Administration 
 
The bill applies the constitutional prohibitions only to persons serving in the affected public offices on or 
after December 31, 2022.  
 
The bill deems a violation of the new constitutional prohibitions to be a violation of the Code of Ethics 
for purposes of administration. This authorizes the Commission to investigate and determine violations 
raised in a written sworn complaint or written authorized referral. The process invoked includes 
preliminary investigations by Commission staff, probable cause determinations by the Commission, 
adjudicatory hearings before the Division of Administrative Hearings, and final orders by the 
Commission.
42
 
 
The bill provides penalties consistent with current penalties for prohibited lobbying and other prohibited 
representation.
43
 The penalties are: 
 Public censure and reprimand; 
 A civil penalty up to $10,000; and 
 Forfeiture of pecuniary benefits received from the violation, which must be paid to the General 
Revenue Fund. 
 
The bill requires the Commission to report violations of the post-service lobbying prohibition and 
recommended penalties to the Governor for imposition of penalties. Existing referral requirements 
                                                
42
 S. 112.324, F.S. 
43
 S. 112.317(1)(d), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
would apply to violations by current public officers.
44
 The Chief Financial Officer and Attorney General 
are each authorized to collect any penalty imposed. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1 creates s. 112.3121, F.S., providing definitions. 
 
Section 2 creates s. 112.3122, F.S., providing applicability, administration, penalties, and collection 
thereof. 
 
Section 3 provides an effective date of December 31, 2022. 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
The bill may result in collection of penalty and forfeiture amounts. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
The bill may result in some expenditures for investigations of and hearings on violations. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on local government. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on local government. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
The bill has no apparent economic impact on the private sector. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. The bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments. 
 
 2. Other: 
The constitutional amendment provides that implementing legislation “shall not contain provisions on 
any other subject”.
45
 The bill neither amends nor incorporates other laws assuring compliance with 
this requirement. 
 
The bill defines terms used in the constitutional amendment, which have no clear constitutional 
definition. The following terms used in the amendment, but not defined in the bill, appear to have 
clear constitutional meaning: 
                                                
44
 S. 112.324(4)-(8), F.S. 
45
 S. 8(f)(5), Art. II, Fla. Const. (effective December 31, 2022).  STORAGE NAME: h7001c.RUC 	PAGE: 8 
DATE: 1/27/2022 
  
 Government body or agency; 
 Legislature; 
 Public officer (the affected officers are specified in the amendment); 
 County commissioner; 
 Constitutional and county charter officers listed in the amendment; 
 Elected municipal officer; 
 School board member and superintendent of schools; 
 The Legislature; 
 Member of the Legislature; 
 The Governor; 
 Members of the Cabinet;  
 Department; and 
 Ad valorem taxing authority. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The bill creates no new rulemaking authority. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On November 30, 2021, the Public Integrity & Elections Committee considered a proposed committee bill 
(PCB) and adopted one amendment, which added (1) quasi-judicial proceedings under s. 286.0115(2) 
F.S., and (2) decisions subject to judicial review, to the definition of administrative action. These specific 
inclusions do not appear to change the scope of the provision as originally published. 
 
On January 13, 2022, the State Affairs Committee adopted an amendment and reported the bill favorably 
as a committee substitute. The amendment changed “governmental”, with respect to lobbying a “state 
governmental body or agency”, to “government”. This changed the term to “state government body or 
agency” in accordance with the constitutional amendment the bill implements. 
 
On January 27, 2022, the Rules Committee adopted an amendment and reported the bill favorably as a 
committee substitute. The amendment added a definition of “elected special district officer in a special 
district with ad valorem taxing authority” which excludes officers of community development districts 
elected by landowners when an election by qualified electors is a condition precedent to the exercise of ad 
valorem taxing authority. 
 
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as approved by the Rules Committee.