This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA
DATE: 2/4/2022
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: HB 7029 PCB CRM 22-01 Time Limitations for Preadjudicatory Juvenile Detention Care
SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice & Public Safety Subcommittee, Brannan and others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS:
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
Orig. Comm.: Criminal Justice & Public Safety
Subcommittee
14 Y, 3 N Petruzzelli Hall
1) Justice Appropriations Subcommittee 9 Y, 5 N Saag Keith
2) Judiciary Committee
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
In Florida, the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) administers the juvenile justice system. When a child is alleged to
have committed a delinquent act, DJJ must review the sufficiency of the probable cause affidavit or report and complete
an intake screening to make an initial determination whether detention care is necessary.
Under s. 985.03, F.S., detention care is the temporary care of a child in secure or supervised release detention pending a
court adjudication or disposition of his or her case. A child held in secure detention care is under the physical restriction of
a secure detention center. A child on supervised release detention care is in the nonsecure custody of a parent or
guardian under the supervision of DJJ staff. A court may require a child to comply with a condition of electronic monitoring
during a term of supervised release detention care.
Generally, s. 985.26, F.S., limits the time period a court may place a child in detention care under a special detention
order to no more than 21 days unless an adjudicatory hearing for his or her case has commenced. When good cause is
shown that additional time is needed for the prosecution or defense, the time period may be extended for up to an
additional nine days if the child is charged with a capital felony, life felony, first degree felony, or second degree felony
involving violence against any person. However, in many juvenile cases, the time period required to commence an
adjudicatory hearing far exceeds 21 days or even 30 days. As such, under current law, a court may be required to release
a child from detention care prior to the adjudicatory hearing in his or her case.
HB 7029 amends ss. 985.24 and 985.26, F.S., to revise the time limitations and court procedures related to
preadjudicatory juvenile detention care by:
Authorizing a court to place a child on supervised release detention care for any time period until an adjudicatory
hearing is commenced by the court.
Requiring a court to conduct a hearing to determine the need for continued supervised release detention care if a
child remains on supervised release detention care for 75 days or more.
Limiting a court from placing a child into secure detention care for more than 21 days unless he or she is charged
with a specified offense and the totality of the circumstances warrant an extension of secure detention care, in
which case, the court may extend the period of secure detention in up to 21-day increments after conducting a
hearing to determine the need for continued secure detention care.
Revising the offenses a child must be alleged to have committed to be eligible for an extension of secure
detention care to also include any second degree felony and a third degree felony involving violence against any
person.
Authorizing, but not requiring, a law enforcement agency to supervise any court-ordered electronic monitoring of
a child on supervised release detention care.
The bill may have a negative, yet indeterminate fiscal impact on state and local governments. The bill expands eligibility
and extends time limitations for detention care, which may result in more children being placed in detention care for a
longer time period, thereby increasing costs to DJJ. However, the bill also authorizes a local law enforcement agency to
conduct an electronic monitoring program, or to partner with DJJ to do so, which may result in cost savings to DJJ.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.
FULL ANALYSIS STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA PAGE: 2
DATE: 2/4/2022
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Background
Juvenile Detention Care
In Florida, the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) administers the juvenile justice system. When a
child is alleged to have committed a delinquent act, DJJ must review the sufficiency of the probable
cause affidavit or report and complete an intake screening to make an initial determination whether
detention care is necessary.
1,2
Detention care is the temporary care of a child in secure or supervised
release detention care pending a court adjudication or disposition of his or her case.
3
A child held in
secure detention is under the physical restriction of a secure detention center. A child on supervised
release detention care is in the nonsecure custody of a parent or guardian under the supervision of DJJ
staff. In some cases, a child placed on supervised release detention care may be ordered to participate
in an electronic monitoring program.
4
Currently, DJJ is responsible for tracking and monitoring youth on
supervised release, and making required contacts, such as night check-ins or face-to-face weekend
contacts.
5
Section 985.24, F.S., requires the use of detention care to be based primarily upon findings that the
child:
Presents a substantial risk of not appearing at a subsequent hearing;
Presents a substantial risk of inflicting bodily harm on others as evidenced by recent behavior,
including illegal firearm possession;
Presents history of committing a property offense prior to adjudication, disposition, or
placement;
Has committed a specified offense of contempt of court; or
Requests protection from imminent bodily harm.
6
Additionally, s. 985.24, F.S., specifically prohibits a child from being placed into secure or supervised
release detention care for any of the following reasons:
To allow a parent to avoid his or her legal responsibility;
To permit more convenient administrative access to the child; or
To facilitate further investigation or interrogation.
7
Generally, a child taken into custody and placed in detention care must be given a hearing within 24
hours to determine the existence of probable cause that the child has committed the delinquent act or
violation of law for which he or she is charged and the need for continued detention. The court
determines the need for continued detention based on the results of a risk assessment performed by
DJJ and whether it indicates secure or supervised release detention care is appropriate.
8
Section 985.26, F.S., controls the time period for which a court can order a child to be placed in
detention care. Generally, a child may not be held in detention care for more than 21 days unless an
1
In 2021, the legislature passed “the Kaia Rolle Act”, which prohibits a child under the age of 7 from being arrested, charged, or
adjudicated delinquent unless the violation of law is a forcible felony. S. 985.031, F.S.
2
In counties that do not have an assessment center, the law enforcement officer calls a DJJ “on-call screener” to assess the juvenile’s
risk and determine if detention is necessary. Office of the State Court’s Administrator, Florida’s Juvenile Delinquency Benchbook (June
2021), https://www.flcourts.org/content/download/752754/file/Delinquency%20Benchbook%20-%20Final%20June%2029,%202021.pdf
(last visited Jan. 28, 2022).
3
S. 985.03(18), F.S.
4
S. 985.03(18)(b), F.S. In FY 19-20, DJJ served 3,565 youth through supervised release with electronic monitoring. OPPAGA,
Department of Juvenile Justice: Detention,https://oppaga.fl.gov/ProgramSummary/ProgramDetail?programNumber=1007 (last visited
Jan. 28, 2022).
5
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, Monitoring and Quality Improvement Standards for Supervised Release Tracking Services FY
2021-2022 (June 2021), https://www.djj.state.fl.us/content/download/54334/file/srt-standards-fy2122-final-06-11-21.pdf (last visited Jan.
28, 2022).
6
S. 985.024(1), F.S.
7
S. 985.24(2), F.S.
8
S. 985.255(3)(a), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA PAGE: 3
DATE: 2/4/2022
adjudicatory hearing for the case has been commenced in good faith by the court.
9
However, when
good cause is shown that the nature of the charge requires additional time for prosecution or defense of
the case, the court may extend the length of detention for an additional nine days if the child is charged
with an offense that, if committed by an adult, would be a:
Capital felony;
Life felony;
First-degree felony; or
Second-degree felony involving violence against any person.
10
Additionally, if the child is a prolific juvenile offender (PJO), the general time limitations for detention
care do not apply and the court is required to place him or her on supervised release detention care
with electronic monitoring or in secure detention care under a special detention order until disposition of
the case.
11
A child may be classified as a PJO if he or she:
Is charged with a delinquent act that would be a felony if committed by an adult;
Has been adjudicated or has had adjudication withheld for a felony offense, or delinquent act
that would be a felony if committed by an adult, that occurred before the current charge; and
Has five or more of the following (three of which must have been for felony offenses or
delinquent acts that would have been felonies if committed by an adult):
o An arrest without a final disposition;
o An adjudication; or
o An adjudication withheld.
12
The time limitations for detention care do not include periods of delay resulting from continuances
granted by a court for cause on motion of the child or his or her counsel or of the state. If the court
grants such a continuance, it must conduct a hearing at the end of each 72-hour period (excluding
Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) to determine the need for continued detention of the child and the
need for any further continuance of the proceedings for the child or the state.
13
Finally, the period for supervised release detention care is tolled under s. 985.26(4)(b), F.S., on the
date that DJJ or a law enforcement officer alleges a child has violated a condition of his or her
supervised release detention care, until such time that the court enters a ruling on the violation. The
court retains jurisdiction over the child during the tolling period. If the court finds that the child violated
his or her supervised release detention care, the number of days the child served in any type of
detention care before the commission of the violation is excluded from the time limitations for detention
care.
14
Although s. 985.26, F.S., generally limits the time period a child can be placed on detention care to 21
days, in many cases, the time period required to commence an adjudicatory hearing far exceeds the
21-day period. As such, under current law, a court may be required to release a child from detention
care prior to the adjudicatory hearing in his or her delinquency case.
9
S. 985.26(2)(a), F.S.
10
S. 985.26(2)(b), F.S.
11
S. 958.26(2)(c), F.S.
12
S. 985.255(1)(f), F.S.
13
S. 985.26(4)(a), F.S.
14
S. 985.26(4)(b), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA PAGE: 4
DATE: 2/4/2022
Effect of Proposed Changes
HB 7029 amends ss. 985.24 and 985.26, F.S., to revise the time limitations and court procedures
related to preadjudicatory juvenile detention care. Specifically, the bill amends s. 985.24, F.S., to
authorize a court to order a child placed on supervised release detention care to comply with any
condition established by DJJ and ordered by the court, including electronic monitoring, when the court
finds such condition necessary to preserve public safety or to ensure the child’s safety or appearance in
court.
The bill amends s. 985.26, F.S., to create time limitations for detention care which differ depending on
whether a child is placed on supervised release detention care, which may include electronic
monitoring, or secure detention care. Under the bill, a court may order a child to be placed on
supervised release detention care for any period of time until an adjudicatory hearing has been
commenced by the court. However, if a child remains on supervised release detention care for 75 days,
the bill requires the court to conduct a hearing within 15 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal
holidays) to determine the need for continued supervised release detention care. If the court finds good
cause that the nature of the charge requires additional time for prosecution or defense of the case, or if
the totality of the circumstances warrant an extension of supervised release detention care, the court
may order the continued placement of the child on such detention care until his or her case adjudicatory
hearing commences.
Additionally, the bill makes the 21-day time limitation under current law applicable to only secure
detention care. As such, a court continues to be limited to placing a child in secure detention care for a
maximum of 21 days unless he or she is charged with an offense for which an extension of secure
detention care is authorized.
The bill authorizes a court, upon a finding that good cause has been shown that additional time is
required to prosecute or defend the case or that the totality of the circumstances warrant an extension,
to extend the time period for which a child may be held in secure detention care for up to 21 days,
rather than the current 9-day extension period, if the child is charged with a specified offense. The bill
expands the types of offenses a child may be charged with to make him or her eligible for an extended
period of secure detention to include:
Any second degree felony; and
A third degree felony involving violence against any person.
The bill authorizes a court to order additional extensions of secure detention, in up to 21-day
increments, but only after conducting a hearing prior to the expiration of the child’s current secure
detention period and making a finding on the record that there is a need for the child’s continued secure
detention. If a court extends the period of secure detention, it must ensure that an adjudicatory hearing
in the child’s case commences as soon as is reasonably possible and must prioritize the disposition of
any child’s case who has been held in secure detention for 60 days or more.
The bill repeals language authorizing the tolling of time limitations for supervised release detention care
upon an allegation of a violation of supervised release. Because the bill authorizes a court to place a
child on supervised release detention care for any time period, such a tolling period is no longer
necessary.
The bill specifies that a court may transition a child between secure detention care and supervised
release detention care when the court finds such placement necessary to preserve public safety or the
child’s safety, appearance in court, or compliance with any condition of supervised release detention
care. If a court orders a child to transition between secure detention care and supervised release
detention care, the bill requires each period of secure detention to count towards the 21-day time
limitation.
Finally, the bill authorizes any electronic monitoring ordered by a court as a condition of supervised
release detention care to be supervised by DJJ, a law enforcement agency, or DJJ and a law STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA PAGE: 5
DATE: 2/4/2022
enforcement agency working in partnership. The bill does not require any law enforcement agency to
conduct electronic monitoring.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1: Amends s. 985.24, F.S., relating to use of detention; prohibitions.
Section 2: Amends s. 985.26, F.S., relating to length of detention.
Section 3: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2022.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
The bill may have an indeterminate fiscal impact on DJJ expenditures. The bill expands eligibility
and extends time limitations for detention care, which may result in more children being placed in
detention care for a longer time period. These changes may result in an indeterminate increase to
DJJ’s operational costs. However, as of Jan. 20, 2022, DJJ reported that residential bed utilization
was at 65% of overall capacity.
15
Additionally, juvenile arrests have decreased 51% over the last
five years.
16
Any impact from expanded eligibility or extended time limitations for detention care can
likely be absorbed within DJJ’s existing resources.
The bill also authorizes a local law enforcement agency to conduct its own electronic monitoring
program, or to partner with DJJ to do so. If additional counties opt to create their own electronic
monitoring programs, it may decrease DJJ’s expenditures for providing electronic monitoring units
by an indeterminate amount.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
The bill may have a negative, yet indeterminate fiscal impact on local law enforcement agencies to
the extent that they opt to conduct an electronic monitoring program as authorized under the bill.
However, the bill does not require local law enforcement agencies to participate in an electronic
monitoring program. Additionally, the bill may have an indeterminate fiscal impact on counties that
contribute to the costs of preadjudicatory detention care as the bill authorizes more children to be
placed in detention care for a longer time period. However, the number of children this may impact
is unknown.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRI VATE SECTOR:
None.
15
Email from Tyler Jefferson, Deputy Legislative Affairs Director, Department of Juvenile Justice, DJJ Residential
Resource Utilization Report (Jan. 24, 2022).
16
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, Delinquency Profile 2021 (August 2021),
https://www.djj.state.fl.us/research/reports-and-data/interactive-data-reports/delinquency-profile/delinquency-profile-
dashboard (last visited Jan. 31, 2022). STORAGE NAME: h7029b.JUA PAGE: 6
DATE: 2/4/2022
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
Six local entities, including five sheriff’s offices and one police department, currently provide electronic
monitoring services. The determination of whether monitoring should be provided by local or state
entities is currently made by the court on a case-by-case basis. It is unknown how many law
enforcement agencies will provide or cease to provide electronic monitoring as a result of the bill.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not applicable.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
None.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
None.