The Florida Senate
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.)
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Appropriations
BILL: CS/SB 430
INTRODUCER: Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security, and Senator
Wright
SUBJECT: Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children
DATE: January 19, 2022
ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION
1. Brown Caldwell MS Fav/CS
2. Grace Sadberry AP Pre-meeting
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes
I. Summary:
CS/SB 430 reenacts provisions of law establishing and implementing the Interstate Compact on
Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Compact) and provides for future legislative
review and repeal of the Compact on July 1, 2025. The state is a member of the Compact, and
therefore has an established State Council. Participation in the Compact enables member states to
address educational transition issues faced by military families as they transfer from a state or
school district pursuant to official military orders.
The bill also provides for the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of
Representatives each to select a member of the State Council, increasing the membership from
seven to eight members.
This bill has an insignificant fiscal impact on general revenue funds. See Section V. Fiscal
Impact Statement.
The bill takes effect upon becoming a law.
REVISED: BILL: CS/SB 430 Page 2
II. Present Situation:
Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children
Children in active-duty military families face unique educational challenges. A military child
changes schools on average three times more often than a non-military child.
1
When a parent is
reassigned, a military child may be impacted by:
Record transfer issues;
Varied course sequencing and academic placement policies;
Varied graduation requirements;
Exclusion from extracurricular activities;
Redundant or missed entrance or exit testing;
Varied kindergarten and first grade entrance ages; and
Having a temporary guardian appointed while the child’s parent is deployed.
2
The Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (Compact) assists
member states in uniformly addressing educational transition issues faced by active-duty military
families. The compact governs member states in several areas, including school placement,
enrollment, records transfer, participation in academic programs and extracurricular activities,
and graduation. The Compact was developed by the Council of State Governments, in
cooperation with the U.S. Department of Defense.
States join the Compact by enacting it into law, which Florida did in 2008.
3
Before the compact
could go into effect, at least ten states must have enacted it. This occurred on July 9, 2008, when
Delaware became the tenth state to adopt the Compact. Currently, all 50 states and the District of
Columbia are members of the Compact.
4
Students eligible for assistance under the Compact must receive public funding through the local
education agency and be the children of:
Active duty members of the uniformed services,
5
including members of the National Guard
and Reserve on active-duty orders;
Members or veterans of the uniformed services who are severely injured and medically
discharged or retired, for a period of one year following separation; or
Members of the uniformed services who die on active duty or as a result of injuries sustained
on active duty, for a period of one year after death.
6
1
U.S. Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). All About DoDEA Educational Partnerships, available at
https://www.dodea.edu/Partnership/about.cfm (last visited Nov. 19, 2021).
2
Military Interstate Children’s Compact Commission, Guide for Parents, School Officials and Public Administrators, p. 2,
available at http://www.mic3.net/assets/2018_parents_guide.pdf (last visited Nov. 22, 2021).
3
Ch. 2008-225, L.O.F.
4
Military Interstate Children’s Compact Commission, Interactive Map, available at http://www.mic3.net/interactive-
map.html (last visited Nov. 22, 2021).
5
“Uniformed services” means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, as well as the Commissioned Corps
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Public Health Services. See Article II, s. R of the Compact,
s. 1000.36, F.S.
6
Article III, s. A of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S. BILL: CS/SB 430 Page 3
Florida State Council
The Compact requires member states to establish a State Council to coordinate implementation
of the Compact.
7
While each state may determine the membership of its own State Council,
membership must include, at a minimum, the following:
State superintendent of education;
Superintendent of a school district with a high concentration of military children;
One representative from a military installation;
One representative from the legislative branch of government; and
One representative from the executive branch of government.
8
Additionally, the state must appoint or designate a military family education liaison and a
compact commissioner. Each of these appointees, unless already a full voting member of the
council, shall serve as an ex officio member of the state council.
9
Florida’s State Council,
consisting of seven members, conducts meetings quarterly, and typically via teleconference.
10
Military Interstate Children’s Compact Commission
The Compact establishes the Military Interstate Children’s Compact Commission (Commission)
to provide national-level oversight of the Compact. The Commission may adopt and enforce
rules and bylaws and perform various administrative functions necessary for day-to-day
operations.
11
The Commission is comprised of one voting representative, or Compact
Commissioner, from each member state.
12
Each state is entitled to one vote on Compact rule
adoption or other business matters.
13
The Commission must meet at least once each calendar
year.
14
The Commission is authorized to promulgate Compact rules that govern member states in the
areas addressed by the Compact.
15
Compact rules have the force and effect of statutory law in
member states and supersede conflicting member state laws to the extent of the conflict.
16
Compact rules must not exceed the scope of authority granted by the Compact. A majority of
member state legislatures may invalidate a Compact rule by legislative action.
17
7
Article VIII of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
8
Article VIII, s. A of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
9
Article VIII, s. B. and C., of the Compact and s. 1000.39(2)(e), F.S.
10
Military Interstate Children’s Compact Commission, Florida State Council Profile, available at
https://mic3.net/state/florida/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2021).
11
Articles IX and X of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
12
Article IX, s. B. of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S. The voting representative from each state is the compact commissioner.
13
Article IX, s. B (1.) of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
14
Article IX, s. D of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
15
See Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children, Compact Rules, Adopted 2009, amended
October 17, 2018, available at http://www.mic3.net/assets/rules-2018-revised-9-nov--2018.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2021).
16
Article X, s. B and Article XVIII, s. B of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S. The Compact also provides that if any part of the
Compact exceeds the constitutional limits imposed on the legislature of any member state, the provision shall be ineffective
to the extent of the conflict with the constitutional provision in question in that member state. See Article XVIII, s. E of the
Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S.
17
Article XII, s. D. of the Compact, s. 1000.36, F.S. BILL: CS/SB 430 Page 4
Review of Compact Rule Adoption
Since its enactment in 2008, Florida’s Compact legislation has included a repeal provision that
requires automatic repeal of the Compact after a period of time, unless reauthorized by the
Legislature. The repeal provision addresses concerns regarding unconstitutional delegation of
legislative authority under Article II, s. 3 of the State Constitution. Because membership in the
Compact entails an agreement to be bound by rules promulgated by a non-legislative entity, i.e.,
the Commission, the repeal provision allows the Legislature to periodically review Compact
rules and determine whether it agrees with any new rules or rule amendments adopted during the
intervening period.
The Legislature last reauthorized the Compact during the 2019 Regular Session,
18
and provided
for repeal of the Compact on July 1, 2022, unless reviewed and saved from repeal by the
Legislature by that date.
III. Effect of Proposed Changes:
The bill amends s. 1000.40, F.S., to reauthorize Florida’s Compact legislation and provide for the
repeal of the Compact statutes, ss. 1000.36, 1000.361, 1000.38, and 1000.39, F.S., on July 1,
2025, unless reviewed and reenacted by the Legislature by that date.
Current law provides for one member of the State Council to be jointly selected by the
legislature. This bill adds a member to the council and provides for one member to be selected by
the President of the Senate and one member to be selected by the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, increasing the membership of the Council from seven to eight.
The bill takes effect upon becoming a law.
IV. Constitutional issues:
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions:
None.
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues:
None.
C. Trust Funds Restrictions:
None.
D. State Tax or Fee Increases:
None.
18
Chapter 2019-7, L.O.F. BILL: CS/SB 430 Page 5
E. Other Constitutional Issues:
To address concerns regarding the delegation of legislative authority, the bill provides for
automatic repeal of Florida’s Compact legislation after a period of time, unless
reauthorized by the Legislature.
19
Because membership in the Compact requires the state
to agree to be bound by rules promulgated by a non-legislative entity, i.e., the Interstate
Commission, the repeal provision allows the Legislature to periodically review Compact
rules and determine whether it agrees with any new rules or rule amendments adopted
during the period. Reauthorization of the Compact after these reviews diminishes a claim
that the Legislature has delegated its authority.
20
V. Fiscal Impact Statement:
A. Tax/Fee Issues:
None.
B. Private Sector Impact:
None.
C. Government Sector Impact:
The annual fee that member states pay as dues to the Interstate Commission is at the rate
of $1.15 per dependent child of a military family eligible for transfer under the Interstate
Compact. The total number of children of active duty personnel in the state for FY 2019-
2020 was 39,293, with dues owed of $45,187, paid for through the 2019-2020 General
Appropriations Act. The number of eligible children decreased to 38,761 in 2020-2021,
while the amount appropriated for 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 stayed at $45,187. If the
annual appropriation remains fairly constant for FY 2022-2023 through FY 2024-2025,
the total appropriation is estimated to be $135,561.
21
VI. Technical Deficiencies:
None.
VII. Related Issues:
None.
VIII. Statutes Affected:
The bill substantially amends the following sections of the Florida Statutes: 1000.39 and
1000.40.
19
See s. 5, ch. 2008-225, s. 3, ch. 2010-52, s. 2, ch. 2013-20, s. 2, s. 2, ch. 2016-34, and s. 1, ch. 2019-7, L.O.F.
20
See Florida Senate, Legislative Bill Analysis for SB 212 (2019).
21
Florida Department of Education, 2022 Agency Legislative Bill Analysis, HB 153 (Oct. 20, 2021) (on file with the Senate
Committee on Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security). BILL: CS/SB 430 Page 6
IX. Additional Information:
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes:
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.)
CS by Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security on January 11,
2022:
This amendment provides for a selection of a member of the State Council by each, the
President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, rather than the
current joint selection, increasing the Council from seven to eight members.
B. Amendments:
None.
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.