Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1210 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/01/2022

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Appropriations  
 
BILL: CS/SB 1210 
INTRODUCER:  Environment and Natural Resources Committee and Senator Albritton 
SUBJECT:  Pollution Control Standards and Liability 
DATE: February 25, 2022 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Collazo Rogers EN Fav/CS 
2. Becker Becker AG Favorable 
3. Reagan Sadberry AP Favorable 
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1210 amends section 403.182, Florida Statutes, regarding local pollution control 
programs. The bill provides that notwithstanding existing law or any existing local pollution 
control programs, the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has 
exclusive jurisdiction in setting standards or procedures for evaluating environmental conditions 
and assessing potential liability for the presence of contaminants on land that is classified as 
agricultural land pursuant to state law and being converted to a nonagricultural use. This 
exclusive jurisdiction includes defining what constitutes all appropriate inquiry required by 
federal law relating to the innocent landowners defense under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and associated guidance. 
 
For land that is classified as agricultural land pursuant to state law and being converted to a 
nonagricultural use, the bill provides that the Secretary of the DEP may not delegate the 
authority to set standards or procedures for evaluating environmental conditions and assessing 
potential liability described in the bill to a county, a municipality, or another unit of local 
government through a local pollution control program. However, the bill does not preempt the 
enforcement authority of a county, a municipality, or another unit of local government through a 
local pollution control program. 
 
The bill does not apply to former agricultural land for which a permit has been approved by a 
local government to initiate development or for which development was completed on or before 
July 1, 2022. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 2 
 
 
The bill may increase costs to the DEP for evaluating environmental conditions and assessing 
potential liability on agricultural land that is being converted to a nonagricultural use. 
II. Present Situation: 
Classification of Agricultural Lands  
Section 193.461(1), F.S., requires state property appraisers to classify for ad valorem tax 
assessment purposes all lands within their counties as agricultural or nonagricultural.
1
 Only lands 
that are used primarily for bona fide agricultural purposes may be classified agricultural.
2
  
 
The term “bona fide agricultural purposes” means good faith commercial agricultural use of the 
land.
3
 The term “agricultural purposes” includes, but is not limited to, horticulture; floriculture; 
viticulture; forestry; dairy; livestock; poultry; bee; pisciculture, if the land is used principally for 
the production of tropical fish; aquaculture as defined in state law; algaculture; sod farming; and 
all forms of farm products as defined in state law; and farm production.
4
 
 
In determining whether the use of the land for agricultural purposes is bona fide, the following 
factors may be taken into consideration: 
 The length of time the land has been so used; 
 Whether the use has been continuous; 
 The purchase price paid; 
 Size, as it relates to specific agricultural use, but a minimum acreage may not be required for 
agricultural assessment; 
 Whether an indicated effort has been made to care sufficiently and adequately for the land in 
accordance with accepted commercial agricultural practices, including, without limitation, 
fertilizing, liming, tilling, mowing, reforesting, and other accepted agricultural practices; 
 Whether the land is under lease and, if so, the effective length, terms, and conditions of the 
lease; and 
 Such other factors as may become applicable.
5
 
 
In contrast, nonagricultural lands are lands that have either been diverted from an agricultural to 
a nonagricultural use, or are no longer being utilized for agricultural purposes.
6
 
 
                                                
1
 Section 193.461(2), F.S. 
2
 Section 193.461(3)(b), F.S. 
3
 Id. 
4
 Section 193.461(5), F.S. 
5
 Id. 
6
 Section 193.461(4), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 3 
 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act  
The CERCLA
7
 is commonly known as the Superfund.
8
 Thousands of contaminated sites exist 
nationally due to hazardous waste being dumped, left out in the open, or otherwise improperly 
managed.
9
 These sites include manufacturing facilities, processing plants, landfills, and mining 
sites.
10
  
 
The CERCLA created a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries and required that the 
money collected be used to clean up hazardous waste sites throughout the country.
11
 The 
Superfund allows the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to clean up contaminated 
sites.
12
 It also forces the parties responsible for the contamination to either perform cleanups or 
reimburse the government for EPA-led cleanup work.
13
 When there is no viable responsible 
party, The Superfund gives the EPA the funds and authority to clean up contaminated sites.
14
 
 
Federal agencies must comply with substantive and procedural CERCLA requirements to the 
same extent as private entities.
15
 The following sequence of events generally applies to all sites, 
both privately and federally-owned or operated: preliminary assessment; site investigation; 
listing on the National Priorities List; remedial investigation; feasibility study; record of 
decision; remedial design; remedial action; long-term operation; and maintenance.
16
 The remedy 
selected for cleanup at a federal facility must meet the CERCLA’s cleanup standards.
17
 
 
All Appropriate Inquiries 
All appropriate inquiries (AAI)
18
 is the process of evaluating a property’s environmental 
conditions and assessing potential liability for any contamination.
19
 AAI requirements apply to 
                                                
7
 42 U.S.C. ss. 9601 et seq. 
8
 EPA, What is CERCLA?, https://usepa.servicenowservices.com/ecss?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=12ec93221bb99c 
1013bdb913cc4bcb32 (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
9
 EPA, What is Superfund?, https://usepa.servicenowservices.com/ecss?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=2e020af01b2154 
10a5dced39bc4bcb98 (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
10
 Id. 
11
 EPA, What is CERCLA?, https://usepa.servicenowservices.com/ecss?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=12ec93221bb99c 
1013bdb913cc4bcb32 (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
12
 EPA, What is Superfund?, https://usepa.servicenowservices.com/ecss?id=kb_article_view&sys_kb_id=2e020af01b2154 
10a5dced39bc4bcb98 (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
13
 Id. 
14
 Id. 
15
 EPA, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Federal Facilities,  
https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/comprehensive-environmental-response-compensation-and-liability-act-cercla-and-federal 
(last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
16
 Id. 
17
 Id. 
18
 See 40 C.F.R. pt. 312 (entitled “Innocent Landowners, Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries,” also known as 
the “AAI Final Rule”); see also EPA, Memorandum: Enforcement Discretion Guidance Regarding Statutory Criteria for 
Those Who May Qualify as CERCLA Bona Fide Prospective Purchasers, Contiguous Property Owners, or Innocent 
Landowners (“Common Elements”) (July 29, 2019), available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-
08/documents/common-elements-guide-mem-2019.pdf (last visited Feb. 9, 2022) (providing Common Elements guidance).  
19
 EPA, Lender Liability and Applicability of All Appropriate Inquiries, available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/ 
default/files/2017-07/documents/aai_factsheet_lender_liability_epa_560_f_17_192_508.pdf (last visited Feb. 9, 2022).  BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 4 
 
any party who can potentially claim protection from CERCLA liability as an innocent 
landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchasers (BFPPs).
20
  
 
Title 40, Part 312 of the Code of Federal Regulations (AAI Final Rule) provides that AAI 
investigations must be documented in a written report prepared by an environmental 
professional.
21
 These reports often take the form of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.
22
 
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment uses existing information to help understand the 
property conditions by examining current and historical uses of the site and potential threats to 
human health or the environment. When a potential owner conducts an AAI in compliance with 
Title 40, Part 312 of the Code of Federal Regulations, he or she may have a defense to liability if 
contamination is later discovered.
23
  
 
A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended if the Phase I Environmental Site 
Assessment results reveal known or potential contamination on the property.
24
 In that event, an 
environmental professional develops a sampling plan to evaluate the potential presence of 
contamination from hazardous substances and petroleum on the property and determines the 
sources and exposures.
25
 If the contamination found at the property exceeds risk thresholds for 
the proposed reuse, a cleanup plan may be necessary.
26
  
 
Local Pollution Control Programs 
Section 403.182, F.S., provides that each county and municipality (or any combination thereof) 
may establish and administer a local pollution control program, so long as it complies with all 
other provisions of the Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act (FAWPCA).
27
 All local 
pollution control programs must:
28
 
 Be approved by the DEP as adequate to meet the requirements of the FAWPCA and any 
applicable rules and regulations pursuant thereto; 
 Provide by ordinance, regulation, or local law for requirements compatible with, or stricter or 
more extensive than those imposed by the FAWPCA and regulations issued thereunder; 
 Provide for the enforcement of such requirements by appropriate administrative and judicial 
process; and 
 Provide for administrative organization, staff, financial, and other resources necessary to 
effectively and efficiently carry out its program. 
 
                                                
20
 Id. 
21
 EPA, All Appropriate Inquiries Rule: Reporting Requirements and Suggestions on Report Content, available at 
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/aai_reporting_factsheet.pdf (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
22
 See EPA, Assessing Brownfield Sites, available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/documents/ 
assessing_brownfield_sites.pdf (last visited Feb. 9, 2022) (explaining that performing a Phase I Environmental Site 
Assessment pursuant to ASTM International Standards E1527-13 prior to owning a property is often equivalent to conducting 
all appropriate inquiries). 
23
 Id. 
24
 Id. 
25
 Id. 
26
 Id. 
27
 Section 403.182, F.S.; see also ch. 67-436, s. 2, Laws of Fla. (identifying the short title of the act). 
28
 Section 403.182(1), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 5 
 
If the DEP determines that a local pollution control program is inadequate to prevent and control 
pollution, or is being administered in a manner inconsistent with the requirements of the 
FAWPCA, it may require necessary corrective measures.
29
 If these corrective measures are not 
implemented, the DEP may reassume implementation of the FAWPCA within the jurisdiction.
30
  
Each local pollution control program must cooperate with and assist the DEP in carrying out its 
powers, duties, and functions.
31
  
 
Site Assessment Guidance for Former Agricultural Sites in Miami-Dade County 
The Miami-Dade County (County) Division of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) 
implements monitoring, education, restoration, regulatory, and land management programs to 
protect water quality, drinking water supply, air quality and natural resources that are vital to the 
health and well-being of all County residents and visitors and the ecosystem.
32
 
 
In August 2021, the DERM issued a revised Site Assessment Guidance for Former Agricultural 
Sites in Miami-Dade County, DERM Guidance 7G (DERM Guidance).
33
 The DERM Guidance 
revised earlier interim guidance on the same topic.
34
 The DERM states that the guidance was 
developed in response to requests to provide environmental professionals and practitioners clear 
guidance for evaluating potential environmental concerns at sites transitioning from a former 
bona fide agriculture land use (e.g. crops and orchards) to a nonagricultural land use, such as 
residential use.
35
 
 
According to the DERM Guidance, the conversion of former agricultural lands into 
nonagricultural uses like residences and schools results in different exposed populations (e.g. 
expectant mothers, children, and construction workers), different exposure scenarios (e.g. 
increased exposure frequency and duration), and different exposure pathways.
36
 Under these new 
scenarios, residual agrichemical concentrations in the environment may pose an unacceptable 
health risk to exposed populations and have the potential to cause a nuisance, ground pollution, 
or water pollution as defined in the Miami-Dade County Code.
37
  
 
                                                
29
 See s. 403.182(4), F.S. 
30
 See id. 
31
 Section 403.182(10), F.S. 
32
 DERM, Environment, https://www.miamidade.gov/environment/ (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
33
 DERM, Site Assessment Guidance for Former Agricultural Sites in Miami-Dade County, DERM Guidance 7G, available 
at https://www.miamidade.gov/resources/legal-ads/2021-08-interim-guidance-assessment-at-former-agricultural-sites.pdf  
(last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
34
 DERM, Interim Site Assessment Guidance for Developing at Former Agricultural Sites, https://www.miamidade.gov/ 
environment/research-reports.asp#0 (last visited Feb. 9, 2022). The Dade County Farm Bureau opposed the interim guidance, 
asserting (among other things) that it unfairly targeted agricultural lands, assumed without evidence that they are polluted, 
and imposed on them heavy-handed environmental testing protocols. See Landowners Urged to Fight Back against Miami-
Dade County DERM, SOUTH DADE NEWSLEADER, Nov. 13, 2020, http://www.southdadenewsleader.com/news/landowners-
urged-to-fight-back-against-miami-dade-county-derm/article_bac6b9f8-253c-11eb-915f-cf89a59e3111.html (last visited Feb. 
9, 2022).   
35
 Id. 
36
 DERM, Site Assessment Guidance for Former Agricultural Sites in Miami-Dade County, DERM Guidance 7G, available 
at https://www.miamidade.gov/resources/legal-ads/2021-08-interim-guidance-assessment-at-former-agricultural-sites.pdf  
(last visited Feb. 9, 2022). 
37
 Id. at 1.  BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 6 
 
To address these concerns, the DERM Guidance requires “testing/proper assessment and, if 
necessary, risk mitigation to ensure the protection of public health, safety, and welfare.”
38
 It 
addresses areas historically utilized for growing agricultural crops and provides minimum 
requirements to characterize the site’s environmental conditions resulting from agricultural 
activities at the site. The DERM notes that based upon changes in types of crops grown, 
agrichemicals used, irrigation, and pest management strategies, homogenous application of 
agrichemicals and distribution of agrichemical residues in soils and groundwater cannot be 
assumed. Ancillary use areas such as agrichemical storage, mix-load areas, and fuel shortage 
areas may require more targeted assessment and may include additional contaminants of concern 
(COCs). And additional assessment may be necessary on a case-by-case basis for properties at 
which a nonagricultural land use predated the bona fide agricultural use (such as landfills and 
military installations) or where the land use history indicates a period during which bona fide 
agricultural use was interrupted by a nonagricultural use.
39
  
 
The DERM Guidance provides guidance on soil assessment issues like sampling methodologies 
(including discrete sampling, composite sampling, and Incremental Sampling Methodology 
(ISM) sampling); sampling intervals; COCs; Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) 
analysis; acute toxicity considerations; assessment of bioavailability from soil; and background 
concentrations.
40
 It also provides guidance on groundwater assessment issues like sampling 
frequency and COCs, the substance of technical reports that property owners submit to the 
DERM, and notifications.
41
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 of the bill amends s. 403.182, F.S., regarding local pollution control programs. The bill 
provides that notwithstanding existing law or any existing local pollution control programs, the 
Secretary of the DEP has exclusive jurisdiction in setting standards or procedures for evaluating 
environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for the presence of contaminants on 
land that is classified as agricultural land pursuant to state law and being converted to a 
nonagricultural use. This exclusive jurisdiction includes defining what constitutes all appropriate 
inquiry required by federal law relating to innocent landowners defense under the CERCLA and 
associated guidance. 
 
For land that is classified as agricultural land pursuant to state law and being converted to a 
nonagricultural use, the bill provides that the Secretary of the DEP may not delegate the 
authority to set standards or procedures for evaluating environmental conditions and assessing 
potential liability described in the bill to a county, a municipality, or another unit of local 
government through a local pollution control program. However, the bill also provides that it 
does not preempt the enforcement authority of a county, a municipality, or another unit of local 
government through a local pollution control program. 
 
                                                
38
 Id. 
39
 Id. 
40
 Id. at 2-6. 
41
 Id. at 6-8.  BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 7 
 
The bill does not apply to former agricultural land for which a permit has been approved by a 
local government to initiate development or for which development was completed on or before 
July 1, 2022. 
 
Section 2 provides that the bill takes effect July 1, 2022. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The bill may increase costs to the DEP because it is assuming exclusive jurisdiction in 
setting standards or procedures for evaluating environmental conditions and assessing 
potential liability for the presence of contaminants on land that is classified as 
agricultural land pursuant to state law and being converted to a nonagricultural use. In 
contrast, local governments may experience a decrease in costs associated with setting 
such standards or procedures.   BILL: CS/SB 1210   	Page 8 
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 403.182 of the Florida Statutes.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Environment and Natural Resources on February 7, 2022: 
The committee substitute: 
 Narrows the scope of the underlying bill to the following: 
o Provides that the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection has 
exclusive jurisdiction from “all matters related to” (in the underlying bill) 
evaluating environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for the 
presence of contaminants, to “setting standards or procedures” for same. 
o Modifies the scope of the evaluation and assessment, from land that is or was 
classified as agricultural land, to land that is classified as agricultural land and is 
being converted to a nonagricultural use. 
o Clarifies that the secretary’s exclusive jurisdiction includes defining what 
constitutes all appropriate inquiry consistent with federal law and guidance. 
o Clarifies that the secretary may not delegate this authority to set standards or 
procedures to a county, a municipality, or another unit of local government 
through a local pollution control program for land that is classified as agricultural 
under state law and being converted to nonagricultural use. 
o Provides that the bill does not preempt the enforcement authority of a county, a 
municipality, or another unit of local government through a local pollution control 
program. 
o Provides that the bill does not apply to former agricultural land for which a permit 
has been approved by a local government to initiate development or for which 
development was completed on or before July 1, 2022.  
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.