Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1262 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/25/2022

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs  
 
BILL: CS/SB 1262 
INTRODUCER: Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee and Senator Burgess 
SUBJECT:  Mental Health and Substance Abuse 
DATE: January 27, 2022 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Delia Cox CF Fav/CS 
2.     AHS   
3.     AP  
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1262 makes several changes to procedures surrounding voluntary and involuntary 
examinations of individuals under the Baker and Marchman Acts. The bill prohibits restrictions 
on visitors, phone calls, and written correspondence for Baker Act patients unless certain 
qualified medical professionals document specific conditions are met. The bill requires law 
enforcement officers to search certain electronic databases for emergency contact information of 
Baker and Marchman Act patients being transported to a receiving facility. 
 
Under the bill, patients subject to an involuntary Baker Act examination who do not meet the 
criteria for a petition for involuntary services must be released at the end of 72 hours, regardless 
of whether the examination period ends on a weekend or holiday, as long as certain discharge 
criteria are met.  
 
The bill makes it a first degree misdemeanor for a person to knowingly and willfully:  
 Furnish false information for the purpose of obtaining emergency or other involuntary 
admission for any person;  
 Cause, or conspire with another to cause, any emergency or other involuntary mental health 
procedure for the person under false pretenses; or,  
 Cause, or conspire with another to cause, any person to be denied their rights under the Baker 
Act statutes. 
 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 2 
 
The bill requires receiving facilities to offer voluntary Baker and Marchman Act patients the 
option to authorize the release of clinical information to certain individuals known to the patient 
within 24 hours of admission. 
 
The bill clarifies that telehealth may be used when discharging patients under an involuntary 
Baker Act examination, and directs facilities receiving transportation reports detailing the 
circumstances of a Baker Act to share such reports with the Department of Children and Families 
(the DCF) for use in analyzing annual Baker Act data. 
 
The bill also makes several changes to the Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse 
(Commission), including:  
 Requiring the Commission to conduct meetings in person at locations throughout the state, 
rather than holding meetings remotely and authorizing members to receive per diem and 
reimbursement and travel expenses; and 
 Modifying the due date for the Commission’s interim report from September 1, 2022 to 
January 1, 2023. 
 
The bill requires the DCF to receive and maintain reports relating to transportation of individuals 
subject to an involuntary examination, which may result in the bill having a negative fiscal 
impact on the DCF. See Section V. Fiscal Impact Statement. 
 
The bill is effective July 1, 2022. 
II. Present Situation: 
Refer to Section III (Effect of Proposed Changes) for discussion of the relevant portions of 
current law. 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
The Baker Act 
In 1971, the Legislature adopted the Florida Mental Health Act, known as the Baker Act.
1
 The 
Baker Act deals with Florida’s mental health commitment laws, and includes legal procedures 
for mental health examination and treatment, including voluntary and involuntary examinations.
2
 
The Baker Act also protects the rights of all individuals examined or treated for mental illness in 
Florida.
3
  
 
Involuntary Examination  
Individuals suffering from an acute mental health crisis may require emergency treatment to 
stabilize their condition. Emergency mental health examination and stabilization services may be 
provided on a voluntary or involuntary basis.
4
 An involuntary examination is required if there is 
reason to believe that the person has a mental illness and because of his or her mental illness: 
                                                
1
 Ch. 71-131, LO.F.; The Baker Act is contained in ch. 394, F.S. 
2
 Sections 394.451-394.47891, F.S. 
3
 Section 394.459, F.S. 
4
 Sections 394.4625 and 394.463, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 3 
 
 The person has refused voluntary examination after conscientious explanation and disclosure 
of the purpose of the examination or is unable to determine for himself or herself whether 
examination is necessary; and 
 Without care or treatment, the person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for 
himself or herself; such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm 
to his or her well-being; and it is not apparent that such harm may be avoided through the 
help of willing family members or friends or the provision of other services; or  
 There is a substantial likelihood that without care or treatment the person will cause serious 
bodily harm to himself or herself or others in the near future, as evidenced by recent 
behavior.
5
  
 
The involuntary examination may be initiated by: 
 A court entering an ex parte order stating that a person appears to meet the criteria for 
involuntary examination, based on sworn testimony;
6
   
 A law enforcement officer taking a person who appears to meet the criteria for involuntary 
examination into custody and delivering the person or having him or her delivered to a 
receiving facility for examination;
7
 or 
 A physician, clinical psychologist, psychiatric nurse, mental health counselor, marriage and 
family therapist, or clinical social worker executing a certificate stating that he or she has 
examined a person within the preceding 48 hours and finds that the person appears to meet 
the criteria for involuntary examination, including a statement of the professional’s 
observations supporting such conclusion.
8
 
 
A law enforcement officer who delivers an individual to a receiving facility must execute a 
written report detailing the circumstances under which the person was taken into custody, and 
the report must be made a part of the patient’s clinical record.
9
 Any facility accepting the patient 
based on this certificate must send a copy of the certificate to the DCF within 5 working days.
10
 
The same reporting requirements apply in instances where a law enforcement officer delivers a 
person to a receiving facility pursuant to a certificate executed by a health care professional.
11
  
 
Involuntary patients must be taken to either a public or private facility which has been designated 
by the DCF as a Baker Act receiving facility. The purpose of receiving facilities is to receive and 
hold, or refer, as appropriate, involuntary patients under emergency conditions for psychiatric 
evaluation and to provide short-term treatment or transportation to the appropriate service 
provider.
12
  
 
The patient must be examined by the receiving facility within 72 hours of the initiation of the 
involuntary examination. The examination may be performed by: 
                                                
5
 Section 394.463(1), F.S. 
6
 Section 394.463(2)(a)1., F.S. Additionally, the order of the court must be made a part of the patient’s clinical record. 
7
 Section 394.463(2)(a)2., F.S. 
8
 Section 394.463(2)(a)3., F.S.  
9
 Section 394.463(2)(a)2., F.S. 
10
 Id. 
11
 Section 394.463(2)(a)3., F.S. 
12
 Section 394.455(40), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 4 
 
 A physician;
13
 
 A clinical psychologist;
14
 or   
 A psychiatric nurse
15
 performing within the framework of an established protocol with a 
psychiatrist at a facility.
16
  
 
The patient may not be released by the receiving facility without the documented approval of one 
of the following:  
 A psychiatrist;  
 A clinical psychologist; or 
 If the receiving facility is owned or operated by a hospital or health system: 
o A psychiatric nurse performing within the framework of an established protocol with a 
psychiatrist;
17
 or  
o An attending emergency department physician with experience in the diagnosis and 
treatment of mental illness after completion of an involuntary examination.
18
  
 
By the end of the 72 hour period, or if the period ends on a weekend or holiday, no later than the 
next working day, one of the following actions must be taken to address the individual needs of 
the patient: 
 The patient must be released, unless he or she is charged with a crime, in which case the 
patient is to be returned to the custody of a law enforcement officer; 
 The patient must be released for voluntary outpatient treatment; 
 The patient, unless he or she is charged with a crime, must be asked to give express and 
informed consent to placement as a voluntary patient and, if such consent is given, the patient 
must be admitted as a voluntary patient; or 
 A petition for involuntary services must be filed in the circuit court if inpatient treatment is 
deemed necessary or with the criminal county court, as applicable. When inpatient treatment 
is deemed necessary, the least restrictive treatment consistent with the optimum improvement 
of the patient’s condition must be made available. A petition for involuntary inpatient 
placement must be filed by the facility administrator.
19
 
 
Receiving facilities must also ensure that a patient’s discharge plan considers all of the following 
prior to the patient’s release: 
                                                
13
 “Physician” means a medical practitioner licensed under ch. 458, F.S., or ch. 459, F.S., who has experience in the diagnosis 
and treatment of mental illness or a physician employed by a facility operated by the United States Department of Veterans 
Affairs or the United States Department of Defense. Section 394.455(33), F.S. 
14
 “Clinical psychologist” means a psychologist as defined in s. 490.003(7), F.S., with 3 years of postdoctoral experience in 
the practice of clinical psychology, inclusive of the experience required for licensure, or a psychologist employed by a 
facility operated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs that qualifies as a receiving or treatment facility. 
Section 394.455(5), F.S. 
15
 “Psychiatric nurse” means an advanced practice registered nurse licensed under s. 464.012, F.S., who has a master’s or 
doctoral degree in psychiatric nursing, holds a national advanced practice certification as a psychiatric mental health 
advanced practice nurse, and has 2 years of post-master’s clinical experience under the supervision of a physician. Section 
394.455(36), F.S. 
16
 Section 394.463(2)(f), F.S. 
17
 A psychiatric nurse may not approve the release of a patient if the involuntary examination was initiated by a psychiatrist 
unless the release is approved by the initiating psychiatrist. Section 394.463(2)(f), F.S. 
18
 Section 394.463(2)(f), F.S. 
19
 Section 394.463(2)(g), F.S.   BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 5 
 
 The patient’s transportation resources; 
 The patient’s access to stable living arrangements; 
 How assistance in securing needed living arrangements or shelter will be provided to patients 
at risk of readmission within the 3 weeks immediately following discharge due to 
homelessness or transient status. The discharging facility must document that, before 
discharging the patient, it has requested a commitment from a shelter provider that assistance 
will be rendered; 
 The availability of assistance in obtaining a timely aftercare appointment for needed services, 
including continuation of prescribed psychotropic medications. Aftercare appointments for 
psychotropic medication and case management must be requested to occur not later than 7 
days after the expected date of discharge; if the discharge is delayed, the discharging facility 
must document notification of the delay to the aftercare provider. The discharging facility 
shall coordinate with the aftercare service provider and document the aftercare planning; 
 The availability of, and access to, prescribed psychotropic medications in the community. To 
ensure a patient’s safety and provision of continuity of essential psychotropic medications, 
such prescribed psychotropic medications, prescriptions, multiple partial prescriptions for 
psychotropic medications, or a combination thereof, must be provided to the patient upon 
discharge to cover the intervening days until the first scheduled psychotropic medication 
aftercare appointment, up to a maximum of 21 calendar days; 
 The provision of education and written information about the patient’s illness and 
psychotropic medications, including other prescribed and over-the-counter medications; the 
common side-effects of any medications prescribed; and any common adverse clinically 
significant drug-to-drug interactions between that medication and other commonly available 
prescribed and over-the-counter medications; 
 The provision of contact and program information about, and referral to, any community-
based peer support services in the community; 
 The provision of contact and program information about, and referral to, any needed 
community resources; 
 Referral to substance abuse treatment programs, trauma or abuse recovery-focused programs, 
or other self-help groups, if indicated by assessments; and 
 The provision of information about advance directives, including how to prepare and use 
them.
20
 
 
Involuntary Inpatient Placement 
A person may be placed in involuntary inpatient placement for treatment upon a finding of the 
court by clear and convincing evidence that: 
 He or she is mentally ill and because of his or her mental illness: 
o He or she has refused voluntary placement for treatment after sufficient and conscientious 
explanation and disclosure of the purpose of placement or is unable to determine for 
himself or herself whether placement is necessary; and 
o He or she is manifestly incapable of surviving alone or with the help of willing and 
responsible family or friends, including available alternative services; and 
o Without treatment, is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself or herself; 
and  
                                                
20
 Rule 65E-5.1303, F.A.C.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 6 
 
o Such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his or her 
well-being; or 
o There is a substantial likelihood that in the near future he or she will inflict serious bodily 
harm on himself or herself or another person, as evidenced by recent behavior causing, 
attempting, or threatening such harm; and 
 All available less restrictive treatment alternatives which would offer an opportunity for 
improvement of his or her condition have been judged to be inappropriate.
21
 
 
The administrator of the receiving or treatment facility that is retaining a patient for involuntary 
inpatient treatment must file a petition for involuntary inpatient placement in the court in the 
county where the patient is located.
22
 Upon filing, the clerk of the court must provide copies to 
the DCF, the patient, the patient’s guardian or representative, and the state attorney and public 
defender of the judicial circuit in which the patient is located.
23
 The court must hold a hearing on 
involuntary inpatient placement within 5 court working days, unless a continuance is granted.
24
 
 
The Marchman Act 
In the early 1970s, the federal government enacted laws creating formula grants for states to 
develop continuums of care for individuals and families affected by substance abuse.
25
 The laws 
resulted in separate funding streams and requirements for alcoholism and drug abuse. In response 
to the laws, the Florida Legislature enacted chs. 396 and 397, F.S., relating to alcohol and drug 
abuse, respectively.
26
 Each of these laws governed different aspects of addiction, and thus had 
different rules promulgated by the state to fully implement the respective pieces of legislation.
27
 
However, because persons with substance abuse issues often do not restrict their misuse to one 
substance or another, having two separate laws dealing with the prevention and treatment of 
addiction was cumbersome and did not adequately address Florida’s substance abuse problem.
28
 
In 1993, legislation was adopted to combine ch. 396 and 397, F.S., into a single law, the Hal S. 
Marchman Alcohol and Other Drug Services Act (Marchman Act).
29
 
 
The Marchman Act encourages individuals to seek services on a voluntary basis within the 
existing financial and space capacities of a service provider. An individual who wishes to enter 
treatment may apply to a service provider for voluntary admission.
30
 Within the financial and 
space capabilities of the service provider, the individual must be admitted to treatment when 
sufficient evidence exists that he or she is impaired by substance abuse and his or her medical 
and behavioral conditions are not beyond the safe management capabilities of the service 
provider.
31
 However, denial of addiction is a prevalent symptom of SUD, creating a barrier to 
                                                
21
 Section 394.467(1), F.S.  
22
 Section 394.467(2) and (3), F.S. 
23
 Section 394.467(3), F.S. 
24
 Section 394.467(5), F.S. 
25
 The DCF, Baker Act and Marchman Act Project Team Report for Fiscal Year 2016-2017, p. 4-5. (On file with the Senate 
Children, Families, and Elder Affairs Committee). 
26
 Id. 
27
 Id. 
28
 Id. 
29
 Ch. 93-39, s. 2, L.O.F. (creating ch. 397, F.S., effective October 1, 1993). 
30
 Section 397.601(1), F.S 
31
 Section 397.601(2), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 7 
 
timely intervention and effective treatment.
32
 As a result, treatment typically must stem from a 
third party providing the intervention needed for SUD treatment.
33
 
 
Involuntary Admissions 
The Marchman Act establishes a variety of methods under which substance abuse assessment, 
stabilization, and treatment can be obtained on an involuntary basis. There are five involuntary 
admission procedures that can be broken down into two categories depending upon whether the 
court is involved.
34
 Three of the procedures do not involve the court, while two require direct 
petitions to the circuit court. The same criteria for involuntary admission apply regardless of the 
admission process used.
35
 
 
An individual meets the criteria for an involuntary admission under the Marchman Act when 
there is good faith reason to believe the individual is substance abuse impaired and, because of 
such impairment, has lost the power of self-control with respect to substance use, and either:
 
 
 Is in need of substance abuse services and, by reason of substance abuse impairment, his or 
her judgment has been so impaired that he or she is incapable of appreciating his or her need 
for such services and of making a rational decision in that regard;
36
 or 
 Without care or treatment: 
o The person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself or herself; 
o Such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his or her 
well-being; and  
o It is not apparent that such harm may be avoided through the help of willing family 
members or friends or the provision of other services; or  
o There is substantial likelihood that the person: 
 Has inflicted, or threatened to or attempted to inflict physical harm on himself, 
herself, or another; or 
 Is likely to inflict, physical harm on himself, herself, or another unless he or she is 
admitted.
37
 
 
Non-Court Involved Involuntary Admissions 
The three types of non-court procedures for involuntary admission for substance abuse treatment 
under the Marchman Act include protective custody, emergency admission, and the alternative 
involuntary assessment for minors. 
 
Law enforcement officers use the protective custody procedure when an individual is substance-
impaired or intoxicated in public and such impairment is brought to the attention of the officer.
38
 
                                                
32
 Darran Duchene and Patrick Lane, Fundamentals of the Marchman Act, Risk RX, Vol. 6 No. 2 (Apr. – Jun. 2006) State 
University System of Florida Self-Insurance Programs, available at http://flbog.sip.ufl.edu/risk-rx-article/fundamentals-of-
the-marchman-act/ (last visited January 19, 2022) (hereinafter cited as “Fundamentals of the Marchman Act”). 
33
 Id. 
34
 Id. 
35
 Id. 
36
 Section 394.675(2)(a), F.S. However, mere refusal to receive services does not constitute evidence of lack of judgment 
with respect to the person’s need for such services. 
37
 Section 397.675(2)(b), F.S. 
38
 Section 397.677, F.S. The individual can be a minor or adult under this process.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 8 
 
The purpose of this procedure is to allow the person to be taken to a safe environment for 
observation and assessment to determine the need for treatment. A law enforcement officer may 
take the individual to their residence, a hospital, a detoxification center, or an addiction receiving 
facility, whichever the officer determines is most appropriate.
39
 The officer is also required to 
execute a written report
40
 detailing the circumstances under which the individual was taken into 
custody.
41
 The current version of the form developed and disseminated by the DCF must also 
include information on transportation, family members or others present when the individual was 
taken into custody, and next of kin or other contact information, if known.
42
 
 
If the individual in these circumstances does not consent to protective custody, the officer may 
do so against the person’s will, without using unreasonable force. Additionally, the officer has 
the option of taking an individual to a jail or detention facility for his or her own protection. Such 
detention cannot be considered an arrest for any purpose and no record can be made to indicate 
that the person has been detained or charged with any crime.
43
 However, if the individual is a 
minor, the law enforcement officer must notify the nearest relative of a minor in protective 
custody without consent.
44
  
 
The second process, emergency admission, authorizes an individual who appears to meet the 
criteria for involuntary admission to be admitted to a hospital, an addiction receiving facility, or 
a detoxification facility for emergency assessment and stabilization, or to a less intensive 
component of a licensed service provider for assessment only.
45
 Individuals admitted for 
involuntary assessment and stabilization under this provision must have a certificate from a 
specified health professional
46
 demonstrating the need for this type of placement and 
recommending the least restrictive type of service that is appropriate to the needs of the 
individual.
47
 
 
Lastly, the alternative involuntary assessment for minors provides a way for a parent, legal 
guardian, or legal custodian to have a minor admitted to an addiction receiving facility to assess 
the minor’s need for treatment by a qualified professional.
48
 
 
                                                
39
 Section 397.6771, F.S. A person may be held in protective custody for no more than 72 hours, unless a petition for 
involuntary assessment or treatment has been timely filed with the court within that timeframe to extend protective custody. 
40
 The DCF is required to develop the form pursuant to s. 397.321(19), F.S. 
41
 Section 397.6772(1)(a), F.S. 
42
 The current version of the form is available at 
https://eds.myflfamilies.com/DCFFormsInternet/Search/OpenDCFForm.aspx?FormId=1061 (last visited January 19, 2022). 
43
 Section 397.6772(1), F.S. 
44
 Section 397.6772(2), F.S.  
45
 Section 397.679, F.S. 
46
 Section 397.6793(1), F.S., provides a list of professionals that include a physician, a clinical psychologist, a physician 
assistant working under the scope of practice of the supervising physician, a psychiatric nurse, an advanced practice 
registered nurse, a mental health counselor, a marriage and family therapist, a master’s-level-certified addictions professional 
for substance abuse services, or a clinical social worker. 
47
 Section 397.6793, F.S. The certificate can be from a physician, advanced practice registered nurse, a psychiatric nurse, a 
clinical psychologist, a clinical social worker, a marriage and family therapist, a mental health counselor, or a physician 
assistant working under the scope of a practice of the supervising physician, or a master’s-level-certified addictions 
professional for substance abuse services. 
48
 Section 397.6798, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 9 
 
Telehealth (Sections 1 and 5) 
Section 456.47, F.S., defines the term “telehealth” as the use of synchronous or asynchronous 
telecommunications technology by a telehealth provider to provide health care services, 
including, but not limited to, assessment, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and monitoring of a 
patient; transfer of medical data; patient and professional health-related education; public health 
services; and health administration. The term does not include audio-only telephone calls, e-mail 
messages, or facsimile transmissions. 
 
“Synchronous” telehealth refers to the live, real-time, or interactive transmission of information 
between a patient and a health care provider during the same time period. The use of live video 
to evaluate and diagnosis a patient would be considered synchronous telehealth. 
 
“Asynchronous” telehealth refers to the transfer of data between a patient and a health care 
provider over a period of time and typically in separate time frames. This is commonly referred 
to as “store-and-forward.” 
 
“Remote patient monitoring” refers to the collection, transmission, evaluation, and 
communication of individual health data to a health care provider from the patient’s location 
through technology such as wireless devices, wearable sensors, implanted health monitors, 
smartphones, and mobile apps.
49
 Remote monitoring is used to monitor physiologic parameters, 
including weight, blood pressure, blood glucose, pulse, temperature, oximetry, respiratory flow 
rate, and more. Remote monitoring can be useful for ongoing condition monitoring and chronic 
disease management. Depending upon the patient’s needs, remote monitoring can be 
synchronous or asynchronous. 
 
Florida Telehealth Providers 
In 2019, the Legislature passed and the Governor approved CS/CS/HB 23, creating s. 456.47, 
F.S., which became effective on July 1, 2019.
50
 It authorized Florida-licensed health care 
providers
51
 to use telehealth to deliver health care services within their respective scopes of 
practice. 
 
Telehealth providers who treat patients located in Florida must be one of the licensed health care 
practitioners listed below and be either Florida-licensed, licensed under a multi-state health care 
licensure compact of which Florida is a member state, or registered as an out-of-state telehealth 
provider: 
 Behavioral Analyst;
52
 
 Acupuncturist;
53
 
 Allopathic physician;
54
 
                                                
49
 American Board of Telehealth, Telehealth: Defining 21
st
 Century Care, available at 
https://www.americantelemed.org/resource/why-telemedicine/ (last visited January 19, 2022). 
50
 Chapter 2019-137, s. 6, L.O.F. 
51
 Section 456.47(1)(b), F.S. 
52
 Section 393.17, F.S. 
53
 Chapter 457, F.S. 
54
 Chapter 458, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 10 
 
 Osteopathic physician;
55
 
 Chiropractor;
56
 
 Podiatrist;
57
 
 Optometrist;
58
 
 Nurse;
59
 
 Pharmacist;
60
 
 Dentist;
61
 
 Dental Hygienist;
62
 
 Midwife;
63
 
 Speech Therapist;
64
 
 Occupational Therapist;
65
 
 Radiology Technician;
66
 
 Electrologist;
67
 
 Orthotist;
68
 
 Pedorthist;
69
 
 Prosthetist;
70
 
 Medical Physicist;
71
 
 Emergency Medical Technician;
72
 
 Paramedic;
73
 
 Massage Therapist;
74
 
 Optician;
75
 
 Hearing Aid Specialist;
76
 
 Clinical Laboratory Personnel;
77
 
 Respiratory Therapist;
78
 
                                                
55
 Chapter 459, F.S. 
56
 Chapter 460, F.S. 
57
 Chapter 461, F.S. 
58
 Chapter 463, F.S. 
59
 Chapter 464, F.S. 
60
 Chapter 465, F.S. 
61
 Chapter 466, F.S. 
62
 Id. 
63
 Chapter 467, F.S. 
64
 Chapter 468, F.S. 
65
 Id. 
66
 Id. 
67
 Chapter 458, F.S. 
68
 Chapter 468, F.S. 
69
 Id. 
70
 Id. 
71
 Chapter 483, F.S. 
72
 Chapter 401, F.S. 
73
 Id. 
74
 Chapter 480, F.S. 
75
 Chapter 484, F.S. 
76
 Id. 
77
 Chapter 483, F.S. 
78
 Chapter 468, F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 11 
 
 Psychologist;
79
 
 Psychotherapist;
80
 
 Dietician/Nutritionist;
81
 
 Athletic Trainer;
82
 
 Clinical Social Worker;
83
 
 Marriage and Family Therapist;
84
 and 
 Mental Health Counselor.
85
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill provides a definition for “telehealth,” specifically that telehealth has the same meaning 
as defined in s. 456.47, F.S. The bill permits receiving facilities holding patients for an 
involuntary examination under the Baker Act to authorize the release of a patient via telehealth. 
 
Under the bill, if a patient’s 72-hour examination period ends on a weekend or holiday, and the 
receiving facility: 
 Intends to file a petition for involuntary services, the patient may be held at a receiving 
facility through the next working day thereafter and the petition for involuntary services must 
be filed no later than that date. If the receiving facility fails to file a petition at the close of 
the next working day, the patient must be released from the receiving facility. 
 Does not intend to file a petition for involuntary services, a receiving facility may postpone 
release of a patient until the next working day thereafter only if a qualified professional 
documents that adequate discharge planning and procedures in accordance with s. 394.468, 
F.S.,
86
 are not possible until the next working day.  
 
Specifically, receiving facilities must include, and document consideration of the following 
newly established discharge planning and procedure requirements delineated in s. 394.468, F.S.: 
 Follow-up behavioral health appointments; 
 Information on how to obtain prescribed medications; and  
 Information pertaining to:  
o Available living arrangements; 
o Transportation; and  
o Recovery support opportunities.  
 
The bill applies these requirements to all patients discharged from a receiving or treatment 
facility. 
 
                                                
79
 Chapter 490, F.S. 
80
 Chapter 491, F.S. 
81
 Chapter 468, F.S. 
82
 Chapter 468, F.S. 
83
 Chapter 491, F.S. 
84
 Id. 
85
 Id. 
86
 Section 394.468, F.S., currently provides that admission and discharge and treatment policies of the DCF are governed 
solely by ch. 394, F.S., and are not subject to control by court procedure rules. The matters within the purview of this part are 
deemed to be substantive, not procedural.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 12 
 
These changes will help to ensure patients are not held by a facility for longer than necessary, 
while maintaining sound and proper discharge considerations. 
 
Notice Requirements (Sections 3-7) 
Receiving facilities must give prompt notice
87
 of the whereabouts of a patient who is being   
involuntarily held for examination to the patient’s guardian,
88
 guardian advocate,
89
 health care 
surrogate or proxy, attorney, and representative.
90
 If the patient is a minor, the receiving facility 
must give prompt notice to the minor’s parent, guardian, caregiver, or guardian advocate. Notice 
for an adult may be provided within 24 hours of arrival; however, notice for a minor must be 
provided immediately after the minor’s arrival at the facility.
91
 The facility may delay the 
notification for a minor for up to 24 hours if it has submitted a report to the central abuse hotline.  
 
The receiving facility must attempt to notify the minor’s parent, guardian, caregiver, or guardian 
advocate until it receives confirmation that the notice has been received. Attempts must be 
repeated at least once every hour during the first 12 hours after the minor’s arrival and then once 
every 24 hours thereafter until confirmation is received, the minor is released, or a petition for 
involuntary services is filed with the court.
92
 
 
Emergency Contact Information and Florida Databases  
On December 7, 2005, Tiffiany Marie Olson was killed in a traffic crash on U.S. 19 in Manatee 
County.
93
 Following her mother not being notified of her death for several hours, her mother was 
instrumental in getting emergency contact information (ECI) added to a person’s driver license 
or identification card record.
94
 The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 
(the FLHSMV) launched the program on October 2, 2006, and it has since been adopted by 15 
other states.
95
  
 
ECI allows law enforcement to contact designated individuals in the event of an emergency.
96
 
The system is securely maintained by the FLHSMV and can be accessed by law enforcement 
only in an emergency situation.
97
 Floridians with a valid driver’s license or ID card may enter up 
                                                
87
 Notice may be provided in person or by telephone; however, in the case of a minor, notice may also be provided by other 
electronic means. Section 394.455(2), F.S. 
88
 “Guardian” means the natural guardian of a minor, or a person appointed by a court to act on behalf of a ward’s person if 
the ward is a minor or has been adjudicated incapacitated. Section 394.455(17), F.S. 
89
 “Guardian advocate” means a person appointed by a court to make decisions regarding mental health treatment on behalf 
of a patient who has been found incompetent to consent to treatment. Section 394.455(18), F.S. 
90
 Section 394.4599(2)(b), F.S. 
91
 Section 394.4599(2)(b)-(c), F.S. 
92
 Section 394.4599(c)2., F.S. 
93
 The Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (the FLHSMV), Emergency Contact Information History, available at 
https://www.flhsmv.gov/driver-licenses-id-cards/emergency-contact-information-history/ (last visited January 19, 2022). 
94
 Id. 
95
 To Inform Families First, About TIFF, available at https://www.toinformfamiliesfirst.org/ (last visited January 19, 2022) 
(hereinafter “About TIFF”). 
96
 The FLHSMV, ECI Brochure, available at https://flhsmv.gov/pdf/eci/eci_brochure.pdf (last visited January 19, 2022). 
97
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 13 
 
to two emergency contacts.
98
 Residents can register or update their ECI without cost at 
flhsmv.gov/eci and in local driver license offices statewide.
99
 
 
Driver and Vehicle Information Database (DAVID) 
The DAVID system is a FLHSMV-owned, multifaceted database that provides accurate, concise, 
and up-to-date driver and motor vehicle information to law enforcement, criminal justice 
officials, and other state agencies.
100
 To maintain the integrity of this information, the records are 
regulated and can only be accessed and used by authorized personnel in accordance with state 
and federal law.
101
 
 
The DAVID system also contains ECI for Florida drivers who have chosen to list emergency 
contacts.
102
 ECI available through DAVID may only be accessed by law enforcement and may 
only be used in emergency situations.
103
 
 
Florida Crime Information Center (FCIC) System 
The FCIC system is Florida’s central database for tracking various crime-related information. 
The system is designed “to provide services, information, and capabilities to the law enforcement 
and criminal justice community” in the state, and gives them access to other criminal justice 
information systems nationwide.
104
 All employees that access the FCIC must be certified by the 
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and all information obtained through the system is 
restricted to criminal justice purposes.
105
 
 
Law enforcement can also use FCIC to access information pertaining to a driver’s specific 
license, providing an officer with information including a driver’s name, date of birth, residential 
address and licensure status. If a driver has chosen to add ECI, it will also be provided to an 
officer along with the rest of the driver-specific information at the bottom of the screen when he 
or she queries the FCIC database.
106
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
Involuntary Admissions 
Baker Act 
                                                
98
 Id. 
99
 Id. 
100
 The FLHSMV Office of Inspector General, DAVID Audits, p. 1, available at 
https://www.flhsmv.gov/pdf/igoffice/20171823.pdf (last visited January 19, 2022). 
101
 Id., s. 119.0712(2)(d), F.S. 
102
 About TIFF. 
103
 The Fort Lauderdale Police Department, Access to Criminal Justice Information, p. 4, available at 
https://www.flpd.org/home/showpublisheddocument/4061/637662691735570000 (last visited January 19, 2022). 
104
 Florida Highway Patrol Policy Manual, Criminal Justice Information Services: Policy 14.02.04C. (Rev. Mar. 2015), 
available at https://www.flhsmv.gov/fhp/Manuals/1402.pdf (last visited Nov. 21, 2017). 
105
 Id. at Policy 14.02.07C. and D. 
106
 News 6 Orlando, Do Florida Drivers Need to Set Up Emergency Contact Information?, available at 
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2022/01/17/do-florida-drivers-need-to-set-up-emergency-contact-information/ (last 
visited January 19, 2022).  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 14 
 
The bill adds emergency contacts, identified by law enforcement through the DAVID or FCIC 
electronic databases, to the list of individuals a receiving facility may contact when a patient is 
brought to a receiving facility for an involuntary examination under the Baker Act. 
 
Under the bill, an officer who delivers a patient to a receiving facility must include all ECI 
discoverable through FCIC, DAVID, or other electronic databases maintained by the FDLE or 
the FLHSMV in the report detailing the circumstances under which the person was taken into 
custody. Such information must be included in reports following instances where a law 
enforcement officer: 
 Determines an individual meets the criteria for involuntary examination and delivers the 
individual to a receiving facility; 
 Delivers an individual to a receiving facility pursuant to a certificate executed by a health 
care professional under s. 394.463(2)(a)3., F.S.; or 
 Determines that a hospital or addictions receiving facility is the most appropriate place for a 
person who: 
o Is in protective custody; or 
o Refuses to consent to assistance. 
 
Such information may not be used for any purpose other than informing emergency contacts of a 
patient’s whereabouts, and shall otherwise remain confidential and exempt from Florida’s public 
records disclosure requirements. 
 
Marchman Act 
When a law enforcement officer delivers a person to a hospital or addictions receiving facility 
under the Marchman Act, the bill requires the officer to attempt to notify the nearest relative or 
emergency contact of the person and document such notification, and attempts at notification, in 
the report.  
 
Voluntary Admissions 
The bill requires receiving facilities and substance abuse service providers serving Baker Act and 
Marchman Act patients, respectively, to document that individuals admitted on a voluntary basis 
have been provided with the option to authorize the release of clinical information, within 24 
hours of admission, to the individual’s: 
 Health care surrogate or proxy; 
 Attorney; 
 Representative; or 
 Other known emergency contact. 
 
The release authorization will help to ensure patients admitted on a voluntary basis will have the 
option of sharing important information regarding health care decisions with the individuals 
specified above. 
  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 15 
 
Individual Bill of Rights (Sections 2 and 5) 
Both the Marchman Act and the Baker Act provide an individual bill of rights.
107
 Rights in 
common include the right to: 
 Dignity; 
 Quality of treatment; 
 Not be refused treatment at a state-funded facility due to an inability to pay; 
 Communicate with others; 
 Care and custody of personal effects; and  
 Petition the court on a writ of habeas corpus.
108
  
 
The individual bill of rights also imposes liability for damages on persons who violate individual 
rights.
109
 The Marchman Act ensures the right to habeas corpus, which means that a petition for 
release may be filed with the court by an individual involuntarily retained or his or her parent or 
representative.
110
 In addition to the petitioners authorized in the Marchman Act, the Baker Act 
permits the DCF to file a writ for habeas corpus on behalf of the individual.
111
 
 
The Marchman Act also makes it a first degree misdemeanor
112
 for a person to: 
 Knowingly furnishing false information for the purpose of obtaining emergency or other 
involuntary admission for any person; 
 Causing or otherwise securing, or conspiring with or assisting another to cause or secure, 
without reason for believing a person to be impaired, any emergency or other involuntary 
procedure for the person; 
 Causing, or conspiring with or assisting another to cause, the denial to any person of any 
right accorded under the Marchman Act.
113
 
 
The Baker Act currently does not contain similar criminal penalties for activities that infringe 
upon patients’ rights. 
 
Right to Outside Communication and Visitation  
All patients held at a receiving facility have the explicit right to communicate freely and 
privately with others outside the facility unless it is determined that communication will likely 
harm the patient or others.
114
 Similar conditions apply to the right of patients to send, receive, 
and mail correspondence, and to access outside visitors.
115
 Facilities must review restrictions on 
                                                
107
 Section 394.459, F.S., provides “Rights of Individuals” for individuals served through the Baker Act; section 397.501, 
F.S., provides “Rights of Individuals” for individuals served through the Marchman Act. 
108
 Id. 
109
 Sections 394.459(10) and 397.501(10)(a), F.S. 
110
 Section 397.501(9), F.S. 
111
 Section 394.459(8)(a), F.S. 
112
 A first degree misdemeanor is punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year and a fine of $1,000. 
Sections 775.082 and 775.083, F.S. However, s. 397.581, F.S., specifically provides that this offense is punishable by a fine 
of up to $5,000.  
113
 Section 397.581, F.S. 
114
 Section 394.459(5)(a), F.S. 
115
 Section 394.459(5)(b)-(c), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 16 
 
a patient’s right to communicate, send or receive sealed, unopened correspondence, or receive 
visitors at least once every 7 days.
116
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
Patient Access and Communication 
The bill prohibits receiving facilities from restricting any of the following patients’ rights unless 
a qualified professional determines that failing to do so would be detrimental to the clinical well-
being of any patient or the general well-being of staff, including: 
 The right to communicate freely and privately with persons outside of the receiving facility; 
 The right to receive, send, and mail sealed, unopened correspondence; and 
 The right to access to any patient, subject to the patient’s right to deny or withdraw consent at 
any time, by the patient’s family, guardian, guardian advocate, representative, Florida 
statewide or local advocacy council, or attorney. 
 
A “qualified professional” is defined in s. 394.455(39), F.S., to mean:  
 A physician licensed under ch. 458, F.S.;  
 A physician assistant licensed under ch. 459, F.S.;  
 A psychiatrist licensed under ch. 458, F.S., or ch. 459, F.S.;  
 A psychologist as defined in s. 490.003(7), F.S.; or  
 A psychiatric nurse as defined in s. 394.455(36), F.S. 
 
The bill also reduces the number of days within which a receiving facility must review 
restrictions on a patient’s right to communicate or receive visitors from 7 days to 3 days. A 
qualified professional must document such restrictions within 24 hours of the restriction being 
implemented. 
 
Criminal Penalty 
The bill also makes it a first degree misdemeanor to knowingly and willfully:  
 Furnish false information for the purpose of obtaining emergency or other involuntary 
admission for any person;  
 Cause, or conspire with another to cause, any involuntary mental health procedure for the 
person without a reason for believing a person is impaired; or,  
 Cause, or conspire with another to cause, any person to be denied their rights under the 
mental health statutes. 
 
The bill also provides that a person who is convicted of this offense may be punished by a fine 
not exceeding $5,000. 
 
Mental Health Data Reporting and Analysis (Section 5) 
The DCF collects and maintains copies of ex parte orders, involuntary outpatient services orders, 
involuntary inpatient placement orders, and professional certificates initiating Baker Act 
                                                
116
 Section 394.459(5)(c), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 17 
 
examinations.
117
 Such documents are considered part of a patient’s clinical record and are used 
to prepare annual reports analyzing the de-identified data contained therein.
118
 The DCF 
contracts with the Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute at the University of South 
Florida (the Institute) to perform the data analysis and prepare the reports.
119
 The Institute also 
analyzes other information relating to mental health and acts as a provider of crisis services to 
certain patients.
120
 The reports are provided to the DCF, the President of the Senate, the Speaker 
of the House of Representatives, and the minority leaders of the Senate and the House of 
Representatives.
121
 
 
Transportation to a Facility  
Baker Act 
The Baker Act requires each county to designate a single law enforcement agency to transfer the 
person in need of services. If the person is in custody based on noncriminal or minor criminal 
behavior, the law enforcement officer will transport the person to the nearest receiving facility. 
If, however, the person is arrested for a felony the person must first be processed in the same 
manner as any other criminal suspect. The law enforcement officer must then transport the 
person to the nearest facility, unless the facility is unable to provide adequate security.
122
 Law 
enforcement must then relinquish the person, along with corresponding documentation, to a 
responsible individual at the facility.
123
 
 
Marchman Act 
The Marchman Act authorizes an applicant seeking to have a person admitted to a facility, the 
person’s spouse or guardian, a law enforcement officer, or a health officer to transport the 
individual for an emergency assessment and stabilization.
124
  
 
If a person in circumstances which justify protective custody
125
 fails or refuses to consent to 
assistance and a law enforcement officer has determined that a hospital or a licensed 
detoxification or addictions receiving facility is the most appropriate place for the person, the 
officer may, after giving due consideration to the expressed wishes of the person: 
 Take the person to a hospital or to a licensed detoxification or addictions receiving facility 
against the person’s will but without using unreasonable force; or 
                                                
117
 Section 394.463(2)(e), F.S. 
118
 Id. 
119
 The University of South Florida, Baker Act Reporting Center, About Us, available at https://www.usf.edu/cbcs/baker-
act/about/index.aspx (last visited January 19, 2022). 
120
 See The University of South Florida, Baker Act Reporting Center, What We Do, available at 
https://www.usf.edu/cbcs/baker-act/about/whatwedo.aspx (last visited Jan. 7, 2022); and The University of South Florida, 
Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, About the Institute, available at https://www.usf.edu/cbcs/fmhi/about/ (last 
visited January 19, 2022).  
121
 Id. 
122
 Section 394.462(1)(f)-(g), F.S. 
123
 Section 394.462(3), F.S. 
124
 Section 397.6795, F.S. 
125
 Section 397.677, F.S., states that a law enforcement officer may implement protective custody measures when a minor or 
an adult who appears to meet the involuntary admission criteria in s. 397.675, F.S., is brought to the attention of law 
enforcement or in a public space.   BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 18 
 
 In the case of an adult, detain the person for his or her own protection in any municipal or 
county jail or other appropriate detention facility.
126
  
 
The officer must use a standard form developed by the DCF to execute a written report detailing 
the circumstances under which the person was taken into custody, and the written report shall be 
included in the patient’s clinical record. 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill adds reports completed by law enforcement when a person is transported to a receiving 
facility to the documents received and maintained by the DCF for use in preparing annual reports 
on Baker Act data. The bill also makes such reports a part of a patient’s clinical record. The 
transportation reports will allow the Baker Act Reporting Center to provide a more 
comprehensive overview of Baker Act data statewide.  
 
Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse  
In 2021, the Legislature created the Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse 
(Commission), adjunct to the DCF, in response to recommendations of the 20
th
 Statewide Grand 
Jury.
127
 The DCF is required to provide administrative staff and support services for the 
Commission.
128
 
 
The purposes of the Commission include: 
 Examining the current methods of providing mental health and substance abuse services in 
the state; 
 Improving the effectiveness of current practices, procedures, programs, and initiatives in 
providing such services; 
 Identifying any barriers or deficiencies in the delivery of such services; and 
 Recommending changes to existing laws, rules, and policies necessary to implement the 
Commission’s recommendations.
129
 
 
The Commission is comprised of 19 members, including the Secretaries of AHCA and DCF.
130
 
Membership of the Commission also includes: 
 Seven members appointed by the Governor, including: 
o A psychologist licensed under ch. 490, F.S., practicing within the mental health delivery 
system; 
o A mental health professional licensed under ch. 491, F.S.; 
o A representative of mental health courts; 
o An emergency room physician; 
o A representative from the field of law enforcement;  
o A representative from the criminal justice system; and 
                                                
126
 Section 397.6772(1)(a)-(b), F.S. 
127
 Chapter 2021-170, L.O.F. 
128
 Section 394.9086(1), F.S. 
129
 Section 394.9086(2), F.S. 
130
 Section 394.9086(3)(a), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 19 
 
o A representative of a child welfare agency involved in the delivery of behavioral health 
services. 
 Five members appointed by the President of the Senate, including: 
o A member of the Senate; 
o A person living with a mental health disorder; 
o A family member of a consumer of publicly funded mental health services; 
o A representative of the Louis de la Parte Mental Health Institute within the University of 
South Florida; and 
o A representative of a county school district. 
 Five members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, including: 
o A member of the House of Representatives; 
o A representative of a treatment facility; 
o A representative of a managing entity; 
o A representative of a community substance abuse provider; and 
o A psychiatrist licensed under chs. 458 or 459, F.S., practicing within the mental health 
delivery system.
131
 
 
The Governor appoints the Commission chair from among its members, and members serve at 
the pleasure of the officer who appointed the member.
132
 The Commission is required to hold its 
meetings via teleconference or other electronic means.
133
 A vacancy on the Commission is 
required to be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
134
  
 
The duties of the Commission include: 
 Conducting a review and evaluation of the management and functioning of existing publicly 
supported mental health and substance abuse systems in the DCF, AHCA, and all other 
relevant state departments; 
o At a minimum, such review must include a review of current goals and objectives, 
current planning, service strategies, coordination management, purchasing, contracting, 
financing, local government funding responsibility, and accountability mechanisms. 
 Considering the unique needs of people who are dually diagnosed; 
 Addressing access to, financing of, and scope of responsibility in the delivery of emergency 
behavioral health care services; 
 Addressing the quality and effectiveness of current service delivery systems and professional 
staffing and clinical structure of services, roles, and responsibilities of public and private 
providers; 
 Addressing priority population groups for publicly funded services, identifying the 
comprehensive delivery systems, needs assessment and planning activities, and local 
government responsibilities for funding services; 
 Reviewing the implementation of ch. 2020-107, Laws of Fla.;
135
 
                                                
131
 Id. 
132
 Section 394.9086(3)(b), F.S. 
133
 Section 394.9086(3)(c), F.S. 
134
 Section 394.9086(3)(b), F.S. 
135
 HB 945 (2020) required managing entities to implement the features of a coordinated system of mental health care for 
children and expands the use of mobile response teams (MRT) across the state. It required the Florida Mental Health Institute 
within the University of South Florida to develop a model protocol for school use of MRTs. The bill also required the AHCA 
and the DCF to identify children and adolescents who are the highest users of crisis stabilization services and take action to  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 20 
 
 Identifying gaps in the provision of mental health and substance abuse services; 
 Providing recommendations on how managing entities may promote service continuity; 
 Making recommendations about the mission and objectives of state-supported mental health 
and substance abuse services and the planning, management, staffing, financing, contracting, 
coordination, and accountability of mechanisms best suited for the recommended mission 
and objectives; and 
 Evaluating and making recommendations regarding the establishment of a permanent, 
agency-level entity to manage mental health, behavioral health, substance abuse, and related 
services statewide, including the: 
o Duties and organizational structure; 
o Resource needs and possible sources of funding; 
o Impact on access to and the quality of services; 
o Impact on individuals with behavioral health needs, and their families, who are currently 
receiving services and those who are in need of services; and 
o Relation to and integration with service providers, managing entities, communities, state 
agencies, and provider systems.
136
 
 
The Commission is required to submit an initial report by September 1, 2022, and a final report 
by September 1, 2023, to the Governor, President of the Senate, and Speaker of the House of 
Representatives on its findings and recommendations on how to best provide and facilitate 
mental health and substance abuse services.
137
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
The bill amends s. 394.9086, F.S., making the following changes to the Commission, including: 
 Requiring the Commission to conduct meetings in person at locations throughout the state, 
rather than holding meetings remotely; 
 Authorizing Commission members to receive per diem and reimbursement and travel 
expenses; and 
 Changes the due date for the Commission’s interim report from September 1, 2022 to 
January 1, 2023. 
 
Cross-References 
The bill amends ss. 409.972 and 744.2007, F.S., relating to mandatory and voluntary managed 
care enrollment, and the powers and duties of public guardians, respectively, to conform cross-
references to changes made by the act. 
                                                
meet the needs of such children. Lastly, the bill required the AHCA to continually test the Medicaid managed care provider 
network databases to ensure behavioral health providers are accepting enrollees and confirm that enrollees have access to 
behavioral health systems. 
136
 Section 394.9086(4)(a), F.S. 
137
 Section 394.9086(5), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 21 
 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
The bill does not appear to require cities and counties to expend funds or limit their 
authority to raise revenue or receive state-shared revenues as specified by Article VII, 
Section 18 of the Florida Constitution. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The DCF anticipates that the fiscal impact will be based on the level of effort required by 
data staff employed under the DCF’s contract with the University of South Florida’s 
Baker Act Reporting Center.
138
 The first year estimated cost of implementation 
anticipated to be approximately $90,000. Of this amount, $15,000 is non-recurring for the 
cost to develop data infrastructure, a data entry interface, and user testing.
139
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
                                                
138
 The DCF, Agency Analysis for SB 1262, p. 5, January 20, 2022 (on file with the Senate Committee on Children, Families, 
and Elder Affairs). 
139
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 22 
 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends sections 394.455, 394.459, 394.4599, 394.4615, 394.463, 394.468, 
394.9086, 397.601, 397.6772, 409.972, and 744.2007 of the Florida Statutes.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs on January 25, 2022: 
The committee substitute: 
 Revises the conditions for restricting a patient’s access to telephonic communications, 
mail correspondence, and in-person visitation to instances where the restriction is 
necessary to ensure the clinical well-being of the patient, clinical well-being of 
another patient, or general well-being of staff. 
 Requires that any restrictions on in-person visitation be reviewed every 3 days, rather 
than every 4 days as currently provided for in the bill, and requires a qualified 
professional to document any such restrictions within 24 hours of implementation. 
 Provides that, under both the Baker and Marchman Acts, emergency contact 
information obtained through electronic databases used by law enforcement cannot be 
used for purposes other than letting the contact know the whereabouts of the patient. 
 Clarifies that a receiving facility can hold a patient until the next working day after 
the weekend or holiday if the intent is to file a petition for involuntary services, but 
requires that the facility release the patient if such petition is not filed by the next 
working day. 
 Provides that a person commits a first degree, rather than second degree misdemeanor 
if he or she knowingly and willfully, rather than only knowingly commits any of the 
acts listed in section 5 of the bill. 
 Makes the following changes to provisions related to discharge planning and 
procedures:  
o Moves the discharge planning requirements from s. 394.463, F.S. to s. 394.468, 
F.S.; 
o Applies the requirements to all patients being discharged from a receiving or 
treatment facility under ch. 394, F.S.; and 
o Modifies the requirements such that receiving facilities must documents and 
consider, at a minimum, follow-up behavioral health appointments and 
information on how to obtain prescribed medications and pertaining to available 
living arrangements, transportation, and recovery support opportunities. 
 Makes the following changes to the Commission on Mental Health and Substance 
Abuse:  BILL: CS/SB 1262   	Page 23 
 
o Requires the Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse to conduct their 
meetings in person at locations throughout the state. Currently, the Commission is 
holding meetings remotely. 
o Requires Commission members to be reimbursed for travel expenses. 
o Moves the due date of the Commission’s interim report from September 1, 2022 
to January 1, 2023. 
 Provides an effective date of July 1, 2022. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.