Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1298 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/14/2022

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Commerce and Tourism  
 
BILL: SB 1298 
INTRODUCER:  Senator Gruters 
SUBJECT:  Agreements with Professional Sports Teams 
DATE: January 14, 2022 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Renner McKay CM Pre-meeting 
2.     CA  
3.     RC  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 1298 prohibits a governmental entity from entering into an agreement with a professional 
sports team that requires a financial commitment by the state or a governmental entity unless the 
agreement includes a written verification that the professional sports team will play the U.S. 
national anthem at the beginning of each team sporting event. 
 
Failure to comply with the written verification constitutes a default and subjects the team to any 
penalty the agreement authorizes for default, which may include the team repaying money paid 
to the team by the state or governmental entity. 
 
The agreement must be strictly enforced. Should a governmental entity fail to timely enforce the 
written verification, the Attorney General is authorized to intervene. 
 
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on state or local governments. 
 
The bill takes effect on July 1, 2022. 
II. Present Situation: 
Professional Sports Franchise Program 
Florida is home to many professional and semi-professional sports teams, organizations and 
facilities, including professional football, basketball, baseball, hockey, soccer, and National 
Association of Stock Car Racing (NASCAR) sanctioned tracks. The Professional Sports 
Franchise program allows professional sports franchises to receive state sales and use tax 
revenue to pay for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a facility for a 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 1298   	Page 2 
 
new or retained professional sports franchise.
1
 Local governments, non-profit, and for-profit 
entities may apply to the program. 
 
The Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) is responsible for screening and certifying 
applicants for state funding.
2
 For both new and retained franchises, the DEO must confirm and 
verify the following:
3
 
 A local government is responsible for the construction, management, or operation of the 
professional sports franchise facility, or holds title to the property where the facility is 
located. 
 The applicant has a verified copy of a signed agreement with a new professional sports 
franchise for at least 10 years, or for 20 years in the case of a retained franchise. 
 The applicant has a verified copy of the approval by the governing body of the NFL, MLB, 
NHL, or NBA authorizing the location of a new franchise in the state after April 1, 1987, for 
new professional sports franchises, or verified evidence of a league-authorization location in 
the state on or before December 31, 1976, for a retained professional sports franchise. 
 The applicant has projections demonstrating a paid annual attendance of over 300,000. 
 The applicant has an independent analysis demonstrating that the annual amount of sales 
taxes generated by the use or operation of the franchise’s facility will be at least $2 million. 
 The local government where the franchise’s facility is located, or the county of the facility is 
in an unincorporated area, has certified by resolution after a public hearing that the 
application serves a public purpose. 
 The applicant has demonstrated that it has provided, is capable of providing, financial or 
other commitments of more than one-half of the costs incurred or related to the 
improvements or development of the franchise’s facility. 
 
Approved applicants are eligible to receive up to $2,000,004 per year for a period of up to 30 
years.
4
 No more than eight facilities can be certified under this program at one time.
5
  
 
Currently, eight facilities receive distributions under the Professional Sports Franchise Program. 
Each facility is on track to receive $60 million, which is the maximum distribution allowable 
under this program ($166,667 per month or $2,000,004 per year, over 30 years) as follows:
6
 
 
Facility name Location, 
Certified entity, 
& certification 
date 
Franchise First and Final 
payments 
Total payments 
as of Aug. 2020 
BB&T Center Sunrise, Broward 
County, June 
1996 
Florida Panthers Aug. 1996 
July 2026 
$47,833,429 
                                                
1
 Section 288.1162, F.S. 
2
 Section 288.1162(1), F.S. 
3
 Section 288.1162(4)(a)-(g), F.S. 
4
 Section 212.20(6)(d)6.b., F.S. 
5
 Section 288.1162(6), F.S. 
6
 Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, Report 20-08, Florida Economic Development 
Program Evaluations-Year 8, p. 48 (Dec. 2020), available at https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/20-08.pdf (last visited 
Jan. 14, 2022).  BILL: SB 1298   	Page 3 
 
TIAA Bank 
Field 
Jacksonville, 
City of 
Jacksonville, 
April 1994 
Jacksonville 
Jaguars 
June 1994 
May 2024 
$52,166,771 
Hard Rock 
Stadium 
Miami, South 
Florida Stadium 
Corp., May 1993 
Miami Dolphins June 1994 
June 2023 
$54,000,108 
American 
Airlines Arena 
Miami, 
Basketball 
Properties, LTD, 
Feb. 1998 
Miami Heat March 1998 
March 2028 
$44,500,089 
Amway Center Orlando, City of 
Orlando, Nov. 
2007 
Orlando Magic Feb. 2008 
Jan. 2038 
$24,833,383 
Raymond James 
Stadium 
Tampa, 
Hillsborough 
County, Nov. 
1996 
Tampa Bay 
Buccaneers 
Jan. 1997 
Dec. 2026 
 
$47,000,094 
AMALIE Arena Tampa, Tampa 
Bay Sports 
Authority, July 
1995 
Tampa Bay 
Lightning 
Sept. 1995 
Aug. 2025 
$49,666,766 
Tropicana Field St. Petersburg, 
City of St. 
Petersburg, July 
1995 
Tampa Bay Rays July 1995 
June 2025 
$50,000,100 
   	Total: $370,000,740 
 
State Incentives for Spring Training Facilities 
Spring Training Baseball Franchises 
The DEO may certify local governments to receive a distribution of $41,667 per month 
($500,000 per year) for a period of up to 30 years.
7
 The funds may be used to acquire, construct, 
reconstruct, or renovate a facility for a baseball spring training franchise, pay debt service on 
bonds issued for those purposes, or, in some instances, assist a spring training franchise in 
moving from one local government to another.
8
 The DEO is authorized to certify up to 10 
facilities at any given time.
9
 
 
Retention of Spring Training Baseball Franchises 
Local governments that partner with a spring training baseball franchise may apply for 
certification from the DEO to receive state distributions for renovating or constructing a spring 
                                                
7
 Section 212.20(6)(d)6.b., F.S. 
8
 Section 288.11621(3), F.S. 
9
 Section 288.11621(2)(b), F.S.  BILL: SB 1298   	Page 4 
 
training baseball facility.
10
 Certified applicants receive a distribution from state sales tax revenue 
of up to $83,333 per month for 20 years for a facility used by a single spring training baseball 
franchise or up to $166,667 per month for 25 years for a facility used by more than one spring 
baseball training franchise.
11
 The amount of state incentive funding per certified applicant may 
not exceed $20 million if the applicant’s facility is used by one franchise or $50 million if the 
applicant’s facility is used by more than one franchise.
12
 
 
Sales and Use Tax 
Florida levies a 6 percent sales and use tax on the sale or rental of most tangible personal 
property,
13
 admissions,
14
 transient rentals,
15
 and a limited number of services. Chapter 212, F.S., 
contains provisions authorizing the levy and collection of Florida’s sales and use tax, as well as 
the exemptions and credits applicable to certain items or uses under specified circumstances.  
 
Additionally, s. 212.20(6)(d)6, F.S., requires the Department of Revenue (DOR) to distribute 
specified amounts on a monthly basis to applicants certified as a sports training facility, 
applicants certified as the professional golf hall of fame, and applicants certified as a spring 
training facility. 
 
Local Government Half-cent Sales Tax 
The Local Government Half-cent Sales Tax program distributes a portion of state sales tax 
revenue via three separate distributions to eligible county or municipal governments. Allocation 
formulas serve as the basis for these separate distributions.
16
 The program’s primary purpose is 
to provide relief from ad valorem and utility taxes in addition to providing counties and 
municipalities with revenues for local programs.
17
 
 
Counties may use up to $3 million annually of the local government half-cent sales tax for the 
following purposes:
18
 
 New or retained professional sports franchises under the Professional Sports Franchise 
Program, or a spring training franchise under s. 288.11621, F.S.; or 
 A certified applicant as a motorsport entertainment complex under s. 288.1171, F.S.
19
 
                                                
10
 Section 288.11631(1)-(2), F.S. 
11
 Section 212.20(6)(d)6.e., F.S. 
12
 Section 288.11631(2)(c), F.S. 
13
 Section 212.05(1)(a)1.a, F.S. 
14
 Section 212.04(b), F.S. 
15
 Section 212.03(1)(a), F.S. 
16
 Office of Economic and Demographic Research, 2021 Local Government Financial Information Handbook, p. 55, 
available at http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/local-government/reports/lgfih21.pdf (last visited Jan. 6, 2022). 
17
 Id. 
18
 Section 218.64(3), F.S. 
19
 The motorsports entertainment complex has had no applicants or funds dispersed since program inception. See Office of 
Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, Report 20-08, Florida Economic Development Program 
Evaluations-Year 8, p. 35 (Dec. 2020), available at https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/20-08.pdf (last visited Jan. 14, 
2022).  BILL: SB 1298   	Page 5 
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
The bill provides that beginning July 1, 2022, a governmental entity is prohibited from entering 
into an agreement with a professional sports team that requires a financial commitment by the 
state or a governmental entity unless the agreement includes: 
 A written verification that the professional sports team will play the United States national 
anthem at the beginning of each team sporting event
20
 held at the team’s home venue or other 
facility controlled by the team for the event; and 
 A provision providing that a failure to comply with the written verification: 
o Constitutes a default of the agreement. 
o Immediately subjects the team to any penalty the agreement authorizes for 
default, which may include repaying any money paid to the team by the state or 
any governmental entity or classifying the team as ineligible to receive further 
money under the agreement. 
o May subject the team to a prohibition on contracting with the state. 
 
A governmental entity that enters into an agreement with a professional sports team must strictly 
enforce the “failure to comply” provision. The Attorney General may intervene to enforce the 
provision should the governmental entity fail to timely enforce the provision. 
 
The bill takes effect on July 1, 2022. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees that “Congress shall make no 
law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people 
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
21
 The 
                                                
20
 The bill defines a “sporting event” as any preseason, regular season, or postseason game or event of a professional sports 
team. 
21
 Amend I, U.S. Const.  BILL: SB 1298   	Page 6 
 
rights guaranteed by the First Amendment apply with equal force to state governments 
through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
22
 
 
The right of freedom of thought protected by the First Amendment against state action 
includes both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all.
23
 
Speech that is mandated or compelled alters the content of speech.
24
 A government 
regulation based on the content of speech is presumptively invalid and will be upheld 
only if it is necessary to advance a compelling governmental interest, precisely tailored to 
serve that interest, and is the least restrictive means available for establishing that 
interest.
25
 The government bears the burden of demonstrating the constitutionality of any 
such content-based regulation.
26
 
 
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a private college’s argument that conditioning federal 
funds on compliance with federal education law violated the First Amendment, finding 
that “Congress is free to attach reasonable and unambiguous conditions to federal 
financial assistance that educational institutions are not obligated to accept.”
27
 However, 
under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, there is a limit on Congress’ ability to 
place conditions on the receipt of funds.
28
 “[T]he government ‘may not deny a benefit to 
a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech’ 
even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.”
29
 
 
SB 1298 prohibits a governmental entity from entering into an agreement with a 
professional sports team that requires a financial commitment by the state or a 
governmental entity unless the agreement includes a written verification that the 
professional sports team will play the U.S. national anthem at the beginning of each team 
sporting event. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
If a professional sports team receiving funding from the state or a governmental entity 
does not play the national anthem per an agreement with a governmental entity, then that 
professional sports team could not only see a loss in distributions, but may have to repay 
any money paid to the team by the state or a governmental entity. 
                                                
22
 Amend XIV, U.S. Const., See also Art. I, Fla. Const. 
23
 Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 714 (1977). See also West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 
(1943). 
24
 Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, Inc., 487 U.S. 781, 795 (1988). See also Miami Herald 
Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, 256-58 (1974). 
25
 Ashcroft v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 656-66 (2004). 
26
 Id. at 660. 
27
 Grove City College v. Bell, 465 U.S. 555, 575 (1984). 
28
 Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006) 
29
 Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr, 518 U. S. 668, 674 (1996).  BILL: SB 1298   	Page 7 
 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
None. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
Currently, the DOR distributes specified amounts to certain recipients for facilities used by 
sports teams. It is unclear, under the bill, if these required payments made by the DOR are 
considered an agreement between a governmental entity and a professional sports team. 
Additionally, it is unclear how the governmental entity would be notified of a default on the 
agreement.  
 
The bill provides that if a governmental entity fails to timely enforce the “failure to comply” 
provision in the agreement, the Attorney General may step in to enforce the provision. However, 
it is unclear what constitutes timely enforcement. 
 
Neither the bill nor Chapter 286, F.S., define “governmental entity.” 
VIII. Statutes Affected:  
This bill creates section 286.31 of the Florida Statutes.    
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.