Florida 2022 2022 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1670 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/25/2022

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Appropriations  
 
BILL: CS/SB 1670 
INTRODUCER:  Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security Committee and Senator 
Hutson 
SUBJECT:  Cybersecurity 
DATE: February 25, 2022 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Lloyd Caldwell MS CS/Fav 
2. Hunter Sadberry AP Pre-meeting 
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1670 modifies cybersecurity training standards for state agencies and local governments 
by: 
 Establishing training requirements for new state and local government employees relating to 
cybersecurity based on the employee’s access level to a computer network; 
 Requiring that such training be conducted within the first 30 days of employment and then 
annually thereafter; 
 Directing the Florida Digital Service (FDS) to create a basic and advanced cybersecurity 
training curriculum for local governments; and 
 Authorizing the FDS to provide the cybersecurity trainings in collaboration with the 
Cybercrime Office, a private sector entity, or an institution of the State University System. 
 
The Legislature finds that this act fulfills an important state interest. 
 
The bill’s effective date is July 1, 2022. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 2 
 
II. Present Situation: 
General Background 
Ransomware is a form of malware
1
 that is used by malicious actors to encrypt files on devices, 
networks, or computer systems, rendering the files on those systems unusable. The malicious 
actors then demand ransom in exchange for decryption or the return of an individual’s or an 
organization’s files. Ransomware actors will also often threaten to sell or leak the data or 
information if the demanded ransom is not paid.  
 
The number of ransomware incidents continues to rise, with 2,474 incidents reported with 
adjusted losses of over $29.1 million,
2
 a figure that is likely under-inclusive, as technology 
experts believe that many ransomware attacks go unreported out of embarrassment by victims 
who decline to report. In its reporting, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) formally 
describes ransomware as: 
 
A type of malicious software, or malware, that encrypts data on a 
computer making it unusable. A malicious cybercriminal holds the data 
hostage until the ransom is paid. If the ransom is not paid, the victim’s 
data remains unavailable. Cyber criminals may also pressure victims to 
pay the ransom by threatening to destroy the victim’s data or to release it 
to the public.
3
 
 
The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), housed within the FBI received a record number of 
complaints from the American public in 2020: 791,790, with the reported losses attached to those 
complaints exceeding $4.1 billion.
4
 This represents a 69 percent increase in total complaints 
from 2019. 
 
Recent ransomware attacks that impacted the American economy include: 
 The Colonial Pipeline shutdown in May 2021, which disrupted the flow of refined gasoline 
and jet fuel through 5,500 miles of pipeline from Texas to New York.
5
 
o Colonial supplied 45 percent of the East Coast’s fuel supply. 
o As a private company, Colonial had no duty to report; however, the FBI and federal 
investigative agencies at the time did confirm involvement in the investigation.
6
  
                                                
1
 “Malware” means hardware, firmware, or software that is intentionally included or inserted in a system for a harmful 
purpose.  See https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/malware (last visited Feb. 4, 2022). 
2
 Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internet Crime Complaint Center, 2020 Internet Crime Report, Business Email 
Compromise (BEC), p.14, available at https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2020_IC3Report.pdf (last visited Feb. 
2, 2022). 
3 
Id. 
4
 Id, p.3. 
5 
David E. Sanger, et al, Cyberattack forces a shutdown of a top U.S. Pipeline, THE NEW YORK TIMES (May 13, 2021) 
available at https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/08/us/politics/cyberattack-colonial-pipeline.html (last visited Feb. 2, 2022). 
6
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 3 
 
o A ransom of 75 Bitcoin was paid a day after Colonial’s network system was breached, 
and a total ransom, which was the equivalent of nearly $5 million in cryptocurrency was 
eventually paid for the software decryption key to unlock its networks.
7
 
 JBS, the world’s largest meat processing plant, was hit by a ransomware attack in June 
2021:
8
  
o The plant is responsible for supplying one quarter of America’s beef.
9
 
o The likely Russian-based hackers threatened disruption or deletion of network files 
unless a ransom was paid. 
o Ultimately, JBS paid a ransom in Bitcoin of $11 million to resolve the cyberattack.
10
 
 
Specifically, in Florida, recent cybersecurity and ransomware incidents include: 
 A February 2021 intrusion into the City of Oldsmar’s water system. The remote hacker 
briefly increased the amount of sodium hydroxide (lye) from 100 parts per million to 11,100 
parts per million, more than 100 times the normal level. The increased amount was caught 
before the public was harmed.  
 The St. Lucie County’s Sheriff’s Department was hit by a cyberattack in December 2020 
when public records were taken and held for $1 million ransom and sheriff employees briefly 
resorted to filing reports using pen and paper instead.   
 In Wakulla County in 2019, the school district’s insurer paid a Bitcoin ransom to hackers to 
bring its computers back online during the first few weeks of the 2019-2020 school year. 
 
Colonial Pipeline and JBS are just two examples from the thousands of other reports investigated 
by the IC3 in 2021. The United States is the number one target for cyberattacks with expected 
increases in both cyberattacks and particularly, ransomware attacks, according to statistics from 
the University of West Florida’s Center for Cybersecurity.
11
 
 
Florida Information Protection Act of 2014 
The Florida Information Protection Act of 2014
12
 requires notice be given to affected customers 
and the Department of Legal Affairs (DLA) when a breach of personal information occurs. The 
notice must be provided within 30 days of the discovery of the breach or the belief that a breach 
has occurred, unless law enforcement has requested a delay for investigative purposes or for 
other good cause. State law requires Florida’s Attorney General to file with the Legislature, 
every February 1
st
, a report identifying any governmental entities that have reported any breaches 
of security of themselves or by any of its third-party agents in the preceding calendar year. 
Additionally, the Attorney General must report on any breaches by any governmental entities 
                                                
7,
 
8, 9
 Associated Press, Colonial Pipeline confirms it paid $4.4m to hacker gang after attack (May 19, 2021), THE GUARDIAN, 
available at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/may/19/colonial-pipeline-cyber-attack-ransom (last visited 
Jan. 23, 2022). 
8
 JBS: Cyber-Attack hits world’s largest meat supplier, BBC.COM, available at https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-
57318965 (last visited Jan. 22, 2022). 
9
 Id. 
10
 Meat Giant JBS pays $11m in ransom to resolve cyberattack, BBC.COM, available at https://www.bbc.com/news/business-
57423008 (last visited Jan. 23, 2022). 
11
 Eman El Sheikh, Ph.D., Center for Cybersecurity, University of West Florida, Cybersecurity Education and Workforce 
Development Highlights (January 17, 2020 Presentation to Florida Cybersecurity Task Force Meeting, January 17, 2020), 
available at CSTF_01.17.20_Meeting_Materials.pdf (myflorida.com) (last visited Jan. 23, 2022). 
12
 Ch. 2014-189, Laws of Fla. (creating s. 501.171, F.S., effective July 1, 2014; Florida Information Protection Act).  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 4 
 
affecting more than 500 individuals in this state as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 30 
days after the determination of the breach or reason to believe the breach has occurred. An 
extension of up to 15 days may be granted if good cause is provided in writing to the DLA. 
 
Enforcement authority is provided to the DLA under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade 
Practices Act to prosecute violations. Violators may be subject to civil penalties if a breach 
notification is not provided on a timely basis, but there are not civil penalties for the timely 
report of a security breach. There are exceptions for those entities that are also required to report 
breaches to federal regulators. 
 
Data Breach Reporting Within Florida Law 
Florida is within the FBI’s top ten states for total number of victims reporting a data breach for 
2020, falling behind only California with 53,793 victims
13
 and is fourth in the total amount of 
victim loss reported at $295 million for 2020.
14
 
 
The Attorney General’s office website posts notices and news releases relating to several multi-
state settlements because of data breaches which are listed through litigation settlements and 
press releases on the site.
 15
 
 
Information Technology Management 
The Department of Management Services (DMS)
16
 oversees information technology (IT)
17
 
governance and security for the executive branch of state government. The Florida Digital 
Service (FDS) within the DMS was established by the Legislature in 2020 to replace the 
Division of State Technology.
18
 The head of the FDS is appointed by the Secretary of 
Management Services
19
 and serves as the state chief information officer (CIO).
20
  
 
The FDS was created to propose innovative solutions that securely modernize state government, 
including technology and information services, to achieve value through digital transformation 
and interoperability, and to fully support Florida’s cloud first policy.
21
 Accordingly, the DMS 
through the FDS has the following powers, duties, and functions: 
 Develop IT policy for the management of the state’s IT resources. 
 Develop an enterprise architecture.  
                                                
13
 Supra, note 2. 
14
 Id. at 24. 
15
 Office of Attorney General Ashley Moody, In the News – News Search (search conducted January 24, 2022), available at 
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/newsreleases (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). 
16
 See s. 20.22, F.S. 
17
 The term “information technology” means equipment, hardware, software, firmware, programs, systems, networks, 
infrastructure, media, and related material used to automatically, electronically, and wirelessly collect, receive, access, 
transmit, display, store, record, retrieve, analyze, evaluate, process, classify, manipulate, manage, assimilate, control, 
communicate, exchange, convert, converge, interface, switch, or disseminate information of any kind or form. 
Section 282.0041(20), F.S. 
18
 Ch. 2020-161, Laws of Fla. 
19 
The Secretary of Management Services serves as the head of Department of Management (DMS) and is appointed by the 
Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate. Section 20.22(1), F.S. 
20 
Section 282.0051(2)(a), F.S. 
21 
Section 282.0051(1), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 5 
 
 Establish project management and oversight standards with which state agencies
22
 must 
comply when implementing IT projects. 
 Perform project oversight on state agency IT projects that have a total cost of $10 million or 
more and that are funded in the General Appropriations Act or any other law.
23
 
 Identify opportunities for standardization and consolidation of IT services that support 
interoperability, Florida’s cloud first policy, and business functions and operations that are 
common across state agencies.
24
 
 
State Cybersecurity Act 
The State Cybersecurity Act
25
 requires the DMS and the heads of state agencies
26
 to meet certain 
requirements to enhance the cybersecurity
27
 of state agencies. Specifically, the DMS, acting 
through the FDS must:  
 Establish standards and processes for assessing state agency cybersecurity risks and 
determining appropriate security measures consistent with generally accepted best practices 
for cybersecurity, including the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) 
cybersecurity framework.  
 Adopt rules to mitigate risk, support a security governance framework, and safeguard state 
agency digital assets, data,
28
 information, and IT resources
29
 to ensure availability, 
confidentiality, and integrity. 
 Designate a chief information security officer (CISO) responsible for the development, 
operation, and oversight of cybersecurity for state technology systems. The CISO must be 
notified of all confirmed or suspected incidents or threats of state agency IT resources and 
must report such information to the CIO and the Governor. 
 Develop and annually update a statewide cybersecurity strategic plan that includes security 
goals and objectives for cybersecurity, including the identification and mitigation of risk, 
proactive protections against threats, tactical risk detection, threat reporting, and response 
and recovery protocols for cyber incidents.
30
 
                                                
22 
“State agency” means any official, officer, commission, board, authority, council, committee, or department of the 
executive branch of state government; the Justice Administrative Commission; and the Public Service Commission. The term 
does not include university boards of trustees, state universities, the Department of Legal Affairs, the Department of 
Agriculture and Consumer Services, or the Department of Financial Services. Section 282.0041(33), F.S. 
23 
For the Department of Financial Services, the Department of Legal Affairs, and the Department of Agriculture and 
Consumer Services, Florida Digital Services (FDS) provides project oversight on information technology (IT) projects that 
have a total cost of $20 million or more. Section 282.0051(1)(n), F.S. 
24 
Section 282.0051(1), F.S. 
25 
Section 282.318, F.S. 
26 
For purposes of the State Cybersecurity Act, the term “state agency” includes the Department of Legal Affairs, the 
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Department of Financial Services. Section 282.318(2), F.S. 
27 
“Cybersecurity” means the protection afforded to an automated information system in order to attain the applicable 
objectives of preserving the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data, information, and information technology 
resources. Section 282.0041(8), F.S. 
28 
“Data” means a subset of structured information in a format that allows such information to be electronically retrieved and 
transmitted. Section 282.0041(9), F.S. 
29 
“Information technology resources” means data processing hardware and software and services, communications, supplies, 
personnel, facility resources, maintenance, and training. Section 282.0041(22), F.S. 
30 
“Incident” means a violation or imminent threat of violation, whether such violation is accidental or deliberate, of 
information technology resources, security, policies, or practices. An imminent threat of violation refers to a situation in 
which the state agency has a factual basis for believing that a specific incident is about to occur. Section 282.0041(19), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 6 
 
 Develop and publish for use by state agencies a cybersecurity governance framework. 
 Assist state agencies in complying with the State Cybersecurity Act. 
 In collaboration with the Cybercrime Office within the Florida Department of Law 
Enforcement (FDLE), annually provide training for state agency information security 
managers and computer security incident response team members that contains training on 
cybersecurity, including cybersecurity threats, trends, and best practices. 
 Annually review the strategic and operational cybersecurity plans of state agencies. 
 Track, in coordination with agency inspectors general, state agencies’ implementation of 
remediation plans. 
 Provide cybersecurity training to all state agency technology professionals that develops, 
assesses, and documents competencies by role and skill level. The training may be provided 
in collaboration with the Cybercrime Office, a private sector entity, or an institution of the 
state university system. 
 Operate and maintain a Cybersecurity Operations Center led by the CISO to serve as a 
clearinghouse for threat information and to coordinate with the FDLE to support state agency 
response to cybersecurity incidents. 
 Lead an Emergency Support Function under the state comprehensive emergency 
management plan.
31
 
 
The State Cybersecurity Act requires the head of each state agency to designate an information 
security manager to administer the cybersecurity program of the state agency.
32
 In addition, the 
head of each state agency must: 
 Establish an agency cybersecurity incident response team in consultation with FDS and the 
Cybercrime Office. The agency cybersecurity incident response team must convene upon 
notification of a cybersecurity incident and must immediately report all confirmed or 
suspected incidents to the CISO.  
 Annually submit to the DMS the state agency’s strategic and operational cybersecurity plans.  
 Conduct and update every three years a comprehensive risk assessment to determine the 
security threats to the data, information, and IT resources of the state agency. Except for 
sharing within the DMS, the cybercrimes unit of the FDLE, and certain agencies under the 
jurisdiction of the Governor and the Chief Inspector, these security plans are confidential and 
exempt from public review under s. 119.019(1), F.S.
33
 
 Develop and periodically update written internal policies and procedures, including 
procedures for reporting cybersecurity incidents and breaches to the FDS and the Cybercrime 
Office.  
 Implement managerial, operational, and technical safeguards and risk assessment 
remediation plans recommended by the DMS to address identified risks to the data, 
information, and IT resources of the agency.  
 Ensure that periodic internal audits and evaluations of the agency’s cybersecurity program 
for the data, information, and IT resources of the agency are conducted. 
 Ensure that the cybersecurity requirements in written specifications for the solicitation, 
contracts, and service-level agreement of IT and IT resources and services meet or exceed 
                                                
31 
Section 282.318(3), F.S. 
32 
Section 282.318(4)(a), F.S 
33 
Section 282.318(4)(d), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 7 
 
applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and standards for cybersecurity, including the 
NIST cybersecurity framework.  
 Provide cybersecurity awareness training to all state agency employees within 30 days of 
commencing employment concerning cybersecurity risks and the responsibility of employees 
to comply with policies, standards, guidelines, and operating procedures adopted by the state 
agency to reduce those risks. The training may be provided in collaboration with the 
Cybercrime Office, a private sector entity, or an institution of the state university system. 
 Develop a process that is consistent with the rules and guidelines established by the FDS for 
detecting, reporting, and responding to threats, breaches, or cybersecurity incidents.
34
 
 
Unfunded Local Government Mandates 
An unfunded mandate on local government is defined in Florida’s Constitution as a general law 
which requires counties or municipalities to spend its funds, limits their ability to raise revenue, 
or limits their ability to receive sales tax revenue. Adopted by Florida voters in 1990, Article VII, 
Section 18(a) of the Florida Constitution states that no county or municipality shall be bound by 
any general law requiring such county or municipality to spend its funds or to take an action 
requiring the expenditure of funds except under certain conditions. The review process is only 
applied to general laws applicable to cities and counties and not to special districts or school 
districts. 
 
Article VII, s. 18 of the State constitution requires also that such laws fulfill an important state 
interest and meet one of the following conditions for constitutionality: 
 The Legislature has provided or will provide the estimated amount of funds necessary to fund 
the mandated activity or program; 
 The Legislature has provided or will provide the county or municipality the authorization to 
enact a funding source not available to them before February 1, 1989, that can be used to 
generate the amount of funds sufficient to meet the mandate by a simple majority vote for the 
governing body; 
 The law passes by a two-thirds membership vote of each house of the Legislature; 
 The expenditure is required to comply with a law that applies to all persons similarly 
situated, including the state and local governments; or 
 The law is required to comply with a federal requirement or is required to comply with a 
federal entitlement. 
 
If none of the constitutional exceptions or exemptions apply, and if the bill becomes law, cities 
and counties are not bound by the law
35
 unless the Legislature has determined that the bill fulfills 
an important state interest and approves the bill by a two-thirds vote of the membership of each 
house. A legislature can meet the condition “meets an important state interest” through a 
legislative declaration and a declaratory statement that the legislation does meet an important 
state interest. 
 
                                                
34 
Section 282.318(4), F.S. 
35 
Although the constitution says, “[n]o county or municipality shall be bound by any general law” that is a mandate, the 
circuit court’s ruling was much broader in that it ordered SB 360 expunged completely from the official records of the state.  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 8 
 
A mandate can still be prohibited if the effect of its enactment results in a reduction in the county 
or municipality’s authority to raise total aggregate revenues or is a reduction in the total 
percentage share of revenue as it existed on February 1, 1989.  
 
Mandates can be exempted in certain circumstances, such as, if the law is being enacted during a 
declared fiscal emergency, when offsetting revenues are provided for, or when the fiscal impact 
is considered insignificant. The Legislature interprets insignificant fiscal impact to mean an 
amount not greater than the average statewide population for the applicable fiscal year times 10 
cents (currently $2.3 million); the average fiscal impact, including any offsetting effects over the 
long term, is also considered.
36
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Sections 1 and 2 require the Florida Digital Service (FDS) to develop a basic and advanced 
cybersecurity training curriculum. All local government employees with access to the local 
government’s network must complete the basic training curriculum, and local government 
technology professionals and employees with access to highly sensitive information must 
complete the advanced training curriculum. The trainings must be completed by the employees 
within 30 days of commencing employments and on an annual basis thereafter. The bill 
authorizes the FDS to provide the cybersecurity trainings in collaboration with the Cybercrime 
Office, a private sector entity, or an institution of the State University System. 
 
The bill requires the advanced cybersecurity training currently provided by the FDS to state 
agency technology professionals to be provided on an annual basis and to be provided to 
employees with access to highly sensitive information. In addition, state agency heads must 
provide the basic cybersecurity training that is currently provided to agency employees on an 
annual basis. 
 
Section 3 provides a statement that the Legislature finds that the act fulfills an important state 
interest. 
 
Section 4 provides an effective date of July 1, 2022. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
The bill requires the training of local government employees who have access to a local 
government network or access to highly sensitive information within the first 30 days of 
employment and then at annual intervals, thereafter. The fiscal impact to the local 
governments is indeterminate as the number of impacted individuals is unknown.  
 
                                                
36 
Guidelines issued in 1991 by then-Senate President Gwen Margolis and Speaker of the House Wetherell (1991); Comm. 
On Comprehensive Planning, Local and Military Affairs, The Florida Senate, Review of Legislative Staff Guidelines for 
Screening Bills for Mandates on Florida Counties and Municipalities (Interim Report 2000-24)(Sept. 1999), available at 
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/data/Publications/2000/Senate/reports/interim_reports/pdf/00-24ca.pdf (last visited Jan. 26, 2022).  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 9 
 
The bill does not clearly define which entities within local government are covered by the 
requirements. For Fiscal Year 2020-2021, the total FTEs employed in Florida’s 67 
counties was reported as 158,685
37
 and, for municipal governments, the total FTEs 
reported was 107,137.
38
  
 
Expenditure of funds would be required of all counties and local governments similarly 
situated in that all counties and local governments would be required to comply in the 
same manner, which may remove the local mandate issue. Additionally, the fiscal impact 
to the local government may be insignificant depending on the format and type of 
training developed. Whether this requirement would meet the threshold to be considered 
a mandate is indeterminate. 
 
The bill includes a statement that the act fulfills an important state interest.  
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
                                                
37
 Office of Economic and Demographic Research, Local Government Financial Reports, County Government Reports, 2020 
Reporting Cycle Results, pg. 12, available at http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/local-government/local-govt-
reporting/2020CountyReport-DataSetwithMetrics.pdf (last visited Feb. 8, 2022). 
38
 Office of Economic and Demographic Research, Local Government Financial Reports, Municipal Government Reports, 
2020 Reporting Cycle Results, pg. 67, available at http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/local-government/local-govt-
reporting/2020MunicipalReport-DataSetwithMetrics.pdf (last visited Feb. 8, 2022).  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 10 
 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
There is an indeterminate fiscal impact associated with providing the training to local 
government employees. The cost will be determined by the format and delivery of the 
training, as well as the number of individuals out of the total county or local government 
workforce that would be required to participate in either the new employee component or 
the annual training. 
 
There may be long-term indeterminate savings in funds and resources to the state, local, 
or county governments if the cybersecurity trainings result in fewer cybersecurity attacks, 
reductions in the loss of data, or mitigation of third party computer breaches. 
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
In describing the types of training to be delivered to local government employees, Section 2 of 
the bill does not define “persons with access to highly sensitive information” who would undergo 
additional training.  
 
It is also unclear as to who is responsible for the delivery of the referenced cybersecurity 
training.  Section (2) states that the Florida Digital Service may provide the training in 
collaboration with other defined entities.  The statement implies that the Florida Digital Service 
is tasked with providing the training to applicable local government employees.   
VII. Related Issues: 
The bill requires that training be created and provided for certain employees of state and local 
government. The definition of local government is not provided. State statutes provide several 
provisions or definitions of “local government” depending on the context or legislative intent, 
which include or exclude other public institutions, such as schools, higher education entities, 
special districts, or councils.  
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 282.318 of the Florida Statutes. 
 
This bill creates section 282.3185 of the Florida Statutes. 
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security on February 8, 
2022: 
The Committee adopted a CS which: 
 Modifies s. 282.318, F.S., to direct the Florida Digital Service (FDS) to provide 
cybersecurity training for all state agency technology employees and employees with  BILL: CS/SB 1670   	Page 11 
 
access to highly sensitive information within the first 30 days of employment and 
then annually thereafter; 
 Defines “local government” to mean any county or municipality”; 
 Creates s. 282.3185, F.S., and directs FDS to develop a basic and advanced 
cybersecurity training curriculum for local government employees with access to the 
local network or have access to highly sensitive information for completion within 30 
days of employment and then annually thereafter; and 
 Allows training to be provided by the Cybercrime Office of the FDLE, a private 
sector entity, or an institution of the state university system. 
 
The CS includes a statement that the Legislature finds that the act fulfills an important 
state interest. 
 
The effective date of the act is July 1, 2022. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.