This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0935a.CRG
DATE: 3/28/2023
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/HB 935 Chiefs of Police
SPONSOR(S): Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee, Jacques and
others
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 998
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law &
Government Operations Subcommittee
12 Y, 0 N, As CS Wagoner Miller
2) Criminal Justice Subcommittee
3) State Affairs Committee
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
The chief of a municipal law enforcement agency has certain powers, duties and obligations, including the
requirement to establish communications and assistance with other law enforcement agencies. The governing
body of a municipality may hire or appoint, and terminate, a police chief directly or may delegate such authority
to the mayor or the city manager.
The bill defines a “Chief of Police” to mean a person, other than an elected official, who is appointed or
employed full time by the state or any political subdivision who is the chief law enforcement officer of a law
enforcement agency.
The bill creates a new section of statute entitled the “Rights of Chiefs of Police.” The bill provides certain
protections when the municipality seeks to terminate the chief’s employment or appointment. The bill provides
that a person employed or appointed as a chief of police may not be terminated by the employing municipality
without written notice. If a chief of police is employed by an elected governing body, the chief must be placed
on the next regularly scheduled meeting and allowed to make a full response to the termination.
The bill may have an indeterminate but negative impact on local governments that employ police chiefs. See
Fiscal Comments.
STORAGE NAME: h0935a.CRG PAGE: 2
DATE: 3/28/2023
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Present Situation
Municipalities are constitutionally granted all governmental, corporate, and proprietary powers
necessary to conduct municipal government, perform municipal functions, and render municipal
services. Additionally, municipalities are constitutionally authorized to exercise any power for municipal
purposes except when expressly prohibited by general or special law.
1
Municipalities may create, fund,
operate, and determine the employment and personnel policies for police departments,
2
including the
hiring and termination of law enforcement officers and the chief of police. A law enforcement officer is
any person who is elected, appointed, or employed full time by any municipality or the state and vested
with authority to bear arms and to make arrests, and whose primary responsibility is the prevention and
detection of crime, or enforcement of the laws of the state.
3
Every municipal law enforcement agency has certain powers, duties, and obligations. Police chiefs
must schedule at least two law enforcement officers to be on duty at all times and either provide for
their ability to communicate directly, communicate with the sheriff’s office, or provide a mutual aid
agreement with other municipal police departments for on-duty officers to request assistance.
4
Every
municipal law enforcement agency is required to incorporate antidiscriminatory policies into the
agency’s operational practices. The policies and practices utilize the Florida Police Chief’s Association
model policy as a guide.
5
Some municipalities authorize a city manager to employ or appoint a chief of police but reserve final
authority to dismiss the chief to the governing body.
6
Other municipalities vest executive authority in the
mayor, with full authority to appoint or remove the chief of police.
7
Effect of the Bill
The bill defines a “Chief of Police” as a person, other than an elected official who is appointed or
employed full time by the state or any political subdivision thereof as the chief law enforcement officer
of a law enforcement agency. The definition excludes state law enforcement executives whose
appointment or employment is governed by other provisions of law. The bill defines “employing agency”
to have the same meaning as provided in s. 943.10(4), Florida Statutes. The bill creates s. 112.5321,
F.S., entitled “Rights of Chiefs of Police.” The bill provides that a police chief may not be terminated by
the employing agency without written notice. If a chief of police is employed by an elected governing
body, the chief must be placed on the next regularly scheduled public meeting and be allowed to make
a full and complete response to the termination.
The protections provided to chiefs of police are not superseded by any written employment contract or
agreement that provides employment, discipline, or termination standards, including any agreement of
non-disclosure.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1 renumbers and amends s. 112.531, F.S. relating to definitions.
1
Art. VIII, s. 2(b), Fla. Const. See s. 166.021, F.S.
2
See ss. 166.049, 166.0493, 166.0495, F.S. See, e.g., Municipal Charter of the City of Tampa, art. V, s. 5.01(d).
3
S. 943.10(1), F.S.
4
S. 166.049, F.S.
5
S. 166.0493, F.S.
6
City of Miami, Code of Ordinances, ch. 42, s. 42-2, at
https://library.municode.com/fl/miami/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIITHCO_CH42PO_ARTIINGE_S42-
2APDIPODE (last visited March 23, 2023);
7
Municipal Charter for the City of Pensacola, art. I, s. 4.01(1)(a); Municipal Charter for the City of Tampa, art. VI, s. 6.03. STORAGE NAME: h0935a.CRG PAGE: 3
DATE: 3/28/2023
Section 2 creates s. 112.5321, F.S. relating to the rights of chiefs of police.
Section 3 provides and effective date of July 1, 2023.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
None.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
The bill may have an indeterminate but negative impact on local governments that employ a chief of
police. See Fiscal Comments.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
The requirement to terminate the employment of a chief of police only after providing written notice and
then providing the chief with the opportunity to make a public presentation at the next regularly
scheduled public hearing of the municipality governing body may create additional expenditures of
public funds by municipalities. However, such expenditures are incurred only in the event a local
government terminates the employment of a chief of police and may not be significant.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not Applicable. This bill does not appear to require counties or municipalities to spend funds or take
action requiring the expenditures of funds; reduce the authority that counties or municipalities have to
raise revenues in the aggregate; or reduce the percentage of state tax shared with counties or
municipalities.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
The bill neither requires nor provides authority for executive branch rulemaking.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None. STORAGE NAME: h0935a.CRG PAGE: 4
DATE: 3/28/2023
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
On March 28, 2023, the Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government Operations Subcommittee
adopted one amendment and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The amendment
clarified that a chief of police must receive written notice if the municipality terminates the chief’s
employment. If a chief of police is employed by an elected governing body, the chief must be placed on
the agenda of the next regularly scheduled meeting and be allowed to make a full response to the
termination. The bill also provides that these protections are not superseded by written employment or
non-disclosure agreements.
This analysis is drawn to the bill as amended by the Constitutional Rights, Rule of Law & Government
Operations Subcommittee.