Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1043 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/03/2023

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 1043    Medicaid Coverage of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing 
SPONSOR(S): Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee, Anderson 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 616 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee 17 Y, 0 N, As CS Poche McElroy 
2) Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee   
3) Health & Human Services Committee   
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
 
Genetic disorders are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in the neonatal and pediatric intensive 
care units in the United States. Approximately 7 percent to 10 percent of the 4 million infants born in the U.S. 
each year are admitted to a neonatal ICU for the diagnosis and treatment of an acute illness.  About one 
percent of all neonatal ICU admissions have an indication of a genetic disorder, and approximately 15 percent 
of babies admitted to high acuity units appear to have a genetic disorder. 
 
All organisms have a unique genetic code, or genome, comprised of nucleotide bases. If the sequence of the 
bases in an organism are known, its unique DNA fingerprint is known. Determining the order of bases is called 
sequencing. Whole genome sequencing is a laboratory procedure that determines the order of bases in the 
genome of an organism in one process. Rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) completes such sequencing 
quickly, and can produce a much quicker diagnosis. 
 
CS/HB 1043 requires the state Medicaid program to cover rWGS as a fee-for-service benefit for Medicaid 
recipients who: 
 Are 20 years of age or younger; 
 Have a complex or acute illness of unknown etiology that has not been caused by environmental 
exposure, toxic ingestion, an infection with normal response to treatment, or trauma; and 
 Are receiving inpatient treatment in a hospital ICU or high-acuity pediatric care unit. 
 
The bill restricts the use of any genetic data resulting from rWGS only to assist in diagnosing and treating the 
patient, and considers such data protected health information under the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act. The bill permits genetic data generated by rWGS to be used in scientific research only if the 
patient, or the patient’s guardian if he or she is a minor, expressly consents to such use. Such consent may be 
rescinded at any time.   
 
The bill has a significant, negative fiscal impact on state government and no fiscal impact on local government. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2023.   STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
 
Background 
 
Genetic Disorders 
 
Genetic disorders are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in the neonatal and pediatric 
intensive care units in the United States. There are more than 13,000 known genetic diseases and 
hundreds of targeted treatments and orphan drugs that have been approved or are in clinical trials.
1
 
Approximately 7 percent to 10 percent of the 4 million infants born in the U.S. each year are admitted to 
a neonatal ICU for the diagnosis and treatment of an acute illness.
2
 About 1 percent of all neonatal ICU 
admissions have an indication of a genetic disorder, and approximately 15 percent of babies admitted 
to high acuity units appear to have a genetic disorder, leading to longer hospitalizations and higher 
resource use.
3
 Disease can progress rapidly in acutely ill infants, necessitating timely diagnosis in the 
hope of implementing personalized interventions that can decrease morbidity and mortality.
4
 
 
Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (rWGS) 
 
All organisms have a unique genetic code, or genome, comprised of nucleotide bases (A, T, C, and G). 
If the sequence of the bases in an organism are known, its unique DNA fingerprint is known. 
Determining the order of bases is called sequencing. Whole genome sequencing is a laboratory 
procedure that determines the order of bases in the genome of an organism in one process.
5
 
 
Scientists conduct whole genome sequencing by following these four main steps: 
 DNA shearing: Scientists begin by using molecular scissors to cut the DNA, which is composed 
of millions of bases (A’s, C’s, T’s and G’s), into pieces that are small enough for the sequencing 
machine to read. 
 DNA bar coding: Scientists add small pieces of DNA tags, or bar codes, to identify which piece 
of sheared DNA belongs to which bacteria. This is similar to how a bar code identifies a product 
at a grocery store. 
 DNA sequencing: The bar-coded DNA from multiple bacteria is combined and put in a DNA 
sequencer. The sequencer identifies the A’s, C’s, T’s, and G’s, or bases, that make up each 
bacterial sequence. The sequencer uses the bar code to keep track of which bases belong to 
which bacteria. 
 Data analysis: Scientists use computer analysis tools to compare sequences from multiple 
bacteria and identify differences. The number of differences can tell the scientists how closely 
related the bacteria are, and how likely it is that they are part of the same outbreak. 
                                                
1
 S Kingsmore, L Smith, A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for sever 
genetic diseases, Amer. J Human Genetics, vol. 109, pgs. 1605-1619, Sept. 1, 2022; M Clark, A Hildreth, Diagnosis of genetic diseases 
in seriously ill children by rapid whole-genome sequencing and automated phenotyping and interpretation, Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 11, 
2019. 
2
 D Dimmock, S. Caylor, et al., Project Baby Bear: Rapid precision care incorporating rWGS in 5 California children’s hospitals 
demonstrates improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs of care, Amer. J. Human Genetics, vol. 108, pgs. 1-8, July 1, 2021, 
available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34089648/.  
3
 Id. 
4
 B Peterson, EJ Hernandez, Automated prioritization of sick newborns for whole genome sequencing using clinical natural language 
processing and machine learning, Genome Medicine, vol. 15:18, 2023. 
5
 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Whole Genome Sequencing, available at 
https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/wgs.html#:~:text=Whole%20genome%20sequencing%20is%20a%20fast%20and%20affordab
le,needed%20to%20quickly%20solve%20and%20prevent%20foodborne%20outbreaks (last viewed on March 30, 2023).  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
rWGS can complete such sequencing quickly and produce a much quicker diagnosis in as many as 
50% of children.
6
 With a turnaround as fast as 48 hours, vital time can be gained to develop and 
implement a plan of care for individuals, mostly children, with genetic disorders. 
 
As the use of whole genome sequencing expands, CDC’s national surveillance systems and laboratory 
infrastructure must keep pace with the changing technology. With modernization, CDC and its public 
health partners can continue to successfully detect, respond to, and stop infectious diseases.  
 
 Project Baby Manatee 
 
From August 2019 to June 2020, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital implemented a pilot program called 
Project Baby Manatee. Through the program, 50 patients were enrolled and sequenced using rWGS.
7
 
The average age was 34.6 months and two thirds were male, while 60 percent of participants were 
white, and 26 percent were African American.
8
 Two types of testing was completed – rWGS and ultra 
rWGS. Ultra WGS testing was selected when delivery of the genetic diagnoses was critical for clinical 
management. Twenty out of fifty patients, or 40 percent, received genetic diagnoses based of WGS.
9
 
The most common presentations of illness in which a genetic disease was diagnosed by rWGS were 
respiratory problems (36 percent), cardiovascular problems (36 percent), seizures (32 percent), brain 
disorders (32 percent), and metabolic issues (24 percent).
10
  
 
Eight of the diagnosed genetic diseases have an incidence of less than one in one million births or is of 
unknown incidence. Some of the identified diseases are so rare that many treating physicians had 
never seen them before, increasing the probability that these disorders would generally go 
underdiagnosed without rWGS. The rWGS led to changes in clinical management of 38 percent of 
children in the pilot program. Such results empowered clinicians and parents to quickly make informed 
decisions that typically altered the course of the child’s hospitalization and led to the initiation of new 
procedures and medications, or the avoidance of unnecessary ones.
11
 The program resulted in 
estimated savings of over $3.76 million, yielding a $2.88 million return on investment.
12
 Based on the 
results of Project Baby Manatee, rWGS and related rapid precision medicine approach was cost-saving 
and cost-effective, but also improved health outcomes and shortened the period to diagnosis.
13
 
 
 Other Studies  
 
Studies performed in clinical research settings have found genome sequencing to be effective for 
diagnosis and management of undiagnosed infants in ICUs and to result in improved diagnostic yield
14
, 
faster time to diagnosis, enhanced physician and parental satisfaction, improved patient outcomes, and 
reductions in health care costs.
15
 Further, rWGS facilitates end-of-life care decisions that can alleviate 
suffering and aid the grieving process.
16
 Studies have shown rWGS provides a diagnosis for 21 percent 
to 57 percent of children in intensive care settings.
17
  
 
                                                
6
 University of California San Francisco, News and Events, Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing: Faster Diagnostics for Fragile Infants, 
May 14, 2020, available at https://precisionmedicine.ucsf.edu/news/rapid-whole-genome-sequencing-faster-diagnostics-fragile-infants 
(last viewed on March 30, 2023).  
7
 Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Project Baby Manatee – Advanced Genomics for Critically Ill Children Final Report, Aug. 1, 2019 to June 
30, 2020, available at https://www.nicklauschildrens.org/NCH/media/docs/pdf/research/Final-report-State-Appropriations-NCH-
PMI.PDF. 
8
 Id., at pg. 6. 
9
 Id., at pg. 7. 
10
 Id., at pg. 8. 
11
 Id. 
12
 Id., at pg. 19. Total costs for WGS and related rapid precision medicine for 50 patients was approximately $880,000. 
13
 Id., at pg. 20. 
14
 V Diaby, A Babcock, et al., Real-world economic evaluation of prospective rapid whole-genome sequencing compared to a matched 
retrospective cohort of critically ill pediatric patients in the United States, Pharmacogenomics J., vol. 22, pgs. 223-229, 2022. 
15
 C Bupp, E Ames, et al., Breaking Barriers to Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatrics: Michigan’s Project Baby Deer, 
Children, vol. 10, pg. 106, 2023, available at https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010106; TA Lavelle, X Feng, et al., Cost-effectiveness of 
exome and genome sequencing for children with rare and undiagnosed conditions, Genet. Med., vol. 24, pgs.1349-1361, 2022.  
16
 L Farnaes, A Hildreth, et al., Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization, npj Genomic 
Medicine 3:10, 2018. 
17
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
Despite evidence that sequencing improves clinical outcomes, reduce net costs of care, and leads to 
high provider and parental satisfaction, routine implementation in ICUs and coverage by payors has 
remained elusive.
18
 It has been shown that WGS, while expensive, may decrease overall cost of 
diagnostic evaluations of medically complex children.
19
 
 
Compared to traditional genetic tests, where diagnosis can be delayed or missed, rWGS has a high 
diagnostic yield, ranging from 40 percent to 70 percent. 
 
Infant Mortality 
 
Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the 
number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births. In 2020, the infant mortality rate in the United States 
was 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births.
20
 
 
The following map shows infant mortality by state for 2020, the most recent year with available data. 
Florida’s infant mortality rate is 4.96 to less than 6.62 per 1,000 live births.
21
 
 
 
 
The 10 leading causes of infant death in 2020 (congenital malformations, low birth weight, sudden 
infant death syndrome, unintentional injuries, maternal complications, cord and placental complications, 
bacterial sepsis of newborn, respiratory distress of newborn, diseases of the circulatory system, and 
neonatal hemorrhage) accounted for 67.5% of all infant deaths in the United States. The graph below 
                                                
18
 Supra, FN at pg. 2. 
19
 Supra, FN 5 at pg. 2; R Hayeems, et al., Care and cost consequences of pediatric whole genome sequencing compared to 
chromosome microarray, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., vol. 25, pgs. 1303-1312, 2017. 
20
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 
Publication and Information Products–Data Briefs, Mortality in the United States, 2020, available at 
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db427.htm#section_5 (last viewed on March 29, 2023).  
21
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Reproductive Health, Maternal and 
Infant Health, Infant Mortality Rates by State, 2020, available at 
https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm (last viewed on March 29, 2023).  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
shows the IMR for the 10 leading causes of infant death in 2020 in the United States, including 2019 for 
comparison.
22
 
 
 
 
The chart below shows the leading cause of death of infants in Florida for 2021, with 2020 rates 
included for comparison.
23
 
 
 
                                                
22
 Supra, FN 1, figure 5. 
23
 Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Community Health Assessment, Division of Public Health Statistics and Performance 
Management, Mortality Dashboard–Deaths by Age, Leading Causes of Death per 100,000 Population, Florida, 2020 and 2021, Under 
Age 1, available at 
https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsReports/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=MortalityAtlas.Dashboard_MortalityAtlas1&rdRequestForwarding
=Form (last viewed on March 29, 2023).  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
 
Florida Medicaid 
 
Medicaid is the health care safety net for low-income Floridians. Medicaid is a partnership of the federal 
and state governments established to provide coverage for health services for eligible persons. The 
program is administered by the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) and financed by federal 
and state funds. 
 
The structure of each state’s Medicaid program varies, but what states must pay for is largely 
determined by the federal government, as a condition of receiving federal funds.
24
 The federal 
government sets the minimum mandatory populations to be included in every program, and the 
minimum mandatory benefits to be covered. These mandatory benefits include physician services, 
hospital services, home health services, and family planning.
25
 States can add benefits, with federal 
approval. Florida has added many optional benefits.
26
  
 
The Florida Medicaid program covers approximately 5.7 million low-income individuals in Florida.
27
 
Medicaid is the largest single program in the state, representing more than 44 percent of the total Fiscal 
Year 2022-2023 state budget.
28
 Florida’s program is the 4th largest in the nation by enrollment and, for 
FY 2020-2021, the program is the 4th largest in terms of expenditures.
29
 
 
Florida delivers medical assistance to most Medicaid recipients - approximately 78% - using a 
comprehensive managed care model.
30
 A minority of Medicaid recipients-mostly those enrolled in 
limited benefit programs participate in the traditional fee-for-service model.  
 
 Payment for Genomic Testing  
 
Florida’s Medicaid program pays for the following standard, non-rapid genomic sequencing procedures: 
 Fetal chromosomal aneuploidy genomic sequence analysis panel. 
 Fetal chromosomal microdeletion genomic sequence analysis. 
 Genomic sequencing procedures and other molecular multianalyte assays. 
 Genetic testing for severe inherited conditions.
31
 
 
Several states are currently implementing coverage policies for rWGS, including California
32
, 
Minnesota
33
, Louisiana
34
, Maryland
35
, and Oregon
36
. 
 
                                                
24
 Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396-1396w-5; Title 42 C.F.R. Part 430-456 (§§ 430.0-456.725). 
25
 S. 409.905, F.S. 
26
 S. 409.906, F.S. 
27
 Agency for Health Care Administration, Florida Statewide Medicaid Monthly Enrollment Report, Feb. 2023, available at 
https://ahca.myflorida.com/medicaid/Finance/data_analytics/enrollment_report/index.shtml (last viewed on March 28, 2023). United 
States Census Bureau, QuickFacts, Florida, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/FL/PST045221 (last viewed on March 28, 
2023). 
28
 Ch. 2022-156, L.O.F. See also Fiscal Analysis in Brief: 2022 Legislative Session, available at 
http://edr.state.fl.us/content/revenues/reports/fiscal-analysis-in-brief/FiscalAnalysisinBrief2022.pdf (last viewed on March 28, 2023). 
29
 The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, State Health Facts, Total Medicaid Spending FY 2021 and Total Monthly Medicaid and CHIP 
Enrollment Nov. 2022, available at http://kff.org/statedata/ (last viewed on March 28, 2023).  
30
 S. 409.964, F.S. 
31
 Agency for Health Care Administration, 2023 Agency Legislative Administration–HB 1043, pg. 2, March 7, 2023. 
32
 Medi-Cal Update, Inpatient Services, Bulletin 573, June 2022, available at https://files.medi-cal.ca-
gov/pubsdoco/bulletins/artfull/ips202206.aspx.  
33
 Minnesota Department of Human Services, Laboratory and Pathology Tests, April 4, 2022, available at 
https://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dD
ocName=DHS16_144353 .  
34
 Louisiana SB 154, Provides for Health Insurance Coverage of Genetic Testing for Critically Ill Infants with No Diagnosis, January 1, 
2023, available at https://legisscan.com/LA/text/SB154/2022. 
35
 Maryland Department of Health, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Clinical Criteria, Whole Genome Clinical Criteria, available at 
https://health.maryland.gov/mmcp/Documents/Whole%20Genome%20Clinical%20Criteria.pdf#search=Whole%20Genome%20Sequen
cing%20Clinical%20Criteria.  
36
 Oregon Health Authority, Prioritized list of Health Services, January 1, 2023, available at https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-
HERC/PrioritizedList/1-1-2022PrioritizedListofHealthServices.pdf.   STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
Over the past decade, rWGS has developed into an effective diagnostic test for almost all heritable 
diseases and is gaining acceptance as a first-tier test for critically ill newborns with suspected genetic 
diseases.
37
 There has been an increase in payor coverage for rWGS, but it varies and is not universal. 
 
Effect of Proposed Changes 
 
CS/HB 1043 requires AHCA to cover rWGS as a fee-for-service benefit for Medicaid recipients who: 
 Are 20 years of age or younger; 
 Have a complex or acute illness of unknown etiology that has not been caused by 
environmental exposure, toxic ingestion, an infection with normal response to treatment, or 
trauma; and 
 Are receiving inpatient treatment in a hospital ICU or high-acuity pediatric care unit. 
 
The bill, by providing Medicaid coverage to children, will identify those children with serious genetic 
disorders in a timely manner, allowing those children to get treatment earlier in the disease process, 
likely reducing long-term medical costs for treating those children over the course of their lives.  
 
The bill also restricts the use of any genetic data resulting from rWGS only to assist in diagnosing and 
treating the patient, and considers such data protected health information protected by the Health 
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). It is likely this information is protected by HIPAA 
without this bill provision. 
 
The bill permits genetic data generated by rWGS to be used in scientific research only if the patient, or 
the patient’s guardian if he or she is a minor, expressly consents to such use. Such consent may be 
rescinded at any time.  Upon receipt of written notice of consent rescission, the health care provider or 
entity using the genetic data must cease using it, and expunge the individual’s genetic data from any 
data repository where it is held. 
 
Lastly, the bill authorizes AHCA to seek approval to amend waivers, request a new waiver, and amend 
contracts as necessary to provide coverage of rWGS. AHCA is also given express rulemaking authority 
to implement the bill provisions. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2023. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
 
Section 1:  Creates s. 409.9063, F.S., relating to rapid whole genome sequencing services for 
Medicaid recipients. 
Section 2:  Provides an effective date of July 1, 2023. 
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
 
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
The bill has a significant, negative fiscal impact on the Medicaid program. In 2021, 14,476 newborn 
babies covered by Medicaid were admitted to a NICU facility. If 5 percent of those newborns were 
tested and testing was reimbursed as a fee-for-service benefit, 724 newborns would be tested.  At a 
                                                
37
 Supra, FN 1.  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 8 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
cost of $4,549.31 per test, the total potential expense is $3,292,791, with potential impact to 
General Revenue totaling $1,334,239. The chart below details potential expenses as the 
percentage of newborns tested increases. This projection is based on the number of newborn 
children in a NICU in 2021, and a reimbursement rate of 60% of the Medicare reimbursement rate 
for rWGS ($7,582.20 x 60%=$4,549.31).
38
 
 
Participation  Potential Participants Total Expense GR Impact 
5% 	724 	$3,292,791 $1,334,239 
10% 	1,448 	$6,585,581 $2,668,477 
15% 	2,171 	$9,878,372 $4,002,716 
25% 	3,619 	$16,463,953 $6,671,194 
50% 	7,238 	$32,927,906 $13,342,387 
75% 	10,857 	$49,391,859 $20,013,581 
100% 	14,476 	$65,855,812 $26,684,775 
 
AHCA will need to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid coverage of rWGS and include 
rWGS in the independent laboratory services fee schedule under Rule 59G-4.002, F.A.C. These 
actions can likely be implemented using existing resources. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
 
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
None. 
 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
 
Entities that perform rWGS testing may see an increase in the number of tests. 
 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
 
rWGS testing may lead to significant cost avoidance over the lifetime of an individual through early 
diagnosis and intervention before any disease conditions worsen. Such cost avoidance may offset the 
initial cost of rWGS testing. 
 
 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
 
Not applicable.  The bill does not impact municipal or county government. 
 
 
 2. Other: 
 
                                                
38
 Agency for Health Care Administration, 2023 Agency Legislative Bill Analysis–HB 1043, March 7, 2023, pg. 5.  STORAGE NAME: h1043a.HRS 	PAGE: 9 
DATE: 4/3/2023 
  
None. 
 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
 
The bill expressly provides AHCA with rulemaking authority to implement the bill provisions. 
 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
 
None. 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On April 3, 2023, the Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee adopted two amendments and reported the bill 
favorably as a committee substitute.  The amendments: 
 Removed the whereas clauses from the bill. 
 Changed the age of eligibility for rWGS under Medicaid to 20 years of age and younger. 
 
The bill was reported favorably as amended. The analysis is drafted to the amended bill as passed by the 
Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee.