Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1043 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/11/2023

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 1043    Medicaid Coverage of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing 
SPONSOR(S): Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee, Anderson 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 616 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee 17 Y, 0 N, As CS Poche McElroy 
2) Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee 	Smith Clark 
3) Health & Human Services Committee   
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
 
Genetic disorders are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in the neonatal and pediatric intensive 
care units in the United States. Approximately seven percent to 10 percent of the four million infants born in the 
U.S. each year are admitted to a neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for the diagnosis and treatment of an 
acute illness. About one percent of all neonatal ICU admissions have an indication of a genetic disorder, and 
approximately 15 percent of babies admitted to high acuity units appear to have a genetic disorder. 
 
All organisms have a unique genetic code, or genome, comprised of nucleotide bases. If the sequence of the 
bases in an organism are known, its unique DNA fingerprint is known. Determining the order of bases is called 
sequencing. Whole genome sequencing is a laboratory procedure that determines the order of bases in the 
genome of an organism in one process. Rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) completes such sequencing 
quickly, and can produce a much quicker diagnosis. 
 
CS/HB 1043 requires the state Medicaid program to cover rWGS as a fee-for-service benefit for Medicaid 
recipients who: 
 Are 20 years of age or younger; 
 Have a complex or acute illness of unknown etiology that has not been caused by environmental 
exposure, toxic ingestion, an infection with normal response to treatment, or trauma; and 
 Are receiving inpatient treatment in a hospital ICU or high-acuity pediatric care unit. 
 
The bill restricts the use of any genetic data resulting from rWGS only to assist in diagnosing and treating the 
patient, and considers such data protected health information under the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act. The bill permits genetic data generated by rWGS to be used in scientific research only if the 
patient, or the patient’s guardian if he or she is a minor, expressly consents to such use. Such consent may be 
rescinded at any time.   
 
The bill would have an indeterminate, but likely significant, negative fiscal impact on state government and no 
fiscal impact on local government. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2023.   STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
 
Background 
 
Genetic Disorders 
 
Genetic disorders are a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in neonatal and pediatric intensive 
care units (ICU) in the United States. There are more than 13,000 known genetic diseases and 
hundreds of targeted treatments and orphan drugs that have been approved or are in clinical trials.
1
 
Approximately seven percent to 10 percent of the four million infants born in the U.S. each year are 
admitted to a neonatal ICU for the diagnosis and treatment of an acute illness.
2
 About one percent of all 
neonatal ICU admissions have an indication of a genetic disorder, and approximately 15 percent of 
babies admitted to high acuity units appear to have a genetic disorder, leading to longer 
hospitalizations and higher resource use.
3
 Disease can progress rapidly in acutely ill infants, 
necessitating timely diagnosis in the hope of implementing personalized interventions that can 
decrease morbidity and mortality.
4
 
 
Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing (rWGS) 
 
All organisms have a unique genetic code, or genome, comprised of nucleotide bases (A, T, C, and G). 
If the sequence of the bases in an organism are known, its unique DNA fingerprint is known. 
Determining the order of bases is called sequencing. Whole genome sequencing is a laboratory 
procedure that determines the order of bases in the genome of an organism in one process.
5
 
 
Scientists conduct whole genome sequencing by following these four main steps:
6
 
 DNA shearing: Scientists begin by using molecular scissors to cut the DNA, which is composed 
of millions of bases, into pieces that are small enough for the sequencing machine to read. 
 DNA bar coding: Scientists add small pieces of DNA tags, or bar codes, to identify which piece 
of sheared DNA belongs to which bacteria. This is similar to how a bar code identifies a product 
at a grocery store. 
 DNA sequencing: The bar-coded DNA from multiple bacteria is combined and put in a DNA 
sequencer. The sequencer identifies the bases that make up each bacterial sequence. The 
sequencer uses the bar code to keep track of which bases belong to which bacteria. 
 Data analysis: Scientists use computer analysis tools to compare sequences from multiple 
bacteria and identify differences. The number of differences can tell the scientists how closely 
related the bacteria are, and how likely it is that they are part of the same outbreak. 
rWGS can complete such sequencing quickly and produce a much quicker diagnosis in as many as 50 
percent of children.
7
 With a turnaround as fast as 48 hours, vital time can be gained to develop and 
implement a plan of care for individuals, mostly children, with genetic disorders. 
                                                
1
 S Kingsmore, L Smith, A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for sever genetic diseases, 
Amer. J Human Genetics, vol. 109, pgs. 1605-1619, Sept. 1, 2022; M Clark, A Hildreth, Diagnosis of genetic diseases in seriously ill children by rapid 
w hole-genome sequencing and automated phenotyping and interpretation, Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 11, 2019, available at 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36007526/ (last visited April 5, 2023). 
2
 D Dimmock, S. Caylor, et al., Project Baby Bear: Rapid precision care incorporating rWGS in 5 California children’s hospitals demonstrates improved 
clinical outcomes and reduced costs of care, Amer. J. Human Genetics, vol. 108, pgs. 1-8, July 1, 2021, available at 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34089648/ (last visited April 5, 2023).  
3
 Id. 
4
 B Peterson, EJ Hernandez, Automated prioritization of sick newborns for whole genome sequencing using clinical natural language processing and 
machine learning, Genome Medicine, vol. 15:18, 2023. 
5
 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Whole Genome Sequencing, available at 
https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/wgs.html#:~:text=Whole%20genome%20sequencing%20is%20a%20fast%20and%20affordable,needed%20to
%20quickly%20solve%20and%20prevent%20foodborne%20outbreaks (last visited on April 5, 2023). 
6
 Id.  
7
 University of California San Francisco, New s and Events, Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing: Faster Diagnostics for Fragile Infants, May 14, 2020, 
available at https://precisionmedicine.ucsf.edu/news/rapid-whole-genome-sequencing-faster-diagnostics-fragile-infants (last visited on April 5, 2023).   STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
 
As the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) expands, the CDC’s national surveillance systems and 
laboratory infrastructure must keep pace with the changing technology. With modernization, the CDC 
and its public health partners can continue to successfully detect, respond to, and stop infectious 
diseases.
8
  
 
 Project Baby Manatee 
 
From August 2019 to June 2020, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital implemented a pilot program called 
Project Baby Manatee. Through the program, 50 patients were enrolled and sequenced using rWGS.
9
 
The average age was 34.6 months and two-thirds were male, while 60 percent of participants were 
white, and 26 percent were African American.
10
 Two types of testing was completed – rWGS and 
ultrarWGS. Ultra rWGS testing was selected when delivery of the genetic diagnoses was critical for 
clinical management. Twenty out of 50 patients, or 40 percent, received genetic diagnoses based on 
WGS.
11
 The most common presentations of illness in which a genetic disease was diagnosed by rWGS 
were respiratory problems (36 percent), cardiovascular problems (36 percent), seizures (32 percent), 
brain disorders (32 percent), and metabolic issues (24 percent).
12
  
 
Eight of the diagnosed genetic diseases in Project Baby Manatee have an incidence of less than one in 
one million births or are of unknown incidence. Some of the identified diseases are so rare that many 
treating physicians had never seen them before, increasing the probability that these disorders would 
generally go underdiagnosed without rWGS. The rWGS led to changes in clinical management of 38 
percent of children in the pilot program. Such results empowered clinicians and parents to quickly make 
informed decisions that typically altered the course of the child’s hospitalization and led to the initiation 
of new procedures and medications, or the avoidance of unnecessary ones.
13
 The program resulted in 
estimated savings of over $3.76 million, yielding a $2.88 million return on investment.
14
 Based on the 
results of Project Baby Manatee, rWGS and related rapid precision medicine approach was cost-saving 
and cost-effective, but also improved health outcomes and shortened the period to diagnosis.
15
 
 
 Other Studies  
 
Studies performed in clinical research settings have found genome sequencing to be effective for 
diagnosis and management of undiagnosed infants in ICUs and to result in improved diagnostic yield
16
, 
faster time to diagnosis, enhanced physician and parental satisfaction, improved patient outcomes, and 
reductions in health care costs.
17
 Further, rWGS facilitates end-of-life care decisions that can alleviate 
suffering and aid the grieving process.
18
 Studies have shown rWGS provides a diagnosis for 21 percent 
to 57 percent of children in intensive care settings.
19
  
 
Despite evidence that sequencing improves clinical outcomes, reduce net costs of care, and leads to 
high provider and parental satisfaction, routine implementation in ICUs and coverage by payors has 
                                                
8
 Supra, note 5. 
9
 Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Project Baby Manatee – Advanced Genomics for Critically Ill Children Final Report, Aug. 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020, 
available at https://www.nicklauschildrens.org/NCH/media/docs/pdf/research/Final-report-State-Appropriations-NCH-PMI.PDF (last visited on April 5, 
2023). 
10
 Id., at pg. 6. 
11
 Id., at pg. 7. 
12
 Id., at pg. 8. 
13
 Id. 
14
 Id., at pg. 19. Total costs for WGS and related rapid precision medicine for 50 patients w as approximately $880,000. 
15
 Id., at pg. 20. 
16
 V Diaby, A Babcock, et al., Real-world economic evaluation of prospective rapid whole-genome sequencing compared to a matched retrospective 
cohort of critically ill pediatric patients in the United States, Pharmacogenomics J., vol. 22, pgs. 223-229, 2022. 
17
 C Bupp, E Ames, et al., Breaking Barriers to Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatrics: Michigan’s Project Baby Deer, Children, vol. 10, pg. 
106, 2023, available at https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010106 (last visited April 5, 2023); TA Lavelle, X Feng, et al., Cost-effectiveness of exome and 
genome sequencing for children with rare and undiagnosed conditions, Genet. Med., vol. 24, pgs.1349-1361, 2022.  
18
 L Farnaes, A Hildreth, et al., Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization, npj Genomic Medicine 3:10, 
2018. 
19
 Id.  STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
remained elusive.
20
 It has been shown that rWGS, while expensive, may decrease overall cost of 
diagnostic evaluations of medically complex children.
21
 
 
Compared to traditional genetic tests, where diagnosis can be delayed or missed, rWGS has a high 
diagnostic yield, ranging from 40 percent to 70 percent. 
 
Infant Mortality 
 
Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the 
number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births. In 2020, the infant mortality rate in the United States 
was 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births.
22
 
 
The following map shows infant mortality by state for 2020, the most recent year with available data. 
Florida’s infant mortality rate is 4.96 to less than 6.62 per 1,000 live births.
23
 
 
 
 
The 10 leading causes of infant death in 2020 (congenital malformations, low birth weight, sudden 
infant death syndrome, unintentional injuries, maternal complications, cord and placental complications, 
bacterial sepsis of newborn, respiratory distress of newborn, diseases of the circulatory system, and 
neonatal hemorrhage) accounted for 67.5% of all infant deaths in the United States. The graph below 
shows the infant mortality rate for the 10 leading causes of infant death in 2020 in the United States, 
with 2019 rates included for comparison.
24
 
 
                                                
20
 Supra note 5, at pg. 2. 
21
 Supra note 5, at pg. 2; R Hayeems, et al., Care and cost consequences of pediatric whole genome sequencing compared to chromosome microarray, 
Eur. J. Hum. Genet., vol. 25, pgs. 1303-1312, 2017. 
22
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Publication and 
Information Products–Data Briefs, Mortality in the United States, 2020, available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db427.htm#section_5 
(last visited on April 5, 2023).  
23
 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Reproductive Health, Maternal and Infant Health, Infant 
Mortality Rates by State, 2020, available at https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm (last visited on April 5, 
2023). 
24
 Supra note 22, figure 5.  STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
 
 
The chart below shows the leading cause of death of infants in Florida for 2021, with 2020 rates 
included for comparison.
25
 
 
 
 
Florida Medicaid 
 
Medicaid is the health care safety net for low-income Floridians. Medicaid is a partnership of the federal 
and state governments established to provide coverage for health services for eligible persons. The 
program is administered by the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) and financed by federal 
and state funds. 
 
The structure of each state’s Medicaid program varies, but what states must pay for is largely 
determined by the federal government, as a condition of receiving federal funds.
26
 The federal 
                                                
25
 Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Community Health Assessment, Division of Public Health Statistics and Performance Management, Mortality 
Dashboard–Deaths by Age, Leading Causes of Death per 100,000 Population, Florida, 2020 and 2021, Under Age 1, available at 
https://www.flhealthcharts.gov/ChartsReports/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=MortalityAtlas.Dashboard_MortalityAtlas1&rdRequestForwarding=Form (last 
visited on April 5, 2023). 
26
 Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396-1396w-5; Title 42 C.F.R. Part 430-456 (§§ 430.0-456.725).  STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
government sets the minimum mandatory populations to be included in every program, and the 
minimum mandatory benefits to be covered. These mandatory benefits include physician services, 
hospital services, home health services, and family planning.
27
 States can add benefits, with federal 
approval. Florida has added many optional benefits.
28
  
 
The Florida Medicaid program covers approximately 5.7 million low-income individuals in Florida.
29
 
Medicaid is the largest single program in the state, representing more than 44 percent of the total Fiscal 
Year (FY) 2022-2023 state budget.
30
 Florida’s program is the 4th largest in the nation by enrollment 
and, for FY 2020-2021, the program is the 4th largest in terms of expenditures.
31
 
 
Florida delivers medical assistance to most Medicaid recipients - approximately 78% - using a 
comprehensive managed care model.
32
 A minority of Medicaid recipients-mostly those enrolled in 
limited benefit programs-participate in the traditional fee-for-service model.  
 
 Payment for Genomic Testing  
 
Florida’s Medicaid program pays for the following standard, non-rapid genomic sequencing procedures: 
 Fetal chromosomal aneuploidy genomic sequence analysis panel. 
 Fetal chromosomal microdeletion genomic sequence analysis. 
 Genomic sequencing procedures and other molecular multianalyte assays. 
 Genetic testing for severe inherited conditions.
33
 
 
Several states are currently implementing coverage policies for rWGS, including California
34
, 
Minnesota
35
, Louisiana
36
, Maryland
37
, and Oregon
38
. 
 
Over the past decade, rWGS has developed into an effective diagnostic test for almost all heritable 
diseases and is gaining acceptance as a first-tier test for critically ill newborns with suspected genetic 
diseases.
39
 While there has been an increase in payor coverage for rWGS, it varies and is not 
universal. 
 
Effect of Proposed Changes 
 
CS/HB 1043 creates s. 409.9063, F.S., which requires AHCA to seek approval from the Centers for 
Medicare and Medicaid Services to cover rWGS as a benefit for Medicaid recipients who: 
 Are 20 years of age or younger; 
 Have a complex or acute illness of unknown etiology that has not been caused by 
environmental exposure, toxic ingestion, an infection with normal response to treatment, or 
trauma; and 
 Are receiving inpatient treatment in a hospital ICU or high-acuity pediatric care unit. 
                                                
27
 S. 409.905, F.S. 
28
 S. 409.906, F.S. 
29
 Agency for Health Care Administration, Florida Statewide Medicaid Monthly Enrollment Report, Feb. 2023, available at 
https://ahca.myflorida.com/medicaid/Finance/data_analytics/enrollment_report/index.shtml (last visited on April 5,  
30
 Ch. 2022-156, Law s of Fla., See also Fiscal Analysis in Brief: 2022 Legislative Session, available at 
http://edr.state.fl.us/content/revenues/reports/fiscal-analysis-in-brief/FiscalAnalysisinBrief2022.pdf (last viewed on April 5, 2023). 
31
 The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, State Health Facts, Total Medicaid Spending FY 2021 and Total Monthly Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment Nov. 
2022, available at http://kff.org/statedata/ (last visited on April 5, 2023).  
32
 S. 409.964, F.S. 
33
 Agency for Health Care Administration, 2023 Agency Legislative Administration–HB 1043, pg. 2, March 7, 2023, on file w ith the House Healthcare 
Regulation Subcommittee. 
34
 Medi-Cal Update, Inpatient Services, Bulletin 573, June 2022.  
35
 Minnesota Department of Human Services, Laboratory and Pathology Tests, April 4, 2022, available at 
https://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=DHS16
_144353 (last visited April 5, 2023).  
36
 Louisiana SB 154, Provides for Health Insurance Coverage of Genetic Testing for Critically Ill Infants with No Diagnosis, January 1, 2023. 
37
 Maryland Department of Health, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Clinical Criteria, Whole Genome Clinical Criteria, available at 
https://health.maryland.gov/mmcp/Documents/Whole%20Genome%20Clinical%20Criteria.pdf#search=Whole%20Genome%20Sequencing%20Clinical
%20Criteria (last visited April 5, 2023).  
38
 Oregon Health Authority, Prioritized list of Health Services, February 1, 2023, available at https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-
HERC/Pages/Prioritized-List.aspx (last visited April 5, 2023).  
39
 Supra note 1.  STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 7 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
 
 
The bill also restricts the use of any genetic data resulting from rWGS only to assist the ordering health 
care professional and treating care team in diagnosing and treating the patient, and considers such 
data protected health information protected by the federal Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act (HIPAA). 
 
The bill permits genetic data generated by rWGS to be used in scientific research only if the patient, or 
the patient’s guardian if he or she is a minor, expressly consents to such use. Such consent may be 
rescinded at any time.  Upon receipt of written notice of consent rescission, the health care provider or 
entity using the genetic data must cease using it, and expunge the individual’s genetic data from any 
data repository where it is held. 
 
Lastly, the bill authorizes AHCA to seek approval to amend waivers, request a new waiver, and amend 
contracts as necessary to provide coverage of rWGS. AHCA is also given express rulemaking authority 
to implement the bill provisions. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2023. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
 
Section 1:  Creates s. 409.9063, F.S., relating to rapid whole genome sequencing services for 
Medicaid recipients. 
Section 2: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2023. 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
The bill would have an indeterminate, but likely significant, negative fiscal impact on state 
expenditures related to the Medicaid program, to the extent that qualified Medicaid recipients 
consent to rWGS services.  
 
In 2021, 14,476 newborn babies covered by Medicaid were admitted to a NICU facility. If 5 percent 
(724) of those newborns were tested and assuming testing was reimbursed as a fee-for-service 
benefit, the total potential expense would be $3,292,791, with potential impact to General Revenue 
Fund totaling $1,334,239. The chart below details potential expenses as the percentage of 
newborns tested increases. This projection is based on the number of newborn children in a NICU 
in 2021, and a reimbursement rate of 60% of the Medicare reimbursement rate for rWGS 
($7,582.20 x 60%=$4,549.31).
40
 The fiscal impact may be significantly higher than this projection, 
because the bill provides for rWGS services to all qualified Medicaid recipients aged 20 years or 
younger, to include newborns. 
 
Participation  Potential Participants Total Expense GR Impact 
5% 	724 	$3,292,791 $1,334,239 
10% 	1,448 	$6,585,581 $2,668,477 
15% 	2,171 	$9,878,372 $4,002,716 
25% 	3,619 	$16,463,953 $6,671,194 
                                                
40
 Agency for Health Care Administration, 2023 Agency Legislative Bill Analysis–HB 1043, March 7, 2023, pg. 5, on file w ith the House Healthcare 
Regulation Subcommittee.  STORAGE NAME: h1043b.HCA 	PAGE: 8 
DATE: 4/11/2023 
  
50% 	7,238 	$32,927,906 $13,342,387 
75% 	10,857 	$49,391,859 $20,013,581 
100% 	14,476 	$65,855,812 $26,684,775 
 
AHCA will need to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid coverage of rWGS. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
 
Future expenditures related to rWGS would be considered by the Social Services Estimating 
Conference in the Medicaid Expenditures forecast. 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
 
Not applicable. The bill does not impact municipal or county government. 
 
 2. Other: 
 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
 
The bill provides AHCA with rulemaking authority to implement the bill provisions. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
 
None. 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On April 3, 2023, the Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee adopted two amendments and reported the bill 
favorably as a committee substitute. The amendments: 
 
 Removed the whereas clauses from the bill. 
 Changed the age of eligibility for rWGS under Medicaid to 20 years of age and younger. 
 
The bill was reported favorably as amended. The analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed 
by the Healthcare Regulation Subcommittee.