Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1595 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/07/2023

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: CS/HB 1595    Law Enforcement Operations 
SPONSOR(S): Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee, Yarkosky and others 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1588 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special 
Districts Subcommittee 
18 Y, 0 N, As CS Mwakyanjala Darden 
2) Judiciary Committee  	Padgett Kramer 
3) State Affairs Committee    
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
The Florida Constitution provides that each county shall have a sheriff elected by the electors of the county to 
a four-year term. As of January 5, 2021, for all counties except Broward and Miami-Dade, a county charter 
may not abolish the office of sheriff or provide an alternative method for selecting the sheriff. This provision 
applies to all counties effective January 7, 2025. Sheriffs are given an extensive list of duties under s. 30.15, 
F.S., but currently the jurisdictional powers of the sheriff are not codified. 
 
Section 166.241, F.S., provides a budget appeal process by which specified persons may challenge funding 
reductions in a municipal law enforcement agency’s budget. If a municipality’s tentative budget contains a 
funding reduction to the operating budget of the municipal law enforcement agency, the state attorney for the 
judicial circuit in which the municipality is located or a member of the governing body of the municipality who 
objects to the funding reduction may appeal by petition to the Administration Commission, comprised of the 
Governor and members of the Cabinet, within 30 days after the day the tentative budget is posted on the 
municipality’s website. The Administration Commission conducts a hearing on the reduction and may approve 
the budget adopted by the governing body of the municipality, or may amend or modify each separate item 
within the operating budget of the municipal law enforcement agency.  
 
CS/HB 1595 amends s. 30.15, F.S., to codify the jurisdictional powers to the sheriff to clarify that the sheriff 
has exclusive policing jurisdiction in the unincorporated areas of each county and concurrent jurisdiction with 
municipal or special district law enforcement agencies in the jurisdictions of those agencies. 
 
The bill amends s. 166.241, F.S., to revise the budget appeal process to challenge funding reductions in a 
municipal law enforcement agency’s budget to only allow a challenge if the reduction is more than five percent 
of the prior year’s budget, transfer the appeals process from the Administration Commission to the Division of 
Administrative Hearings, and require that a copy of a petition be given to the affected municipality. The bill 
provides guidance for administrative law judges in considering petitions and specifies required elements of the 
recommended order. 
 
There could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to municipal government budgets based on the appeal process 
for law enforcement funding. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of upon becoming a law. 
 
 
 
     STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Background 
 
County Constitutional Officers 
 
The Florida Constitution requires the Legislature to divide the state into counties.
1
 Statutes divide the 
state into 67 counties, establishing their boundaries by providing the exact legal description of each 
county.
2
 The Florida Constitution recognizes two types of county governments: those operating under a 
county charter and those without a charter.
3
 Non-charter county governments may exercise those 
powers of self-government that are provided by general or special law.
4
 Counties operating under a 
county charter have all powers of self-government not inconsistent with general law or special law 
approved by the vote of the electors.
5
 
 
The electors of each county elect county constitutional officers (the sheriff, tax collector, property 
appraiser, supervisor of elections, and clerk of the circuit court) to a four-year term.
6
 Before 2018, a 
county charter could provide an alternative method of selecting county constitutional officers or abolish 
those offices, as long as the duties of the office prescribed by general law were transferred to another 
office.
7
 During the 2018 general election, voters approved Amendment 10, requiring all county 
constitutional officers to be elected to a four-term year and prohibiting the transfer of those duties to 
another office.
8
 Most counties were required to comply with this requirement by January 5, 2021, while 
Broward and Miami-Dade Counties were given until January 7, 2025.
9
 
 
Office of the Sheriff 
 
There are currently 66 elected sheriffs in Florida’s 67 counties.
10 
Section 30.15, F.S., provides the 
duties and powers of sheriffs, including: 
 Executing all process of the Supreme Court, circuit courts, county courts, and boards of county 
commissioners of this state, to be executed in their counties; 
 Executing such other writs, processes, warrants, and other papers directed to them, as may 
come to their hands to be executed in their counties; 
 Attending all sessions of the circuit court and county court held in their counties; 
 Executing all orders of the boards of county commissioners of their counties; 
 Being conservators of the peace in their counties; and  
 Suppressing tumults, riots, and unlawful assemblies in their counties with force and strong hand 
when necessary.
11
 
 
Current law does not provide an explicit statement of the sheriff’s jurisdictional powers. 
 
                                                
1
 Art. VIII, s. 1(a), Fla. Const. 
2
 See ch. 7, F.S. 
3
 Art. VIII, ss. 1(f), (g), Fla. Const. 
4
 Art. VIII, s. 1(f), Fla. Const. 
5
 Art. VIII, s. 1(g), Fla. Const. 
6
 Art. VIII, s. 1(d), Fla. Const. 
7
 Art. VIII, s. 1(d), Fla. Const. (2018). 
8
 See art. VIII, s. 1(d), Fla. Const. 
9
 Art. VIII, s. 6(g), Fla. Const. 
10
 The Miami-Dade County Charter abolishes the office of sheriff, transfers its duties and responsibilities to the mayor of Miami-Dade 
County, and authorizes the mayor to delegate the functions of the sheriff to a “suitable person or persons.” Miami-Dade County Charter, 
s. 9.01. Currently, Miami-Dade Police Department Director Alfredo Ramirez III serves in the appointed position. Additionally, the Miami-
Dade Police Department currently “provides basic police services throughout the unincorporated area of Miami-Dade County, Miami 
Lakes, Palmetto Bay and Cutler Bay,” and its “specialized patrol teams include the airport, seaport, marine, motorcycle, bomb disposal 
and SWAT.” Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department, https://www.miamidade.gov/global/police/home.page (last visited 
Apr. 7, 2023). 
11
 S. 30.15(1), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
  
Municipal Law Enforcement Budget Appeal Procedure 
 
A municipality is required to adopt a budget each fiscal year.
12
 As part of the budget process, a 
municipality is required to post a tentative budget to the municipality’s official website prior to a formal 
hearing adopting the final budget.
13
 Typically, the municipal police chief is appointed or hired by a city 
official or officials (mayor, city manager, city commission) and law enforcement funding is determined 
by the municipal governing body. 
 
Section 166.241, F.S., provides a budget appeal process by which specified persons may challenge 
funding reductions in a municipal law enforcement agency’s budget.
14
 If a municipality’s tentative 
budget contains a funding reduction to the operating budget of the municipal law enforcement agency, 
the state attorney for the judicial circuit in which the municipality is located or a member of the 
governing body of the municipality who objects to the funding reduction may appeal by petition to the 
Administration Commission within 30 days after the day the tentative budget is posted on the 
municipality’s website.
15
 
 
The petition is filed with the Executive Office of the Governor (EOG), with copies served upon the 
governing body of the municipality or to the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the 
municipality is located.
16
 Upon receipt of a copy of the petition, the governing body of the municipality 
has five working days to file a reply with EOG and serve the petitioner with a copy. 
 
The EOG conducts a budget hearing upon receipt of the petition and submits a report of its findings 
and recommendations to the Administration Commission.
17
 Within 30 days of receipt of the report, the 
Administration Commission may approve the budget adopted by the governing body of the municipality, 
or may amend or modify each separate item within the operating budget of the municipal law 
enforcement agency. The budget, as approved, amended, or modified by the Administration 
Commission is final. 
 
Administrative Law Judges 
 
Administrative law judges (ALJs) preside over disputes arising under the Administrative Procedure 
Act
18
 and other state laws in which the substantial interests of a person are determined by an agency
19
 
which involve a disputed issue of material fact.
20
 When a state agency proposes to take some action 
that is adverse to a person, the affected person is normally entitled to request an administrative hearing 
to determine the matter.
21
  
 
                                                
12
 S. 166.241(1) and (2), F.S. 
13
 S. 166.241(3), F.S. 
14
 S. 166.241(4), F.S. 
15
 S. 166.241(4)(a), F.S. The Administration Commission consists of the Governor and Cabinet. S. 14.202, F.S. 
16
 S. 166.241(4)(a), F.S. 
17
 S. 166.241(5), F.S. 
18
 Ch. 120, F.S. 
19
 The term “agency” means the following officers or governmental entities if acting pursuant to powers other than those derived from 
the Constitution: 
 The Governor; each state officer and state department, and each departmental unit described in s. 20.04, F.S.; the Board of Governors 
of the State University System; the Commission on Ethics; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; a regional water supply 
authority; a regional planning agency; a multicounty special district, but only if a majority of its governing board is comprised of 
nonelected persons; educational units; and each entity described in chs. 163, 373, 380, and 582, F.S., and s. 186.504, F.S. 
 Each officer and governmental entity in the state having statewide jurisdiction or jurisdiction in more than one county. 
 Each officer and governmental entity in the state having jurisdiction in one county or less than one county, to the extent they are 
expressly made subject to this chapter by general or special law or existing judicial decisions. 
The definition does not include a municipality or legal entity created solely by a municipality; a legal entity or agency created in whole or 
in part pursuant to part II of ch. 361, F.S.; a metropolitan planning organization created pursuant to s. 339.175, F.S.; a separate legal or 
administrative entity created pursuant to s. 339.175, F.S., of which a metropolitan planning organization is a member; an expressway 
authority pursuant to ch. 348, F.S. or any transportation authority or commission under ch. 343, F.S., or ch. 349, F.S.; or a legal or 
administrative entity created by an interlocal agreement pursuant to s. 163.01(7), F.S., unless any party to such agreement is otherwise 
an agency pursuant to this definition. S. 120.52(1), F.S. 
20
 S. 120.65(4), F.S. 
21
 DOAH, Representing Yourself Before the Division of Administrative Hearings, https://www.doah.state.fl.us/ALJ/Represent 
Yourself.asp (last visited Apr. 7, 2023).  STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
  
Each ALJ is employed by the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) and must have been a 
member of The Florida Bar in good standing for the preceding five years.
22
 DOAH is administratively 
housed under the Department of Management Services (DMS); however, DOAH is not subject to the 
control, supervision, or direction of DMS. 
 
Effect of Proposed Changes 
 
CS/HB 1595 amends s. 30.15, F.S., to revise the statutory duties of a sheriff by: 
 Clarifying that each county must have an elected sheriff and prohibit the transfer of the sheriff’s 
duties to another officer or office; 
 Specifying that the sheriff has exclusive policing jurisdiction in the unincorporated areas of each 
county and concurrent jurisdiction with municipal or special district law enforcement agencies in 
the jurisdictions of those agencies; 
 Prohibiting a county board of county commissioners, or other county legislative body, from 
maintaining or establishing a police department or other policing entity in unincorporated areas 
of the county; 
 Providing that only the duly elected sheriff may provide such policing and police functions in the 
unincorporated areas of any county; and 
 Prohibiting a county from contracting with or engaging in any manner with a municipal or special 
district law enforcement agency to provide any services provided by the sheriff, including 
policing or police functions, in the unincorporated areas of any county. 
 
The bill provides that these duties do not inhibit the jurisdiction of any state or federal law enforcement 
agency and do not prohibit a sheriff from entering into mutual aid agreements with other law 
enforcement agencies. 
 
The bill also amends s. 166.241, F.S., to revise the process for appealing a reduction in a municipal law 
enforcement budget by: 
 Limiting appeals to reductions of more than five percent compared to the prior fiscal year’s 
approved budget; 
 Replacing the role of the Administration Commission in the appeal process with DOAH; and  
 Requiring the petitioner to serve a copy of the petition to an affected local government. 
 
The bill provides that the parties may present the following information to an ALJ for consideration: 
 The grounds for the petition; 
 The grounds for opposing the petition; 
 The municipality’s reasons for proposing a reduction in funding in the current fiscal year’s 
operating budget; 
 The operating budget approved by the municipality; 
 A comparison of the municipal law enforcement agency’s operating budget to the operating 
budgets of other entities within the municipality; 
 A comparison of the municipal law enforcement agency’s operating budget to operating budgets 
of law enforcement agencies in nearby municipalities that are of comparable size; 
 Data and all other information describing the municipal law enforcement agency’s staffing needs 
and budgetary requirements from the current fiscal year and the two previous fiscal years; 
 The draft municipal law enforcement agency operating budgets, budget amendments, or budget 
meeting minutes from the current fiscal year and the two previous fiscal years; 
 The revenue and projected revenue available to the municipality and the change in the amount 
of revenue collected over the last three fiscal years; and 
 Any other information provided by the parties relevant to the municipal law enforcement 
agency’s operating budget. 
 
In making such a determination, the ALJ may consider whether: 
 The law enforcement agency can fully perform its duties despite the budget reduction; 
                                                
22
 S. 120.65(4), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
  
 The proposed level of funding will endanger the safety of the municipality’s residents; and 
 The proposed operating budget for the municipal law enforcement agency will have a 
substantially negative effect on the effectiveness of the law enforcement agency. 
 
The ALJ must issue a recommended order approving or rejecting the proposed operating budget with 
30 days after the hearing. The recommended order must contain findings and explain the ALJ’s 
decision with reference to the information presented or discussed during the hearing. The 
recommended order is subject to appeal in accordance with ch. 120, F.S. 
 
The recommended order becomes a final order 90 days after its issuance unless the parties voluntarily 
enter into an agreement resolving the issues raised in the hearing. Before executing an agreement, the 
municipality must conduct a public hearing. 
 
If the final order approves the tentative budget of a municipality which contains a funding reduction to 
the operating budget of the municipal law enforcement agency, that portion of the operating budget is 
valid. If the final order rejects the tentative budget of a municipality which contains a funding reduction, 
the municipality must approve a budget that does not reduce funding to the municipal law enforcement 
agency. 
 
 The bill provides an effective date of upon becoming a law. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1:  Amends s. 30.15, F.S., concerning the powers, duties, and obligations of sheriffs. 
 
Section 2: Amends s. 166.241, concerning municipal law enforcement budgeting. 
 
Section 3: Provides an effective date of upon becoming a law. 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
 
2. Expenditures: 
There could be an indeterminate fiscal impact to municipal government budgets based on the 
appeal process for law enforcement funding. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None.  STORAGE NAME: h1595a.JDC 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 4/7/2023 
  
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not Applicable. This bill does not appear to require counties or municipalities to spend funds or take 
action requiring the expenditures of funds; reduce the authority that counties or municipalities have 
to raise revenues in the aggregate; or reduce the percentage of state tax shared with counties or 
municipalities. 
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The bill neither authorizes nor requires rulemaking by executive branch agencies. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
On March 29, 2023, the Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee adopted a 
proposed committee substitute (PCS) and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The PCS 
removed provisions providing a transition process to be followed for moving from appointed to an elected 
sheriff and a prohibition on a county budget providing funding to certain officers or offices. The PCS revises 
the process by which a state attorney or a member of the municipality’s governing board appeals a 
reduction to the operating budget of the municipal law enforcement agency. 
 
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed by the Local Administration, Federal Affairs 
& Special Districts Subcommittee.