Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S0320 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/20/2023

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources  
 
BILL: SB 320 
INTRODUCER:  Senator Harrell 
SUBJECT:  Land Acquisition Trust Fund 
DATE: February 20, 2023 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Carroll Rogers EN Pre-meeting 
2.     AEG   
3.     AP  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 320 appropriates from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund a minimum of the lesser of 7.6 
percent
1
 of the funds remaining after debt service or $50 million annually for projects dedicated 
to the conservation of the Indian River Lagoon. The Department of Environmental Protection 
(DEP) will use the funds to provide grants for projects that implement the 2008 updated Indian 
River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. Priority must be given to 
projects for ecosystem monitoring and habitat restoration, septic to sewer conversion, and 
management of stormwater, freshwater, and agricultural discharges. Grants for septic to sewer 
conversion and discharge management projects must require a minimum 50 percent local match.  
 
Beginning January 1, 2024, DEP must annually submit a report regarding the projects to the 
Governor and the Legislature. 
II. Present Situation: 
The Indian River Lagoon 
The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) is a 156-mile-long estuary spanning approximately 40 percent of 
Florida’s east coast.
2
 There are six coastal counties in the IRL watershed: Volusia, Brevard, 
Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach.
3
 The IRL extends from Ponce de Leon Inlet 
near New Smyrna Beach in Volusia County to the southern border of Jupiter Inlet in Martin 
                                                
1
 Approximately $93 million based on estimates for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. 
2
 DEP, Basin Management Action Plan, Indian River Lagoon Basin Central Indian River Lagoon, 14 (2021), available at 
https://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DEAR/BMAP/IndianRiverLagoon/BMAP_Documents/2021_IRL_BMAP_Final/CIRL/Final
_CIRL_BMAP_02102021.pdf; IRLNEP, Importance, https://onelagoon.org/importance/ (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
3
 DEP, Basin Management Action Plan, Indian River Lagoon Basin Central Indian River Lagoon, 14 (2021). 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 320   	Page 2 
 
County.
4
 There are three interconnected 
lagoons in the IRL basin: Mosquito 
Lagoon, Banana River Lagoon, and Indian 
River Lagoon.
5
 Seventy-one percent of its 
area and nearly half its length is within 
Brevard County.
6
 
 
The IRL is considered the most biologically 
diverse estuary in North America.
7
 It is 
home to more than 2,000 species of plants, 
600 species of fish, 300 species of birds, 
and 53 threatened or endangered species.
8
 
In 2014, the estimated annual economic 
value received from the IRL was 
approximately $7.6 billion, around $1.57 
billion of which was attributable to 
recreation and visitor-related activity.
9
 
Industry groups directly influenced by the 
IRL supported nearly 72,000 jobs.
10
 
 
The IRL ecosystem has been harmed by 
human activities in the region. Stormwater 
runoff from urban and agricultural areas, 
wastewater treatment facility discharges, 
canal discharges, septic systems, animal 
waste, and fertilizer applications have led 
to harmful levels of nutrients and sediments 
                                                
4
 Id.  
5
 DEP, TMDL Report, Nutrient and Dissolved Oxygen TMDLs for the Indian River Lagoon and Banana River Lagoon, 1 
(Mar. 2009), available at https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/indian-banana-nutrient-do-tmdl.pdf. 
6
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update, xi (Feb. 2023)[hereinafter 
Save Our Lagoon], available at https://www.brevardfl.gov/SaveOurLagoon/ProjectPlan. The map on this page shows the 
IRL watershed. IRLNEP, IRLWatershedMap_With PlBound, https://onelagoon.org/irlwatershedmap_withplbound/# (last 
visited Feb. 17, 2023).  
7
 DEP, Basin Management Action Plan, Indian River Lagoon Basin Central Indian River Lagoon, 45 (2021), available at 
https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/central-irl-bmap.pdf; An estuary is a partially enclosed, coastal waterbody where 
freshwater from rivers and streams mixes with saltwater from the ocean. Estuaries are among the most productive ecosystems 
on earth, home to unique plant and animal communities that have adapted to brackish water: freshwater mixed with saltwater. 
U.S. EPA, What Is An Estuary?, https://www.epa.gov/nep/basic-information-about-estuaries (last visited Feb. 15, 2023); 
NOAA, What Is An Estuary?, https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/estuary.html (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
8
 Indian River Lagoon Species Inventory, Biodiversity, 
https://www.irlspecies.org/misc/Total_Biodiv.php#:~:text=Home%20to%20over%204%2C200%20species%20of%20plants
%2C%20birds%2C,species%20of%20fish%20and%20370%20species%20of%20birds (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
9
 East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Indian River Lagoon 
Economic Valuation Update, vi, ix (Aug. 26, 2016), available at 
https://files.tcrpc.org/portfolio%20of%20work/Economic%20Development/IRL%20Valuation/FinalReportIRL08_26_2016.p
df.  
10
 Id. at ix.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 3 
 
entering the lagoon.
11
 These pollutants create cloudy conditions, feed algal blooms, and lead to 
muck accumulation, all of which negatively impact the seagrass that provides habitat for much of 
the IRL’s marine life.
12
 During the 2011 “Superbloom,” intense algal blooms of phytoplankton 
occurred throughout most of the IRL, lasting for seven months and resulting in massive losses of 
seagrass that has yet to fully recover.
13
 There have also been recurring brown tides; unusual 
mortalities of dolphins, manatees, and shorebirds; and large fish kills due to low dissolved 
oxygen from decomposing algae.
14
 Brown tide is a type of algal bloom dominated by a brown, 
microscopic marine algae, which can be harmful to ecosystems in high concentrations, and was 
first documented in state waters in 2012.
15
 The St. Lucie Estuary is a major tributary to the 
southern IRL, so freshwater discharges from Lake Okeechobee, which can include toxic 
cyanobacteria (“blue-green algae”), also impact the IRL.
16
  
 
The St. Johns River Water Management District, South Florida Water Management District, and 
local governments implement projects that address water quality issues in the IRL.
17
 Brevard 
County established the Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan, which outlines local projects 
to meet water quality targets and improve the health, productivity, aesthetic appeal, and 
economic value of the IRL.
18
 In 2016, Brevard County passed a referendum, approved by 62.4 
percent of voters, to authorize the issuance of a half-cent infrastructure sales tax to pay for a 
portion of the plan.
19
 The sales tax will generate an estimated $542 million over ten years.
20
 
 
 
                                                
11
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update at xi; Marine Resources 
Council, Indian River Lagoon Health Update, 4-7 (2018), available at https://savetheirl.org/wp-content/uploads/mrc-report-
card-2018-min.pdf. 
12
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update at xi. 
13
 IRL 2011 Consortium, Indian River Lagoon 2011 Superbloom - Plan of Investigation, 2-3 (2012), available at 
https://www.sjrwmd.com/static/waterways/irl-technical//2011superbloom_investigationplan_June_2012.pdf; Marine 
Resources Council, Indian River Lagoon Coastal Community Report Card, 2,4 (2022), available at https://savetheirl.org/wp-
content/uploads/IRLReportCard2022-opt.pdf.  
14
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update at xi. 
15
 SJRWMD, Renewing the Lagoon - Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.sjrwmd.com/waterways/renew-lagoon/#faq-
01 (last visited Feb. 15, 2023); FWC, Effects of Brown Tide in the Indian River Lagoon (2012), 
https://myfwc.com/research/redtide/monitoring/historical-events/brown-tide/ (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
16
 DEP, Basin Management Action Plan, St. Lucie River and Estuary Basin, 15 (2020), available at 
https://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DEAR/DEARweb/BMAP/NEEP_2020_Updates/St_Lucie_BMAP_01-31-20.pdf ; DEP, 
Basin Management Action Plan, Lake Okeechobee, 14 (2020), available at 
https://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DEAR/DEARweb/BMAP/NEEP_2020_Updates/Lake%20Okeechobee%20BMAP_01-31-
20.pdf.  
17
 SJRWMD, The Indian River Lagoon, https://www.sjrwmd.com/waterways/indian-river-lagoon/ (last visited Feb. 15, 
2023); SFWMD, Celebrating the Indian River Lagoon-South C-23/24 Stormwater Treatment Area Groundbreaking, 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/news-events/news/celebrating-indian-river-lagoon-south-c-2324-stormwater-treatment-area (last 
visited Feb. 15, 2023).  
18
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update at xi. 
19
 Brevard County Supervisor of Elections, 2016 General Election Official Results, 
https://enr.electionsfl.org/BRE/1616/Summary/ (last visited Feb. 15, 2023); Brevard County, Save our Indian River Lagoon 
Project Plan, https://www.brevardfl.gov/SaveOurLagoon/ProjectPlan (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
20
 Id.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 4 
 
On January 10, 2023, Governor DeSantis signed Executive Order 23-6, directing the Department 
of Environmental Protection (DEP) to identify and prioritize strategies and projects to expedite 
water quality restoration in the IRL.
21
 The executive order instructed DEP to: 
 Work with the Legislature to establish the IRL Protection Program and secure at least $100 
million annually for priority projects; 
 Coordinate with stakeholders to expand partnerships to identify and prioritize projects for 
water quality restoration; 
 Undertake enhanced water quality monitoring in the IRL to better identify sources of nutrient 
loading to inform project prioritization and improve water quality in the IRL; 
 Take actions to reduce nutrient contributions to the IRL from septic tanks and wastewater 
facilities, stormwater discharges, and agriculture non-point sources; and 
 Support innovative nature-based solutions including living shorelines, freshwater and coastal 
wetland restoration, and seagrass recovery utilizing strategic propagation and planting 
efforts.
22
  
 
Pollution from Onsite Sewage and Disposal Systems 
Onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems (OSTDSs), commonly referred to as “septic 
systems,” generally consist of two basic parts: the septic tank and the drainfield.
23
 Waste from 
toilets, sinks, washing machines, and showers flows through a pipe into the septic tank, where 
anaerobic bacteria break the solids into a liquid form. The liquid portion of the wastewater flows 
into the drainfield, which is generally a series of perforated pipes or panels surrounded by 
lightweight materials such as gravel or Styrofoam. The drainfield provides a secondary treatment 
where aerobic bacteria continue deactivating the germs. The drainfield also provides filtration of 
the wastewater, as gravity draws the water down through the soil layers.
24
 In Florida, 
development in some areas is dependent on OSTDSs due to the cost and time it takes to install 
central sewer systems.
25
 For example, in rural areas and low-density developments, central sewer 
systems are not cost-effective.
26
 
 
In a conventional OSTDS, a septic tank does not reduce nitrogen from the raw sewage. In 
Florida, approximately 30-40 percent of the nitrogen levels are reduced in the drainfield of a 
system that is installed 24 inches or more from groundwater. This still leaves a significant 
amount of nitrogen to percolate into the groundwater, which makes nitrogen from OSTDSs a 
potential contaminant in groundwater.   
 
OSTDSs account for much of the nitrogen enrichment in groundwater in the IRL watersheds 
because the six counties adjacent to the IRL rely heavily on OSTDS for wastewater 
                                                
21
 Office of the Governor, Executive Order 23-6, 6 (Jan. 10, 2023), available at https://www.flgov.com/wp-
content/uploads/2023/01/EO-23-06.pdf.  
22
 Id. at 7.  
23
 DOH, Septic System Information and Care, http://columbia.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/environmental-
health/onsite-sewage-disposal/septic-information-and-care.html (last visited Feb, 2023); EPA, Types of Septic Systems, 
https://www.epa.gov/septic/types-septic-systems (last visited Feb. 10, 2023) (showing the graphic provided in the analysis). 
24
 Id. 
25
 DOH, Report on Range of Costs to Implement a Mandatory Statewide 5-Year Septic Tank Inspection Program, Executive 
Summary (Oct. 1, 2008), available at http://www.floridahealth.gov/environmental-health/onsite-sewage/_documents/costs-
implement-mandatory-statewide-inspection.pdf (last visited Feb. 10, 2023).  
26
 Id.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 5 
 
management.
27
 As of 2021, there were approximately 300,000 permitted OSTDSs in the IRL 
watershed. Indian River and Martin Counties used OSTDSs for over 50 percent of their 
wastewater management and there were approximately 31,000 septic systems in each county.
28
 
As of 2019, Brevard County, which borders nearly half of the IRL, had an estimated 53,204 
OSTDSs and contributed approximately 17,863 pounds per year of total nitrogen from failing 
OSTDSs.
29
 
 
The Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program  
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Estuary Program is a community-
based program to protect and restore the water quality and ecological integrity of estuaries of 
national significance.
30
 Currently, 28 estuaries located along the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific 
coasts and in Puerto Rico are designated as estuaries of national significance. Each National 
Estuary Program focuses within a study area that includes the estuary and surrounding 
watershed. Through a process of involving community stakeholders, the 28 National Estuary 
Programs develop and implement Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plans, which 
are long-term plans that contain actions to address water quality and living resource challenges 
and priorities. The National Estuary Program challenges and priorities are defined by local, city, 
state, federal, private, and non-profit stakeholders.
31
 
 
The IRL National Estuary Program was established in 1990 under the sponsorship of the St. 
Johns River and South Florida Water Management Districts.
32
 The program developed the IRL 
Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan Update, first published in 1997 and updated 
in 2008 and 2018.
33
 The plan provides goals and action plan outputs regarding water quality, 
habitats, and living resources within the IRL.
34
  
 
In 2015, the IRL Council was established to carry out the IRL National Estuary Program.
35
 The 
Council includes DEP, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the South Florida Water 
Management District, Volusia County, Brevard County, St. Lucie County, Martin County, and a 
collection of local governments known as the Indian River County Lagoon Coalition.
36
 The goals 
of the parties to the IRL Council’s interlocal agreement are the goals set forth in the amended 
                                                
27
 L.W. Herren, et al., Septic systems drive nutrient enrichment of groundwaters and eutrophication in the urbanized Indian 
River Lagoon, Florida, Marine Pollution Bulletin 172, 2 (2021), available at 
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0025326X21009620?token=1384E4307B3A786FC65C7DD3270D91440566F5E27
93CAE8F859A2139CF19FE68102D54027EEFF164F8492399C7F65B49&originRegion=us-east-
1&originCreation=20230217141616. 
28
 Id. 
29
 Tetra Tech, Inc. & Closewaters, LLC, Save Our Indian River Lagoon Project Plan 2019 Update at 22-23. 
30
 33 U.S.C. s. 1330; U.S. EPA, National Estuary Program (NEP), Overview of the National Estuary Program, 
https://www.epa.gov/nep/overview-national-estuary-program (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
31
 EPA, Overview of the National Estuary Program. 
32
 IRLNEP, The Indian River Lagoon NEP, https://onelagoon.org/irlnep/ (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). 
33
 IRLNEP, Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan Update, 15 (2019), available at 
https://onelagoon.org/wp-content/uploads/IRLNEP_Final-Draft-CCMP-REVISION_2018-12-07_LowRes__20200204.pdf.  
34
 Id. at 18.  
35
 IRLNEP, the Indian River Lagoon NEP.  
36
 First Amended and Restated Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Interlocal Agreement, 1-3 (Sept. 2015), 
available at https://onelagoon.net/wp-content/uploads/irlnep_amended_interlocal_agreement_2015.pdf.   BILL: SB 320   	Page 6 
 
Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan.
37
 The interlocal agreement established 
minimum annual funding contributions from each party to the IRL Council.
38
 These 
contributions supplement annual funding from the EPA.
39
 
 
DEP has designated the IRL as an impaired waterbody. In 2009, DEP adopted total maximum 
daily load (TMDL) water quality restoration targets for the North and Central IRL and the 
Banana River Lagoon.
40
 In 2013, DEP adopted three basin management action plans to achieve 
these TMDLs.
41
 In 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, the Legislature appropriated recurring funds 
from the General Revenue Fund to the IRL National Estuary Program for activities necessary to 
achieve the TMDLs for the North and Central IRL and the Banana River Lagoon.
42
  
 
Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan 
The 2008 IRL Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan was revised in 2019 to 
respond to a combination of events that dramatically reinforced scientific concerns about the 
health of the IRL, including ongoing algal blooms, widespread loss of seagrass, and episodic 
wildlife mortality events.
43
 Goals of the Plan include, but are not limited to: 
 Achieving water quality standards to remove waterbodies from the Impaired Waters list;
44
 
 Improving wastewater infrastructure to increase capacity and treatment and achieving 
advanced wastewater treatment;
45
 
 Reducing stormwater runoff entering the IRL and improving the quality of runoff that does 
enter the IRL;
46
 
 Improving scientific understanding of IRL hydrology and hydrodynamics to improve 
management;
47
 and 
 Removing muck in the IRL to reduce nutrient loads and improve water clarity.
48
  
 
Land Acquisition Trust Fund 
Documentary stamp tax revenues are collected under ch. 201, F.S., which requires an excise tax 
to be levied on two classes of documents: deeds and other documents related to real property, 
                                                
37
 Id. at 4. 
38
 Id. at 10. 
39
 IRLNEP, 5-Year Program Evaluation Report FY 2017-2021, 13, available at https://onelagoon.org/wp-
content/uploads/IRLNEP_EPA-PE-Report-2021_Draft_2022_03_28.pdf. 
40
 DEP, TMDL Report, Nutrient and Dissolved Oxygen TMDLs for the Indian River Lagoon and Banana River Lagoon, 49-
64 (Mar. 2009), available at https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/indian-banana-nutrient-do-tmdl.pdf; see also DEP, 
TMDL Report, Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrient TMDLs for Eight Tributary Segments of the Indian River Lagoon (2013), 
available at http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/DEAR/DEARweb/TMDL/Final_TMDL/gp5/irltrib_donut_tmdl_mainreport.pdf.  
41
 DEP, Basin Management Action Plans (BMAPs), https://floridadep.gov/dear/water-quality-restoration/content/basin-
management-action-plans-bmaps (last visited Feb. 15, 2023). Links to the three plans are located under “adopted BMAPS.” 
42
 Chapter 2019-115, Laws of Fla., Specific Appropriation 1678; Chapter 2020-157, Laws of Fla., Specific Appropriation 
1658; Chapter 2021-36, Laws of Fla., Specific Appropriation 1630; Chapter 2022-156, Laws of Fla., Specific Appropriation 
1690. 
43
 IRLNEP, A 10-Year Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, 13 (2019), 
available at https://onelagoon.org/wp-content/uploads/IRLNEP_CCMP-Looking-Ahead-to-2030_eBook.pdf.  
44
 Id. at 29. 
45
 Id. at 33. 
46
 Id. at 40.  
47
 Id. at 46.  
48
 Id. at 50.   BILL: SB 320   	Page 7 
 
which are taxed at the rate of 70 cents per $100; and certificates of indebtedness, promissory 
notes, wage assignments, and retail charge account agreements, which are taxed at 35 cents per 
$100.
49
 
 
In 2014, Florida voters approved Amendment One, a constitutional amendment to provide a 
dedicated funding source for land and water conservation and restoration.
50
 The amendment 
required that starting on July 1, 2015, and for 20 years thereafter, 33 percent of net revenues 
derived from documentary stamp taxes be deposited into the Land Acquisition Trust 
Fund (LATF).
51
 Article X, s. 28 of the State Constitution requires that funds in the LATF be 
expended only for the following purposes: 
 
As provided by law, to finance or refinance: the acquisition and 
improvement of land, water areas, and related property interests, including 
conservation easements, and resources for conservation lands including 
wetlands, forests, and fish and wildlife habitat; wildlife management areas; 
lands that protect water resources and drinking water sources, including 
lands protecting the water quality and quantity of rivers, lakes, streams, 
springsheds, and lands providing recharge for groundwater and aquifer 
systems; lands in the Everglades Agricultural Area and the Everglades 
Protection Area, as defined in Article II, Section 7(b); beaches and shores; 
outdoor recreation lands, including recreational trails, parks, and urban open 
space; rural landscapes; working farms and ranches; historic or geologic 
sites; together with management, restoration of natural systems, and the 
enhancement of public access or recreational enjoyment of conservation 
lands.
 52
 
 
To implement Art. X, s. 28 of the State Constitution, the Legislature passed ch. 2015-229, Laws 
of Florida. This act, in part, amended the following sections of law: 
 Section 201.15, F.S., to conform to the constitutional requirement that the LATF receive at 
least 33 percent of net revenues derived from documentary stamp taxes; and 
 Section 375.041, F.S., to designate the LATF within DEP as the trust fund to serve as the 
constitutionally mandated depository for the percentage of documentary stamp tax 
revenues.
53
 
 
Under s. 375.041, F.S., funds deposited into the LATF must be distributed in the following order 
and amounts: 
 First, obligations relating to debt service, specifically, payments relating to debt service on 
Florida Forever Bonds and Everglades restoration bonds. 
 Then, unless superseded by the General Appropriations Act, before funds are authorized to 
be appropriated for other uses: 
                                                
49
 See ss. 201.02(1)(a) and 201.08(1)(a), F.S. 
50
 The Florida Senate, Water and Land Conservation, https://www.flsenate.gov/media/topics/WLC (last visited Feb 15, 
2023). 
51
 Id. 
52
 FLA. CONST. art. X, s. 28(b)(1). 
53
 Ch. 2015-229, ss. 9 and 50, Laws of Fla.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 8 
 
o A minimum of the lesser of 25 percent of the funds remaining after the payment of debt 
service or $200 million annually for Everglades projects that implement the 
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), the Long-Term Plan, or the 
Northern Everglades and Estuaries Protection Program (NEEPP), with priority given to 
Everglades restoration projects that reduce harmful discharges of water from Lake 
Okeechobee to the St. Lucie or Caloosahatchee estuaries in a timely manner. From these 
funds, the following specified distributions are required: 
 $32 million annually through the 2023-2024 fiscal year for the Long-Term Plan;  
 After deducting the $32 million, the minimum of the lesser of 76.5 percent of the 
remainder or $100 million annually through the 2025-2026 fiscal year for the CERP; 
and 
 Any remaining funds for Everglades projects under the CERP, the Long-Term Plan, 
or the NEEPP. 
o A minimum of the lesser of 7.6 percent of the funds remaining after the payment of debt 
service or $50 million annually for spring restoration, protection, and management 
projects;  
o $5 million annually through the 2025-2026 fiscal year to the St. Johns River Water 
Management District for projects dedicated to the restoration of Lake Apopka;  
o $64 million to the Everglades Trust Fund in the 2018-2019 fiscal year and each fiscal 
year thereafter, for the Everglades Agricultural Area reservoir project, and any funds 
remaining in any fiscal year shall be made available only for Phase II of the C-51 
Reservoir Project or projects that implement the CERP, the Long Term Plan, or the 
NEEPP; and 
o $50 million annually to the South Florida Water Management District for the Lake 
Okeechobee Watershed Restoration Project. 
 Then, any remaining moneys are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes set forth in 
Art. X, s. 28 of the State Constitution.
54
 
 
During the 2022 session, the Legislature added language that specifies that the purposes set forth 
in s. 375.041(3)(a)3., F.S., relating to Lake Apopka would instead be appropriated as provided in 
the General Appropriations Act.
55
 In August 2022, the General Revenue Estimating Conference 
estimated that for fiscal year 2023-2024 a total of $4.04 billion will be collected in documentary 
stamp taxes.
56
 Thirty-three percent of the net revenues collected, or approximately $1.33 billion, 
must be deposited into the LATF in accordance with Art. X, s. 28 of the State Constitution. Of 
that amount, approximately $105 million is committed to debt service, leaving approximately 
$1.22 billion to be distributed for the uses specified by s. 375.041, F.S., and other purposes in 
accordance with the General Appropriations Act.
57
 
 
                                                
54
 Section 375.041(3)-(4), F.S. 
55
 Chapter 2022-157, Laws of Fla.  
56
 Office of Economic & Demographic Research, Revenue Estimating Conference, Documentary Stamp Tax, Conference 
Results (Aug. 2022) available at http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/conferences/docstamp/docstampexecsummary.pdf (last visited 
Feb. 15, 2023). 
57
 Id.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 9 
 
Litigation 
In 2015, two lawsuits were filed challenging the constitutionality of appropriations from the 
LATF and expenditures by state agencies.
58
 The cases were consolidated and a hearing was held 
in June of 2018.
59
 The plaintiffs argued that funds from the LATF were appropriated and 
expended for general state expenses in ways that were inconsistent with the State Constitution. 
The circuit court held for the plaintiffs, stating the amendment requires the funds be used for 
acquiring conservation lands, and for improving, managing, restoring, and enhancing public 
access to conservation lands acquired after the effective date of the amendment.
60
 The decision 
described how the LATF funds may be used, and ruled that numerous appropriations from 2015 
and 2016 were unconstitutional.
61
 
 
On appeal, the First District Court of Appeal overturned the circuit court ruling, holding that the 
LATF funds are not restricted to use on land purchased by the state after the constitutional 
amendment took effect in 2015.
62
 The court held that the plain language in the Constitution 
authorizing the use of funds for management, restoration, and enhancement activities would 
specifically authorize use of the funds on activities beyond land acquisition.
63
 The case was then 
remanded to the circuit court to rule on the legality of appropriations made since the enactment 
of the constitutional amendment.
64
  
 
The circuit court dismissed the lawsuit on January 3, 2022, finding that it was moot because the 
money approved by the Legislature in 2015 had already been spent.
65
 On July 20, 2022, the 
Florida Wildlife Federation filed a motion to reopen the case.
66
 The case is now on appeal in the 
First District Court of Appeal.
67
  
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 amends s. 371.041, F.S., to appropriate from the Land Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) 
a minimum of the lesser of 7.6 percent
68
 of the LATF funds remaining after the payments of the 
debt service or $50 million annually for projects dedicated to the conservation and management 
of the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). The distribution must be reduced by an amount equal to the 
debt service paid out of the LATF on bonds issued for conservation and management of the IRL 
after July 1, 2023.  
                                                
58
 Fla. Wildlife Fed’n v. Negron, No. 2015-CA-001423 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. 2015); Fla. Defenders of the Env’t, Inc., v. Detzner, 
No. 2015-CA-002682 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. 2015). 
59
 Fla. Wildlife Fed’n v. Negron, Nos. 2015-CA-001423, 2015-CA-002682 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. 2018). 
60
 Id. at 3. 
61
 Id. at 7–8. 
62
 Oliva v. Fla. Wildlife Fed’n, 281 So. 3d 531, 539 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2019). 
63
 Id. at 537. 
64
 Id. at 539. 
65
 Fla Wildlife Fed’n v. Negron, Nos. 2015-CA-001423, 2015-CA-002682 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. 2022), available at 
https://www.politico.com/states/f/?id=0000017e-21d8-d3d7-a37f-afdee5cb0000&source=email (last visited Feb. 14, 2023). 
66
 Dep’t of Environmental Protection, Fla. Enviro. Cases August, 1 (Aug. 2022) (on file with the Senate Committee on 
Environment and Natural Resources).  
67
 Fla. Wildlife Fed’n v. Fla. Legislature, No. 1D22-3142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022). 
68
 7.6 percent would amount to approximately $93 million based on estimates for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. This amount can be 
calculated by taking the total amount of documentary stamp tax collections to LATF (1,329.2 million), subtracting the debt 
service (104.8 million), and then calculating 7.6 percent of the remainder (multiply 1,224.3 million by .076).   BILL: SB 320   	Page 10 
 
 
The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) must use the funds to make grants for 
projects that implement the 2008 updated Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and 
Management Plan, including multiyear grants for the planning and construction of the projects. 
DEP must coordinate all grants with the St. Johns River and South Florida Water Management 
Districts. DEP and the St. Johns and South Florida Water Management Districts must coordinate 
with other water management districts, as necessary. 
 
Priority must be given to projects for: 
 Ecosystem monitoring and habitat restoration;  
 Connection of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems to central sewer systems; and  
 Management of stormwater, freshwater, and agricultural discharges.  
 
Grants for sewer system connection projects and discharge management projects must require a 
minimum 50 percent local match. Beginning January 1, 2024, DEP must submit an annual report 
regarding the projects funded pursuant to this bill to the Governor, the President of the Senate, 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. 
 
The bill deletes obsolete language that directed LATF funds to be appropriated for the 2022-
2023 fiscal year as provided in the General Appropriations Act. 
 
Section 2 provides an effective date of July 1, 2023.  
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
See Present Situation.  
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None.  BILL: SB 320   	Page 11 
 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The Department of Environmental Protection may incur costs in administering grants and 
producing an annual report. 
 
The bill would provide grant funding opportunities to local governments for certain water 
quality and wastewater infrastructure projects. This funding may pay up to 50 percent of 
the project costs, where local governments may otherwise be paying the entire cost of 
such projects. Therefore, this bill may have an indeterminate, positive fiscal impact on 
local governments.   
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 375.041 of the Florida Statutes:     
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.