Florida 2023 2023 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1134 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/24/2023

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources  
 
BILL: SB 1134 
INTRODUCER:  Senator Gruters 
SUBJECT:  Outstanding Florida Springs 
DATE: March 24, 2023 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Barriero Rogers EN Pre-meeting 
2.     CA  
3.     RC  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 1134 amends the statutory list of Outstanding Florida Springs in s. 373.802, F.S., to include 
Warm Mineral Springs. 
II. Present Situation: 
Florida’s Springs 
Because of the thick, water-filled limestone underlying it, Florida has more large springs than 
any other state.
1
 Springs are the window into the health of our groundwater, which is the source 
of 90 percent of drinking water for the state.
2
 Some springs support entire ecosystems with 
unique plants and animals. In addition, Florida’s springs offer many recreational opportunities, 
such as swimming, kayaking, and diving, and serve as economic drivers for local communities.
3
 
  
Springs can be classified based on several characteristics but are most often classified by the 
average discharge of water.
4
 First magnitude springs are those that discharge 100 cubic feet of 
                                                
1
 Dep’t of Environmental Protection (DEP), 2022 Florida Forever Five-Year Plan: Florida’s First Magnitude Springs,1 
(2022), available at 
https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/FLDEP_DSL_OES_FF_22_FloridasFirstMagnitudeSprings.pdf#:~:text=Those%20di
scharging%20an%20average%20of%20100%20cubic%20feet,the%20Floridan%20Aquifer%20arches%20close%20to%20th
e%20surface.  
2
 DEP, Springs, https://floridadep.gov/springs (last visited Mar. 21, 2023). 
3
 Id. 
4
 DEP, Florida Geological Survey, First Magnitude Springs of Florida: Open File Report no. 85, 6 (2002), available at 
http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/FGS/FGS_Publications/OFR/OFR85.pdf. 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 1134   	Page 2 
 
water per second or greater.
5
 Of Florida’s more than 700 springs, 33 are first magnitude, 191 are 
second magnitude, and 151 third magnitude springs.
6
  
 
Individual springs exhibit variable discharge depending upon rainfall, recharge, and groundwater 
withdrawals within their recharge areas.
7
 One discharge measurement is enough to place a spring 
into one of the eight magnitude categories. However, springs have dynamic flows. A spring 
categorized as being a first magnitude spring at one moment in time may not continue to remain 
in the same category. This can result in a spring being classified as a first magnitude spring at 
one point in time and a second magnitude at another.
8
  
 
Florida’s springs face various complex threats, including decreasing spring flows and excessive 
nutrients.
9
 Spring flows decrease because of declining water levels in the groundwater aquifer 
that sustains them, and excessive nutrients, mainly nitrate, can lead to algal growth and habit 
degradation. Florida has invested in many nitrate-reducing capital projects and water-quantity 
projects to protect and restore springs, as well as the acquisition of land intended to protect the 
springs.
10
 In fiscal year 2020-21, there were 31 springs restoration projects funded.
11
 Funding 
comes partly from DEP’s Springs and Watershed Restoration
12
 program and the Land 
Acquisition Trust Fund, which provides for the lesser of 7.6 percent or $50 million for spring 
restoration, protection, and management projects.
13
 Last year, the Legislature appropriated $75 
million for springs restoration projects, including $25 million from the general revenue fund and 
$50 million from the land acquisition trust fund.
14
 
 
 
Springs Restoration Projects 2020-2021 
                                                
5
 DEP, 2022 Florida Forever Five-Year Plan: Florida’s First Magnitude Springs at 1. 
6
 DEP, Florida Geological Survey, Springs of Florida Bulletin no. 66, 9 (2004), available at 
http://publicfiles.dep.state.fl.us/FGS/FGS_Publications/B/B66.pdf 
7
 Id. at 8.  
8
 Id. 
9
 DEP, Springs, https://floridadep.gov/springs (last visited Mar. 21, 2023). 
10
 Id. 
11
 DEP, Springs Restoration Projects 2020-21, 
https://fdep.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=1783539ce99e463f9a073c2d305902cd (last visited Mar. 
22, 2023).  
12
 DEP, Springs and Watershed Restoration Program, https://floridadep.gov/springs/restoration-funding (last visited Mar. 23, 
2023). 
13
 Section 375.041(3)(b)2., F.S. 
14
 Ch. 2022-156, s. 5, Laws of Fla. (line item 1657).  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 3 
 
Outstanding Florida Springs 
In 2016, the Florida Legislature enacted the Florida Springs and Aquifer Protection Act (the Act) 
and identified 30 Outstanding Florida Springs (OFSs) that require additional protections to 
ensure their conservation and restoration for future generations.
15
 These springs are a unique part 
of the state’s scenic beauty, provide critical habitat, and have immeasurable natural, recreational, 
and economic value.
16
 OFSs are defined by statute and include all historic first magnitude 
springs, including their associated spring runs, as determined by DEP using the most recent 
Florida Geological Survey springs bulletin, and the following additional springs, including their 
associated spring runs:  
 De Leon Springs; 
 Peacock Springs; 
 Poe Springs; 
 Rock Springs; 
 Wekiwa Springs; and 
 Gemini Springs.
17
 
 
The Act requires DEP to assess the water quality in the OFSs. Based on these assessments, DEP 
determined that most of these springs are impaired.
18
 For these impaired springs, DEP must 
adopt (or re-adopt) a basin management action plan (BMAP)
19
 to implement all the protections 
of the Act, including: 
 Prioritized lists of restoration projects along with planning level estimates for cost, schedule, 
and nutrient load reduction; 
 Phased milestones (5-year, 10-year, and 15-year) to achieve water quality restoration targets 
in 20 years; 
 Estimated nutrient pollutant loads, allocated to each source or category of sources; 
 Completed remediation plans for onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems (OSTDS), 
commonly referred to as “septic systems,” where septic loading accounts for at least 20 
percent of the estimated nutrient input;
20
 and 
 Delineated “priority focus areas” where certain activities are prohibited.
 21
 
 
                                                
15
 DEP, Springs, https://floridadep.gov/springs/ (last visited Mar. 13, 2023).  
16
 DEP, Protect and Restore Springs, https://floridadep.gov/springs/protect-restore (last visited Mar. 13, 2023). 
17
 Section 373.802(4), F.S. 
18
 DEP, Protect and Restore Springs. 
19
 A BMAP is a framework for water quality restoration that contains local and state commitments to reduce pollutant loading 
through current and future projects and strategies. DEP, Basin Management Action Plans (BMAPS), 
https://floridadep.gov/dear/water-quality-restoration/content/basin-management-action-plans-
bmaps#:~:text=A%20basin%20management%20action%20plan%20%28BMAP%29%20is%20a,loading%20through%20cur
rent%20and%20future%20projects%20and%20strategies (last visited Mar. 22, 2023). 
20
 Although OSTDS remediation plans were first only required for springs, in 2020, the requirement was expanded to 
BMAPs statewide as part of the Clean Waterways Act. See Chapters 2016-1, s. 27 and 2020-150, s. 13, Laws of Fla. Notably, 
OSTDS remediation plans for springs are only required within the priority focus areas, whereas the laws governing BMAPs 
require OSTDS remediation plans more generally within the entire BMAP. 
21
 DEP, Protect and Restore Springs, https://floridadep.gov/springs/protect-restore (last visited Mar. 22, 2023).  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 4 
 
A “priority focus area” is the area or areas of a basin where the Floridan Aquifer
22
 is generally 
most vulnerable to pollutant inputs where there is a known connectivity between groundwater 
pathways and an OFS, as determined by DEP in consultation with the appropriate water 
management districts and delineated in a BMAP.
23
  
 
 
 
The activities prohibited within priority focus areas include: 
 New domestic wastewater disposal facilities with permitted capacities of 100,000 gallons per 
day or more, except for those facilities that meet an advanced wastewater treatment standard 
of no more than 3 mg/l total nitrogen, on an annual permitted basis, or a more stringent 
treatment standard if necessary to attain a total daily maximum load; 
 New OSTDSs on lots of less than one acre, if the addition of the specific systems conflicts 
with an OSTDS remediation plan incorporated into a BMAP; 
 New facilities for the disposal of hazardous waste; 
 The land application of Class A or Class B domestic wastewater biosolids not in accordance 
with a DEP-approved nutrient management plan; and 
 New agriculture operations that do not implement best management practices, measures 
necessary to achieve pollution reduction levels established by DEP, or groundwater 
monitoring plans.
24
 
 
                                                
22
 The Floridan Aquifer is the largest aquifer in the southeastern United States and one of the most productive aquifer systems 
in the world. The aquifer underlies an area of about 100,000 square miles that includes all of Florida and extends into parts of 
Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina, as well as parts of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. St. Johns River Water 
Management District, Florida’s aquifers, https://www.sjrwmd.com/water-
supply/aquifer/#:~:text=Aquifer%20facts%201%20More%20than%2090%20percent%20of,2%2C000%20feet%20below%20
land%20surface.%20...%20More%20items (last visited Mar. 22, 2023). 
23
 Section 373.802(5), F.S.; DEP, Map of Priority Focus Areas in BMAPs, 
https://fdep.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=1afdd97c67584c06840019241becde74 (last visited Mar. 22, 
2023) (map of priority focus areas). 
24
 Section 373.811, F.S.  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 5 
 
There have been recent legal challenges to DEP’s development of BMAPs for OFSs. In Sierra 
Club v. Department of Environmental Protection, the court held that DEP failed to comply with 
ss. 403.067(6)(b) and 373.801(1)(b), F.S., in creating the BMAPs because the BMAPs failed to 
include an identification of each specific point source or category of nonpoint sources and an 
estimated allocation of the pollutant for each point source or category of nonpoint sources.
25
 
Instead, the BMAPs included pie charts that only showed current estimated nitrogen loading in 
the various springsheds by source and allocations to entire basins, not to any point or nonpoint 
source.
26
     
 
Warm Mineral Springs 
Warm Mineral Springs, located in southern Sarasota County, Florida, is a warm, highly 
mineralized, inland spring.
27
 Since 1946, a bathing spa has been in operation at the spring, 
attracting vacationers and health enthusiasts. During the winter months, the warm water attracts 
manatees to the adjoining spring run and provides vital habitat for these mammals. Well-
preserved late Pleistocene to early Holocene-age human and animal bones, artifacts, and plant 
remains have been found in and around the spring, and indicate the surrounding sinkhole formed 
more than 12,000 years ago.
28
   
 
Warm Mineral Springs is a third magnitude spring, which is defined as having discharge less 
than 10 cubic feet per second (though discharge measurements for Warm Mineral Springs has 
occasionally exceeded this amount).
29
 Discharge at Warm Mineral Springs decreased from about 
11–12 cubic feet per second in the 1940s to 6–9 cubic feet per second in the 1970s, and remained 
at about that level for the duration of the period of record.
30
 This pattern of decrease until about 
the 1970s is consistent with the trend of water withdrawals and changes in the potentiometric 
surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer in the region.
31
 
 
DEP has determined that Warm Mineral Springs is impaired and not attaining water quality 
standards.
32
 However, further study is needed to determine the causative pollutants or other 
factors contributing to impairment. For this reason, it has been placed on the statewide 
comprehensive study list.
33
 
 
                                                
25
 Sierra Club v. DEP, No. 1D21-1667, *2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023). 
26
 Id. at *5. 
27
 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Discharge, water temperature, and water quality of Warm Mineral Springs, Sarasota 
County, Florida: A retrospective analysis, 1 (2016), available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2016/1166/ofr20161166.pdf.  
28
 Id. 
29
 Id. at 2, 8. 
30
 Id. at 27. 
31
 Id. 
32
 DEP, Comprehensive Study List, row 810 (2022), available at https://floridadep.gov/dear/watershed-assessment-
section/documents/comprehensive-study-list. 
33
 A waterbody is placed on the study list when one or more water quality parameters do not meet applicable water quality 
criteria, which indicates that the waterbody does not fully support its designated use; however, additional data or information 
is needed to determine attainment of the designated use. The listing determination is based on prescribed analytical protocols 
and minimum data sufficiency requirements as defined by Florida’s water quality standards and Impaired Waters Rule. DEP, 
Impaired Waters Listing Process, https://floridadep.gov/dear/water-quality-assessment/content/impaired-waters-listing-
process (last visited Mar. 23, 2023).  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 6 
 
Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) 
MFLs are established for waterbodies in order to prevent significant harm to the water resources 
or ecology of an area as a result of water withdrawals.
34
 MFLs are typically determined based on 
evaluations of natural seasonal fluctuations in water flows or levels, nonconsumptive uses, and 
environmental values associated with coastal, estuarine, riverine, spring, aquatic, wetlands 
ecology, and other pertinent information associated with the water resource.
35
  
 
While the DEP has the authority to adopt MFLs, WMDs have the primary responsibility for 
MFL adoption. WMDs submit annual MFL priority lists and schedules to DEP for the 
establishment of MFLs for surface watercourses, aquifers, and surface waters within the 
district.
36
 MFLs are calculated using the best information available
37
 and are considered rules by 
the WMDs and are subject to Chapter 120, F.S., challenges.
38
 MFLs are subject to independent 
scientific peer review at the election of the DEP, a WMD, or, if requested, by a third party.
39
 
 
WMDs or DEP are required to adopt MFLs for OFSs. If the WMD or DEP fails to do so, it must 
adopt a MFL by emergency rule.
40
 For OFSs identified on a WMD’s priority list which have the 
potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent WMD, the adjacent WMD and DEP must 
collaboratively develop and implement a recovery or prevention strategy for an OFS not meeting 
an adopted MFL.
41
  
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 amends s. 373.802, F.S., which provides a definition for “Outstanding Florida Spring” 
and identifies which springs are included in this term. The bill adds Warm Mineral Springs to the 
list of Outstanding Florida Springs. 
 
Section 2 reenacts, s. 373.042, regarding minimum flows and water levels, for the purpose of 
incorporating the amendment made by this act to s. 373.802, F.S., in a reference thereto. 
 
Section 3 provides that the act will take effect upon becoming a law. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
                                                
34
 See section 373.042, F.S.; see also DEP, Minimum Flows and Minimum Water Levels and Reservations, 
https://floridadep.gov/water-policy/water-policy/content/minimum-flows-and-minimum-water-levels-and-
reservations#Minimum%20Flows%20and%20Minimum%20Water%20Levels%20(MFLs) (last visited Mar. 22, 2023). 
35
 Fla. Admin. Code R. 62-40.473(1). 
36
 Section 373.042(3), F.S. 
37
 Section 373.042(1), F.S. 
38
 Section 373.042(5) and (7), F.S. 
39
 Section 373.042(6)(a), F.S. 
40
 Section 373.042(2), F.S. 
41
 Section 373.042(2)(b), F.S.  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 7 
 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement:  
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The Department of Environmental Protection and water management districts may incur 
costs related to establishing minimum flows and water levels for Warm Mineral Springs. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 373.802 of the Florida Statutes. 
 
This bill reenacts section 373.042 of the Florida Statutes.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None.  BILL: SB 1134   	Page 8 
 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.