Florida 2024 2024 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0417 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/25/2024

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h0417a.EQS 
DATE: 1/25/2024 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: HB 417    Educational Services in Department of Juvenile Justice Programs 
SPONSOR(S): López, J. and others 
TIED BILLS:  None. IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1266 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
1) Education Quality Subcommittee 	15 Y, 0 N Collins Sanchez 
2) PreK-12 Appropriations Subcommittee   
3) Education & Employment Committee   
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
Current law requires specified educational services to be provided to children in Department of Juvenile Justice 
(DJJ) programs and establishes the educational expectations for DJJ youth in such programs. Educational 
services consist of basic academic, career, or exceptional curricula that support treatment goals and reentry, 
and that may lead to the completion of a high school diploma or its equivalent.  
 
Furthermore, school districts must provide the high school equivalency examination exit option for students 
enrolled in all juvenile justice education programs. 
 
The bill requires school districts to annually provide certain students in a juvenile justice program with at least 
one opportunity to take the high school equivalency examination at no cost to the students. 
 
The estimated fiscal impact on local government expenditures is $1.1 million.  See Fiscal Analysis 
 
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2024.   STORAGE NAME: h0417a.EQS 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 1/25/2024 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Present Situation 
 
Educational Services in DJJ Programs 
Section 1003.52, F.S., requires specified educational services to be provided to children in DJJ 
programs and establishes the educational expectations for DJJ youth in such programs.
1
 The 
Department of Education (DOE) is the lead agency for juvenile justice education programs, curriculum, 
support services, and resources; however, district school boards are responsible for actually providing 
educational services to youth in juvenile justice programs.
2
 Educational services consist of basic 
academic, career, or exceptional curricula that support treatment goals and reentry, and that may lead 
to the completion of a high school diploma or its equivalent.
3
 These services can be provided by the 
district school board itself or by a private provider through a contract with the district school board.
4
   
 
Students who do not attend a local public school due to their placement in a DJJ detention, prevention, 
residential, or day treatment program are provided high-quality and effective educational programs by 
the local school district in which the DJJ facility is located or by a provider through a contract with the 
local school district.
5
 Each program must be conducted according to applicable law providing for the 
operation of public schools and rules of the State Board of Education (SBE).
6
 
 
The district school board must make provisions for each student to participate in basic, Career and 
Professional Education, and exceptional student programs as appropriate. Students served in DJJ 
education programs have access to the appropriate courses and instruction to prepare them for the 
high school equivalency examination. School districts must provide the high school equivalency 
examination exit option for all juvenile justice education programs.
7
 
 
Annually, DJJ and DOE must develop a cooperative agreement and plan for juvenile justice education 
service enhancement, which must be submitted to the Secretary of DJJ and the Commissioner of 
Education. The plan must include, at a minimum, each agency’s role regarding educational program 
accountability, technical assistance, training, and coordination of services.
8
 
 
Each district school board must negotiate a cooperative agreement with DJJ regarding the delivery of 
educational programming to DJJ youth. These agreements must include provisions that address certain 
issues, such as: 
 Curriculum and delivery of instruction; 
 Classroom management procedures and attendance policies; 
 Procedures for provision of qualified instructional personnel; 
 Improving skills in teaching and working with juvenile delinquents; 
 Transition plans for students moving into and out of juvenile facilities; and 
 Deficiencies found through the quality assurance process and strategies for correcting such 
deficiencies.
9
 
 
                                                
1
 Section 1003.52, F.S. 
2
 Section 1003.52(1), (3), and (4), F.S. 
3
 Section 1003.52(5), F.S. 
4
 Section 1003.52(12), F.S. 
5
 Rule 6A-6.05281(2), F.A.C. 
6
 Section 1003.52(3)(c), F.S. 
7
 Id. 
8
 Section 1003.52(1), F.S. 
9
 Section 1003.52(14), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h0417a.EQS 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 1/25/2024 
  
High School Equivalency Diploma Program 
 
The high school equivalency exit option offers students who are off track to graduate with their 
kindergarten cohort an opportunity to earn a high school diploma by successfully passing the standard 
GED test. Students participating in the exit option may not graduate prior to their kindergarten cohort. 
Participation in this model is voluntary and requires parental notification and consent. Entry and exit 
policies must conform to state compulsory attendance requirements, as well as district daily attendance 
policies.  
 
Any eligible student currently enrolled in a PK-12 program, including special programs such as 
exceptional student education, dropout prevention, teenage parent, DJJ, and English for Speakers of 
Other languages (ESOL) may participate in the exit option. To eligible for the high school equivalency 
diploma exit option, a student must, at a minimum, be: 
 At least 16 years old and currently enrolled in a PK-12 program; 
 Enrolled in and attending high school courses that meet high school graduation requirements as 
specified in s.1003.4282, F.S.; 
 In jeopardy of not graduating with their kindergarten cohort because they are overage for grade, 
behind in credits, or have a low grade point average (GPA); 
 Assessed at a seventh-grade reading level or higher at the time of selection (ninth grade or 
higher at the time of testing for the State of Florida High School Diploma authorized under Rule 
6A-6.0201, F.A.C.), as documented by the Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) reading 
component or other assessment to determine grade level proficiency.
10
 
 
A candidate for a high school equivalency diploma must be at least 18 years of age on the date of the 
examination, except that in extraordinary circumstances, as provided for in rules of the district school 
board of the district in which the candidate resides or attends school, a candidate may take the 
examination after reaching the age of 16.
11
 A school district board may not require a student who is 16 
or older to take any course before taking the examination unless the student fails to achieve a passing 
score on the GED practice test.
12
  
 
Funding of Students Enrolled in Juvenile Justice Education Programs 
Funding for eligible students enrolled in juvenile justice education programs is provided through the 
Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP).
13
 Students participating in high school equivalency 
examination preparation programs are funded at the basic program cost factor for DJJ programs in the 
FEFP.
14
  
 
At least 95 percent of the FEFP funds generated by students in DJJ programs or in an education 
program for juveniles must be spent on instructional costs for those students.
15
 One hundred percent of 
the formula-based categorical funds
16
 generated by students in DJJ programs must be spent on 
appropriate categoricals such as instructional materials and public school technology for those 
students.
17
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
 
The bill requires school districts to provide students who are 16 years of age or older and enrolled in a 
juvenile justice education program, the opportunity to take the high school equivalency examination at 
least once a year at no cost to the student. 
                                                
10
 Rule 6A-6.0212, F.A.C. 
11
 Section 1003.435(4)(a), F.S. 
12
 Section 1003.435(4)(b), F.S. 
13
 Sections 1011.62, F.S. and s. 1003.52(13)(a), F.S. Students enrolled in DJJ education programs are funded the same as students 
enrolled in traditional public schools. 
14
 Section 1003.52(3)(c), F.S.; See 1003.52(13)(a), F.S. 
15
 Section 1003.51(2)(i), F.S. 
16
 Section 1003.51(2)(i), F.S; See section 1011.62(10), F.S. 
17
 Section 1003.51(2)(i), F.S.   STORAGE NAME: h0417a.EQS 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 1/25/2024 
  
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1: Amends s. 1003.52, F.S., requiring school districts to annually provide certain students 
in a juvenile justice program with at least one opportunity to take the high school 
equivalency examination at no cost to the students. 
 
Section 2:  Provides an effective date. 
 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues:  
None 
 
2. Expenditures:  
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None 
 
2. Expenditures:  
This bill would require school districts to provide all students who are 16 years old and older and 
participate in juvenile justice education programs the opportunity to take the General Educational 
Development (GED) exam at least once annually at no cost to them. The cost per student to take 
this exam is $128 ($32 for each of the four subject areas included in the exam). Based on 2022-23 
student enrollment and the age of students at the time that data was collected, an estimated 9,008 
students might take advantage of the free testing, for a total statewide cost of $1,153,024 to school 
districts. The actual cost would depend on the number of students who opted to take the GED 
exam, and the cost would vary among school districts based on the number of qualified candidates 
who opted to take the GED. 
 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
None. 
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:  STORAGE NAME: h0417a.EQS 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 1/25/2024 
  
None. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
None.