This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS
DATE: 1/19/2024
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/HB 675 State Recognition of Indian Tribes and Bands
SPONSOR(S): Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee, Salzman
TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 1010
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special
Districts Subcommittee
15 Y, 0 N, As CS Burgess Darden
2) Commerce Committee
3) State Affairs Committee
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
Federal law recognizes Indian tribes as “distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original
natural rights.” Indian tribes recognized by the federal government have a government-to-government
relationship with the United States.
Historically, tribes secured federal recognition by treaties, acts of Congress, executive branch actions, or
federal court decisions. Today, a tribe may gain federal recognition by an act of Congress, administrative
procedures, or a decision by a federal court. The administrative process, known as the Federal
Acknowledgment Process (FAP), is intended to recognize the continued existence of an inherent sovereign
authority, not provide a grant of sovereign status or create a tribe made of Indian descendants. Some non-
recognized tribes have expressed that the administrative process for recognition can be costly and time-
consuming. Since 1978, the FAP has resulted in the acknowledgement of 18 tribes (out of 52 completed
applications). There are two federally recognized tribes, the Seminole Tribe of Florida and the Miccosukee
Tribe of Indians of Florida, that currently reside and have tribal lands in the state.
Additionally, some states provide a process for tribal recognition. State recognition of a tribe may provide
access to certain federal grant programs, permit tribe members to market their arts and crafts as genuine, and
apply for certain scholarship programs.
The bill provides for state recognition for the Santa Rosa Band of the Lower Muscogee. The bill clarifies that
state recognition of an Indian tribe or band does not create any basis or authority for a tribe to engage in
prohibited gaming activity or to claim any interest in real estate or land that is not already provided elsewhere
in law. The bill also provides that state recognition does not grant any authority or ability for a tribe or band to
consult on state undertakings by the Division of Historical Resources or activities carried out by the State
Archaeologist.
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on state or local governments.
STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/19/2024
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
Present Situation
Tribal Sovereignty and Federal Recognition
Federal law recognizes Indian tribes as “distinct, independent political communities, retaining their
original natural rights.”
1
Indian tribes recognized by the federal government have a government-to-
government relationship with the United States.
2
There are currently 574 federally recognized Indian
tribes in the United States, 347 in the contiguous 48 states, and 227 federally recognized Native entities
within the state of Alaska.
3
Historically, tribes secured federal recognition by treaties, acts of Congress, executive branch actions,
or federal court decisions.
4
Today, a tribe may gain federal recognition through one of three processes:
An act of Congress;
Administrative procedures under 25 C.F.R. Part 83; or
A decision by a federal court.
5
The administrative process under 25 C.F.R. Part 83, known as the Federal Acknowledgment Process
(FAP), originates from a regulation first issued by the Interior Department in 1978.
6
The FAP underwent
significant revisions in 1994 and 2015.
7
The purpose of the FAP was to recognize the continued
existence of an inherent sovereign authority, not provide a grant of sovereign status or to create a tribe
made of Indian descendants.
8
To qualify for acknowledgment under the current version of the FAP, a
petitioner must:
Demonstrate that it has been identified as an American Indian entity on a substantially
continuous basis since 1900;
Show that the petitioning group comprises a distinct community and has existed as a
community from 1900 until the present;
Demonstrate that it has maintained political influence or authority over its members as an
autonomous entity from 1900 until the present;
Provide a copy of the group’s present governing document, including its membership criteria, or
a written statement describing in full its membership criteria and current governing procedures;
Demonstrate that its membership consists of individuals who descend from the historical Indian
tribe or from historical Indian tribes that combined and functioned as a single autonomous
political entity and provide a current membership list;
Show that the membership of the petitioning group is composed principally of persons who are
not members of any acknowledged North American Indian tribe; and
Demonstrate that neither the petitioner nor its members are the subject of congressional
legislation that has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship.
9
Some non-recognized tribes have expressed that the administrative process for recognition can be
costly and time-consuming.
10
Since 1978, the FAP has resulted in the acknowledgement of 18 tribes
(out of 52 completed applications).
11
1
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515, 519 (1832).
2
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.bia.gov/frequently-asked-questions (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
3
88 Fed. Reg. 2112 (Jan. 12, 2023).
4
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.bia.gov/frequently-asked-questions (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
5
Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-454. If a tribe has previously had its relationship with the United
States expressly terminated by an act of Congress, that tribe’s recognition may only be restored by a subsequent act.
6
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.bia.gov/frequently-asked-questions (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
7
See id. and 80 Fed. Reg. 37887 (July 1, 2015) (publication of final rule for 25 C.F.R. Part 83, concerning Federal Acknowledgment of
American Indian Tribes).
8
The Federal Acknowledgement Process: Hearing Before S. Committee on Indian Affairs, May 11, 2005 (statement of R. Lee Fleming,
Director, Office of Federal Acknowledgment).
9
25 C.F.R. s. 83.11 (2015). STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/19/2024
State Recognition of Indian Tribes
There are currently 63 state-recognized tribes across 11 states: Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia,
Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, and
Virginia.
12
The method of determining which tribes to recognize varies, from giving a decision-making
role to other tribes in the state (e.g., North Carolina
13
), an advisory role to other tribes (e.g. Vermont
14
),
or providing for recognition as determined solely by the legislature (e.g., Georgia
15
).
State recognition of a tribe can provide certain benefits. State-recognized tribes are eligible to apply to
several federal grant programs.
16
Members of state-recognized tribes are also allowed to market their
arts and crafts products as being genuine
17
and may access certain scholarship programs.
18
Indian Tribes in Florida
There are six federally-recognized tribes that are considered “culturally affiliated” with Florida.
19
Two
tribes, the Seminole Tribe of Florida and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, currently reside
and have tribal lands in the state. Four other tribes—the Muscogee Creek Nation, the Poarch Band of
Creek Indians, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, and the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians—do
not have reservation lands within the state, but have previously lived in the state and have a direct
historical and cultural association.
Most state law governing the relationship between the state and the federally-recognized tribes with
tribal lands in the state is contained in ch. 285, F.S.
20
This chapter:
Describes the respective reservations of the tribes;
21
Provides that members may hunt, fish, and frog for personal consumption on tribal lands
without paying licensing or permitting fees;
22
Establishes state criminal and civil jurisdiction on reservations;
23
Creates special improvement districts for reservation lands;
24
and
Provides for the gaming compact between the state and the Seminole Tribe of Florida.
25
Additionally, Florida law previously provided for a Creek Indian Council to assist Creek Indians and their
descendants in accessing state, local, and federal programs that could provide for economic, cultural,
and social advancement.
26
This provision was repealed in 2001.
27
10
National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), Federal Recognition, https://www.ncai.org/policy-issues/tribal-governance/federal-
recognition (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
11
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Petitions Resolved, https://www.bia.gov/as-ia/ofa/petitions-resolved (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
12
Natl. Conf. of State Legislatures, State Recognition of American Indian Tribes, https://www.ncsl.org/quad-caucus/state-recognition-of-
american-indian-tribes (last visited Jan. 12, 2024)
13
N.C. Gen. Stat. s. 143B-406(a)(10).
14
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 1, s. 852(c)(5).
15
Ga. Code Ann. S. 44-12-300.
16
See Natl. Conf. of State Legislatures, State Recognition of American Indian Tribes, https://www.ncsl.org/quad-caucus/state-
recognition-of-american-indian-tribes (last visited Jan. 12, 2024) (“Departments of Housing and Urban Development, Labor, Education,
and Health and Human Services have statutory and regulatory authority to provide funding for state-recognized tribes). See also U.S.
Dept. of Health and Human Services, Tribal Programs, https://www.acf.hhs.gov/tribal-programs (last visited Jan. 12, 2024) (state-
recognized tribes eligible for Administration for Native Americans programs).
17
Dept. of the Interior Indian Arts and Crafts Board, The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990, https://www.doi.gov/iacb/act (last visited
Jan. 12, 2024).
18
American Indian College Fund, Scholarships, https://collegefund.org/students/scholarships/ (last visited Jan. 12, 2024).
19
Fla. Dept. of Transportation, Office of Environmental Management Consulting Tribes, https://www.fdot.gov/environment/na-website-
files/consulting-tribes.shtm (last visited Jan. 12, 2024)
20
Ch. 285, F.S. But see s. 210.1801, F.S. (exempting the sale of cigarettes to tribe members on reservation land for personal use from
the cigarette excise tax).
21
S. 285.061, F.S.
22
Ss. 285.09, 285.10, and 285.15, FS.
23
S. 285.16, F.S.
24
Ss. 285.17-285.18, F.S.
25
Ch. 285, Part II, passim.
26
Ch. 79-421, s. 1, Laws of Fla.
27
Ch. 2001-89, Laws of Fla. STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/19/2024
Division of Historical Resources
The Division of Historical Resources is granted many powers and responsibilities necessary to carry
out the state policy regarding historical resources, including, but not limited to:
Directing and conducting a comprehensive statewide survey of historic resources in cooperation
with federal and state agencies, local governments, and private organizations;
Developing a comprehensive statewide historic preservation plan;
Ensuring that historic resources are taken into consideration at all levels of planning and
development;
Advising and assisting federal and state agencies and local governments in carrying out their
historic preservation responsibilities and programs;
Providing public information, education, and technical assistance relating to historic preservation
programs;
Carrying out on behalf of the state the programs of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, to establish, maintain, and administer a state historic preservation program meeting the
requirements of an approved program and fulfilling the responsibilities of state historic
preservation programs as provided in s. 101(b) of that act;
Establishing professional standards for the preservation, exclusive of acquisition, of historic
resources in state ownership or control; and
Advising and assisting federal and state agencies, local governments, and organizations and
individuals in the recognition, protection, and preservation of the archaeological sites and
artifacts of this state.
28
The division also has jurisdiction over unmarked human burial in order to initiate efforts for the proper
protection of the burial and the human skeletal remains and associated burial artifacts.
29
The State
Archaeologist is responsible for determining whether an unmarked human burial is historically,
archaeologically, or scientifically significant.
30
The State Archaeologist must make reasonable efforts to
identify and locate persons who can establish direct kinship, tribal, community, or ethnic relationships
with the individual or individuals discovered.
31
If the State Archaeologist is unable to establish a kinship,
tribal, community, or ethnic relationship with the unmarked human burial, he or she must determine the
proper disposition of the burial and consult with persons with relevant experience, which include:
A human skeletal analyst.
Two Native American members of current state tribes recommended by the Governor's Council
on Indian Affairs, Inc., if the remains are those of a Native American;
Two representatives of related community or ethnic groups if the remains are not those of a
Native American; and
An individual who has special knowledge or experience regarding the particular type of the
unmarked human burial.
32
Effect of Proposed Changes
The bill provides for state recognition for the Santa Rosa Band of the Lower Muscogee.
The bill clarifies that state recognition of an Indian tribe or band does not create any basis or authority
for a tribe to engage in prohibited gaming activity or to claim any interest in real estate or land that is
not already provided elsewhere in law. The bill also provides that state recognition does not grant any
authority or ability to consult on state undertakings by the Division of Historical Resources or activities
carried out by the State Archaeologist.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
28
See s. 267.031(5), F.S.
29
S. 872.05(5), F.S.
30
S. 872.05(6)(a), F.S.
31
S. 872.05(6)(b), F.S.
32
S. 872.05(6)(c), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS PAGE: 5
DATE: 1/19/2024
Section 1: Creates s. 285.195, F.S., relating to state recognition of Indian tribes and bands.
Section 2: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2024.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None
2. Expenditures:
None.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
None.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
None.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
Not applicable. This bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
None.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
On January 19, 2024, the Local Administration, Federal Affairs, & Special Districts Subcommittee adopted
a strike-all amendment and reported the bill favorably as a committee substitute. The strike-all amendment
removed the Muscogee Nation of Florida and the Lower Chattahoochee Band of Yuchi Indians from the list
of state recognized tribes that would be created by the bill. The bill clarifies that state recognition of an STORAGE NAME: h0675a.LFS PAGE: 6
DATE: 1/19/2024
Indian tribe or band does not create authority or ability to consult on state undertakings by the Division of
Historical Resources or activities carried out by the State Archaeologist.
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed by the Local Administration, Federal Affairs
& Special Districts Subcommittee.