This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives.
STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC
DATE: 1/31/2024
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: CS/HB 1473 School Safety
SPONSOR(S): Judiciary Committee, Trabulsy and others
TIED BILLS: HB 1509 IDEN./SIM. BILLS:
REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
1) Judiciary Committee 22 Y, 0 N, As CS Wolff Kramer
SUMMARY ANALYSIS
CS/HB 1473 amends s. 30.15, F.S., to clarify that private schools seeking to participate in the guardian program are
responsible for costs associated with background screening in addition to costs associated with training, however,
the bill authorizes the sheriff providing training for the participating private school to waive costs related to training
and background screening. Additionally, the bill provides that an individual certified by the Criminal Justice
Standards and Training Commission is exempt from the required school guardian training. The bill implements new
reporting requirements related to individuals certified as school guardians and serving as school guardians in school
districts, charter schools, and private schools. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) shall serve as
the central repository of information regarding certified and appointed guardians.
The bill amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to establish new perimeter and door safety requirements that school districts and
charter school governing boards must comply with by August 1, 2024. These requirements include keeping routes of
ingress and egress securely closed and locked when students are on campus, requiring that these routes be
actively staffed when open or unlocked, requiring that violations of such perimeter and safety requirements be
reported to applicable school official or governing board, and providing disciplinary measures for a school
administrator who knowingly violates such requirements.
The bill amends s. 1001.212, F.S., to require the OSS, by August 1, 2024, to develop and adopt a Florida school
safety compliance inspection report to document compliance with Florida school safety requirements. The bill
requires that the OSS triennially conduct unannounced inspections of all public schools, using the safety compliance
inspection report. The bill provides for a bonus program for school principals and charter school administrators
whose schools are found to be in full compliance with school safety requirements. The bill requires the OSS, by
December 1, 2024, to recommend a methodology to distribute the safe schools allocation based upon the number
and severity of incidents in school district School Environmental Safety Incident Reporting (SESIR) and each school
district's proportionate share of the state's total unweighted full-time equivalent student enrollment.
The bill amends s. 330.41, F.S., to prohibit a person from operating a drone over a public or private school serving
students in any grade from voluntary prekindergarten through grade 12, unless the person was granted permission
by school personnel or the drone is operated by a law enforcement agency. A violation of the prohibition is
punishable as a second degree misdemeanor for a first offense and a first degree misdemeanor for a second or
subsequent offense. The bill provides increased penalties if a person operates a drone over a public or private
school and, in doing so, records video of the school, including any person or object on the premises of the school.
The bill creates, subject to appropriation, a grant program to support private schools’ school safety efforts. Under the
program, the FDLE shall provide competitive grants to sheriff's offices and law enforcement agencies to conduct
physical site security assessments for and provide reports to private schools with recommendations on improving
such schools' infrastructure safety and security.
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on state government expenditures by requiring OSS to
conduct a triennial inspection of all public schools, which may require OSS to hire additional staff, and, to the extent
the Legislature appropriates funding for the grant program created by the bill, by providing such funding to provide
security inspections for private schools.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2024. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 2
DATE: 1/31/2024
FULL ANALYSIS
I. SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
In February 2018, a 19-year old gunman killed 14 students and three staff members at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
1
The staff members killed were athletic director
Chris Hixon, assistant football coach Aaron Feis, and teacher and cross-country coach Scott Beigel.
2
The incident of mass violence was preceded by multiple, repeated interactions between the shooter
and law enforcement agencies, social services agencies, and schools, over many years. This history
was characterized by a lack of communication and coordination, preventing these many entities from
understanding the whole problem and acting to prevent the mass violence incident.
In response, the Legislature created the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety
Commission (Commission) within FDLE.
3
The Commission is composed of 16 voting members and
four nonvoting members. The Governor appointed five voting members to the Commission, including
the chair, and the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives each
appointed five voting members to the Commission. The Secretary of the Department of Children and
Families, the Secretary of the Department of Juvenile Justice, the Secretary of the Agency for Health
Care Administration, and the Commissioner of Education serve as ex officio, non-voting members of
the Commission.
4
The Commission meets, as necessary, to conduct its work at the call of the chair and
at designated times and locations throughout the state.
The Commission published an initial report on its findings and recommendations on January 2, 2019.
Many of the recommendations were adopted during the 2019 Legislative Session. The Commission
issued its second report on November 1, 2019, and may issue reports annually until it sunsets.
5
In 2022, the Legislature extended the sunset of the Commission until July 1, 2026, and substantially
amended the responsibilities of the Commission.
6
The Commission must monitor the implementation of
school safety legislation by:
Evaluating the activities of the Office of Safe Schools (OSS) to provide guidance to school
districts, identifying areas of noncompliance and mechanisms used to achieve compliance.
Reviewing the findings of the Auditor General regarding school district school safety policies
and procedures needing improvement to ensure and demonstrate compliance with state law.
Reviewing school hardening grant expenditures and evaluating such expenditures based on the
report of the School Hardening and Harm Mitigation Workgroup, recommendations of law
enforcement agencies based on school campus tours and the required return on investment
analysis component of the Florida Safe Schools Assessment Tool (FSSAT).
Evaluating the utilization of the centralized integrated data repository by schools and its
effectiveness in conducting threat assessments.
Assessing efforts by local governments to improve communication and coordination among
regional emergency communications systems.
Investigating any failures in incident responses by local law enforcement agencies and school
resource officers.
Investigating any failures in interactions with perpetrators preceding incidents of violence.
7
School Safety Oversight and Compliance
1
Tonya Alanez, David Fleshler, Stephen Hobbs, Lisa J. Huriash, Paula McMahon, Megan O’Matz and Scott Travis, Unprepared and
Overwhelmed, South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Dec 28, 2018), https://projects.sun-sentinel.com/2018/sfl-parkland-school-shooting-critical-
moments/ (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
2
Eric Levenson, These are the victims of the Florida school shooting, CNN (Oct. 13, 2022) https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/us/florida-
shooting-victims-school/index.html (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
3
S. 943.687, F.S.
4
Id.
5
Id.
6
Id.
7
Id. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 3
DATE: 1/31/2024
Background
Florida’s Commissioner of Education (commissioner) oversees compliance with school safety and
security requirements by school districts, district school superintendents, and public schools, including
charter schools.
8
The commissioner must facilitate compliance to the maximum extent provided under
law, identify incidents of noncompliance, and impose or recommend enforcement and sanctioning
actions to the State Board of Education (SBE), the Governor, or the Legislature.
9
The OSS is fully accountable to the commissioner and serves as a central repository for best practices,
training standards, and compliance oversight in all matters regarding school safety and security,
including prevention efforts, intervention efforts, and emergency preparedness planning.
10
The OSS
responsibilities include, among other duties, collecting School Environmental Safety Incident Reporting
(SESIR) data, providing a School Safety Specialist Training Program, evaluating usage of the
standardized, statewide behavioral threat assessment instrument, monitoring compliance with
requirements relating to school safety, and reporting incidents of noncompliance to the commissioner
and the SBE.
11
District school boards and superintendents each have responsibilities related to school safety and
security. District school superintendents must designate a school safety specialist who is responsible
for the supervision and oversight for all school safety and security personnel, policies, and procedures
in the school district, including conducting and reporting the recommendations from the annual school
security risk assessment at each public school using the FSSAT.
12
District school boards must adopt
policies that guide many aspects of school safety including the establishment of threat management
teams (TMT) and emergency procedures and emergency preparation drills. TMTs assess and provide
intervention recommendations for individuals whose behavior may pose a threat to the safety of school
staff or students.
13
TMT members must include individuals with expertise in counseling, instruction,
school administration, and law enforcement.
14
To conduct its work, a TMT must use the standardized,
statewide behavioral threat assessment instrument developed by the OSS
15
and may use the Florida
Schools Safety Portal (FSSP) until the OSS operationalizes the statewide threat management portal,
which must be in place by August 1, 2025.
16
Emergency drills and procedures are guided by district school boards’ policies and procedures, which
are formulated in consultation with the appropriate public safety agencies. These policies apply to all
students and faculty at all K-12 public schools. Emergencies include fires, natural disasters, active
shooter and hostage situations, and bomb threats.
17
Drills for active shooter and hostage situations
must be conducted in accordance with developmentally appropriate and age-appropriate procedures at
least as often as other emergency drills.
18
The active shooter situation training for each school must
engage the participation of the district school safety specialist, the TMT members, faculty, staff, and
students, and must be conducted by the law enforcement agency or agencies designated as first
responders to the school’s campus.
19
In 2020, the Legislature passed HB 23, requiring all public and charter schools to have a mobile panic
alert system.
20
Known as Alyssa’s Law, the bill is named for Alyssa Alhadeff, a Marjory Stoneman
Douglas High School student who was one of the 17 people killed during the shooting. The legislation
required the DOE to procure a statewide, mobile panic alert system for school districts to facilitate an
8
S. 1001.11(9), F.S.
9
Id.
10
S. 1001.212, F.S.
11
Id.
12
Id.
13
S. 1006.07(7), F.S.
14
S. 1006.07(7)(a), F.S.
15
Id.
16
S. 1006.07(7)(f), F.S.; S. 1001.212(12)(c), F.S.
17
S. 1006.07(4)(a), F.S.
18
Id.
19
S. 1006.07(4)(b)1., F.S.
20
Ch. 2020-145, Laws of Fla. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 4
DATE: 1/31/2024
integrated Enhanced 911 transmission or mobile activation during emergencies on public school
campuses. The DOE completed the procurement and selected 11 vendors from which school districts
may choose to satisfy this requirement.
21
In 2021, the Legislature clarified that school districts were required to conduct active assailant drills but
may provide accommodations for emergency drills conducted by exceptional student education
centers.
22
In 2022, to provide more statewide uniformity in emergency drills at Florida’s schools, the Legislature
required the SBE to adopt rules governing emergency drills by August 1, 2023, and required such rules
be based on recommendations from the Commission and in consultation with state and local
constituencies. The rules must require all types of emergency drills be conducted at least once per
school year. Additionally, the rules must define “emergency drill,” “active threat,” and “after-action
report” and provide minimum requirements for school district emergency drill policies and procedures
by incident type, school level, school type, and student and school characteristics, including timing,
frequency, participation, training, notification, accommodations, and response to threat situations.
23
Additionally, law enforcement responsible for responding to schools in the event of an active assailant
emergency must be physically present and participate in active assailant emergency drills. School
districts must provide notice to the law enforcement officers required to be present at such drills at least
24 hours before the drill.
24
Effect of Proposed Changes – School Safety Oversight and Compliance
Perimeter and Door Security Measures
CS/HB 1473 amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to establish new perimeter and door safety requirements that
school districts and charter school governing boards must comply with by August 1, 2024. The bill
requires compliance with the following:
All gates or other access points that restrict ingress to or egress from a school campus shall
remain closed and locked when students are on campus. The school safety specialist may
determine in writing and notify the OSS that the open and unlocked gate or other access point is
not a threat to school safety based upon other school safety measures. The OSS may conduct
a compliance visit to review if such determination is appropriate.
All school classrooms and other instructional spaces must be locked to prevent ingress when
occupied by students, except between class periods when students are moving between
classrooms or other instructional spaces.
All campus access doors, gates, and other access points that allow ingress to or egress from a
school building shall remain closed and locked at all times to prevent ingress, unless a person is
actively entering or exiting the door, gate, or other access point. The school safety specialist
may determine in writing and notify the OSS that the open and unlocked gate or other access
point is not a threat to school safety based upon other school safety measures. The OSS may
conduct a compliance visit to review if such determination is appropriate. All campus access
doors, gates, and other access points may be electronically or manually controlled by school
personnel to allow access by authorized visitors, students, and school personnel.
In relation to the locking of doors and access points, the bill requires that any time a door or access
point is left open or unlocked it must be actively staffed by a person standing or seated at the door.
Additionally, the bill requires that all school classrooms and other instructional spaces must clearly and
conspicuously mark the safest areas in each classroom or other instructional space where students
must shelter in place during an emergency. Students must be notified of these safe areas within the
first 5 days of the school year. If it is not feasible to clearly and conspicuously mark the safest areas in
21
Florida Department of Education, Alyssa’s Alert, https://www.fldoe.org/safe-schools/alyssas-alert.stml (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
22
Ch. 2021-176, Laws of Fla.
23
S. 1006.07(4), F.S.
24
Id. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 5
DATE: 1/31/2024
a classroom or other instructional space, the school safety specialist or his or her designee must
document such determination in writing, identify where affected students must shelter in place, and
notify the OSS. The OSS shall conduct a compliance inspection of this requirement.
The bill requires any person who becomes aware of a violation of these requirements to report the
violation to the school principal. The school principal must report the violation to the school safety
specialist no later than the next business day after receiving such report. If the school principal or
charter school administrator allegedly violated these requirements, then the report must be made
directly to the district school superintendent or charter school governing board, as applicable.
The bill requires that the OSS refer any instructional personnel that knowingly violated the perimeter
and door safety requirements to the district school superintendent or charter school administrator for
disciplinary action. The superintendent or charter school administrator must notify the OSS of the
outcome of the disciplinary proceeding within 3 school days of the conclusion of the proceedings.
The bill requires that the OSS refer any administrative personnel that knowingly permitted a violation of
the perimeter and door safety requirements to the Education Practices Commission. The bill amends s.
1012.795, F.S., to authorize the Education Practices Commission to discipline an administrative
certificate holder for a knowing violation of the perimeter and door safety requirements.
The OSS is required to maintain a record of any instructional or administrative personnel that
unknowingly violated the perimeter and door safety requirements, and may use such information to
inform any future investigation of the individual for a violation of the requirements.
The bill requires that the OSS annually notify all administrative and instructional personnel by electronic
mail of the perimeter and door safety requirements.
Unannounced School Inspections
The bill amends s. 1001.212, F.S., to require the OSS, by August 1, 2024, to develop and adopt a
Florida school safety compliance inspection report to document compliance with Florida school safety
requirements. The OSS must provide school district superintendents and charter school administrators
with a blank copy of the adopted report.
The bill requires that the OSS triennially conduct unannounced inspections of all public schools,
including charter schools, using the safety compliance inspection report. Within 3 school days of the
inspection, the OSS must provide a copy of the completed report to the school safety specialist and the
school principal or charter school administrator. The school principal or charter school administrator
must acknowledge receipt of the report within 1 school day. If the OSS finds any instance of
noncompliance with Florida’s school safety laws, the bill requires that a reinspection of the school occur
within 6 months.
Upon a finding of noncompliance with the perimeter and door safety requirements in the bill, a school
principal or charter school administrator must notify the OSS within 3 school days of receipt of the
report how the noncompliance will be remedied.
In addition to the unannounced inspections, the OSS must provide quarterly reports to each district
superintendent and school safety specialist identifying the number and percentage of school inspected
or reinspected during the quarter and the number and percentage of schools that had no safety
deficiencies.
The bill requires the school safety specialist to present the quarterly OSS report to the district school
board in a public meeting. Additionally, during the first quarter of every school year, the school safety
specialist shall report to the district school board the number of schools inspected during the preceding
calendar year and the number and percentage of schools in compliance with school safety laws during
the initial inspection and reinspection.
STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 6
DATE: 1/31/2024
The bill amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to require the school safety specialist to conduct annual
unannounced inspections of all public schools while school is in session and investigate reports of
noncompliance with school safety requirements.
The bill creates a bonus program for school principals and charter school administrators that provides a
bonus, as set forth in the General Appropriations Act, if, after the initial unannounced inspection during
each triennial period, the OSS report reflects full compliance with Florida’s school safety laws.
Emergency Drills
The bill amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to require each public school to maintain a record that is accessible
on each campus or by request of the OSS of all emergency drills conducted, including the names of
law enforcement personnel present on campus for each active assailant emergency drill.
School Safety Specialist Duties
The bill also amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to improve the communication between the school safety
specialist and the district superintendent by requiring the school safety specialist to report to the district
school superintendent and school board, at least on a quarterly basis, any noncompliance by the
school district with laws or rules relating to school safety. In addition, the bill requires the school safety
specialist to report any violations of the perimeter and door safety requirements by administrative
personnel or instructional personnel to the district school superintendent or charter school
administrator, and to the OSS.
Safe-school Officers
Background
District school boards and school district superintendents are required to partner with law enforcement
or security agencies to establish or assign one or more safe-school officers at each school facility within
the district, including charter schools. To assist charter schools with fulfilling this requirement, a district
school board must collaborate with charter school governing boards to facilitate charter school access
to all safe-school officer options.
25
A safe-school officer may be a school resource officer, school safety officer, school guardian, or a
school security guard. A school district may implement any combination of the following options based
upon the needs of the school district and may.
26
School Resource Officer: Establish a school resource officer program through a cooperative
agreement with law enforcement agencies. A school resource officer is a certified law
enforcement officer
27
who is employed by a law enforcement agency and is required to undergo
criminal background checks, drug testing, and a psychological evaluation.
28
School resource
officers abide by school board policies and consult with and coordinate activities through the
school principal. They are responsible to the law enforcement agency in all matters relating to
employment, subject to agreements between a school board and a law enforcement agency.
Activities conducted by the school resource officer, which are part of the regular instructional
program of the school, are under the principal's direction.
29
School Safety Officer: Commission one or more school safety officers as recommended by the
district school superintendent and appointed by the district school board. A school safety officer
is a certified law enforcement officer who may be employed by a district school board or law
enforcement agency and is required to undergo criminal background checks, drug testing, and a
psychological evaluation. A school safety officer has and must exercise the power to make
arrests for violations of law on school board property or on property owned or leased by a
25
S. 1006.12, F.S.
26
S. 1006.12(1)–(4), F.S.
27
See s. 943.10(1), F.S.
28
S. 1006.12(1)(a), F.S.
29
S. 1006.12(1)(b), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 7
DATE: 1/31/2024
charter school under a charter contract. The officer may also make arrests off school board
property if the law violation occurred on such property and may carry weapons when performing
his or her official duties. A school safety officer’s salary may be paid jointly by the school board
and the law enforcement agency, as mutually agreed.
30
School Guardian: Appoint a school guardian under the Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and
Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program who is certified by the sheriff after completing a
psychological evaluation, drug testing, and specified training, which includes firearm instruction.
A guardian may be a school district employee or charter school employee who volunteers to
serve as a guardian, in support of school sanctioned activities, in addition to his or her official
job duties. A qualifying individual may also be employed specifically as a guardian.
31
Guardians
do not have arrest powers.
32
School Security Guard: Contract with a security agency to employ a school security guard. A
school security guard is an individual who is employed by a security agency and serves on a
school facility as a safe-school officer in support of school sanctioned activities. Security guards
are required to hold a concealed carry weapon permit and undergo drug testing and a
psychological evaluation. An individual serving in this capacity must complete guardian program
training, including 144 training hours.
33
A security guard must aid in the prevention or abatement
of active assailant incidents on school premises,
34
but does not have arrest powers.
35
A school district contract with a security agency must define the entity or entities responsible for training
and the responsibilities for maintaining records relating to training, inspection, and firearm
qualification.
36
All safe-school officers are required to receive mental health training. Safe-school officers who are
sworn law enforcement officers must complete mental health crisis intervention training using a
curriculum developed by a national organization with expertise in the topic. The training must improve
the safe-school officers’ knowledge and skills as a first responder to incidents involving students with
emotional disturbance or mental illness, to include de-escalation skills. Safe-school officers who are not
sworn law enforcement officers are required to receive training to improve their knowledge and skills
related to incident response and de-escalation.
37
A district school superintendent or charter school administrator, or their designee, is required to notify
its county sheriff and the OSS within 72 hours after a safe-school officer being dismissed for
misconduct, being disciplined, or discharging a firearm in the exercise of duties during a non-training
incident.
38
The OSS must annually publish certain information about safe-school officers including the total
number of officers, officers disciplined or relieved of duty due to misconduct, disciplinary incidents, and
incidents in which a safe-school officer discharged his or her firearm outside of a training situation or in
the course of duty.
39
Florida law exempts from disclosure any information held by a law enforcement agency, school district,
or charter school that would identify whether a particular individual has been appointed as a safe-
school officer.
40
30
S. 1006.12(2), F.S.
31
S. 1006.12(3), F.S.
32
S. 30.15(1)(k), F.S.
33
S. 1006.12(4), F.S.
34
S. 1006.12(4)(c), F.S.
35
S. 30.15(1)(k), F.S.
36
S. 1006.12(4)(b), F.S.
37
S. 1006.12(6), F.S.
38
S. 1006.12(5), F.S.
39
S. 1001.212(16), F.S.
40
S. 1006.12(8), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 8
DATE: 1/31/2024
Florida law prohibits a person from falsely impersonating a school guardian and a violation of the
prohibition is a third degree felony. In addition, the law prohibits a person from impersonating a law
enforcement officer or licensed security officer acting in the capacity of a safe-school officer.
41
Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program
The Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program (Guardian Program)
authorizes qualified school personnel to serve as an armed guard to aid in the prevention or abatement
of active assailant incidents on school premises.
42
A school district or charter school employee may serve as a guardian if the individual is appointed by
the district school superintendent or charter school principal and is certified by a sheriff. The individual
must satisfy the following requirements:
Hold a concealed weapons or concealed firearms License;
Pass a psychological evaluation administered by a licensed psychologist;
Pass an initial drug test and subsequent random drug tests;
Successfully complete a 144-hour training program that includes at least 12 hours of certified
nationally recognized diversity training and 132 total hours of specified, comprehensive firearm
safety and proficiency training conducted by Criminal Justice Standards and Training
Commission-certified instructors, and ongoing training, weapon inspection, and firearm
qualification on at least an annual basis.
43
An individual must satisfy the background screening, psychological evaluation, and drug testing
requirements prior to participating in the required guardian training. All training for the guardian
program must be conducted by a sheriff.
44
A county sheriff must establish a program if the district school board elects to participate. The sheriff
may contract with another county sheriff who has already established a program to provide training.
Charter school governing boards may directly request guardian training from the county sheriff even if
the school district decides not to participate. Should the sheriff deny the request, the charter school
may contract with a county sheriff who is willing to provide the training.
45
A sheriff who establishes a program may consult with the FDLE on programmatic guiding principles,
practices, and resources.
46
A school guardian has no authority to act in any law enforcement capacity except to the extent
necessary to prevent or abate an active assailant incident on school premises.
47
The sheriff who
conducts the guardian training must issue a school guardian certificate to individuals who meet these
requirements and maintain documentation of weapon and equipment inspections, as well as the
training, certification, inspection, and qualification records of each school guardian certified by the
sheriff.
48
The guardian training specified in statute is the statewide standard that must be used, however, sheriffs
are authorized to supplement such training. A guardian that has received the required training cannot
be required to attend the training again unless there has been at least a one-year break in her or his
employment as a guardian.
49
41
S. 843.08, F.S. A third degree felony is punishable by up to five years imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. Ss. 775.082, 775.083, or
775.084, F.S.
42
S. 30.15(1)(k), F.S.
43
Id.
44
S. 1006.12(7), F.S.
45
S. 30.15(1)(k), F.S.
46
S. 943.03(16), F.S.
47
S. 30.15(1)(k), F.S.
48
Id.
49
S. 30.15(1)(k)1.d., F.S. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 9
DATE: 1/31/2024
Safe-school Officers in Private Schools
In 2023, the Legislature expanded the Guardian Program by authorizing private schools to partner with
a law enforcement or security agency to establish or assign a safe-school officer to their schools.
50
The
private school is responsible for any costs associated with implementing a safe-school officer, including
training under the Guardian Program.
51
A private school electing to implement a safe-school officer
must comply with the same statutory requirements for such officers as school districts and charter
schools.
52
If the county in which a private school operates does not currently participate in the Guardian Program,
the private school may request the sheriff to initiate a Guardian Program for the purpose of training
private school employees.
53
If the local sheriff declines, the private school may contract with a sheriff of
a county that has implemented a Guardian Program to provide the necessary training.
54
The private
school is responsible for notifying the local sheriff prior to entering into such a contract and is
responsible for all costs associated with the training of private school employees to serve as
guardians.
55
The sheriff providing guardian training to private school employees is prohibited from
comingling funds received for such training with funds received from the state for the purposes of
training school district or charter school employees to serve as guardians.
56
Effect of Proposed Changes – Safe-School Officers
The bill amends s. 30.15, F.S., to clarify that private schools seeking to participate in the guardian
program are responsible for costs associated with background screening in addition to costs associated
with training. However, the bill authorizes a sheriff to waive training and background screening costs for
a private school participating in the school guardian program. Funds provided to the sheriff by the DOE
for the school guardian program may not be used to subsidize any costs that have been waived by the
sheriff.
The bill clarifies that the one-time guardian stipend only applies to employees of the school district or
charter school serving as guardians.
The bill provides that an individual certified under the Florida Criminal Justice Standards and Training
Commission, and who is otherwise qualified to serve as a guardian, is exempt from the 144-hour
training requirement prior to certification as a guardian. The bill authorizes a sheriff to issue a school
guardian certificate to such individuals.
The bill requires a school guardian to complete 12 hours of training to improve the guardian’s
knowledge and skills necessary to respond to and de-escalate incident on school premises, and
deletes a requirement for a school guardian to complete 12 hours of certified nationally recognized
diversity training.
The bill amends s. 1006.12, F.S., to require that agreements between a school district and a law
enforcement agency for the provision of school resource officers (SRO) in district schools must identify
the entity responsible for maintain records relating to SRO training.
The bill requires that a school notify the local sheriff and the OSS within 72 hours when a safe-school
officer separates from employment or appointment with the district.
Required Reporting of Certified and Appointed School Guardians
50
S. 2, ch. 2023-18, L.O.F.
51
S. 30.15(1)(k)1.c., F.S.
52
S. 1002.42(18), F.S.
53
S. 30.15(1)(k)1.c., F.S.
54
Id.
55
Id.
56
Id. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 10
DATE: 1/31/2024
The bill implements new reporting requirements related to individuals certified as school guardians and
serving as school guardians in school districts, charter schools, and private schools. Under the bill, the
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) shall serve as the central repository of information
regarding certified and appointed school guardians.
The bill amends s. 30.15, F.S., to require that each sheriff report to FDLE, within 30 days of such
certification, each individual certified as a school guardian. Each sheriff must also make a one-time
report, by September 1, 2024, of every individual previously certified as a school guardian by the
sheriff. The required reports must include the name, date of birth, and certification date of the guardian.
Additionally, the bill requires each school district, charter school, and private school participating in the
guardian program to report to FDLE, each February 1 and September 1, the name, date of birth, and
appointment date of each individual appointed as a school guardian. The schools must also report the
end date of any appointment as a school guardian within 30 days of the end of the appointment. Each
participating school must make a one-time report to FDLE, by September 1, 2024, providing a current
list of appointed school guardians that includes, name, date of birth, and appointment date of each
guardian.
Using the information from these reports, the FDLE must maintain a list of all individuals appointed as
school guardians that includes name, certification date, date of appointment, including the name of the
school, information reported by the DOE related to a school guardian discharging their firearms or
being subject to discipline, and end date of appointment, if applicable. FDLE must remove anyone from
the list whose required guardian training has expired.
The bill requires that each sheriff report to the FDLE, on a quarterly basis, the schedule for upcoming
guardian trainings, including the dates, locations, contact person for registration, and class capacity.
The FDLE is required to publish, and update quarterly, the information related to such trainings on its
website.
For any sheriff that fails to comply with the above reporting requirements, the bill prohibits the sheriff
from receiving reimbursements from the DOE for costs associated with the school guardian program.
For any school district, charter school, or private school that fails to comply with the above reporting
requirements, the bill prohibits the entity from operating a school guardian program the following school
year. Such prohibition is lifted as soon as the sheriff, school district, charter school, or private school
complies with reporting requirements. In order for the DOE to be able to enforce these prohibitions, the
bill requires the FDLE to report any non-compliance to the DOE by March 1 and October 1, each year.
The bill requires that each school district, charter school, or private school, before employing an
individual as a school guardian, must contact the FLDE and review all information maintained by the
FDLE related to the individual’s school guardian certification and employment as a school guardian.
Additionally, the DOE must provide the FDLE with any information relating to a school guardian
discharging their firearms or being disciplined.
Incident Reporting and School Safety Funding
Background
Incident Reporting
With respect to school safety, there are a number of tracking and reporting tools managed by the DOE
to which school districts are required to report incident information. The OSS monitors school district
compliance with SESIR requirements and TMT utilization of the standardized behavioral assessment
tool, i.e., the FSSP. The FSSP is available to individual TMT members with specific permissions and STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 11
DATE: 1/31/2024
the OSS tracks the number of queries.
57
The FSSP provides a centralized repository to access student
records across multiple disciplines including law enforcement and behavioral health care.
58
SESIR data is collated by a DOE electronic database to which school districts report on 26 incidents of
crime, violence, and disruptive behaviors that occur on school grounds.
59
SESIR reporting is required
for all public schools.
60
Each district school board must adopt policies to ensure the accurate and timely
reporting of incidents related to school safety and discipline and the district school superintendent is
responsible for reporting such incidents in SESIR.
61
The DOE revised the reporting rule in 2020 to
direct how incidents are reported at regular intervals throughout the school year.
62
Superintendents
must annually certify that the school district is in compliance with state board rule. Failure to report
SESIR data by the survey deadlines can result in forfeiture of the superintendent’s salary until the
reporting is completed.
63
The DOE makes the data available annually through publication of summary
excel files on its website,
64
which are separate from other DOE databases that provide public visibility
into school accountability and performance metrics.
65
School districts must provide emergency notifications for a limited list of life-threatening emergencies
that take place on a K-12 public school campus.
66
Incidents include weapon-use, hostage, and active
shooter situations, hazardous materials or toxic chemical spills, weather emergencies, and exposure as
a result of manmade emergencies.
67
For colleges and universities, the Clery Act prescribes a broader
list of violent incidents or criminal acts for which notification is required to the “campus community.”
68
Acts that must be reported include criminal offenses,
69
hate crimes,
70
Violence Against Women Act
offenses,
71
and arrests and referrals for discipline for weapons, drug, or liquor law violations.
72
In 2021,
73
the Legislature established the parental right to timely notification of school safety and
emergency incidents, including certain threats, unlawful acts, and significant emergencies, and the right
to access SESIR data as reported by school districts to the DOE.
74
The DOE must annually publish the
most recently available SESIR data, along with other school accountability and performance data, in a
uniform, statewide format that is easy to read and understand.
75
In response to concerns the SESIR reporting requirements were unclear and not aligned with Florida’s
criminal statutes regarding criminal offenses being reported by schools, the DOE substantially
amended the SESIR reporting rule in January 2023.
76
The amendment updated a number of
definitions, clarified the process for determining when incidents must be referred to law enforcement,
and bolstered the annual school district reporting requirements to improve overall data quality.
77
To
address under-reporting of serious crimes due to school district discretion, in 2023, the Legislature
57
Florida Department of Education, Department of Education Announces the Florida Schools Safety Portal,
http://www.fldoe.org/newsroom/latest-news/department-of-education-announces-the-florida-schools-safety-portal.stml (last visited Jan.
31, 2024).
58
S. 1001.212(12), F.S.
59
Florida Department of Education, Discipline Data, http://www.fldoe.org/safe-schools/discipline-data.stml (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
60
Ss. 1001.212(8) and 1006.07(6), F.S.
61
S. 1006.07(9), F.S.
62
R. 6A-1.0017, F.A.C. The survey periods for submission of data by school districts to the DOE are established in Full-time Equivalent
(FTE) General Instructions 2022-2023, https://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7508/urlt/2223FTEGenInstruct.pdf (last visited Jan. 31,
2024).
63
R. 6A-1.0017, F.A.C.
64
Florida Department of Education, Discipline Data, http://www.fldoe.org/safe-schools/discipline-data.stml (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
65
See Florida Department of Education, Know Your Schools, https://edudata.fldoe.org/ (last visited Jan. 31, 2024).
66
S. 1006.07(4), F.S.
67
Id.
68
Pub. L. No. 101-152, 104 Stat. 2381 (Nov. 8, 1990).
69
Id. Criminal offenses include criminal homicide, sexual assault, robbery, burglary, motor vehicle theft, and arson.
70
Id. Hate crimes can include any of the covered criminal offenses and larceny-theft, simple assault, intimidation, and destruction,
damage, or vandalism of property.
71
Id. Violence Against Women Act offenses include domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking.
72
Id.
73
Ch. 2021-176, Laws of Fla.
74
Ss. 1002.20(25) and 1002.33(9)(r), F.S.
75
S. 1006.07(9), F.S.
76
R. 6A-1.0017, F.A.C.
77
Id. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 12
DATE: 1/31/2024
authorized the SBE to adopt emergency rules to establish which SESIR incidents must be reported to
law enforcement. The SBE must adopt final rules no later than July 1, 2024.
78
Additionally, school districts must provide timely notice to parents of the following unlawful acts and
significant emergency situations on school grounds, school transportation, or school-sponsored
activities:
Weapons possession or use or hostage and active assailant situations.
Murder, homicide, or manslaughter.
Sex offenses, including rape, sexual assault, or sexual misconduct with a student by school
personnel.
Aggravated assault or battery.
Natural emergencies, including hurricanes, tornadoes, and severe weather.
Exposure as a result of a manmade emergency.
79
When a child is taken into custody by a law enforcement officer for an offense that would have been a
felony if committed by an adult, or a crime of violence, the law enforcement agency must notify the
superintendent of schools that the child is alleged to have committed the delinquent act.
80
School Safety Funding
A safe school allocation provides funding to assist school districts in their compliance with ss. 1006.07-
1006.12, F.S., with priority given to safe-school officers.
81
For the 2023-2024 school year,
$250,000,000 was appropriated for safe schools funding. Each district received a minimum of $250,000
and the remaining funds are allocated by a formula based on one-third of the recent Florida Crime
Index and two-thirds allocated based on each school district’s proportionate share of the state’s total
unweighted full-time equivalent student enrollment.
82
The distribution of safe schools funds provided to a school district is contingent upon the district’s
compliance with all reporting procedures related to the prevention of bullying and harassment.
83
Another program related to school safety is the School Hardening Grant program, which was designed
to improve the physical security of school buildings based on the required security risk assessment.
Funds could only be used for capital purchases and are allocated based on each school district’s
capital outlay Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) and charter school FTE. Funds must be provided based on
district application.
84
In 2023, all school safety funding for public schools was rolled into the safe
schools allocation in order provide school districts the most flexibility in the use of funds to fulfill the
needs of the school district.
The Safe Schools Allocation and the school physical security improvement,
85
or school hardening,
grant program represent the most significant investments in school safety since the shooting at Marjory
Stoneman Douglas High School. Below is a summary of the appropriations associated with these
programs:
Safe Schools Allocation
Fiscal Year Funding Amount
2018-2019
86
$ 161,956,019
2019-2020
87
$ 180,000,000
78
S. 24, ch. 2023-18, L.O.F.
79
S. 1006.07(4)(b), F.S.
80
S. 985.04(4)(a), F.S.
81
S. 1011.62(12), F.S.
82
Specific Appropriations 5 and 86, s. 2, ch. 2022-156, L.O.F. See S. 1011.62(12), F.S.
83
S. 1006.147(7), F.S.
84
See, e.g., Specific Appropriation 108, s. 2, ch. 2022-156, L.O.F.; see, also, specific appropriation 113A, s. 2, ch 2021-36, specific
appropriation 117A, s. 2, ch. 2020-111, and specific appropriation 116A, s. 2, ch 2019-115, L.O.F.
85
S. 44, ch. 2018-3, L.O.F.
86
S. 42, ch. 2018-3, L.O.F. ($97,500,000); Specific Appropriations 6 and 92, s. 2, ch. 2018-9, L.O.F. ($64,456,019)
87
Specific Appropriations 6 and 93, s. 2, ch. 2019-115, L.O.F. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 13
DATE: 1/31/2024
2020-2021
88
$ 180,000,000
2021-2022
89
$ 180,000,000
2022-2023
90
$ 210,000,000
2023-2024
91
$250,000,000
Total $ 1,161,956,019
School Physical Security Improvement Grant
Fiscal Year Funding Amount
2018-2019
92
$98,962,286
School Hardening Grant
Fiscal Year Funding Amount
2019-2020
93
$ 50,000,000
2020-2021
94
$ 42,000,000
2021-2022
95
$ 42,000,000
2022-2023
96
$ 20,000,000
Total $ 154,000,000
In 2023, during Regular Session, $5,000,000 dollars in nonrecurring appropriations were made for
security funding at Jewish Day Schools.
97
During special session in November 2023, the Legislature
appropriated an additional $25,000,000 for security measures at Jewish Day Schools
98
and
$20,000,000 for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program
99
while amending such program to include
nonprofit schools.
100
Other than these programs, the law does not currently provide security funding for
private schools generally.
Effect of Proposed Changes – Incident Reporting and School Safety Funding
The bill creates, subject to appropriation, a grant program to support private schools’ school safety
efforts. Under the program, the FDLE shall provide grants to sheriff's offices and law enforcement
agencies to:
Conduct physical site security assessments for and provide reports to private schools with
recommendations on improving such schools' infrastructure safety and security;
Assist private schools in developing active assailant response protocols and develop and
implement training relating to active assailant responses, including active assailant response
drills; and
Consult with or provide guidance to private schools in implementing a threat management
program similar to the program required for public schools.
The FDLE must develop a site security assessment form for use by sheriff's offices and law
enforcement agencies and provide the form, including any subsequent revisions, to the recipient of
funds in conducting the duties outlined in the bill. Grants awarded under this program may be used by
sheriff’s offices and law enforcement agencies for personnel costs and to purchase software and other
items necessary to assist private schools. The FDLE must establish the requirements for awarding
88
Specific Appropriations 8 and 92, s. 2, ch. 2020-111, L.O.F.
89
Specific Appropriations 7 and 90, s. 2, ch. 2021-36, L.O.F.
90
Specific Appropriations 5 and 86, s. 2, ch. 2022-156, L.O.F.
91
Specific Appropriations 5 and 80, s. 2, ch. 2023-239, L.O.F.
92
S. 44, ch. 2018-3, L.O.F.
93
Specific Appropriation 116A, s. 2, ch 2019-115, L.O.F.
94
Specific Appropriation 117A, s. 2, ch. 2020-111, L.O.F.
95
Specific Appropriation 113A, s. 2, ch 2021-36, L.O.F.
96
Specific Appropriation 108, s. 2, ch. 2022-156, L.O.F.
97
Specific Appropriations 100 and 105, s. 2, ch.2023-239, L.O.F
98
Ss. 4 and 5, ch. 2023-352, L.O.F.
99
Established in 2023, the Nonprofit Security Grant Program allows Florida nonprofit organizations, including houses of worship and
community centers, that are at high risk of violent attacks or hate crimes to apply for program grants to increase safety and security.
Section 252.3712, F.S.
100
Ss. 1 and 2, ch. 2023-352, L.O.F. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 14
DATE: 1/31/2024
such grants through an open, competitive process and must award grants no later than October 1,
2024.
The bill amends 1001.212, F.S., to require the OSS, by December 1, 2024, to recommend a
methodology to distribute the safe schools allocation based upon the number and severity of incidents
in school district SESIR reporting and each school district's proportionate share of the state's total
unweighted FTE student enrollment.
The bill also requires the superintendent, if the student in question was taking dual enrollment courses,
to inform the postsecondary institution where the dual enrollment courses were being taken of the
alleged delinquent act within 24 hours of receiving such notification.
FortifyFL
Background
The School Safety Awareness Program is a mobile suspicious activity reporting tool known as
FortifyFL, which is based upon a recommendation by the students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High
School. The tool allows students and the community to share information anonymously concerning
unsafe, potentially harmful, dangerous, violent, or criminal activities, or the threat of criminal activities,
to the appropriate public safety agencies and school officials.
101
The information reported using
FortifyFL must be promptly forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agency or school official.
102
The tool will notify the person reporting the suspicious activity that information may be provided
anonymously, but if, following an investigation, it is determined that an individual knowingly submitted a
false tip, the Internet Protocol (IP) address of the device from which the tip was submitted will be
provided to law enforcement and the individual may be subject to criminal penalties.
103
If the person
chooses to identify him or herself, then the identity will be shared with the law enforcement agency and
school officials. However, those entities must keep the identify information confidential.
104
The FDLE must collaborate with the Division of Victims Services within the Office of the Attorney
General and the OSS to develop and provide a comprehensive training and awareness program on the
use of FortifyFL.
105
Each district school board must promote the use of FortifyFL by advertising it on the
school district website, in publications, and on school campuses. FortifyFL must be installed on all
mobile devices issued to students and bookmarked in web browsers on all computer devices issued to
students.
106
Effect of Proposed Changes – FortifyFL
The bill amends s. 943.082, F.S., to require each school principal to incorporate use of FortifyFL into
the school curriculum at least once per school year. Instruction on FortifyFL must be age and
developmentally appropriate and include the consequences for inappropriate use of the system.
Drones
Background
Under Florida law, a drone is a powered, aerial vehicle that:
Does not carry a human operator;
Uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift;
Can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely;
Can be expendable or recoverable; and
101
S. 943.082(1), F.S.
102
S. 943.082(3), F.S.
103
S. 943.082(2), F.S.
104
Id.
105
S. 943.082(5), F.S.
106
S. 943.082(4)(b), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 15
DATE: 1/31/2024
Can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload.
107
In Florida, the authority to regulate the operation of drones is preempted to the state.
108
Political
subdivisions may not enforce ordinances or resolutions impacting the design, manufacture, testing,
maintenance, licensing, registration, certification, or operation of a drone.
109
However, political
subdivisions may enact or enforce ordinances relating to nuisances, voyeurism, harassment, reckless
endangerment, property damage, or other illegal acts arising from the use of drones if such laws or
ordinances are not specifically related to the use of a drones for those illegal acts.
110
A person may not knowingly or willfully:
Operate a drone over a critical infrastructure facility;
Allow a drone to make contact with a critical infrastructure facility, including any person or object
on the premises of or within the facility; or
Allow a drone to come close enough to a critical infrastructure facility as to interfere with the
operations of or cause a disturbance to the facility.
111
A person who violates this prohibition commits a second degree misdemeanor.
112
A second or
subsequent violation is a first degree misdemeanor.
113
The prohibition against operating a drone over a critical infrastructure facility does not apply to:
A federal, state, or other governmental entity, or a person under contract or otherwise acting
under the direction of a federal, state, or other governmental entity;
A law enforcement agency that is in compliance with s. 934.50, F.S.,
114
or a person under
contract with or otherwise acting under the direction of such law enforcement agency; or
An owner, operator, or occupant of the critical infrastructure facility, or a person who has prior
written consent of such owner, operator, or occupant.
A “critical infrastructure facility” is defined as any of the following, if completely enclosed by a fence or
other physical barrier, or if clearly marked with a sign or signs that indicate entry is forbidden:
A power generation or transmission facility, substation, switching station, or electrical control
center;
A chemical or rubber manufacturing or storage facility;
A water intake structure, water treatment facility, wastewater treatment plant, or pump station;
A mining facility;
A natural gas or compressed gas compressor station, storage facility, or natural gas or
compressed gas pipeline;
A liquid natural gas or propane gas terminal or storage facility;
Any portion of an aboveground oil or gas pipeline;
A refinery;
A gas processing plant, including a plant used in the processing, treatment, or fractionalization
of natural gas;
A wireless communications facility, including the tower, antennae, support structures, and all
associated ground-based equipment;
A seaport;
An inland port or other facility or group of facilities serving as a point or intermodal transfer of
freight in a specific area physically separated from a seaport;
An airport;
A spaceport;
107
S. 934.50(2)(a), F.S.
108
S. 330.41(3)(a), F.S.
109
S. 330.41(3)(b), F.S.
110
S. 330.41(3)(c), F.S.
111
S. 330.41(4)(a), F.S.
112
A second degree misdemeanor is punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine. Ss. 775.082 or 775.083, F.S.
113
A first degree misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. Ss. 775.082 or 775.083, F.S.
114
Generally, s. 934.50, F.S., provides requirements for the use of drones by a law enforcement agency. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 16
DATE: 1/31/2024
A military installation as defined in 10 U.S.C. s. 2801(c)(4) or an armory;
A dam, or other structures such as locks, floodgates, or dikes, which are designed to maintain
or control the level of navigable waterways;
A state correctional institution or a private correctional facility;
A secure detention center or facility, or a nonsecure residential facility, a high-risk residential
facility, or a maximum-risk residential facility; or
A county detention facility.
115
Effect of Proposed Changes – Drones
The bill amends s. 330.41, F.S., to prohibit a person from knowingly or willfully:
Operating a drone over a public or private school serving students in any grade from voluntary
prekindergarten through grade 12; or
Allowing a drone to make contact with a school, including any person or object on the premises
of or within a school facility.
Under the bill, a person who violates such a prohibition commits a second degree misdemeanor for a
first violation or a first degree misdemeanor for a second or subsequent violation.
If a person commits a violation and records video of the school, including any person or object on the
premises of or within the school facility, the person commits a first degree misdemeanor for a first
violation, or a third degree felony for a second or subsequent violation.
The prohibition against operating a drone over a school does not apply to a:
Person operating a drone with the prior written consent of the school principal, district school
board, superintendent, or school governing board; or
Law enforcement agency that is in compliance with s. 934.50, F.S., or a person under contract
with or otherwise acting under the direction of such law enforcement agency.
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2024.
B. SECTION DIRECTORY:
Section 1: Amends s. 30.15, F.S., relating to powers, duties, and obligations.
Section 2: Amends s. 330.41, F.S., relating to Unmanned Systems Aircraft Act.
Section 3: Amends s. 943.082, F.S., relating to School Safety Awareness Program.
Section 4: Amends s. 985.04, F.S., relating to oaths; records; confidential information.
Section 5: Amends s. 1001.212, F.S., relating to Office of Safe Schools.
Section 6: Amends s. 1006.07, F.S., relating to district school board duties relating to student
discipline and school safety.
Section 7: Amends s. 1006.12, F.S., relating to safe-school officers at each public school.
Section 8: Amends s. 1012.795, F.S.; relating to Education Practices Commission; authority to
discipline.
Section 9: Establishes a grant program.
Section 10: Provides an effective date of July 1, 2024.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
115
S. 330.41(2)(a), F.S. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 17
DATE: 1/31/2024
See Fiscal Comments.
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
1. Revenues:
None.
2. Expenditures:
None.
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR:
None.
D. FISCAL COMMENTS:
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on state government expenditures by
requiring OSS to conduct a triennial inspection of all public schools, which may require OSS to hire
additional staff, and, to the extent the Legislature appropriates funding for the grant program created by
the bill, by providing such funding to provide security inspections for private schools.
III. COMMENTS
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES:
1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision:
None.
2. Other:
None.
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY:
The bill does not give the SBE any additional rulemaking authority, however, existing rules may need to
be amended to incorporate the changes to statute in the bill.
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS:
None.
IV. AMENDMENTS/COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES
On January 30, 2024, the Judiciary Committee adopted a proposed committee substitute (PCS) and two
amendments to the PCS. The PCS, as amended, differed from the original bill as filed in that it:
Specified that any stipend provided by a sheriff to a school guardian cannot be used to subsidize any
screening or training-related costs that have been waived by a sheriff.
Required a school guardian to complete 12 hours of deescalation training, rather than 12 hours of
diversity training.
Revised the date by which a sheriff must report to FDLE specified information about each person who
was issued a guardian certificate from August 1 to September 1.
Revised the date by which a school district, charter school, or private school must report to FDLE
specified information about each person who has been appointed as a school guardian from August 1
to September 1. STORAGE NAME: h1473.JDC PAGE: 18
DATE: 1/31/2024
Specified that a school district, charter school, or private school who fails to report guardian information
to FDLE may not operate a guardian program for the following school year.
Prohibited a person from knowingly or willfully operating a drone over a public or private school.
Required OSS to conduct unannounced inspections of schools triennially, rather than annually.
Deleted a requirement for OSS to provide a copy of the school safety compliance inspection report to
the Commissioner of Education and the State Board of Education.
Required the school safety specialist to report noncompliance with laws or rules relating to school
safety to the district school board, in addition to the district school superintendent.
Required the school safety specialist to conduct annual unannounced inspections of all public schools
while school is in session and investigate reports of noncompliance with school safety requirements.
Deleted signage requirements for specified gates or access points.
Authorized a school safety specialist to determine that an open or unlocked door, gate, or other access
point is not a threat to school safety and thus does not need to be closed or locked at all times.
Required a school district or charter school, prior to appointing a person as a school guardian, to
contact FDLE and review all information related to the person.
Made other technical changes to improve the clarity and structure of the bill.
This analysis is drafted to the committee substitute as passed by the Judiciary Committee.