Florida 2024 2024 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H7045 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/05/2024

                    This docum ent does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. 
STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS  
 
BILL #: HB 7045          PCB EEG 24-06    OGSR/Department of the Lottery 
SPONSOR(S): Ethics, Elections & Open Government Subcommittee, Porras 
TIED BILLS:   IDEN./SIM. BILLS: CS/SB 7008 
 
REFERENCE 	ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or 
BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 
Orig. Comm.: Ethics, Elections & Open Government 
Subcommittee 
15 Y, 0 N Poreda Toliver 
1) Regulatory Reform & Economic Development 
Subcommittee 
14 Y, 0 N Wright Anstead 
2) State Affairs Committee  	Poreda Williamson 
SUMMARY ANALYSIS 
The Open Government Sunset Review Act (OGSR Act) requires the Legislature to review each public record 
exemption and each public meeting exemption five years after enactment. If the Legislature does not reenact 
the exemption, it automatically repeals on October 2
nd
 of the fifth year after enactment. 
 
The Florida Constitution permits the state to create lotteries, the proceeds from which are required to be 
deposited in a State Education Lotteries Trust Fund. The Department of the Lottery (department) was 
established to operate the state lottery with the purpose of maximizing revenues in a manner consonant with 
the dignity of the state and the welfare of its citizens.  
 
Current law provides  public record exemptions for the following information held by the department: 
 Information relating to the security of the department’s information technology security. 
 Security information or information that would reveal security measures of the department. 
 Information about lottery games, tickets, inventory, and promotions for games. 
 Information concerning terminals, machines, and devices that issue tickets.  
 Information that must be maintained as confidential in order for the department to participate in a multi-
state lottery association or game. 
 Personal identifying information obtained by the department when processing background 
investigations of current or potential retailers or vendors. 
 Financial information about an entity that is not publicly available and is provided to the department in 
connection with its review of the financial responsibility of the entity. 
 
In 2022, the Legislature created a general public record exemption — applicable to all agencies — for certain 
information related to cybersecurity. Pursuant to the OGSR act, the exemption for cybersecurity information will 
repeal on October 2, 2027, unless reviewed and saved from repeal by the Legislature. 
 
The bill extends the repeal date for the department’s information technology security exemption to October 2, 
2027, to coincide with the future OGSR repeal date of the general cybersecurity exemption. The bill also saves 
from repeal the remaining public record exemptions for the department, which will repeal on October 2, 2024, if 
this bill does not become law. 
 
The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact on state government or local governments.   STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 	PAGE: 2 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
  
FULL ANALYSIS 
I.  SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS 
 
A. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES: 
Background 
 
Open Government Sunset Review Act 
The Open Government Sunset Review Act (OGSR Act)
1
 sets forth a legislative review process for 
newly created or substantially amended public record or public meeting exemptions. It requires an 
automatic repeal of the exemption on October 2nd of the fifth year after creation or substantial 
amendment, unless the Legislature reenacts the exemption.
2
 
 
The OGSR Act provides that a public record or public meeting exemption may be created or maintained 
only if it serves an identifiable public purpose. In addition, it may be no broader than is necessary to 
meet one of the following purposes: 
 Allow the state or its political subdivisions to effectively and efficiently administer a 
governmental program, which administration would be significantly impaired without the 
exemption. 
 Protect sensitive personal information that, if released, would be defamatory or would 
jeopardize an individual’s safety; however, only the identity of an individual may be exempted 
under this provision. 
 Protect trade or business secrets.
3
 
 
If, and only if, in reenacting an exemption that will repeal, the exemption is expanded, then a public 
necessity statement and a two-thirds vote for passage are required.
4
 If the exemption is reenacted with 
grammatical or stylistic changes that do not expand the exemption, if the exemption is narrowed, or if 
an exception to the exemption is created,
 
then a public necessity statement and a two-thirds vote for 
passage are not required. 
 
Department of the Lottery 
The Florida Constitution initially prohibited “[l]otteries, other than the types of pari-mutuel pools 
authorized by law.”
5
 However, in 1986, Florida voters approved an amendment to the Florida 
Constitution that specifically authorizes the state to operate lotteries, the proceeds from which are 
required to be deposited in a State Education Lotteries Trust Fund.
6
 The Legislature, soon thereafter, 
passed legislation to implement the constitutional provision
7
 in order to enable “the people of the state 
to benefit from significant additional moneys for education” and “to play the best lottery games 
available.”
8
   
 
The Department of the Lottery (department)
9
 was established in 1987 to operate the state lottery with 
the purpose of maximizing revenues in a manner consonant with the dignity of the state and the welfare 
of its citizens.
10
 The department is headed by a secretary appointed by the Governor, subject to the 
confirmation of the Senate.
11
 The department is authorized to adopt rules governing the establishment 
and operation of the state lottery.
12
 Florida began offering lottery games in 1988, with a $1 weekly 
                                                
1
 Section 119.15, F.S.  
2
 Section 119.15(3), F.S.  
3
 Section 119.15(6)(b), F.S.  
4
 Article I, s. 24(c), FLA. CONST.  
5
 Article X, s. 7, FLA. CONST. 
6
 Article X, s. 15, FLA. CONST. 
7
 Chapter 24, F.S. and Chapter 87-65, L.O.F 
8
 Id. 
9
 Section 24.102, F.S. 
10
 Section 24.104, F.S. 
11
 Section 20.317(1)(a), F.S.  
12
 Section 24.105(9), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 	PAGE: 3 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
  
drawing.
13
 Since then, the Lottery has grown to include approximately 13,500 retailer locations across 
the state with lottery tickets ranging from $1 to $50
14
 and total ticket sales of $9.325 billion.
15
 
 
Current Public Record Exemptions related to the Department 
The name of a winner of a prize valued at $250,000 or more is confidential and exempt
16
 from public 
record requirements for 90 days from the date the prize is claimed, unless the winner consents to the 
release of his or her name,
17
 as well as the street address and telephone number of all game winners.
18
  
 
The department must disclose any confidential and exempt information to the Auditor General, the 
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA), or an independent 
auditor upon his or her request.
19
 In addition, if the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives certifies that confidential information is necessary for effecting legislative changes, 
the requested information must be disclosed to him or her, and he or she may disclose such 
information to members of the Legislature and legislative staff as necessary to affect such purpose.
20
 
 
Current law provides that any person who, with intent to defraud or with intent to provide a financial or 
other advantage to himself, herself, or another, knowingly and willfully discloses any confidential and 
exempt information relating to the lottery is guilty of a first-degree felony.
21
 
 
Cybersecurity Public Record Exemption 
In 2022, the Legislature created a general public record exemption applicable to all agencies
22
 for 
certain information related to cybersecurity.
23
 Section 119.0725, F.S., provides that the following 
information is confidential and exempt from public record requirements: 
 Information related to critical infrastructure.
24
 
 Network schematics, hardware and software configurations, or encryption information or 
information that identifies detection, investigation, or response practices for suspected or 
confirmed cybersecurity incidents, including suspected or confirmed breaches, if the disclosure 
of such information would facilitate unauthorized access to or unauthorized modification, 
disclosure, or destruction of: 
o Data or information, whether physical or virtual; or 
o Information technology (IT) resources, which include an agency’s existing or proposed 
IT systems. 
                                                
13
 Florida Lottery, History, available at https://www.flalottery.com/history (last visited Feb. 2, 2024).  
14
 Id. 
15
 OPPAGA, Review of the Florida Lottery, 2022, available at https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/23-02.pdf (last visited Feb. 2, 
2024). Ticket sales figure based on Fiscal Year 2021-2022. 
16
 There is a difference between records the Legislature designates exempt from public record requirements and those the Legislature 
designates confidential and exempt. A record classified as exempt from public disclosure may be disclosed under certain 
circumstances. See WFTV, Inc. v. Sch. Bd. of Seminole, 874 So.2d 48, 53 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), review denied, 892 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 
2004); State v. Wooten, 260 So. 3d 1060, 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018); City of Rivera Beach v. Barfield, 642 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 
1994); Williams v. City of Minneola, 575 So.2d 683, 687 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). If the Legislature designates a record as confidential 
and exempt from public disclosure, such record may not be released by the custodian of public records to anyone other than the 
persons or entities specifically designated in statute. See Op. Att’y Gen. Fla. 04- 09 (2004). 
17
 Section 24.1051(3)(a), F.S. However, the name of a winner must be provided pursuant to s. 24.115, F.S., regarding persons owing 
child support and s. 409.2577, F.S., regarding the parent locator service to locate parents that have deserted their children. 
18
 Section 24.1051(2), F.S. 
19
 Section 24.1051(4), F.S.  
20
 Section 24.105(12)(c), F.S. 
21
 A first-degree felony is punishable by up to thirty years imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000. Sections 755.082 and 755.083, 
F.S. 
22
 “Agency” means any state, county, district, authority, or municipal officer, department, division, board, bureau, commission, or 
other separate unit of government created or established by law including, for the purposes of ch. 119, F.S., the Commission on Ethics, 
the Public Service Commission, and the Office of Public Counsel, and any other public or private agency, person, partnership, 
corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public agency. Section 119.011(2), F.S. 
23
 See s. 119.0725, F.S.  
24
 “Critical infrastructure” means existing and proposed information technology and operation technology systems and assets, whether 
physical and virtual, the incapacity or destruction of which would negatively affect security, economic security, public health, or 
public safety. Section 119.0725(1)(b), F.S.  STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 	PAGE: 4 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
  
 Coverage limits and deductible or self-insurance amounts of insurance or other risk mitigation 
coverages acquired for the protection of IT systems, operational technology systems, or data of 
an agency. 
 Cybersecurity incident information contained in certain reports. 
 
The Legislature also created a public meeting exemption for any portion of a meeting that would reveal 
the confidential and exempt information; however, any portion of an exempt meeting must be recorded 
and transcribed.
25
 The recording and transcript are confidential and exempt from public record 
requirements.
26
 
 
Pursuant to the OGSR act, the exemption for cybersecurity information will repeal on October 2, 2027, 
unless reviewed and saved from repeal by the Legislature. 
 
Public Record Exemptions under Review 
In 2019, the Legislature created public record exemptions for certain information held by the 
department related to cybersecurity, IT, lottery games, and retailers and vendors. The following 
information is confidential and exempt from public record requirements if release could harm the 
security or integrity of the department: 
 Information relating to the security of the department’s technologies, processes, and practices 
designed to protect networks, computers, data processing software, data, and data systems 
from attack, damage, or unauthorized access. 
 Security information or information that would reveal security measures of the department, 
whether physical or virtual. 
 Information about lottery games, tickets, inventory, and promotions for games, including 
description, design, production, printing, packaging, shipping, delivery, storage, and validation 
of such games, promotions, tickets, and stock. 
 Information concerning terminals, machines, and devices that issue tickets.
27
  
 
Current law also makes the following information confidential and exempt, regardless of whether 
release could harm the security or integrity of the department:  
 Information that must be maintained as confidential in order for the department to participate in 
a multi-state lottery association or game. 
 Personal identifying information obtained by the department when processing background 
investigations of current or potentials retailers or vendors.  
 Financial information about an entity that is not publicly available and is provided to the 
department in connection with its review of the financial responsibility of the entity, provided that 
the entity marks such information as confidential.
28
 
 
The confidential and exempt information must be released to the Auditor General, OPPAGA, and an 
independent auditor upon his or her request.
29
 Such information may be released to other 
governmental entities as needed in connection with the performance of their duties.
30
  
 
In 2019, the public necessity statement
31
 for the public record exemptions provided, in part, that if: 
 
[S]ecurity information were made available to the public, the integrity and efficiency 
of the lottery would be jeopardized and the effective and efficient administration of 
the lottery would be significantly impaired…The department is authorized to enter 
into agreements with other states for the operation and promotion of a multistate 
                                                
25
 Section 119.0725(3), F.S.  
26
 Id. 
27
 Section 24.1051(1)(a)1., F.S. 
28
 Section 24.1051(1)(a)2., 3., and 4., F.S. 
29
 Section 24.1051(4), F.S.  
30
 Section 24.1051(1)(c), F.S.  
31
 Article I, s. 24(c), FLA. CONST., requires each public record exemption to “state with specificity the public necessity justifying the 
exemption.”  STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 	PAGE: 5 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
  
lottery and without the exemption, the department would be unable to join certain 
associations and games, thus causing the state to miss opportunities to generate 
revenue for education…
32
 
 
In addition, the public necessity statement provided that: 
 
The release of … sensitive personal information could cause great financial harm 
to an individual and his or her family, cause unwarranted damage to the good name 
and reputation of such individuals, and increase the risk of identity theft. Without 
the exemption, current and potential retailers and vendors may be reluctant to 
participate as a department retailer or vendor, and the effective and efficient 
administration of the lottery would be significantly impaired.
33
 
 
Furthermore, the release of certain confidential and exempt information “could harm the business 
operations of entities with which the department wishes to contract, injure those entities in the 
marketplace, and decrease the likelihood that such entities would work with the department.”
34
 
 
Pursuant to the OGSR Act, the exemptions will repeal on October 2, 2024, unless reenacted by the 
Legislature. 
 
During the 2023 interim, House and Senate committee staff met jointly with staff from the Department 
of the Lottery to discuss the public record exemptions under review. Department staff indicated that 
they had not had any difficulty interpreting or applying the exemptions and were not aware of any 
litigation concerning the exemptions. Department staff noted the continued necessity for the 
exemptions and recommended that the exemptions be reenacted as is. Committee staff inquired as to 
whether any duplicity existed between the cybersecurity protections in the department’s exemption 
concerning certain IT security information and the general cybersecurity exemption in s. 119.0725, F.S. 
Department staff indicated that while there was likely overlap between the two exemptions, the general 
cybersecurity exemption would not cover the same categories of information.
35
 
 
Effect of the Bill 
 
The bill extends the repeal date for the department’s IT security exemption to October 2, 2027, to 
coincide with the future OGSR repeal date of the general cybersecurity exemption in s. 119.0725, F.S. 
The bill also saves from repeal the remaining public record exemptions under review, which will repeal 
on October 2, 2024, if this bill does not become law. 
 
B. SECTION DIRECTORY: 
Section 1 amends s. 24.1051, F.S., relating to exemptions from inspection or copying of public records. 
 
Section 2 provides an effective date of October 1, 2024. 
II.  FISCAL ANALYSIS & ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT 
 
A. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
                                                
32
 Chapter 2019-41, L.O.F. 
33
 Id. 
34
 Id. 
35
 Memorandum from Reginald D. Dixon, Chief of Staff, Department of the Lottery, September 26, 2023, on file with the Ethics, 
Elections & Open Government Subcommittee.   STORAGE NAME: h7045b.SAC 	PAGE: 6 
DATE: 2/5/2024 
  
None. 
 
B. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: 
 
1. Revenues: 
None. 
 
2. Expenditures: 
None. 
 
C. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR: 
None. 
 
D. FISCAL COMMENTS: 
None. 
III.  COMMENTS 
 
A. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: 
 
 1. Applicability of Municipality/County Mandates Provision: 
Not applicable. This bill does not appear to affect county or municipal governments.   
 
 2. Other: 
None. 
 
B. RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY: 
The bill does not require rulemaking nor confer rulemaking authority. 
 
C. DRAFTING ISSUES OR OTHER COMMENTS: 
None. 
IV.  AMENDMENTS/ COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE CHANGES 
None.