Florida 2024 2024 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S0556 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 02/27/2024

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules 
 
BILL: CS/CS/SB 556 
INTRODUCER:  Rules Committee; Banking and Insurance Committee; and Senator Rouson 
SUBJECT:  Protection of Specified Adults 
DATE: February 27, 2024 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Johnson Knudson BI Fav/CS 
2. Hall  Tuszynski CF Favorable 
3. Johnson Twogood RC Fav/CS 
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/CS/SB 556 provides additional protections for specified adults (age 65 years or older) and 
vulnerable adults who have accounts with financial institutions and may be victims of suspected 
financial exploitation. A vulnerable adult is a person 18 years of age or older whose ability to 
perform the normal activities of daily living or to provide for his or her own care or protection is 
impaired due to a mental, emotional, sensory, long-term physical, or developmental disability or 
dysfunction, or brain damage, or the infirmities of aging. The bill allows financial institutions to 
delay disbursements or transactions of funds from an account of a specified adult or a vulnerable 
adult under the following conditions: 
 A financial institution reasonably believes that financial exploitation of the specified adult 
has occurred, is occurring, has been attempted, or will be attempted in connection with the 
disbursement or transaction. 
 Not later than 3 business days after the date on which the delay was first placed, the financial 
institution provides written notice to all parties authorized to transact business on the account 
and any trusted contact on the account, using the contact information provided on the 
account, unless the employee of the financial institution believes that any of the parties are 
involved in the suspected exploitation. 
 Not later than 3 business days after the date on which the delay was first placed, a state-
chartered financial institution notifies the Office of Financial Regulation of the delay. 
 The financial institution must initiate an internal review of the facts and circumstances that 
caused the employee to reasonably believe that the financial exploitation of the specified 
adult has occurred, is occurring, has been attempted, or will be attempted promptly. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 2 
 
A delay in a disbursement or transaction expires in 15 business days, and may be extended for an 
additional 30 business days. A court of competent jurisdiction may shorten or extend the length 
of any delay. 
 
The bill grants immunity from any administrative or civil liability that might otherwise arise 
from a delay in a disbursement or transaction to any financial institution who in good faith and 
exercising reasonable care complies with the provisions of s. 415.10341, F.S. The bill does not 
alter the obligation of a financial institution to comply with instructions from a client absent a 
reasonable belief of financial exploitation. The bill does not create new rights or obligations or 
new duties on a financial institution under other applicable laws or rules. The bill does not limit 
the right of a financial institution to refuse to place a delay on a transaction or disbursement 
under other laws or rules or under a customer agreement. 
 
The bill takes effect January 1, 2025. 
II. Present Situation: 
Demographics of Florida’s Older Adults   
In 2021, an estimated 21 percent (4,498,198 out of 21,477,737) of Florida’s population was age 
65 or older.
1
 Florida’s population of individuals age 65 or older, as of April 1, 2022, was 
4,782,219.
2
 
 
Financial Exploitation of Older Adults 
Older adults are targets for financial exploitation due to their income and accumulated life-long 
savings, in addition to the possibility that they may face declining cognitive or physical abilities, 
isolation from family and friends, lack of familiarity or comfort with technology, and reliance on 
others for their physical well-being, financial management, and social interaction.
3
 According to 
the U.S. Department of Justice, elder abuse, which includes elderly financial exploitation among 
other forms of abuse, affects at least 10 percent of older adults each year in the United States.
4
  
 
The monetary amount of losses is difficult to ascertain. A 2023 report estimated the cost of elder 
financial exploitation in the United State at $269.5 billion in 2022.
5
 The amount of elder fraud 
losses in Florida is estimated to be $15.43 billion.
6
 However, the amount of reported loss in 
Florida is about $657 million. Many victims fail to report exploitation because of shame and 
                                                
1
 GAO-21-90, ELDER JUSTICE: HHS Could Do More to Encourage State Reporting on the Costs of Financial Exploitation            
KFF, Population Distribution by Age | KFF (2021) (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
2
 University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Florida Population Projections, Bulletin 196, (Oct. 
2023). 
3
 See Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, “Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta Delivers Remarks at the 
Elder Justice Coordinating Council Meeting,” (December 7, 2021); see also “Associate Deputy Attorney General Paul R. 
Perkins Delivers Remarks at the ABA/ABA Financial Crimes Enforcement Conference,” (December 9, 2020). 
4
About Elder Abuse | EJI | Department of Justice (last visited Sep. 28, 2023). 
5
 The United States of Elder Fraud – How Prevalent is Elder Financial Abuse in Each State? (June 15, 2023). The United 
States of Elder Fraud - How Prevalent is Elder Financial Abuse in Each State? - Comparitech (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
6
 Id.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 3 
 
embarrassment. The tendency to not report may also be related to the perpetrator being a friend 
or family member of the victim.
7
 
 
Some of the most common forms of financial exploitation reported to state adult protective 
services include: 
 Theft. Involves assets taken without knowledge, consent or authorization; may include taking 
of cash, valuables, medications other personal property. 
 Fraud. Involves acts of dishonestly by persons entrusted to manage assets but appropriate 
assets for unintended uses; may include falsification of records, forgeries, unauthorized 
check-writing, and Ponzi-type financial schemes. 
 Real Estate. Involves unauthorized sales, transfers or changes to a property title; may include 
unauthorized or invalid changes to an estate documents. 
 Contractor. Includes building contractors or handymen who receive a payment for building 
repairs, but fail to initiate or complete project; may include invalid liens by contractors 
 Lottery Scams. Involves payments (or transfer of funds) to collect unclaimed property or 
“prizes” from lotteries or sweepstakes.
8
 
 
The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) within the Federal Bureau of Investigations, receives 
and tracks thousands of complaints daily, reported by victims of fraud, their family members, 
and law enforcement officers. The 2022 annual Elder Fraud Report
9
 provides a summary of 
complaints submitted by or on behalf of victims aged 60 and over. Some of the findings include: 
 Over 88,000 victims over the age of 60 reported losses of $3.1 billion to the IC3. This 
represents an 84 percent increase in losses over losses reported in 2021.  
 The average loss per victim was $35,101. There were 5,456 victims who lost more than 
$100,000 each. 
 Florida accounted for 8,480 out of the 88,000 total victims. Florida victims incurred over 
$328 million in losses. 
 
In 2013, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which receives and maintains 
the database of suspicious activity reports (SARs),
10
 introduced electronic SAR filing with a 
designated category for “elder financial exploitation.”
11
 Recent analysis of SARs related to elder 
financial exploitation has revealed the following: 
                                                
7
 AARP, The Scope of Elder Financial Exploitation: What it Costs Victims (2023), available at: 
https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/money/scams-and-fraud/2023/true-cost-elder-financial-exploitation.doi.10.26419-
2Fppi.00194.001.pdf (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
8
 National Adult Protective Services Association, What is Financial Exploitation? Financial Exploitation – NAPSA (napsa-
now.org) (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
9
 FBI IC3 Elder Fraud Report (2022), https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2022_IC3ElderFraudReport.pdf  
(last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
10
 A financial institution is required to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement 
Network (FinCEN) if it knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect a transaction conducted or attempted by, at, or through the 
financial institution involves funds derived from illegal activity, or attempts to disguise funds derived from illegal activity; is 
designed to evade regulations promulgated under the BSA; lacks a business or apparent lawful purpose; or involves the use 
of the financial institution to facilitate criminal activity, including elder financial exploitation. See 31 CFR ss. 1020.320, 
1021.320, 1022.320, 1023.320, 1024.320, 1025.320, 1026.320, 1029.320, and 1030.320.  
11
 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Suspicious Activity Reports on Elder Financial Exploitation: Issues and Trends, 3 
(Feb. 2019), available at: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_suspicious-activity-reports-elder-financial-
exploitation_report.pdf (last visited Jan. 24, 2024).  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 4 
 
 Among the SARs that reported a loss to an older adult, the average amount lost was $34,200; 
in 7 percent of these SARs, the loss exceeded $100,000.
12
 
 One-third of the individuals who lost money were ages 80 and older, and adults ages 70 to 79 
had the highest average monetary loss ($45,300).
13
 
 Where an individual has incurred an actual loss, the amount of loss reflects substantial 
financial hardship for elders: The median suspicious activity amount from one sample of 
scam-related SARs was $6,105, and for theft-related SARs it was $15,964. These amounts 
represent 16 and 41 percent, respectively, of the median income of $38,515 for households 
maintained by individuals 65 and over in 2015 (as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau).
14
 
 The total number of SAR filings and total suspicious activity amounts increased 20 percent 
and 30 percent, respectively, each year during the period studied (October 2013 – August 
2019).
15
 
 
Elderly financial exploitation schemes generally involve either theft or scams.
16
 Suspicious 
activity report narratives indicate that financial exploitation most often involves money transfer 
scams conducted through money services businesses (MSBs) and theft perpetrated through 
depository, securities, and futures institutions.
17
 
 
Financial Exploitation and the Role of Financial Institutions  
Financial institutions can play a key role in detecting, responding to, and preventing elderly 
financial exploitation.
18
 Financial institutions are often well-positioned to detect when older 
account holders have been targeted or victimized. In recognition of this, FinCEN issued an 
Advisory to Financial Institutions on Filing Suspicious Activity Reports Regarding Elder 
Financial Exploitation (advisory).
19
 The advisory provided potential “red flag” indicators and 
instructions on how to report exploitation activity through Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). 
Once such threats have been detected, financial institutions should report to law enforcement and 
the state or local Adult Protective Service agency. In 2013, eight federal regulatory agencies 
issued interagency guidance clarifying that reporting suspected financial abuse of older adults to 
appropriate authorities does not generally violate the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-
Bliley Act. 
                                                
12
 Id. at 4. 
13
 Id. 
14
 FinCen, Financial Trend Analysis: Elders Face Increased Financial Threat from Domestic and Foreign Actors, 7 (Dec. 
2019), available at: 
https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FinCEN%20Financial%20Trend%20Analysis%20Elders_FINAL%20508.p
df (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
15
 Id. at 1. 
16
 See FinCEN Financial Trend Analysis (FTA),  “Elders Face Increased Financial Threat from Domestic and Foreign 
Actors,” (December 2019), available at: Financial Trend Analysis (fincen.gov) (Dec. 2019) (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
17
 Id.  
18
 See, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Advisory for financial institutions on preventing and responding to 
elder financial exploitation (March 2016), available at http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201603_cfpb_advisory-for-
financial-institutions-on-preventing-and-responding-to-elder-financial-exploitation.pdf (last visited Jan. 24, 2024); and, 
CFPB, Recommendations and report for financial institutions on preventing and responding to elder financial exploitation 
(March 2016), available at 201603_cfpb_recommendations-and-report-for-financial-institutions-on-preventing-and-
responding-to-elder-financial-exploitation.pdf (consumerfinance.gov) (last visited Jan. 24, 2024). 
19
 See, FinCEN, FIN-2011-A003, Advisory to Financial Institutions on Filing Suspicious Activity Reports Regarding Elder 
Financial Exploitation (Feb. 22, 2011), available at INTELLIGENCE REPORT (fincen.gov) (last visited Jan. 24, 2024).  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 5 
 
Mandatory Reporting of Abuse or Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults in Florida 
The Adult Protective Services Act (ch. 415, F.S.) defines abuse as any willful act or threatened 
act by a relative, caregiver, or household member, which harms or is likely to harm a vulnerable 
adult’s physical, mental, or emotional health.
20
 The Adult Protective Services program is located 
within the Department of Children and Families (department), and is responsible for 
investigating allegations of abuse, neglect or exploitation, as provided in the Adult Protective 
Services Act (act).
21
 Section 415.1034, F.S., requires any person who knows, or has reasonable 
cause to suspect, that a vulnerable adult has been or is being abused, neglected, or exploited to 
report suspected abuse to the central abuse hotline immediately. Any person reporting or that 
participates in a judicial proceeding is presumed to be acting in good faith and, unless lack of 
good faith is shown by clear and convincing evidence, is immune from any civil or criminal 
liability that otherwise might be incurred or imposed.
22
 
 
For purposes of the act, the following terms apply: 
 A “vulnerable adult” is a person 18 years of age or older whose ability to perform the normal 
activities of daily living or to provide for his or her own care or protection is impaired due to 
a mental, emotional, sensory, long-term physical, or developmental disability or dysfunction, 
or brain damage, or the infirmities of aging.
23
 
 “Exploitation” means a person who:
24
 
o Stands in a position of trust and confidence with a vulnerable adult and knowingly, by 
deception or intimidation, obtains or uses, or endeavors to obtain or use, a vulnerable 
adult’s funds, assets, or property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a 
vulnerable adult of the use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property for the 
benefit of someone other than the vulnerable adult; or 
o Knows or should know that the vulnerable adult lacks the capacity to consent, and 
obtains or uses, or endeavors to obtain or use, the vulnerable adult’s funds, assets, or 
property with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the vulnerable adult of the 
use, benefit, or possession of the funds, assets, or property for the benefit of someone 
other than the vulnerable adult. 
 “Exploitation” may include, but is not limited to:
25
 
o Breaches of fiduciary relationships, such as the misuse of a power of attorney or the 
abuse of guardianship duties, resulting in the unauthorized appropriation, sale, or transfer 
of property; 
o Unauthorized taking of personal assets; 
o Misappropriation, misuse, or transfer of moneys belonging to a vulnerable adult from a 
personal or joint account; or 
o Intentional or negligent failure to effectively use a vulnerable adult’s income and assets 
for the necessities required for that person’s support and maintenance. 
 
                                                
20
 Section 415.102, F.S. 
21
 Sections 415.101-415.113, F.S. 
22
 Section 415.1036, F.S. 
23
 See s. 415.102(28), F.S. 
24
 See s. 415.102(8), F.S. 
25
 Id.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 6 
 
Once a person reports to the central abuse hotline,
26
 the department must initiate a protective 
investigation within 24 hours.
27
 If a caregiver refuses to allow the department to begin a 
protective investigation or interferes with the investigation, the department can contact the 
appropriate law enforcement agency for assistance. If, during the course of the investigation, the 
department has reason to believe that the abuse, neglect, or exploitation is perpetrated by a 
second party, the appropriate law enforcement agency and state attorney must be notified. The 
department shall make a preliminary written report to the law enforcement agencies within 
5 working days after the oral report and complete the investigation within 60 days.
28
 
 
Florida’s Law on the Protection of Vulnerable Investors
29
 
In 2020, legislation was enacted in Florida to protect vulnerable investors.
30
 The law allows a 
dealer or investment adviser to delay a disbursement or transaction of funds or securities from 
the account of a specified adult or an account for which a specified adult is a beneficiary or 
beneficial owner if the dealer or investment adviser reasonably believes that financial 
exploitation of the specified adult has occurred, is occurring, has been attempted, or will be 
attempted in connection with the disbursement or transaction. A specified adult is an individual 
who is age 65 or older or who meets the definition of “vulnerable adult” under the act. 
 
The suspected financial exploitation must be immediately reported to the Florida Abuse Hotline 
if so required by the act. Not later than three business days after placing a delay, the dealer or 
investment adviser must notify all parties authorized to transact business on the account as well 
as any designated trusted contact, unless such person is believed to be engaged in the suspected 
financial exploitation. Not later than three business days after placing or extending a delay, the 
dealer or investment adviser must notify the Office of Financial Regulation of the delay or 
extension.  
 
A delay expires in 15 business days but may be terminated sooner. The dealer or investment 
adviser may extend the delay for up to an additional 10 business days. The length of the hold 
may be shortened or extended by a court of competent jurisdiction. A dealer or investment 
adviser must annually conduct training that is reasonably designed to educate its associated 
persons on issues pertaining to financial exploitation. A dealer, an investment adviser, or an 
associated person who in good faith and exercising reasonable care complies with the bill is 
immune from any administrative or civil liability that might otherwise arise from a delay in a 
disbursement or transaction.  
 
Regulation of Financial Institutions 
The Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) is responsible for all activities of the Financial 
Services Commission relating to the regulation of banks, credit unions, other financial 
institutions, finance companies, and the securities industry.
31
 The OFR has three divisions: the 
                                                
26
 Section 415.103, F.S. 
27
 Section 415.104, F.S. 
28
 Id. 
29
 Section 517.34, F.S. 
30
 Ch. 2020-157, Laws of Fla. 
31
 Section 20.121(3)(a)2., F.S.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 7 
 
Division of Consumer Finance, the Division of Financial Institutions (DFI), and the Division of 
Securities. 
 
Florida law defines the term “financial institution” broadly; the term includes “state and federal 
savings or thrift associations, banks, savings banks, trust companies, international bank agencies, 
international banking corporations, international branches, international representative offices, 
international administrative offices, international trust entities, international trust company 
representative offices, qualified limited service affiliates, credit unions, agreement corporations 
operating pursuant to s. 25 of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. ss. 601 et seq. and Edge Act 
corporations organized pursuant to s. 25(a) of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. ss. 611 et 
seq.”
32
  
 
Dual Regulatory System 
Banks and credit unions in the United States are chartered and regulated under a dual regulatory 
system. These depository institutions may elect to have a national charter and a federal primary 
regulator, or they may choose to be chartered and regulated by the state in which they are 
headquartered. OFR’s DFI provides general supervision over all Florida-chartered financial 
institutions, along with their subsidiaries and service corporations.
33
 DFI is tasked with the 
administration of the financial institutions codes,
34
 which apply to all Florida state-authorized or 
state-chartered financial institutions and to the enforcement of all laws relating to Florida state-
authorized or state-chartered financial institutions.
35
 
  
As a result of the dual regulatory system, the OFR does not have absolute regulatory authority 
over every financial institution operating in Florida. Florida-chartered depository institutions 
(banks and credit unions) are chartered by the OFR, but are additionally required to obtain 
deposit insurance,
36
 and thus are also subject to examination and regulation by federal regulatory 
authorities. While the Federal Reserve serves as the primary federal regulator of a state bank 
which has elected to become a member bank of the Federal Reserve System,
37
 the FDIC remains 
the primary federal regulator for non-member state-banks and remains authorized to make 
special examination of any insured bank when necessary. Likewise, state-chartered credit unions 
are subject to examination and regulation by the National Credit Union Administration 
(NCUA).
38
 Thus, federal supervisors play an important role in ensuring and protecting the 
financial stability of financial institutions operating in Florida. 
  
The OFR is required to conduct an examination of the condition of each state financial institution 
“at least every 18 months,” but is authorized to conduct more frequent examinations based on the 
risk profile of the financial institution, prior examination results, or significant changes in the 
institutions or its operations. The examination process is risk-focused and covers all aspects of 
prudent management practices, including: governance, board and management oversight, 
identification, and reporting of complaints and regulation pertaining to discrimination. The 
                                                
32
 Section 655.005(1)(i), F.S. 
33
 Section 655.012(1), F.S.   
34
 Sections 655.001(1) and 655.012(1), F.S.   
35
 Id. 
36
 Section 658.38, F.S. 
37
 12 U.S.C. s. 248. 
38
 Section 657.033, F.S.; 12 U.S.C. s. 1784.    BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 8 
 
examinations predominantly evaluate the strength of the Capital, Asset Quality, Management, 
Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to Market Risk (CAMELS) of the financial institution, 
however, examiners evaluate compliance with Florida law, including confidentiality rules, as 
well.  
 
National banks are chartered pursuant to the National Bank Act and supervised by the Office of 
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
39
 National banks are required to be members of the 
Federal Reserve System; state banks may apply for membership.
40
 The Federal Reserve system 
is the primary federal regulator of state member banks, and also serves as the primary regulator 
of bank holding companies and financial holding companies.
41
 Federally-chartered credit unions 
are chartered and supervised by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
42
 Both state- 
and federally-chartered credit unions must obtain insurance of their accounts and are subject to 
examination by the NCUA.
43
 
 
Access to the Books and Records of a Financial Institution 
Section 655.059, F.S., governs access to the books and records of a financial institution. Access 
to books and records is strictly limited. Books and records are expressly confidential, and may 
only be made available for inspection and examination to certain persons and government 
entities, including:  
 The OFR and its duly authorized representatives;  
 Any person duly authorized to act for the financial institution;  
 Any federal or state instrumentality or agency authorized to inspect or examine the books and 
records of an insured financial institution;  
 The home country supervisor of an international banking corporation or international trust 
entity, under certain conditions;  
 To the extent the books and records pertain to their own accounts or the determination of 
their voting rights, depositors, borrowers, members, and stockholders have the right to 
inspect; and  
 To any person otherwise authorized by the board of directors.  
 
Books and records may also be made available for inspection pursuant to a subpoena, under the 
following circumstances:  
 As compelled by a court of competent jurisdiction;  
 As compelled by a legislative subpoena; and  
 To any federal or state law enforcement or prosecutorial instrumentality authorized to 
investigate criminal activity.  
 
A person who willfully violates of these confidentiality rules is guilty of a felony of the third 
degree, punishable as provided in sections 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084, F.S. 
 
                                                
39
 12 U.S.C. s. 481. 
40
 12 U.S.C. s. 208.3 and 222. 
41
 12 U.S.C. s. 248. 
42
 See 12 U.S.C. s. 1751, et. seq. 
43
 Section 657.033, F.S.; 12 U.S.C. s. 1784.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 9 
 
Federal Right to Privacy Act (RFPA) 
Pursuant to RFPA,
44
 a federal government authority generally must seek a subpoena to access 
such books and records, and may only request financial records pursuant to a formal written 
request under certain conditions, one of which includes serving a copy of the request upon the 
customer.
45
   
 
2018 Federal Safe Senior Act 
The federal Safe Senior Act
46
 provides immunity for covered financial institutions from suit for 
disclosure of financial exploitation of senior citizens. 
 
For purposes of the act, the term ‘‘exploitation’’ means the fraudulent or otherwise illegal, 
unauthorized, or improper act or process of an individual, including a caregiver or a fiduciary, 
that: 
 Uses the resources of a senior citizen for monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain; or 
 Results in depriving a senior citizen of rightful access to or use of benefits, resources, 
belongings, or assets. 
 
The act defines the term, “covered agency,” to include: 
 A state financial regulatory agency, including a state securities or law enforcement authority 
and a state insurance regulator; 
 Each of the Federal agencies represented in the membership of the Financial Institutions 
Examination Council established under section 1004 of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3303);
47
 
 A securities association registered under section 15A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78o–3);  
 The Securities and Exchange Commission; 
 A law enforcement agency; or 
 A state or local agency responsible for administering adult protective service laws. 
 
The term, “covered financial institution” means: 
 A credit union;
48
 
 A depository institution;
49
 
 An investment adviser; 
 A broker-dealer; 
 An insurance company; 
 An insurance agency; or 
                                                
44
 12 U.S.C. s. 3401 et seq. 
45
 See 12 U.S.C. s. 3408. 
46
 Public Law 115-174 (May 24, 2018); 132 STAT. 1336.  
47
 This would include the Federal Reserve, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, National Credit Union Association, Office 
of the Comptroller of the Currency. 
48
 The term ‘‘credit union’’ has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5301). 
49
 The term ‘‘depository institution’’ has the meaning given the term in section 3(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c));  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 10 
 
 A transfer agent.  
 
The federal Safe Senior Act offers a safe harbor from liability for specified individuals or 
covered financial institutions in any civil or administrative proceedings for disclosing the 
suspected information regarding the suspected exploitation of a senior citizen to a covered 
agency, such as a state adult protective services agency, regulators, or law enforcement. A senior 
citizen for purposes of the act is an individual age 65 years or older. The civil and administrative 
immunity established by the act is provided on the condition that specified individuals
50
 receive 
specified training on how to identify and report exploitative activity against seniors before 
making a report, and reports of suspected exploitation are made “in good faith” and “with 
reasonable care.”  
 
Further, the act provides that a covered financial institution shall not be liable, including any 
civil or administrative proceeding, for a disclosure made by specified individuals if the following 
conditions are met: 
 The individual was employed by, or, in the case of a registered representative, insurance 
producer, or investment adviser representative, affiliated or associated with, the covered 
financial institution at the time of the disclosure; and 
 Before the time of the disclosure, such individual received the training. 
 
However, the civil or administrative immunity provided by this act may not be construed to limit 
the liability of an individual or a covered financial institution in a civil action for any act, 
omission, or fraud that is not a disclosure described in the provision relating to the immunity 
from suit for individuals. 
 
Training 
A covered financial institution or a third party selected by a covered financial institution may 
provide the training described in the act to each officer or employee of, or registered 
representative, insurance producer, or investment adviser representative affiliated or associated 
with the covered financial institution who: 
 Is specified in the act;  
 May come into contact with a senior citizen as a regular part of the professional duties of the 
individual; or 
 May review or approve the financial documents, records, or transactions of a senior citizen in 
connection with providing financial services to a senior citizen. 
 
The act provides that the training described above must be provided as soon as reasonably 
practicable; and with respect to an individual who begins employment, or becomes affiliated or 
associated with a covered financial institution after the date of enactment of this act, not later 
than one year after the date on which the individual becomes employed by, or affiliated or 
associated with, the covered financial institution in a position described in the act. 
 
                                                
50
 The employee served as a supervisor or in a compliance or legal function (including as a Bank Secrecy Act officer) 
for, or, in the case of a registered representative, investment adviser representative, or insurance producer, was affiliated or 
associated with, a covered financial institution.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 11 
 
Record Retention 
The act requires a covered financial institution to maintain a record of each individual who is 
employed by, or affiliated or associated with, the covered financial institution in a position 
described in the act; and has completed the training described in the act. Upon request, the 
covered financial institution must provide a record described in the act to a covered agency with 
examination authority over the covered financial institution. 
 
Relationship to State Law 
The act provides that nothing in the act may be construed to preempt or limit any provision of 
state law, except only to the extent that the immunity described in the act provides a greater level 
of protection against liability to an individual described in the act or to a covered financial 
institution described in the act than is provided under state law. 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 creates s. 415.10341, F.S. The section creates definitions and a voluntary process for 
financial institutions to delay disbursements or transactions if they reasonably suspect, and 
report, the financial exploitation of specified adults, i.e., adults aged 65 years or older and 
vulnerable adults.  
 
The term, “financial exploitation,” means the wrongful or unauthorized taking, withholding, 
appropriation, or use of money, assets, or property of a specified adult, or any act or omission by 
a person, including through the use of a power of attorney, guardianship, or conservatorship, to 
divert or obtain control over the specified adult’s money, assets, or property through deception, 
intimidation, or undue influence to deprive the specified adult of the ownership, use, benefit, or 
possession of their money, assets, or property. The term “financial institution” means the same as 
that term is defined within ch. 655, F.S. “Specified adult” means a natural person 65 years of age 
or older, or a vulnerable adult as that term is defined in s. 415.102, F.S.  
 
The term “trusted contact” mean a natural person 18 years of age or older whom an account 
holder has expressly identified and recorded in a financial institution’s books and records as the 
person who may be contacted about either the account or the account owner to address possible 
financial exploitation or to confirm the specifics of the account owner’s current contact 
information or health status; to determine the identity of any conservator, executor, trustee, or 
individual or entity granted a power of attorney; or to address any other concern reasonably 
related to the administration of the account. The term may include a joint account owner or an 
individual or entity who has been granted a power of attorney. 
 
Subsection (2) provides a statement of legislative findings and intent. Stated findings include:  
 There are many Floridians that are at increased risk of financial exploitation due to their age 
or disability;  
 Specified adults are at a statistically higher risk of being targeted for financial exploitation 
due to their accumulation of substantial assets and wealth compared to younger age groups; 
and   BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 12 
 
 Specified adults have the freedom and right to manage their assets, make investment choices, 
and spend their funds. Such rights may not be infringed upon absent a reasonable belief of 
financial exploitation.  
 
The Legislative intent of the legislation includes:  
 Preventing financial exploitation;  
 Encouraging the constructive involvement of financial institutions;  
 Providing immunity from liability for financial institutions and their employees who take 
action as authorized by the act; and  
 Balancing the rights of specified adults to direct and control their assets, funds, and 
investments and to exercise their constitutional rights consistent with due process against the 
need to give financial institutions the ability to place narrow, time-limited restrictions on 
those rights in order to decrease the risk of loss due to abuse, neglect, or financial 
exploitation.  
 
Subsection (3) authorizes a financial institution that reports suspected financial exploitation of a 
specified adult to delay a disbursement or transaction if certain criteria are met, and requires the 
financial institution to make and keep certain records related to the delay.  
 
Subsection (4) creates timeframes for the delay of disbursements or transactions. Delays expire 
after 15 business days, but may be extended by an additional 30 business days if the financial 
institution’s review of the available facts and circumstances continues to support the reasonable 
belief of financial exploitation. A court of competent jurisdiction may shorten or extend these 
timeframes.  
 
Subsection (5) eliminates civil or administrative liability for a financial institution that acts in 
good faith and exercises reasonable care to comply with the provisions of the bill.  
 
Subsection (6) creates eligibility requirements that financial institutions must meet prior to 
delaying a disbursement or transaction under the bill. These requirements include:  
 Developing training policies or programs reasonably designed to educate employees who 
perform or approve transactions on behalf of customers on issues pertaining to financial 
exploitation of specified adults;  
 Conducting training for the specified employees as soon as reasonably practicable and 
maintaining a written record of all trainings conducted. With respect to an individual who 
begins employment with a covered financial institution after July 1, 2024, such training must 
be conducted within 1 year after the person becomes employed by or affiliated or associated 
with the covered financial institution. 
 Developing, maintaining, and enforcing written procedures regarding the manner in which 
suspected financial exploitation is reviewed internally, including, if applicable, the manner in 
which suspected financial exploitation is required to be reported to supervisory personnel.  
 
Subsection (7) clarifies that absent a reasonable belief of financial exploitation, the bill does not 
otherwise alter a financial institution’s obligations to all parties authorized to transact business 
on an account, and any trusted contact named on such account.  
  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 13 
 
Subsection (8) clarifies that the bill does not create new rights or impose new obligations or new 
duties on a financial institution under other applicable law.  
 
Section 2 provides an effective date of January 1, 2025. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
The ability of a financial institution to place a delay on a disbursement or transaction, 
may decrease losses to account holders who are financially preyed upon because such a 
delay may prevent the money from ever getting into the hands of the bad actor. Once the 
bad actor receives the money, it is difficult, or in some cases impossible, to ever recover 
the money. 
 
The bill may result in increased training and compliance costs for financial institutions. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
None.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 556   	Page 14 
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill creates section 415.10341 of the Florida Statutes.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS/CS by Rules on February 26, 2024: 
The CS provides the following changes: 
 Revises the definition of the term, “trusted contact.” 
 Clarifies which positions of a financial institution are subject to training pertaining to 
financial exploitation of specified adults. 
 Changes the effective date from July 1, 2024, to January 1, 2025. 
 Provides technical and conforming changes. 
 
CS by Banking and Insurance on January 16, 2024: 
The CS provides the following changes: 
 Allows a financial institution to extend a delay on a disbursement or transaction for 
an additional 30 days instead of 10 days. 
 Revises eligibility requirements, relating to the frequency of training of employees, 
that financial institutions must meet prior to delaying a disbursement or transaction. 
 Eliminates provisions relating to records of financial institutions available for review 
since state and federal law already address access to these records.  
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.