Florida 2024 2024 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S0902 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 01/30/2024

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Commerce and Tourism  
 
BILL: CS/CS/SB 902 
INTRODUCER:  Commerce and Tourism Committee; Banking and Insurance Committee; and Senator 
Boyd 
SUBJECT:  Motor Vehicle Retail Financial Agreements 
DATE: January 30, 2024 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Moody Knudson BI Fav/CS 
2. McKay McKay CM Fav/CS 
3.     FP  
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 902 substantially adopts portions of the Products Model Act by the Guarantee Asset 
Protection Alliance relating to vehicle value protection agreements, excess wear and use waivers, 
and guaranteed asset protection products. 
 
Vehicle Value Protection Agreements 
The bill creates the “Florida Vehicle Value Protection Agreements Act” (the “Florida Act”), 
which includes: 
 Definitions of the terms: administrator, commercial transaction, consumer, contract holder, 
finance agreement, free look period, motor vehicle, provider, and vehicle value protection 
agreement. 
o A “vehicle value protection agreement” is a contractual agreement that provides a benefit 
toward either the reduction of some or all of the contract holder’s current finance 
agreement deficiency balance, or the purchase or lease of a replacement motor vehicle 
upon the occurrence of an adverse event to the vehicle. The term does not include 
guaranteed asset protection products, and the product is not insurance.  
 Requirements for offering vehicle value protection agreements (“VVPAs”), including 
provisions regarding restricting the type of charges, prohibiting certain conditional sales, 
utilizing an administrator, providing a copy of the agreement, prohibiting sales with 
duplicative coverage, and providing for financial security requirements; 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 2 
 
 The nature, extent and type of disclosures required in VVPAs;   
 Penalties for violating the Florida Act, which include noncriminal violations punishable by a 
fine per violation or in the aggregate for all “violations of a similar nature,” which is defined 
in the bill; and 
 Exemption of VVPAs offered in connection with a commercial transaction from the 
disclosure and penalty provisions of the Florida Act. 
 
Excess Wear and Use Waivers 
The bill authorizes a retail lessee to contract with a retail lessor for an “excess wear and use 
waiver,” which is an agreement wherein the lessor agrees to cancel all or part of amounts that 
may become due under the lease because of excessive wear and use of a motor vehicle. The bill 
also prohibits the terms of the related motor vehicle lease from being conditioned upon the 
consumer’s payment for any excess wear and use wavier, except such waiver may be discounted 
or given at no charge for the purchase of other noncredit-related goods. A lease agreement that 
includes an excess wear and use waiver must contain certain disclosures. An excess wear and use 
waiver is not insurance for purposes of the Florida Insurance Code. 
 
Guaranteed Asset Protection Products 
The bill amends the definition of “guaranteed asset protection product” (“GAP product”), which 
is an agreement by which a creditor agrees to waive a customer’s liability for any debt that 
exceed the value of the collateral, to specify that a GAP product: 
 May be with or without a separate charge; 
 May cancel, rather than just waive, the customer’s liability; 
 Applies when a motor vehicle incurs total physical damage or is subject to an unrecovered 
theft; and 
 May provide for a benefit that waives a portion of, or provides a customer with a credit 
toward, the purchase of a replacement vehicle. 
 
The bill also amends the provisions regarding GAP products to:  
 Provide for the refund of all unearned portions of the purchase price of a contract for a GAP 
product if the contract is terminated, unless the contract provides otherwise; 
 Prohibit an entity from deducting more than $75 in administrative fees from a refund; 
 Provide that a GAP product may be cancelable or noncancelable after a “free-look period” 
defined in the bill; and 
 Provide that if a termination of a GAP product occurs for a specified reason, the entity may 
pay any refund directly to the holder or administrator, and deduct the refund amount from the 
amount owed under the retail installment contract except if such contract has been paid in 
full. 
 
The bill has an effective date of October 1, 2024.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 3 
 
II. Present Situation: 
Florida Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Laws 
The Florida Motor Vehicle Retail Sales Finance Act
1
 regulates sellers,
2
 commonly referred to as 
auto dealers, who enter into retail installment contracts
3
 with buyers
4
 for the purchase or lease of 
a motor vehicle.
5
 Except for certain businesses, such as banks or trust companies, sellers are 
required to obtain a license to operate in Florida.
6
 A seller must submit an application, specified 
information, and a nonrefundable fee to the Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) to obtain the 
required license.
7
  
 
Any person who willfully and intentionally violates any provision of s. 520.995, F.S., or engages 
in the business of a retail installment seller without a license is guilty of a misdemeanor of the 
first degree. Section 520.995, F.S., provides grounds for disciplinary action by the OFR when, 
for instance, there is failure to comply with any provision of ch. 520, F.S. Further, the OFR has 
authority to issue and serve upon any person a cease and desist order whenever such person is 
violating, has violated, or is about to violate any provision of ch. 520, F.S.,
8
 or may impose an 
administrative fine not to exceed $1,000 for each violation that has occurred.
9
 
 
Retail installment contracts must comply with several requirements and prohibitions, including, 
but not limited to, that the agreement must: 
 Be in writing;
10
 
 Contain a “Notice to the Buyer” which includes specified information;
11
 and 
 Contain other specified information, including the amount financed, finance charges, total 
amount of payments, total sale price, and payment details.
12
 
 
Sellers must provide buyers with a separate written itemization of the amount financed.
13
 Florida 
law contains several other provisions to protect the buyer, such as regulation on insurance rates, 
                                                
1
 Sections 520.01-520.10, 520.12, 520.125, and 520.13, F.S. 
2
 Section 520.02(11), F.S., defines “motor vehicle retail installment seller” or “seller” as a person engaged in the business of 
selling motor vehicles to retail buyers in retail installment transactions. 
3
 “Retail installment contract” or “contract” is defined as an agreement, entered into in this state, pursuant to which the title 
to, or a lien upon the motor vehicle, which is the subject matter of a retail installment transaction, is retained or taken by a 
seller from a retail buyer as security, in whole or in part, for the buyer’s obligation. The term includes a conditional sales 
contract and a contract for the bailment or leasing of a motor vehicle by which the bailee or lessee contracts to pay as 
compensation for its use a sum substantially equivalent to or in excess of its value and by which it is agreed that the bailee or 
lessee is bound to become, or for no further or a merely nominal consideration, has the option of becoming, the owner of the 
motor vehicle upon full compliance with the provisions of the contract. Section 520.02(17), F.S. 
4
 “Retail buyer” or “buyer” is defined as a person who buys a motor vehicle from a seller not principally for the purpose of 
resale, and who executes a retail installment contract in connection therewith or a person who succeeds to the rights and 
obligations of such person. 
5
 See Ch. 520, F.S. 
6
 Section 520.03(1), F.S. 
7
 Id. 
8
 Section 520.994(3), F.S. 
9
 Section 520.994(4), F.S. 
10
 Section 520.07(1)(a), F.S. 
11
 Section 520.07(1)(b), F.S. 
12
 Section 520.07(2), F.S. 
13
 Section 520.07(3), F.S.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 4 
 
refunds for unearned insurance premiums, limits on the amount of delinquency charges a 
holder
14
 may charge, and restrictions on when a contract may be signed with blank spaces.
15
 
 
In conjunction with entering into any new retail installment contract or contract for a loan, a 
seller, a sales finance company,
16
 or a retail lessor,
17
 and any assignee of such an entity, may 
offer an optional guaranteed asset protection product (“GAP product”) for a fee or otherwise.
18
 
Florida law defines a “guaranteed asset protection product” as: 
a loan, lease, or retail installment contract term, or modification or addendum to a 
loan, lease, or retail installment contract, under which a creditor agrees to waive a 
customer’s liability for payment of some or all of the amount by which the debt 
exceeds the value of the collateral. Such a product is not insurance for purposes of 
the Florida Insurance Code. This subsection also applies to all guaranteed asset 
protection products issued before October 1, 2008. 
 
A seller or any other authorized entity may not require the buyer to purchase a GAP product as a 
condition for making the loan. In order to offer a GAP product, a seller or any other authorized 
entity must comply with the following:
19
 
 The cost of any GAP product must not exceed the amount of the loan indebtedness. 
 Any contract or agreement pertaining to a GAP product must be governed by s. 520.07, F.S., 
relating to requirements and prohibitions as to retail installment contracts. 
 A GAP product must remain the obligation of any person that purchases or otherwise 
acquires the loan contract covering such product. 
 An entity providing GAP products must provide readily understandable disclosures that 
explain in detail eligibility requirements, conditions, refunds, and exclusions. The disclosures 
must explain that the purchase of the GAP product is optional, and must meet certain criteria 
regarding the language contained in it. 
 An entity must provide a copy of the executed contract for the GAP product to the buyer. 
 An entity may not offer a contract for a GAP product that contains terms giving the entity the 
right to unilaterally modify the contract unless: 
o The modification is favorable to the buyer and is made without any additional charge; or 
o The buyer is notified of any proposed change and is provided a reasonable opportunity to 
cancel the contract without penalty before the change goes in effect. 
 If a contract for a GAP product is terminated, the entity must refund to the buyer any 
unearned fees paid for the contract unless the contract provides otherwise. A customer who 
receives the benefit of the GAP product is not entitled to a refund. The buyer must notify the 
entity of the event terminating the contract and request a refund within 90 days after the 
                                                
14
 Section 520.02(8), F.S., provides that a “holder” of a retail installment contract means the retail seller of a motor vehicle 
retail installment contract or an assignee of such contract. 
15
 Section 520.07, F.S. 
16
 Section 520.02(19), F.S., defines “sales finance company” as a person engaged in the business of purchasing retail 
installment contracts from one or more sellers. The term includes, but is not limited to, a bank or trust company, if so 
engaged. The term does not include the pledge of an aggregate number of such contracts to secure a bona fide loan thereon. 
17
 Section 521.003(8), F.S., defines “retail lessor” as a person who regularly engages in the business of selling or leasing 
motor vehicles and who offers or arranges a lease agreement for a motor vehicle. The term includes an agent or affiliate who 
acts on behalf of the retail lessor and excludes any assignee of the lease agreement. 
18
 Section 520.07(11), F.S. 
19
 Id.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 5 
 
terminating event. An entity may offer a buyer a nonrefundable contract for a GAP product 
only if the entity also offers the buyer a bona fide option to purchase a comparable contract 
that provides for a refund. 
 
Ch. 520, F.S., does not contain any provisions on vehicle value protection agreements 
(“VVPAs”) or excess wear and use waivers. 
 
GAPA Products Model Act 
The Guarantee Asset Protection Alliance (“GAPA”) is an organization composed of insurance 
companies, lenders, and administrative services companies, and offers member benefits relating 
to, amongst other things, legislative efforts regarding GAP waivers.
20
 On November 30, 2023, 
GAPA approved the latest Products Model Act (the “Revised Model Act”) relating to motor 
vehicle financial protection,
21
 such as VVPA and debt waivers.
22
 Debt waivers include GAP 
products and excess wear and use waivers.
23
 The Model Act relates to the GAP waiver only. The 
Revised Model Act, of which the bill adopts many portions, incorporates updated provisions on 
GAP waivers, provisions covering excess wear and use waivers, and provisions on VVPAs.  
According to GAPA, 15 states have enacted GAP waivers, 22 states have adopted the Model Act 
(including Florida), and 4 states have adopted the Revised Model Act.
24
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Florida Vehicle Value Protection Agreements Act 
Section 3 of the bill provides that ss. 520.151, F.S., to 520.156, F.S., may be cited as the “Florida 
Act.” 
 
Section 4 of the bill defines, for purposes of the Florida Vehicle Value Protection Agreements 
Act, the following terms: 
 “Administrator” means the person who is responsible for the administrative or operational 
function of managing vehicle value protection agreements, including, but not limited to, the 
adjudication of claims or benefit requests by contract holders. 
 “Commercial transaction” means a transaction in which the motor vehicle subject to the 
transaction is used primarily for business or commercial purposes. 
 “Contract holder” means a person who is the purchaser or holder of a vehicle value 
protection agreement. 
 “Finance agreement” means a loan, retail installment sales contract, or lease for the purchase, 
refinancing, or lease of a motor vehicle. 
                                                
20
 The GAPA, Membership, available at: GAPA Membership Information (gapalliance.org) (last visited Jan. 29, 2024).  
21
 The GAPA, Motor Vehicle Financial Protection Products Model Act, Nov. 30, 2023, p. 2, available at: GAPA-Model-Act-
APPROVED-2023_11_30.pdf (gapalliance.org) (last visited Jan. 29, 2024) (hereinafter cited as the “Revised Model Act”). 
The Revised Model Act defines “Motor Vehicle Financial Protection Products” as agreements defined herein that protect a 
Consumer’s financial interest in their current or future motor vehicle and include but are not limited to debt waivers and 
vehicle value protection agreements. 
22
 The Revised Model Act. 
23
 The Revised Model Act at p. 2-3. 
24
 The GAPA, Legislative Status of GAP Waiver, May 2023, available at: PowerPoint Presentation (gapalliance.org) (last 
visited Jan. 29, 2024).  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 6 
 
 “Free-look period” means the period of time, commencing on the effective date of the 
contract, during which the buyer may cancel the contract for a full refund of the purchase 
price. This period may not be shorter than 30 days. 
 “Motor vehicle” has the same meaning as provided in s. 520.02, F.S., which defines the term 
as any device or vehicle, including automobiles, motorcycles, motor trucks, trailers, mobile 
homes, and all other vehicles operated over the public highways and streets of this state and 
propelled by power other than muscular power, but excluding traction engines, road rollers, 
implements of husbandry and other agricultural equipment, and vehicles which run only 
upon a track. 
 “Provider” means a person that is obligated to provide a benefit under a VVPA. A provider 
may function as an administrator or retain the services of a third-party administrator. 
 “Vehicle value protection agreement” includes a contractual agreement that provides a 
benefit towards either the reduction of some or all of the contract holder’s current finance 
agreement deficiency balance or the purchase or lease of a replacement motor vehicle or 
motor vehicle services upon the occurrence of an adverse event to the motor vehicle, 
including, but not limited to, loss, theft, damage, obsolescence, diminished value, or 
depreciation. The term does not include GAP products defined in s. 520.02, F.S. Such a 
product is not insurance for purposes of the Florida Insurance Code. 
 
All of the defined terms are substantially the same as the definitions contained in the Revised 
Model Act.
25
  
 
Section 5 of the bill provides that a VVPA may be offered, sold, or given to consumers in 
compliance with the Florida Act. Notwithstanding any other law, any amount charged or 
financed for a VVPA must not be a finance charge or interest and must be separately stated in the 
finance agreement and in the VVPA. The extension or terms of credit, or the terms of the motor 
vehicle sale or lease may not be conditioned upon the consumer’s payment for or financing of 
any charge for a VVPA, except a VVPA may be discounted or given at no charge in connection 
with the purchase of other noncredit-related goods or services. These provisions are substantially 
the same as the provisions in the Revised Model Act that apply to the requirements for offering 
motor vehicle financial protection products.
26
 
 
The bill authorizes a provider to use an administrator or other designee to administer a VVPA. A 
consumer may not be sold a VVPA unless a copy of the agreement has been or will be provided 
to him or her at a reasonable time after such agreement is sold, or if coverage is duplicative of 
another VVPA sold to a person or duplicative of a GAP product. The Revised Model Act does 
not contain a provision that prohibits duplicative coverage. This provision was added to ensure 
consumers were not purchasing products that provide the same coverage. 
 
Each provider must do one of the following: 
 Insure
27
 all of its VVPAs under a policy that pays or reimburses the contract holder in the 
event the provider fails to perform its obligations under the agreement. The Revised Model 
Act provides more details on the amount of minimum coverage that would be required. This 
                                                
25
 The Revised Model Act at pp. 1-2, and 6 
26
 The Revised Model Act at p. 2. 
27
 The insurer must be licensed or otherwise authorized or eligible to do business in this state.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 7 
 
language was omitted to avoid inconsistencies with the Florida Insurance Code, but the 
overall intent and protection afforded under the Revised Model Act is maintained under this 
provision in the bill.   
 Maintain a funded reserve account for its obligations under its contracts issued and 
outstanding in this state. The reserves may not be less than 40 percent of gross consideration 
received, less claims paid, on the sale of the VVPA for all in-force contracts in this state. The 
reserve must be placed in trust with the OFR and have a financial security deposit valued at 
not less than 5 percent of the gross consideration received, less claims paid, on the sale of the 
VVPAs for all VVPAs issued and in force in this state, but at least $25,000. The reserve 
account must consist of one of the following: 
o A surety bond issued by an authorized surety; 
o Securities of the type eligible for deposit by insurers as provided in s. 625.52, F.S.; 
o Cash; or 
o A letter of credit issued by a qualified financial institution. 
 Maintain, or together with its parent corporation maintain, a net worth or stockholders’ 
equity of $100 million and, upon request, provide the OFR with a copy of the provider’s or 
the provider’s parent company’s Form 10-K or Form 20-F filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within the last calendar year, or if the company does not file 
with the SEC, a copy of the company’s audited financial statements, which must show a net 
worth of the provider or its parent company of at least $100 million. If the provider’s parent 
company’s Form 10-K, Form 20-F, or financial statements are filed to meet the provider’s 
financial security requirement, the parent company must agree to guarantee the obligations of 
the provider relating to vehicle value protection agreements sold by the provider in this state. 
 
A financial security requirement other than those described in this paragraph may not be imposed 
on VVPA providers. 
 
Section 6 of the bill requires VVPAs to disclose in writing, in clear, understandable language, all 
of the following: 
 The name and address of the provider, contract holder, and administrator. 
 The terms of the VVPA, including any purchase price to be paid by the contract holder, the 
requirements for eligibility and conditions of coverage, and any exclusions. 
 Whether the VVPA may be canceled by the contract holder during a free-look period, and 
that the contract holder is entitled to a full refund if the contract is cancelled of any purchase 
price if no benefits have been provided. 
 Any procedure the contract holder must follow to obtain a benefit under the terms and 
conditions of the VVPA, including a telephone number, website, or mailing address where 
the contract holder may apply for a benefit. 
 Whether the VVPA is cancelable after the free-look period and the conditions under which it 
may be canceled, including the procedures for requesting any refund of the unearned 
purchase price paid by the contract holder. In the event that the agreement is cancelable, it 
must include the methodology for calculating any refund due of the unearned purchase price 
of the vehicle value protection agreement. 
 The extension or terms of credit, or the terms of the related motor vehicle sale or lease may 
not be conditioned upon the purchase of the vehicle value protection agreement.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 8 
 
 A VVPA must state the terms, restrictions, or conditions governing cancellation of the 
VVPA before the termination or expiration date of the VVPA by either the provider or the 
contract holder. The provider of the VVPA shall mail a written notice to the contract holder 
at the last known address of the contract holder contained in the records of the provider at 
least 5 days before cancellation by the provider, which notice must state the effective date of 
the cancellation and the reason for the cancellation. However, such prior notice is not 
required if the reason for cancellation is nonpayment of the provider fee, a material 
misrepresentation by the contract holder to the provider or administrator, or a substantial 
breach of duties by the contract holder relating to the covered motor vehicle or its use. If a 
vehicle value protection agreement is canceled by the provider for a reason other than 
nonpayment of the provider fee, the provider must refund to the contract holder 100 percent 
of the unearned pro rata provider fee paid by the contract holder, if any. If coverage under the 
vehicle value protection agreement continues after a claim, any refund may reflect a 
deduction for claims paid and, at the discretion of the provider, an administrative fee of not 
more than $75. 
 
Section 7 of the bill provides that the provisions on disclosures (section 6) and the provisions on 
penalties (section 8) do not apply to VVPAs offered in connection with a commercial 
transaction, which is defined in section 4 of the bill as a transaction in which the motor vehicle 
subject to the transaction is used primarily for business or commercial purposes. This section of 
the bill adopts the Revised Model Act.  
 
Section 8 of the bill provides that a provider, an administrator, or any other person who willfully 
and intentionally violates the Florida Vehicle Value Protection Agreements Act commits a 
noncriminal violation.
28
 Such violation is punishable by a civil fine not to exceed $500 per 
violation and not more than $10,000 in the aggregate for all violations of a similar nature. For 
purposes of this section, the term “violations of a similar nature” means violations that consist of 
the same or similar course of conduct, action, or practice, irrespective of the number of times the 
action, conduct, or practice determined to be a violation of the Florida Act occurred. The bill 
adopts part of the Revised Model Act that provides for penalties, including the issuance of cease 
and desist orders and the imposition of penalties. The OFR has administrative authority to issue 
cease and desist orders pursuant to s. 520.994, F.S. 
 
Excess Wear and Use Waiver Agreements 
Section 9 of the bill substantially adopts the definition of “excess wear and use waiver” in the 
Revised Model Act to mean a contractual agreement wherein a lessor agrees, with or without a 
separate charge, to cancel or waive all or part of amounts that may become due under a lease 
agreement as a result of excessive wear and use of a motor vehicle, which agreement must be 
part of, or a separate addendum to, the lease agreement. Such waivers may also cancel or waive 
amounts due for excess mileage.  
 
                                                
28
 Section 775.08(3), F.S., defines “noncriminal violation” as any offense that is punishable under the laws of this state, or 
that would be punishable if committed in this state, by no other penalty than a fine, forfeiture, or other civil penalty. A 
noncriminal violation does not constitute a crime, and conviction for a noncriminal violation shall not give rise to any legal 
disability based on a criminal offense.   BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 9 
 
The bill establishes legal authority and requirements for retail lessees to contract with retail 
lessors for an excess wear and use waiver in connection with lease agreements. The terms of the 
related motor vehicle lease may not be conditioned upon the consumer’s payment for any excess 
wear and use waiver. However, excess wear and use waivers may be discounted or given at no 
charge in connection with the purchase of other noncredit-related goods. A lease agreement that 
includes an excess wear and use waiver must disclose all of the following: 
 The total charge for the excess wear and use waiver. 
 Any exclusions or limitations on the amount of excess wear and use which may be waived 
under the excess wear and use waiver. 
 The terms, restrictions, or conditions governing cancellation of the excess wear and use 
waiver before the termination or expiration of the excess wear and use waiver, which may 
include an administrative fee of not more than $75. 
 
The bill provides that an excess wear and use waiver is not insurance for purposes of the Florida 
Insurance Code. 
 
Guaranteed Asset Protection Products 
Section 1 of the bill amends the definition of “guaranteed asset protection product” to mean: 
a loan, lease, or retail installment contract term, or modification or addendum to a loan, 
lease, or retail installment contract, under which a creditor agrees, with or without a 
separate charge, to cancel or waive a customer’s liability for payment of some or all of 
the amount by which the debt exceeds the value of the collateral that has incurred total 
physical damage or is the subject of an unrecovered theft. A guaranteed asset protection 
product may also provide, with or without a separate charge, a benefit that waives a 
portion of, or provides a customer with a credit toward, the purchase of a replacement 
motor vehicle…This subsection also applies to all guaranteed asset protection products 
issued before October 1, 2008. 
The current definition of GAP products under Florida law is being amended to substantially 
conform to the Revised Model Act, and clarify that a GAP product can: 
 Be included in a loan contract with or without a separate fee; 
 Cover a loan balance when a consumer has a total loss of their car or an unrecovered theft; 
and  
 Provide a credit towards the purchase of a replacement motor vehicle. 
 
Section 2 of the bill provides that if a contract for a GAP product is terminated, the entity that 
sold the product must refund to the buyer all unearned portions of the purchase price of the 
contract, unless the contract provides otherwise. 
 
The bill also prohibits an entity that gives a refund pursuant to s. 520.07(11)(g), F.S., from 
deducting more than $75 in administrative fees from the refund. 
 
The bill allows GAP products to be cancelable or noncancelable after a free-look period, which 
is defined in section 4 of the bill to mean the period of time, commencing on the effective date of 
the contract, during which the buyer may cancel the contract for a full refund of the purchase 
price. The period may not be shorter than 30 days. 
  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 10 
 
If a GAP product is terminated because of: 
 A default under the retail installment contract or contract for a loan,  
 The repossession of the motor vehicle associated with such contract or loan, or  
 Any other termination of such contract or loan, a refund of the GAP product amount maybe 
used to satisfy any balance owed on the retail installment contract or contract for a loan 
unless the buyer can show that the retail installment contract has been paid in full. 
 
Effective Date 
 
Section 10 of the bill provides an effective date of October 1, 2024. 
 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None identified. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 11 
 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
OFR reports that any insignificant fiscal impact that may result from this bill could be 
absorbed within its current resources.
29
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends sections 520.02 and 520.07 of the Florida Statutes.  
This bill creates sections 520.151, 520.152, 520.153, 520.154, 520.155, 520.156, and 520.157 of 
the Florida Statutes.   
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Commerce and Tourism on January 30, 2024: 
The CS provides that if a contract for a guaranteed asset protection product is terminated, 
the entity that sold the product must refund to the buyer all unearned portions of the 
purchase price of the contract, unless the contract provides otherwise. 
 
CS by Banking and Insurance on January 16, 2024: 
 Removes the modification to the definition of “guaranteed asset protection product” 
that would apply the definition to “related” products issued before October 1, 2008; 
 With respect to financial security requirements for VVPAs, requires a provider to 
place the reserve in trust with the office (rather than the commission), and to provide 
the OFR (rather than the commission) with a copy of the company’s audited financial 
statements; 
 Removes the option for another form of security held in reserve to be prescribed by 
commission regulation; 
 Removes the definitions of the terms “person” and “commission;” 
 Clarifies that the exemption for commercial transactions applies to the disclosure and 
penalties provisions by amending the cross-reference from s. 520.155, F.S., to s. 
520.156, F.S.; and 
 Relocates provisions on “excess wear and use waiver” from ch. 521, F.S., (motor 
vehicle lease disclosure) to ch. 520, F.S. (retail installment sales). 
                                                
29
 Email from Gregory C Oats, Director of the Division of Consumer Finance, OFR, to Jacqueline Moody, Florida Senate 
Committee on Banking and Insurance Senior Attorney, SB 902, (Jan. 12, 2024) (on file with Senate Committee on Banking 
and Insurance.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 902   	Page 12 
 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.