Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0693 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/06/2025

                    STORAGE NAME: h0693a.CRM 
DATE: 3/6/2025 
 	1 
      
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
BILL ANALYSIS 
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. 
BILL #: HB 693    
TITLE: Aggravating Factors for Capital Felonies 
SPONSOR(S): Redondo 
COMPANION BILL: SB 984 (Gruters) 
LINKED BILLS: None 
RELATED BILLS: None 
Committee References 
 	Criminal Justice 
17 Y, 1 N 

Judiciary 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Effect of the Bill: 
HB 693 allows a jury to consider whether a victim was gathered with one or more persons for a school activity, 
religious activity, or public government meeting as an aggravating factor in determining whether a defendant who 
has been convicted of a capital felony is eligible to receive a death sentence and whether to recommend a sentence 
of death or life imprisonment for such a defendant. 
 
Fiscal or Economic Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate negative impact on state expenditures. To the extent the bill results in more 
death sentences being imposed, it may increase costs associated with the incarceration and execution of prisoners 
sentenced to death and may increase the workload of the Florida Supreme Court by requiring the Court to review 
an increased number of death penalty cases.  
 
  
JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 
ANALYSIS 
EFFECT OF THE BILL: 
HB 693 adds a new aggravating factor that may be considered by a jury during a sentencing proceeding in 
determining whether a defendant who has been convicted of a capital felony is eligible to receive a death sentence 
and whether to recommend a sentence of death or life imprisonment for such a defendant. Under the bill, a jury 
may consider, as an aggravating factor, whether the victim of the capital felony was gathered with one or more 
persons for a school activity, religious activity, or public government meeting. (Section 1).  
 
The bill provides an effective date of October 1, 2025. (Section 2).  
 
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:  
 
STATE GOVERNMENT:  
The bill may have an indeterminate negative impact on state expenditures. To the extent the bill results in more 
death sentences being imposed, it may increase the number of inmates on death row and the costs associated with 
their incarceration and execution. 
 
Additionally, to the extent the bill results in more death sentences being imposed, it may increase the workload of 
the Florida Supreme Court related to reviewing death penalty cases. However, any increased workload would 
likely be absorbed within existing resources.  
 
 
  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	2 
RELEVANT INFORMATION 
SUBJECT OVERVIEW: 
Capital Sentencing 
Section 775.082(1), F.S., requires a person who has been convicted of a capital felony
1, 2 to be punished by death if a 
proceeding held to determine sentence under s. 921.141, F.S., results in a determination that such person shall be 
punished by death, otherwise the person shall be punished by life imprisonment and is not eligible for parole.  
 
Under s. 921.141, F.S., to sentence a defendant to death when he or she has not waived the right to a sentencing 
proceeding by a jury, a jury must unanimously find the existence of at least one aggravating factor and find that any 
aggravating factors found to exist were proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If a jury makes such a finding, the jury 
must then make a recommendation to the court as to whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or life 
imprisonment.
3 The jury’s recommendation must be based on the following: 
 Whether aggravating factors are sufficient to impose death;  
 The aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating circumstances found to exist; and  
 That, based on the prior considerations, the defendant should be sentenced to death.
4 
 
If fewer than eight jurors determine that the defendant should be sentenced to death, the jury must recommend a 
sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and the court must impose a life sentence.
5 If at 
least eight jurors determine that the defendant should be sentenced to death, the jury must recommend a sentence 
of death.
6 Thereafter, the judge must consider each aggravating factor that was unanimously found to exist by the 
jury and all mitigating circumstances, and may impose a sentence of life imprisonment or a death sentence.
7 The 
aggravating factors a jury may consider are limited by statute. 
 
Aggravating Factors 
Section 921.141(6), F.S., provides the following aggravating factors: 
 The capital felony was committed by a person previously convicted of a felony and under sentence of 
imprisonment or placed on community control or on felony probation.  
 The defendant was previously convicted of another capital felony or of a felony involving the use or threat 
of violence to the person.  
 The defendant knowingly created a great risk of death to many persons.  
 The capital felony was committed while the defendant was engaged, or was an accomplice, in the 
commission of, or an attempt to commit, or flight after committing or attempting to commit, any: robbery; 
sexual battery; aggravated child abuse; abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult resulting in great 
bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement; arson; burglary; kidnapping; aircraft 
piracy; or unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb.  
 The capital felony was committed for the purpose of avoiding or preventing a lawful arrest or effecting an 
escape from custody.  
 The capital felony was committed for pecuniary gain. 
 The capital felony was committed to disrupt or hinder the lawful exercise of any governmental function or 
the enforcement of laws. 
 The capital felony was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel.  
                                                            
1
 Capital felony offenses include offenses such as: first-degree murder under s. 782.04(1)(a), F.S.; the killing of an unborn child 
by injury to the mother under s. 782.04(1)(a)2., F.S.; making, possessing, throwing, projecting, placing, discharging, or 
attempting to do the same, any destructive device that results in death under s. 790.161(4), F.S.; and manufacturing, 
possessing, selling, delivering, sending, mailing, displaying, using, threatening, attempting, or conspiring to use, or making 
readily accessible to others a weapon of mass destruction if death results under s. 790.166(2), F.S. 
2
 The sentencing of capital sexual battery and capital drug trafficking felonies are specifically provided for in S. 921.142, F.S., 
and S. 921.1425, F.S. 
3
 S. 921.141(2)(b), F.S. 
4
 Id. 
5
 S. 921.141(2) and (3), F.S. 
6
 S. 921.141(2)(c), F.S. 
7
 S. 921.141(3)(a)2., F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	3 
 The capital felony was a homicide and was committed in a cold, calculated, and premeditated manner 
without any pretense of moral or legal justification.  
 The victim of the capital felony was a law enforcement officer engaged in the performance of his or her 
official duties. 
 The victim of the capital felony was an elected or appointed public official engaged in the performance of 
his or her official duties, if the motive for the capital felony was related, in whole or in part, to the victim's 
official capacity. 
 The victim of the capital felony was a person less than 12 years of age.  
 The victim of the capital felony was particularly vulnerable due to advanced age or disability, or because 
the defendant stood in a position of familial or custodial authority over the victim. 
 The capital felony was committed by a criminal gang member, as defined in s. 874.03, F.S.  
 The capital felony was committed by a person designated as a sexual predator pursuant to s. 775.21, F.S., or 
a person previously designated as a sexual predator who had the sexual predator designation removed. 
 The capital felony was committed by a person subject to specified injunctions or foreign protection orders 
and was committed against the petitioner who obtained the injunction or protection order or any spouse, 
child, sibling, or parent of the petitioner. 
 
Mitigating Circumstances  
Mitigating circumstances are not limited by statute. Section 921.141(7), F.S., specifies that mitigating 
circumstances for a capital offense include the following:  
 The defendant has no significant history of prior criminal activity.  
 The capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or 
emotional disturbance. 
 The victim was a participant in the defendant's conduct or consented to the act.  
 The defendant was an accomplice in the capital felony committed by another person and his or her 
participation was relatively minor. 
 The defendant acted under extreme duress or under the substantial domination of another person. 
 The capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his or her conduct or to conform his or her 
conduct to the requirements of law was substantially impaired.  
 The age of the defendant at the time of the crime.  
 The existence of any other factors in the defendant’s background that would mitigate against imposition of 
the death penalty. 
 
Automatic Review 
Section 921.141(5), F.S., provides that any judgment of conviction and sentence of death shall be subject to 
automatic review by the Supreme Court of Florida, with the required disposition rendered within two years after 
the filing of a notice of appeal. Such automatic reviews have priority over all other cases.
8  
 
BILL HISTORY 
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE 
STAFF 
DIRECTOR/ 
POLICY CHIEF 
ANALYSIS 
PREPARED BY 
Criminal Justice Subcommittee 17 Y, 1 N 3/6/2025 Hall Leshko 
Judiciary Committee     
 
 
 
 
 
                                                            
8
 S. 921.141(5), F.S.