Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H0847 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/04/2025

                    STORAGE NAME: h0847b.JDC 
DATE: 4/4/2025 
 	1 
      
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
BILL ANALYSIS 
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. 
BILL #: CS/HB 847 
TITLE: Expedited DNA Testing Grant Program 
SPONSOR(S): Johnson 
COMPANION BILL: SB 1072 (McClain) 
LINKED BILLS: None 
RELATED BILLS: None 
Committee References 
 	Criminal Justice 
17 Y, 0 N, As CS 

Judiciary 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Effect of the Bill: 
The bill creates the Expedited DNA Testing Grant Program within the Florida Department of Law Enforcement 
(FDLE) to award grants to law enforcement agencies for the processing of evidentiary items for DNA testing. The 
bill requires FDLE to annually award any funds specifically appropriated for the grant program to law enforcement 
agencies to cover testing of DNA samples by specified private laboratories when:  
 The technology or technique needed to properly test a DNA sample is not readily available at a local or state 
laboratory; or  
 When expedited testing of the DNA sample is in the best interest of an investigation.  
 
Under the bill, an agency receiving grant funds must submit a specified report to the executive director of FDLE no 
later than one year after receiving funding. 
 
Fiscal or Economic Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate positive impact on local governments by making local law enforcement 
agencies eligible to receive funds to cover the cost of specified DNA testing. By doing so, the bill may have an 
indeterminate positive impact on private laboratories that perform DNA testing eligible for such grant funds. 
However, because the bill does not appropriate funds for the grant program, the impact of the bill on such entities 
and the impact to state government is indeterminate. 
 
  
JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 
ANALYSIS 
EFFECT OF THE BILL: 
The bill creates the Expedited DNA Testing Grant Program within the Florida Department of Law Enforcement 
(FDLE) to award grants to law enforcement agencies for the processing of evidentiary items for DNA testing. FDLE 
must annually award any funds specifically appropriated for the grant program to law enforcement agencies to 
cover testing of DNA samples by private laboratories. The bill defines a “private laboratory” as any DNA laboratory 
accredited for a minimum of five years in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and applicable Federal Bureau of 
Investigation Quality Assurance Standards. (Section 1) 
 
Under the bill, grants may be used by a law enforcement agency when: 
 The technology or technique needed to properly test the DNA sample is not readily available at a local or 
state laboratory. 
 In the law enforcement agency's judgment, expedited testing of the DNA sample is in the best interest of 
advancing an investigation. (Section 1) 
 
The bill requires each grant recipient to provide a report to the executive director of FDLE no later than one year 
after receiving grant funding that details the: 
 Amount of annual funding received from the grant.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	2 
 Number of cases tested by the private laboratory. 
 Type of DNA testing used, including the name of the private laboratory to which such testing was 
outsourced and the type of primary equipment used by the private laboratory for such testing. 
 Lab report with the results of the DNA testing. 
 Average amount of time it took to complete the DNA testing. (Section 1) 
 
The effective date of the bill is July 1, 2025. (Section 2) 
 
RULEMAKING:  
The bill provides rulemaking authority to FDLE to implement, administer, and establish the process for the 
allocation of grant funds. 
 
Lawmaking is a legislative power; however, the Legislature may delegate a portion of such power to executive 
branch agencies to create rules that have the force of law. To exercise this delegated power, an agency must 
have a grant of rulemaking authority and a law to implement. 
 
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:  
 
STATE GOVERNMENT:  
The bill may have an indeterminate positive impact on state revenues as FDLE and other statewide  
law enforcement agencies may receive grant funds. The bill may have an indeterminate impact on state 
expenditures to the extent the bill authorizes FDLE to distribute funds specifically appropriated for the grant 
program. Any such impact is subject to legislative appropriation.  
 
According to FDLE, the department currently utilizes contracts with private laboratories for specialized testing 
when it is deemed the most suitable option for a particular case, and the cost of specialized testing is covered by 
funds appropriated to the statewide laboratory system.
1 
 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT:  
The bill may have an indeterminate positive impact on local government revenues to the extent that some local law 
enforcement agencies may receive future grant funding to cover the costs associated with specified DNA testing. 
Any such impact is subject to legislative appropriation.  
 
PRIVATE SECTOR:  
The bill may have an indeterminate positive impact on the private sector to the extent that the bill  
authorizes recipients of grant funds to cover expenses related to using certain DNA testing, which may require 
outsourcing to a private entity. Any such impact is subject to legislative appropriation.  
 
RELEVANT INFORMATION 
SUBJECT OVERVIEW: 
FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) 
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is hereditary material existing in the cells of all living organisms. A DNA profile may 
be created by testing the DNA in a person’s cells. Similar to fingerprints, a person’s DNA profile is a unique 
identifier, except for identical twins, who have the exact same DNA profile. DNA evidence may be collected from 
any biological material, such as hair, teeth, bones, skin cells, blood, semen, saliva, urine, feces, and other bodily 
substances.
2  
 
                                                            
1
 Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Agency Analysis of 2025 House Bill 847, p. 5 (Mar. 10, 2025).  
2
 FindLaw, How DNA Evidence Works (last visited Mar. 21, 2025).  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	3 
Historically, the most common form of DNA analysis used to match samples and test for identification in forensic 
laboratories analyzes only certain parts of DNA, known as short tandem repeats (STRs).
3 In the early 1990s, the 
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) chose 13 STRs as the basis for a DNA identification profile, and the 13 STRs 
became known as the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS).
4 CODIS is now the general term used to describe the 
FBI’s program of support for local, state, and national criminal justice DNA databases, as well as the software used 
to run these databases.
5 
 
When a suspect’s identity is unknown, a participating crime laboratory may upload a forensic profile into CODIS to 
compare against additional DNA profiles uploaded by other federal, state, or local participating laboratories. If a 
match is identified, the laboratories involved exchange information to verify the match and establish coordination 
between the two agencies. This match can provide probable cause for law enforcement to obtain a warrant to 
collect a biological reference sample from an offender. A laboratory can then perform DNA analysis on the known 
biological sample and present the analysis as evidence in court.
6  
 
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is a worldwide federation consisting of technical 
committees that work with governmental and nongovernmental organizations to prepare standards related to 
technology and manufacturing.
7 ISO and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) develop joint ISO/IEC 
documents to provide uniform guidelines in each subject for which a technical committee has been established, 
including technical committees that establish international standards for DNA laboratories.
8 
 
ISO/IEC standards for DNA laboratories outline requirements related to: 
 Personnel; 
 Facilities and environmental conditions; 
 Equipment; 
 Selection, verification, and validation of methods; 
 Ensuring the validity of results; and 
 Reporting results.
9 
 
Federal Bureau of Investigation Quality Assurance Standards 
The FBI provides quality assurance requirements that laboratories performing forensic DNA testing or utilizing the 
Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) must follow.
10 These standards ensure the quality and integrity of the data 
generated by the laboratory and apply to: 
 Forensic DNA testing laboratories using Rapid DNA instruments/Systems on casework reference samples. 
 Vendor laboratories that perform forensic DNA testing in accordance with specified standards.
11 
 
The FBI standards also require laboratories to establish, follow, and maintain quality assurance systems that 
include elements related to: 
 Goals and objectives; 
 Organization and management; 
 Personnel; 
 Training; 
                                                            
3
 Kelly Lowenberg, Applying the Fourth Amendment when DNA Collected for One Purpose is Tested for Another, 79 U. Cin. L. Rev.  
1289, 1293 (2011), https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/APPLYING-THE-FOURTH-AMENDMENT-WHEN-
DNA-COLLECTED-FOR-ONE-PURPOSE.pdf (last visited Mar. 21, 2025). 
4
 Id. 
5
 FBI, Frequently Asked Questions on CODIS and NDIS (last visited Mar. 21, 2025). 
6
 Id. 
7
 International Standard, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration 
Laboratories (last visited Mar. 21, 2025). 
8
 Id. 
9
 Id. 
10
 FBI, Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories (last visited Mar. 21, 2025). 
11
 Id. Additionally, FBI standards do not preclude the participation of a laboratory, by itself or in collaboration with others, in 
research and development on procedures that have not been validated.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	4 
 Facilities and evidence control; 
 Validation; 
 Analytical procedures; 
 Equipment; 
 Reports; 
 Review; 
 Proficiency testing; 
 Corrective action; 
 Audits; 
 Professional development; and 
 Outsourcing ownership.
12 
 
Additionally, each laboratory must: 
 Have and develop a policy regarding document retention that specifically addresses proficiency tests, 
corrective action, audits, training records, continuing education, case files, and court testimony monitoring; 
 Annually review each quality assurance system related to DNA; and 
 Annually review case files that are a representative sample of cases worked.
13 
 
DNA Grant Programs 
The Legislature created DNA grant programs during the two prior regular sessions. In 2024, the “Forensic 
Investigative Genetic Genealogy Grant Program” appropriated a non-recurring sum of $500,000 for the 2024-2025 
fiscal year from the General Revenue Fund to FDLE to cover expenses related to using forensic investigative genetic 
genealogy methods to generate investigative leads for criminal investigations of violent crimes and unidentified 
human remains.
14 In 2023, the “Rapid DNA Grant Program” established within FDLE allowed the department to 
annually award grants, from funds specifically appropriated to the grant program, to county jails or sheriffs’ offices 
to procure Rapid DNA machines and other necessary supplies required to rapidly process DNA samples in support 
of the statewide DNA database under s. 943.325, F.S.
15 
 
RECENT LEGISLATION:  
 
YEAR BILL #  HOUSE SPONSOR(S) SENATE SPONSOR OTHER INFORMATION 
2024 CS/SB 678 Anderson 	Bradley Became law on July 1, 2024. 
2023 CS/HB 1105 Temple 	Ingoglia Became law on July 1, 2023. 
 
 
                                                            
12
 Id. 
13
 Id. 
14
 Ch. 24-113, Laws of Fla. 
15
 Ch. 23-234, Laws of Fla.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	5 
BILL HISTORY 
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE 
STAFF 
DIRECTOR/ 
POLICY CHIEF 
ANALYSIS 
PREPARED BY 
Criminal Justice Subcommittee 17 Y, 0 N, As CS 3/19/2025 Hall Butcher 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Clarified that a grant fund recipient must provide the specified report to 
the executive director of FDLE. 
 Provided rulemaking authority to FDLE to adopt rules to implement, 
administer, and establish the process for the allocation of grant funds. 
 Made technical changes. 
Judiciary Committee   Kramer Butcher 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
THIS BILL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THE CHANGES DESCRIBED ABOVE. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------