Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1101 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/30/2025

                    STORAGE NAME: h1101b.HHS 
DATE: 3/30/2025 
 	1 
      
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
BILL ANALYSIS 
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. 
BILL #: HB 1101 
TITLE: Out-of-network Providers 
SPONSOR(S): Albert 
COMPANION BILL: SB 2 (Rodriguez) 
LINKED BILLS: None 
RELATED BILLS: SB 1842 (Burton) 
Committee References 
 Health Care Facilities & Systems 
15 Y, 2 N 

Health & Human Services 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Effect of the Bill: 
The bill requires health care practitioners to notify patients in writing when referring them to out-of-network 
providers that the providers are out of network and that may result in higher out-of-pocket patient costs.  
 
The bill also requires insurers to apply patient payments for covered services by nonpreferred providers to the 
patient’s deductible and out-of-pocket maximum under the policy if the cost is the same as or less than the insurer’s 
average payments or the statewide average on the Florida Health Price Finder website. 
 
Fiscal or Economic Impact: 
The bill has no fiscal impact on state or local government, and may have indeterminate negative and positive 
impacts on practitioners and insurers. 
 
 
  
JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 
ANALYSIS 
EFFECT OF THE BILL: 
Current law does not obligate health care practitioners to inform patients when referring them to other providers 
who do not have a contract with the patient’s insurer, so are not in the insurer’s provider network, or inform them 
of the possible financial consequences of treatment by out-of-network providers. 
 
The bill requires health care practitioners to give a written notice to a patient any time the health care provider 
refers a patient to a provider who is not in the provider network covered by the patient’s insurance. The bill 
requires health care practitioners to notify patients in writing when referring them to out-of-network providers 
that the providers are out-of-network and that using such providers may result in higher out-of-pocket patient 
costs. This applies to all practitioners governed by ch. 456, F.S.
1 (Section 1.) 
 
Currently, insurers may contract with a network of providers, such as health care practitioners or facilities, at an 
alternative or reduced rate, called preferred providers. Insurers may encourage patients to use preferred 
providers by imposing additional cost-sharing for the use non-preferred providers, and by not including the 
                                                            
1
 Chapter 456 applies to professionals licensed under the following laws: s. 393.17; part III, ch. 401; ch. 457; ch. 458; ch. 459; 
ch. 460; ch. 461; ch. 463; ch. 464; ch. 465; ch. 466; ch. 467; part I, part III, part IV, part V, part X, part XIII, and part XIV, ch. 468; 
ch. 478; ch. 480; part II and part III, ch. 483; ch. 484; ch. 486; ch. 490; and ch. 491. These provisions apply to these occupations: 
behavioral analyst, nurse, acupuncturist, pharmacist, allopathic physician, dentist, osteopathic physician, dental hygienist, 
chiropractor, midwife, podiatrist, speech therapist, occupational therapist, medical physicist, radiology technician, emergency 
medical technician, electrologist, paramedic, orthotist, massage therapist, pedorthist, optician, prosthetist, hearing aid 
specialist, clinical laboratory personnel, dietician/nutritionist, respiratory therapist, athletic trainer, psychologist, clinical 
social worker, psychotherapist, marriage and family therapist, optometrist, mental health counselor, and genetic counselor.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	2 
patient’s out-of-pocket expenses for a non-preferred provider in the patient’s deductible or out-of-pocket 
maximum. 
 
The bill requires all health insurers and multiple-employer welfare arrangements
2 to apply patient payments for 
covered services by nonpreferred providers to the patient’s deductible and out-of-pocket maximum under the 
policy. This applies only to non-emergency services
3 covered under the policy, and only if the cost of the out-of-
network treatment is the same as or less than the insurer’s average payments for that service or the statewide 
average on the Florida Health Price Finder website. (Section 2.) 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2025. (Section 3.) 
 
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:  
 
PRIVATE SECTOR:  
The bill’s practitioner notice requirement may have a workload impact on practitioners to provide notices or look 
up insurer provider networks to avoid an out-of-network referral. It may have a positive economic impact on 
insurers if the practitioner notice requirement results in greater fidelity to in-network referrals.  
 
The bill’s non-preferred provider provision may have a negative impact on insurers for the administrative costs of 
including out-of-network patient expenditures in deductible and out-of-pocket maximums. To the extent the bill 
results in a greater patient utilization of non-preferred providers, it may have a negative impact on insurers related 
revenue/expenditure assumptions insurers might make with regard to preferred provider service utilization 
volume; or may have a positive impact if the non-preferred providers cost less for the insurers. 
 
 
RELEVANT INFORMATION 
SUBJECT OVERVIEW: 
Health Insurance Networks 
 
Health insurers contract with a limited number of providers to serve their enrollees, called a provider network. 
Insurers may encourage patients to use in-network providers by imposing higher cost-sharing, such as co-
payments, for out-of-network provider treatment, and may not apply any patient expenditure to the patient’s 
deductible
4 or out-of-pocket maximum
5. 
 
Preferred Providers 
 
A Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)
6 is a health plan that contracts with providers, such as hospitals and 
doctors, to create a network of providers who participate for an alternative or reduced rate of payment. Generally, 
the patient, or member, is only responsible for the policy co-payment, deductible, or co-insurance amounts if 
covered services are obtained from network providers.  
 
                                                            
2
 Multiple-employer welfare arrangements, or MEWAs, are employee benefit arrangements established to offer health 
insurance benefits to the employees of two or more employers. See, S. 624.437, F.S. 
3
 Under the insurance code, nonemergency services are services other than those for medical conditions that manifest by acute 
symptoms of sufficient severity such that that absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected to result 
in serious jeopardy to health of a pregnant woman or fetus, serious impairment of bodily functions, serious dysfunction of a 
bodily organ or part. See, ss. 627.62194, F.S., 641.74, F.S. 
4
 A deductible is the amount of money a patient must pay before an insurer begins paying for covered services, in a given plan 
year or other policy term. 
5
 An out-of-pocket maximum is a limit set on the amount a patient much pay for services covered by an insurance policy in a 
given plan year or other policy term. 
6
 See generally s. 627.6471, F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	3 
However, if a member chooses to obtain services from an out-of-network provider, those out-of-pocket costs likely 
will be higher. In addition, the terms of the policy may prohibit the patient from receiving credit for out-of-pocket 
(cash) expenditures for such services toward the patient’s out-of-pocket maximum or deductible obligations. In 
addition, because a non-participating provider does not have a contract with the insurer delineating the 
reimbursement rates, the provider may bill the patient for the difference between what the provider bills the 
insurer and what the insurer chooses to pay – called balance-billing. Current law requires insurers to include an 
express warning to enrollees in the policy, advising them of the possible financial consequences of using a non-
participating provider.  
 
Current law requires each health insurer that uses a preferred provider model to give the policy-holder a list of the 
participating providers and publish that list on its website.
7 
 
Health Care Price Finder 
 
Current law requires the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) to maintain a Florida Center for Health 
Care Information and Transparency to collect, analyze and disseminate health care information data and statistics 
(s. 408.05, F.S.). As part of its functions, the agency administers a website of health care paid-claims data to assist 
consumers identify the costs of care. The Florida Health Price Finder
8 website accesses national paid-claims data 
for at least 15 billion claim lines from multiple payers, and current law requires all authorized insurers in Florida 
to provide claims data to the AHCA vender managing the website. The site allows a consumer to search for prices 
health care providers were paid by insurers, expressed as a range of averages, for providers in the consumer’s 
geographic location. Prices are searchable by specific service or as a bundle of all the corollary services part of a 
major service. 
 
Health Price Finder includes data on most hospitals in Florida, although AHCA limits data on hospitals in some 
geographic areas with little competition or few payers to avoid the possibility that specific reimbursement 
amounts might be identified. The payment information available on the website is limited; for example, a patient 
cannot search by specific facility or provider, so it has limited usefulness for a patient searching for a provider 
based on cost or comparing providers based on cost. 
 
Health Care Practitioners 
 
Health care practitioners are regulated by the Department of Health (DOH) under ch. 456, F.S., and individual 
practice acts for each profession.  Many practitioners are regulated by profession-specific boards or councils of 
members of the profession appointed by the Governor and administered by DOH; some are regulated directly by 
DOH without a board or council. 
 
Chapter 456 and individual practice acts delineate standards of licensure and practice, and the boards, or 
department if there is no board, enforce violations of those standards under the Administrative Procedures Act. 
Boards and the department may issue a reprimand or letter of concern, assess fines, suspend or restrict licenses, or 
revoke licenses, among other penalties, based on the nature of the violation.
9 
 
Out-of-Network Referrals 
 
Health care practitioners may refer patients to other health care practitioners for the patient to obtain additional, 
possibly more specialized diagnosis or treatment. Sometimes, the referred practitioner does not participate in the 
patient’s insurer’s provider network, which may result in increased costs for the patient – or delays in care while 
the patient goes back to the referring provider for an alternative referral. However, this is common practice. For 
example, one survey of primary care providers (PCPs)
10 found:  
 
                                                            
7
 s. 627.6471, F.S. 
8
 Available at https://price.healthfinder.fl.gov/#.  
9
 See, s. 456.072, F.S. 
10
 Kyruus Health, 2018 Referral Trends Report, at https://kyruushealth.com/new-physician-referral-report-identifies-top-
barriers-to-patient-retention-and-care-coordination-within-health-system-networks/ (last visited March 15, 2025).  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	4 
 79% refer patients out-of-network. 
 34% of out-of-network referrals could be avoided if providers had more information on other providers’ 
specialties and areas of focus. 
 72% refer to the same provider for a specialty, rather than determining whether another provider has 
more specific expertise or earlier appointment time. 
 60% of PCPs did not always know whether their patient required re-referral. 
 
An analysis of PCP referrals in the Washington, D.C. area found significant out-of-network referral, as indicated by 
graphic below.
11 
 
 
 
That analysis, showed significant variation in referral patterns by PCPs, with some making non-participating 
providers 100% of their referrals; others referring out-of-network at much lower rates.  
 
Current law does not obligate practitioners to inform patients when referring them to other providers who are not 
in the patient’s insurance network, or the possible financial consequences of treatment by out-of-network 
providers. 
 
BILL HISTORY 
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE 
STAFF 
DIRECTOR/ 
POLICY CHIEF 
ANALYSIS 
PREPARED BY 
Health Care Facilities & Systems 
Subcommittee 
15 Y, 2 N 3/19/2025 Calamas Calamas 
Health & Human Services 
Committee 
  Calamas Calamas 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
                                                            
11
 CareJourney, Using Healthcare Analytics to Understand & Optimize Physician Referrals at the Point of Care (2021), at 
https://carejourney.com/healthcare-analytics-to-optimize-physician-referrals-at-point-of-care/ (last visited March 15, 2025).