Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1169 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/22/2025

                    STORAGE NAME: h1169e.SAC 
DATE: 4/22/2025 
 	1 
      
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
BILL ANALYSIS 
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. 
BILL #: CS/CS/CS/HB 1169 
TITLE: Water Management Districts 
SPONSOR(S): Conerly 
COMPANION BILL: CS/SB 7002 
LINKED BILLS: None 
RELATED BILLS: None 
Committee References 
 Natural Resources & Disasters 
16 Y, 0 N, As CS 

Ways & Means 
16 Y, 0 N, As CS 

State Affairs 
19 Y, 7 N, As CS 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Effect of the Bill: 
The bill revises various provisions related to water management district (WMD) planning, funding, budgeting, 
reporting, and business practices. Specifically, the bill: 
 Revises quorum and meeting requirements for WMD governing boards. 
 Prohibits WMD officials and employees from accepting an expenditure from a lobbyist. 
 Authorizes a WMD to levy ad valorem taxes for certain capital improvement projects via referendum. 
 Requires WMDs to give preference to bids that include certain financial assurances for certain contracts. 
 Requires WMDs to submit additional information on capital improvement projects in their preliminary and 
tentative budgets, and requires the South Florida WMD to include additional information related to the 
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan in its budgets. 
 Allows the Legislative Budget Commission to review certain projects in WMD budgets. 
 Requires the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration task force to identify sources of funding when making 
recommendations for the Integrated Delivery Schedule. 
 Repeals a section of law relating to management review teams for lands owned by a WMD.  
 
Fiscal or Economic Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate positive revenue impact on WMDs that raise their millage to fund capital 
improvement projects.   
 
  
JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 
ANALYSIS 
EFFECT OF THE BILL: 
Water Management District Operations 
 
Governing Board Meetings 
The bill requires a quorum for a water management district (WMD) governing board to conduct official business 
and specifies that a majority of the members of the governing board, including both appointed members and 
vacancies, constitutes a quorum. A board member’s appearance at a board meeting, whether it is in person or 
through the use of communications media technology, must be counted for the determination of a quorum. Except 
where otherwise provided by law, action may be taken by the governing board only upon affirmative vote of a 
majority of the members of the governing board. (Section 2)  
 
Contracts  
The bill requires a WMD that has requested bids for a contract for the design, engineering, or construction, or for 
any combination of the design, engineering, or construction, of capital improvement projects with an estimated 
cost of $20 million or more to give preference for a bid, proposal, or reply that meets certain requirements. 
Specifically, such preference must be given to the lowest responsible and responsive bid, proposal, or reply that 
includes proof of district-defined acceptable minimum work experience within the state, project-specific payment  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	2 
and performance bonds in amounts appropriate for the project contract amount, and a minimum warranty of two 
years beginning at substantial completion of the project or that provides proof of a comparable financial assurance 
mechanism, as defined by a WMD in rule.  
 
For the purpose of the competitive selection process in the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act or the 
procurement procedures applicable to public-private partnerships, the bill requires a WMD to consider whether a 
bid, proposal, or reply includes appropriate payment and performance bonds; proof of a comparable financial 
assurance mechanism, as defined by a WMD in rule; or documentation of any and all bond faults or bond claims 
within the last 10 years, including all open and closed claims and agreed-upon amounts with a description of the 
claim and any resolution. (Section 9) 
 
Lobbying 
The bill prohibits a lobbyist or principal from making, directly or indirectly, and a WMD governing board member, 
executive director, or any WMD employee who qualifies as a local officer
1 from knowingly accepting, directly or 
indirectly, any expenditure. (Section 1) 
 
The bill requires the Commission on Ethics to investigate a lobbyist or principal who has made a prohibited 
expenditure to a WMD. (Section 1) 
 
Water Management District Funding 
 
Millage 
The bill authorizes a WMD to, by resolution adopted by a majority vote of the governing board, levy ad valorem 
taxes within the WMD. (Section 5) 
 
The bill authorizes a WMD to, by referendum, levy separate ad valorem taxes on property within the WMD or basin 
for the purposes of the construction of capital improvement projects. The bill defines “capital improvement 
projects” to mean projects related to: 
 Water supply, including alternative water supply and water resource development projects identified in 
the WMD’s regional water supply plans; 
 Water quality; 
 Flood protection and floodplain management; and  
 Natural systems. (Section 5) 
 
A WMD that chooses to levy separate ad valorem taxes for this purpose must adopt a resolution to be approved by 
a majority vote of the electors in the WMD or basin, as applicable, voting in a referendum held at a general election. 
The bill requires the resolution to include the following: 
 The millage to be levied; 
 A detailed description of the capital improvement projects to be funded; 
 Such projects’ expected dates of completion; and 
 The maximum duration of the levy, which may not extend beyond the date the projects are expected to be 
complete. (Section 5) 
 
The referendum question on the ballot must provide a brief and general description for the purpose of the levy, 
and specify the maximum length of time the millage may be imposed. (Section 5) 
 
Any millage raised for capital improvement projects, when combined with the ad valorem millage raised for 
properties within the WMD, cannot exceed the maximum total millage rate established for a WMD in statute.
2 A 
resolution must take effect on the January 1 immediately succeeding approval. (Section 5) 
                                                            
1
 “Local officer” means every person elected to office in any political subdivision of the state, and every person appointed to fill 
a vacancy and any person appointed to certain boards, councils, commissions, authorities, or other bodies of any county, 
municipality, school district, independent special district, or other political subdivision of the state. Section 112.3145(1)(a), 
F.S. 
2
 See s. 373.503(3)(b), F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	3 
 
The bill specifies that the statutory limits that apply to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) 
regarding the percent of the millage that may be assessed for district purposes (60 percent) and basin purposes 
(40 percent) do not apply to the millage raised for capital improvement programs pursuant to the referendum 
process outlined above. (Section 5) 
 
Preliminary Budgets 
The bill requires a WMD to include a section in its preliminary budget that includes the WMD’s capital 
improvement plan for the current fiscal year and the next fiscal year, which will be incorporated as part of the 
WMD’s five-year capital improvement plan. The bill requires the following information to be included for each 
project contained in the capital improvement plan: 
 Estimated beginning and end dates. 
 Current status, such as planning, construction, or operations. 
 Funding distribution, broken down by federal, state, local, or other. 
 Total cost of the project. 
 Whether the project is funded from reserves. 
 Total expenditures made to date, by fiscal year. 
 Current year estimated expenditures. 
 Annual budget, including future budget requests, until project completion, by funding source.  
 Project description.  
 State program code, such as operations and maintenance or ecosystem restoration. (Section 6) 
 
In addition to the above information, the bill requires the SFWMD to include a separate section in its preliminary 
budget for all projects within the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). The information for the 
separate section must be provided on a project-by-project basis and include the source of funds. For each project, 
the bill requires all of the following information to be included: 
 The project title and a brief description.  
 The total estimated cost, broken down by federal and nonfederal sponsor obligations. The local sponsor 
obligations must be further broken down by state and WMD obligations.  
 The timeline for the project.  
 The total expenditures to date and estimate of remaining expenditures needed for project completion.  
 The estimate of expenditures for the current year.  
 The estimate of expenditures for the next fiscal year. (Section 6) 
 
The bill requires the SFWMD to indicate which fiscal year the appropriation is from for expenditures funded by 
state appropriations. When estimating expenditures for the next fiscal year, the SFWMD may only incorporate 
state revenues in an amount up to the amount of funds specifically provided for in the Land Acquisition Trust Fund, 
unless the SFWMD commits its own revenues on a dollar-for-dollar basis for any amount over such amount 
specifically provided. (Section 6) 
 
Tentative Budgets 
The bill authorizes the Legislative Budget Commission (LBC) to reject certain WMD budget proposals unless they 
were specifically appropriated by the Legislature. In addition to the projects LBC can currently reject, the bill 
authorizes the LBC to reject any individual portion of a WMD’s tentative budget funded with state appropriations, 
and any individual project within the WMD’s five-year capital improvement plan. (Section 7) 
 
The bill requires a WMD’s capital improvement plan for the current fiscal year and next fiscal year to be included in 
the tentative budget in the same format as required in the preliminary budget. (Section 7) 
 
The SFWMD is required to specify the amount of state revenues appropriated for costs associated with the 
Everglades Construction Project and the CERP in the separate document it prepares as part of its tentative budget. 
(Section 7) 
  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	4 
Local Match 
The bill prohibits a WMD from using state funds as a local match for any state grant program unless those funds 
have been specifically appropriated to the WMD for that purpose. (Section 4) 
 
Everglades Restoration 
The bill requires the SFWMD to include in its annual progress report on the comprehensive plan for the Central 
and Southern Florida Project Comprehensive Review Study the total estimated remaining cost to implement the 
comprehensive plan. The report must include applicable performance indicators for all project components. The 
bill requires the project components to be subdivided into the following categories based on the project’s status:  
 A planning and design phase.  
 A construction phase, which must include performance indicators including, but not limited to, whether the 
project is on time and on budget based on a schedule performance index. 
 An operational phase, which must include performance indicators including, but not limited to, whether the 
project is operating in accordance with the draft operating manual included in the project implementation 
report, and an explanation of any significant modification to the final project operating manual.  
 A pending project phase, which includes project components that have not yet entered the planning or 
design phase. (Section 3) 
 
The bill specifies that the Integrated Delivery Schedule (IDS) is a forward-looking snapshot of upcoming planning, 
design, and construction schedules for the comprehensive plan as a tool that provides information to 
decisionmakers and facilitates the achievement of the goals and purposes of the comprehensive plan at the earliest 
possible time to the extent practical given funding, engineering, and other contractual constraints. Additionally, the 
bill specifies that the IDS acts as a planning document and does not represent a budgetary or financial commitment 
on behalf of any of the members of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force. As such, the bill requires 
the state and local members of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task force to identify project funding 
sources to reflect whether the project will be funded using recurring or nonrecurring state funds when making 
recommendations for any update to the IDS. (Section 3) 
 
Land Management 
The bill repeals a section of law that requires WMDs to establish management review teams. (Section 8) 
 
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:  
STATE GOVERNMENT:  
The bill may have an indeterminate positive revenue impact on WMDs that raise their millage to fund capital 
improvement projects.   
 
RELEVANT INFORMATION 
SUBJECT OVERVIEW: 
Water Management Districts 
Florida’s water management districts (WMDs) are responsible for administering water resources at a regional 
level.
3 The state is divided into five WMDs, including the Northwest WMD, the Suwannee River WMD, the St. Johns 
River WMD, the Southwest Florida WMD, and the South Florida WMD (SFWMD).
4 The Department of 
Environmental Protection (DEP) exercises general supervisory authority over the WMDs through a cooperative 
working relationship and guidance memos.
5 The core focus of WMDs is on water supply, water quality, flood 
protection and floodplain management, and natural systems.
6  
 
                                                            
3
 DEP, Water Management Districts, https://floridadep.gov/owper/water-policy/content/water-management-districts (last 
visited Mar. 11, 2025); Section 373.069, F.S. 
4
 DEP, Water Management Districts, https://floridadep.gov/owper/water-policy/content/water-management-districts (last 
visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
5
 Id. 
6
 Id.; Water supply includes alternative water supply and the water resource development projects identified in a district’s 
regional water supply plans. Section 373.535(1)(a)2., F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	5 
Governing Boards 
Each WMD is directed by a governing board.
7 Each board includes nine members who reside in the WMD, except 
the Southwest Florida WMD board, which includes 13 members who reside in the WMD.
8 The Governor is tasked 
with appointing board members, subject to Senate confirmation.
9 Vacancies in governing boards prior to the 
expiration of the affected term must be filled for that term.
10 A governing board is required to meet at least once a 
month and upon the call of the chair.
11 The governing boards may conduct meetings by means of communications 
media technology.
12 
 
Currently, the governing board for only one district – the St. Johns River WMD – has no vacancies.
13 The Northwest 
Florida, Suwannee River, and South Florida WMDs have eight out of nine possible members.
14 The Southwest WMD 
has 12 out of 13 possible members.
15 
 
Lobbying  
Prior to lobbying before a WMD, a lobbyist
16 must register with the WMD he or she intends to lobby.
17 To register, 
a lobbyist must provide a statement signed by the principal
18 or principal’s representative stating that the lobbyist 
is authorized to represent the principal. The principal must also identify its main business on the authorization 
statement.
19 The registration form requires each lobbyist to disclose certain information.
20 
 
The Commission on Ethics
21 is required to investigate a lobbyist or principal if it receives any allegation that the 
lobbyist or principal has failed to register with a WMD or has knowingly submitted false information in a report or 
registration.
22 The Commission on Ethics must provide the Governor with a report of its findings and 
recommendations from an investigation into a lobbyist or principal.
23 The governor may enforce the Commission 
on Ethics findings and recommendations.
24  
 
                                                            
7
 Section 373.073, F.S. 
8
 Section 373.073(1)(a), F.S. 
9
 Id.  
10
 Section 373.076, F.S. 
11
 Section 373.079(7), F.S. There is no statutory language defining a quorum for district governing board purposes. See section 
373.079, F.S. 
12
 Section 373.079(7), F.S. “Communications media technology” means the electronic transmission of printed matter, audio, 
full-motion video, freeze-frame video, compressed video, and digital video by any method available.” Section 120.54(5)(b)2., 
F.S. 
13
 St. Johns River WMD, Governing Board, https://www.sjrwmd.com/governingboard/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
14
 Northwest Florida WMD, Governing Board, https://nwfwater.com/about/governing-board/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025); 
Suwannee River WMD, Current Governing Board Members, https://www.mysuwanneeriver.com/134/Current-Board-Members 
(last visited Mar. 11, 2025); South Florida WMD, Governing Board, https://www.sfwmd.gov/who-we-are/governing-board 
(last visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
15
 Southwest Florida WMD, Governing Board, https://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/about/about-the-district/governing-board (last 
visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
16
 “Lobbyist” means a person who is employed and receives payment for lobbying, or a person who is principally employed for 
governmental affairs by another person or governmental entity to lobby on behalf of that other person or governmental entity. 
Section 112.3215(1)(h), F.S. 
17
 Section 112.3261(2), F.S. 
18
 “Principal” means the person, firm, corporation, or other entity that employs or retains a lobbyist. Section 112.3215(1)(i), 
F.S. 
19
 Section 112.3261(2), F.S. 
20
 Section 112.3261(2)(a)-(d), F.S. 
21
 The Commission on Ethics was created in statute to serve as guardian of the standards of conduct for the officers and 
employees of the state, and of a county, city, or other political subdivision of the state. Section 112.320, F.S. 
22
 Section 112.3261(7), F.S. 
23
 Id. 
24
 Id.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	6 
Contracts  
WMDs are authorized to purchase commodities and contractual services that have been procured pursuant to 
competitive bid, request for proposal, request for qualification, competitive selection, or competitive negotiation.
25 
This authorization does not extend to the purchase of commodities and contractual services that require an agency 
to publicly announce each occasion when professional services are needed, as required by the Consultants’ 
Competitive Negotiation Act
26 (CCNA)
27   
 
Professional services are defined in the CCNA to include services within the scope of the practice of architecture, 
professional engineering, landscape architecture, or registered surveying and mapping.
28 The CCNA requires a 
WMD to publicly announce when such professional services must be purchased for projects that meet certain 
threshold amounts.
29 For each proposed project, the WMD must select, in order of preference, at least three firms 
that are the most highly qualified to perform the required services.
30 To do this, the WMD must consider factors 
including, but not limited to, the ability level of the professional personnel, whether a firm is a certified minority 
business enterprise, past performance, and willingness to meet time and budget requirements.
31 
 
Preliminary Budgets 
The WMD fiscal year begins on October 1 and ends on September 30 of the following year.
32 On January 15 of each 
year, WMDs must submit a preliminary budget for the next fiscal year for legislative review.
33 Each preliminary 
budget must include the following information: 
 A section clearly identifying and justifying each proposed expenditure relating to salaries and benefits, 
expenses, operating capital outlay, the number of authorized positions, and other personal services for 
public outreach activities, lobbying, management, and administration. It must also identify the source of 
funds for each proposed expenditure. 
 A section identifying the justification for proposed expenditures by the core mission area of responsibility 
and the source of funds needed for activities related to water supply, water quality, flood protection and 
floodplain management, and natural systems. 
 A section reviewing the adopted and proposed budget allocations by program area and the performance 
metrics of the prior year. 
 An analysis based on the core mission areas of responsibility of each preliminary budget to determine the 
adequacy of fiscal resources available to the WMD and the adequacy of proposed WMD expenditures 
relating to its core mission areas.
34 
 
If applicable, the preliminary budget must specify that a WMD’s first obligation for payment is the debt service on 
bonds and certificates of participation.
35  
 
The Legislature may review each preliminary budget by March 1 and submit comments to the WMDs.
36 Any WMD 
that receives comments must respond in writing to the Legislature and the Governor by March 15.
37 Following the 
                                                            
25
 Section 373.6075, F.S. WMDs may purchase commodities and contractual services from the purchasing contracts of special 
districts, municipalities, counties, other political subdivisions, educational institutions, other states, nonprofit entities, 
purchasing cooperatives, or the federal government. Id.  
26
 Section 287.055, F.S. 
27
 Id.  
28
 Section 287.055(2)(a), F.S. 
29
 Section 287.055(3)(a)1., F.S. Threshold amounts for purchasing categories are as follows: Category 1 is $20,000, Category 2 
is $35,000, Category 3 is $65,000, Category 4 is $195,000, and Category 5 is $325,000. Section 287.017, F.S. 
30
 Section 287.055(4)(b), F.S. 
31
 Id.  
32
 Section 373.536(1), F.S. 
33
 Section 373.535(1)(a), F.S. The preliminary budget must be submitted to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives, and the chairs of each legislative committee and subcommittee having substantive or fiscal 
jurisdiction over WMDS, as applicable. Id.  
34
 Section 373.535(1)(a), F.S.  
35
 Section 373.535(1)(b), F.S. 
36
 Section 373.535(2)(a), (b), F.S. 
37
 Section 373.535(2)(b), F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	7 
review of the preliminary budget, if the Legislature takes no action
38 by July 1, a WMD may proceed with the 
budget process.
39 
 
Tentative Budgets 
By July 15 each year, the budget officer of each WMD must develop a tentative budget and submit it for review and 
adoption by the governing board.
40 By August 1, the tentative budget must also be submitted for review to the 
Legislature, the Governor, the chairs of all legislative committees and subcommittees that have substantive or fiscal 
jurisdiction over WMDs, the Secretary of DEP, and the governing body of each county over which the WMD has 
jurisdiction or from which it derives any funds for WMD operations.
41 The tentative budget must be based on the 
preliminary budget.
42  
 
The tentative budget must include, at a minimum, the following information for the preceding fiscal year and the 
current fiscal year, and the proposed amounts for the upcoming fiscal year: 
 The estimated amount of funds remaining at the beginning of the fiscal year that have been obligated for 
the payment of outstanding commitments that are not completed. 
 The estimated amount of unobligated funds or net cash balance on hand at the beginning of the fiscal year, 
as well as an accounting of the source, balance, and projected future use of the unobligated funds and the 
estimated amount of funds that the WMD will raise through taxes or receive from other sources to meet the 
requirements of the WMD. 
 The millage rates and the percentage increase above the rolled-back rate, an explanation of the necessity of 
the increase, and the percentage increase in taxable value from new construction in the WMD. 
 The salaries and benefits, expenses, operating capital outlay, number of authorized positions, other 
personal services, and estimated amounts in the WMD budget for certain enumerated program areas. 
 The total estimated amount in the WMD budget for each program area and for water resource, water 
supply, and alternative water supply development projects identified in the WMD’s regional water supply 
plan. 
 A description of each new, expanded, reduced, or eliminated program. 
 The funding sources, including, but not limited to, ad valorem taxes, Surface Water Improvement and 
Management Program funds, other state funds, federal funds, and user and permit fees for each program 
area.
43 
 
In addition to other program areas, the SFWMD must also include separate sections on costs associated with the 
Everglades Construction Project and the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP).
44  
 
By September 5, the chairs of each legislative committee and subcommittee may submit comments and objections 
to the WMDs.
45 Each WMD’s governing board must include its response in the record of the meeting where the 
final budget is adopted.
46 The record must be transmitted to the Governor, the chairs of the legislative 
appropriations committees, and DEP. Then, by December 15, the Executive Office of the Governor must file with 
the Legislature a report that summarizes its review of the tentative budget.
47 The Executive Office of the Governor 
may approve or disapprove all or part of the budget of each WMD.
48  
 
                                                            
38
 The Legislature is required to annually review districts’ preliminary budgets to ensure that taxes authorized by chapter 373, 
F.S., continue to be in proportion to the benefits derived by the parcels of real estate within the districts. Based on the review, 
the Legislature can set the authorized maximum millage rate or the maximum amount of property tax revenue to be raised by 
each district in the next fiscal year from the taxes levied. Section 373.503(4), F.S. 
39
 Section 373.535(2)(c), F.S. 
40
 Section 373.536(2), F.S. 
41
 Id. 
42
 Section 373.536(5)(e), F.S. 
43
 Section 373.536(5)(e), F.S.  
44
 Id.  
45
 Section 373.536(5)(f), F.S. 
46
 Id.  
47
 Section 373.536(5)(g), F.S. 
48
 Section 373.536(5)(a), F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	8 
The Legislative Budget Commission
49 may also reject the following WMD budget proposals: 
 A single purchase of land over $10 million, except for land exchanges. 
 Any cumulative purchase of land during a single fiscal year over $50 million. 
 Any issuance of debt on or after July 1, 2012. 
 Program expenditures relating to salaries and benefits, expenses, operating capital outlay, number of 
authorized positions, and other personal services for public outreach activities, lobbying, management, and 
administration
50 in excess of 15 percent of a WMD’s total annual budget. 
 Any individual variances in the tentative budget over 25 percent from the preliminary budget.
51 
 
Written disapproval of any provision in the tentative budget must be received by the WMD at least five business 
days before the final WMD budget adoption hearing.
52  
 
After the final budget adoption hearing, each WMD must submit copies of the following documents to the 
Governor, the Legislature, the chairs of all legislative committees and subcommittees with substantive or fiscal 
jurisdiction over the districts, the Secretary of DEP, and the governing board of each county over which the WMD 
has jurisdiction or from which it derives any funds for the operation of the WMD: 
 The adopted budget; 
 A financial audit of the district’s accounts and records; 
 A five-year capital improvement plan, which will be included in the consolidated annual report
53 and which 
must include expected sources of revenue for planned improvement; and 
 A five-year water resource development work program.
54  
 
Ad Valorem Taxes 
The ad valorem tax is an annual tax levied by counties, municipalities, school districts, and some special districts 
based on the value of real and tangible personal property as of January 1 of each year.
55 The Florida Constitution 
reserves ad valorem taxation to local governments and prohibits the state from levying ad valorem taxes on real 
and tangible personal property.
56  
 
The Florida Constitution requires that all property be assessed at just value for ad valorem tax purposes,
57 and it 
provides for specified assessment limitations, property classifications, and exemptions.
58 After the property 
appraiser considers any assessment limitation or use classification affecting the just value of a property, an 
assessed value is produced. The assessed value is then reduced by any exemptions to produce the taxable value.
59 
Each year, local governing boards levy millage rates (i.e., tax rates) on taxable value to generate the property tax 
revenue contemplated in their annual budgets. 
 
Millage 
                                                            
49
 The Legislative Budget Commission is a constitutionally created body consisting of seven members of the Senate, appointed 
by the President of the Senate, and seven members of the House of Representatives, appointed by the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives. Art. III, s. 19 Fla. Const.; Section 11.90(1), F.S.  
50
 These expenditures are listed in s. 373.536(5)(e)4.e. and f., F.S. 
51
 Section 373.536(5)(c), F.S. 
52
 Section 373.536(5), F.S. 
53
 The consolidated annual report is required under the Florida Water Plan in s. 373.036(7), F.S. 
54
 Section 373.536(6)(a), F.S. 
55
 S. 192.001(12), F.S., defines “real property” as land, buildings, fixtures, and all other improvements to land. The terms “land,” 
“real estate,” “realty,” and “real property” may be used interchangeably. S. 192.001(11)(d), F.S., defines “tangible personal 
property” as all goods, chattels, and other articles of value (but does not include the vehicular items enumerated in Art. VII, s. 
1(b), Fla. Const., and elsewhere defined) capable of manual possession and whose chief value is intrinsic to the article itself. 
56
 Art. VII, s. 1(a), Fla. Const. 
57
 Art. VII, s. 4, Fla. Const. 
58
 Art. VII, ss. 3, 4, and 6, Fla. Const. 
59
 Section 196.031, F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	9 
The Florida Constitution sets maximum millage rates for water management purposes.
60 The constitutional 
maximum millage rate is 0.05 mill for the northwest portion of the state and 1.0 mill for the rest of the state.
61 This 
millage may only be levied by the WMDs.
62  
 
WMDs, if appropriate, separate the taxes they levy into a millage necessary for the purposes of the WMD and a 
millage necessary for financing basin functions.
63 Notwithstanding any other law, and subject to annual legislative 
review in the preliminary budgets of each WMD, the maximum total millage rates for WMD and basin purposes are 
as follows: 
 Northwest Florida WMD: 0.05 mill. 
 Suwannee River WMD: 0.75 mill. 
 St. Johns River WMD: 0.60 mill. 
 Southwest Florida WMD: 1.0 mill.
64 In the Southwest Florida WMD, the maximum millage assessed for 
WMD purposes may not exceed 50 percent of the total authorized millage if there are one or more basins in 
the WMD, and the maximum millage assessed for basin purposes may not exceed 50 percent of the total 
authorized millage.
65 
 SFWMD: 0.80 mill.
66 The apportionment of taxes raised by the SFWMD is a maximum of 40 percent for 
WMD purposes and a maximum of 60 percent for basin purposes.
67  
 
Land Management 
WMDs may acquire land in fee simple for various purposes, including conservation
68 and water management 
activities.
69 These lands can be managed by the WMD or a land manager. To determine whether conservation, 
preservation, and recreation lands titled in the names of WMDs are being managed for the purposes for which they 
were acquired, and in accordance with land management objectives, WMDs must establish land management 
review teams.
70 The purpose of the teams is to conduct periodic management reviews of such lands. The review 
teams must consist of individuals from the local community, WMD, private sector, and various state agencies.
71  
 
When conducting these reviews, the management review team must consider the extent to which the existing 
management plan provides sufficient protection to threatened or endangered species, unique or important natural 
or physical features, geological or hydrological functions, or archaeological features.
72 If the land management 
review team finds that the lands subject to review are not being managed in accordance with their management 
plan, the land managing agency must provide a written explanation to the management review team.
73 By October 
1 of each year, each WMD must provide a report to its governing board that indicates which properties have been 
reviewed and the review team’s findings.
74 
 
South Florida Water Management District 
The SFWMD was created in 1949 and is the oldest and largest of Florida’s WMDs.
75 The SFWMD covers 16 counties 
and stretches from Orlando at its northernmost point to the Florida Keys at its southernmost point. It is 
                                                            
60
 Article VII, s. 9(b), Fla. Const.    
61
 Id.  
62
 Section 373.503(2)(a), F.S. 
63
 Section 373.503(3), F.S. Basin functions include: preparing engineering plans for water resources development and holding 
related public hearings, developing and preparing the overall basin plan for secondary water control facilities, budgeting, 
considering and approval of final construction plans for works that will be constructed within the basin, managing basin 
affairs, and planning for and providing water supply and transmission facilities for water supply. Section 373.0695(1), F.S. 
64
 Section 373.503(3)(a), F.S. 
65
 Section 373.503(3)(c), F.S. 
66
 Section 373.503(3)(a), F.S. 
67
 Section 373.503(3)(b), F.S. 
68
 Sections 259.105 and 373.199, F.S.  
69
 Section 373.036(2)(e), F.S. 
70
 Section 373.591(1), F.S. 
71
 Id. 
72
 Sections 373.591(2) and 259.036(3), F.S. 
73
 Section 373.591(4), F.S. 
74
 Section 373.591(5), F.S.  
75
 SFWMD, Who We Are, https://www.sfwmd.gov/who-we-are (last visited Mar. 11, 2025).   JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	10 
responsible for managing the water resources for 9 million residents by balancing and improving flood control, 
water supply, water quality, and natural systems.
76  
 
Pursuant to its mission, the SFWMD manages the Central and Southern Florida (C&SF) Project.
77 The C&SF Project 
was authorized in 1948 to provide flood control, water supply, saltwater intrusion prevention, fish and wildlife 
preservation, recreation, and navigation in Central and South Florida.
78 The C&SF Project includes over 2,100 miles 
of canals and levees, 918 water control structures, and 89 pump stations.
79 Much of this infrastructure is over 60 
years old and the SFWMD has determined that it will need repair or replacement to address the risk of more 
frequent and significant flooding.
80 
 
Everglades Restoration 
At one time, the Everglades system covered well over 7 million acres of South Florida.
81 Water flowed 
uninterrupted from the Kissimmee River to Lake Okeechobee through the “River of Grass” that was the Everglades 
and then on to the Biscayne Bay estuaries, the Ten Thousand Islands, and Florida Bay.
82 By the early 1900s, land in 
the Everglades was being drained to make room for agriculture and development, with little concern for the 
increasingly damaged ecosystem.
83  
 
Early conservationists, scientists, and other advocates, however, were concerned about environmental degradation 
and with their support, the Everglades National Park was created in 1947.
84 The following year, Congress 
authorized the C&SF Project.
85 It addressed flood control, regional water supply, prevention of saltwater intrusion, 
water supply to Everglades National Park, wildlife preservation, recreation, and navigation.
86 The C&SF Project 
initially focused on the construction of levees and canals, water control structures, pump stations, and other 
projects.
87 
 
In spite of its stated purpose, the construction and operation of the C&SF Project had unintended adverse effects on 
the Everglades system.
88 Some of these included extreme fluctuations in the water levels of Lake Okeechobee, 
extreme fluctuations in the salinity levels of the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie estuaries caused by major changes in 
freshwater discharges, detrimental changes in hydrologic conditions in freshwater wetland habitats, and 
fluctuations in the salinity levels of Florida and Biscayne Bays caused by unsuitable freshwater flows. Wading bird 
populations are indicative of ecosystem health and by 1999, those populations had decreased by 85 to 90 percent 
                                                            
76
 Id.  
77
 SFWMD, 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on Flood Resiliency, 2 (Oct. 2024), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Flood_Resiliency_SFWMD_2024_Consolidated_Annual_Report.pdf. 
(last visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
78
 SFWMD and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study Final Integrated 
Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, i, 1-1 (April 1999), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/CENTRAL_AND_SOUTHERN_FLORIDA_PROJECT_COMPREHENSIVE_
REVIEW_STUDY.pdf. 
79
 SFWMD, 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on Flood Resiliency, 2 (Oct. 2024), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Flood_Resiliency_SFWMD_2024_Consolidated_Annual_Report.pdf. 
(last visited Mar. 11, 2025).  
80
 Id.  
81
 SFWMD, Everglades, https://www.sfwmd.gov/our-work/everglades (last visited Feb. 14, 2025). 
82
 Id.; National Park Service, Everglades, https://www.nps.gov/ever/learn/historyculture/index.htm (last visited Mar. 11, 
2025).  
83
 Id.  
84
 Id.  
85
 The Flood Control Act of 1948. Pub. L. No. 858, s. 203, 62 Stat. 1176. 
86
 SFWMD and USACE, C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic 
Environmental Impact Statement, i, 1-1 (April 1999), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/CENTRAL_AND_SOUTHERN_FLORIDA_PROJECT_COMPREHENSIVE_
REVIEW_STUDY.pdf. 
87
 Id.; SFWMD, 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on Flood Resiliency, 2 (Oct. 2024), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Flood_Resiliency_SFWMD_2024_Consolidated_Annual_Report.pdf. 
(last visited Mar. 11, 2025).  
88
 Id. at iii.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	11 
and were steadily declining.
89 Further, the C&SF Project created water supply shortages in Central and South 
Florida during dry periods because the canals drained water off the land too quickly without allowing for storage.
90 
 
In 1994, in response to litigation over water quality issues in the Everglades, the state adopted the Everglades 
Forever Act.
91 The state also began to implement the Everglades Construction Project, which focused on the 
construction of stormwater treatment areas and the implementation of best management practices to improve 
water quality flowing south.
92 
 
The federal government was increasingly concerned about the environmental consequences of the C&SF Project 
and in 1992 and 1996, Congress authorized the Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy).
93 The Restudy 
reexamined the C&SF Project to evaluate modifications that would help restore the Everglades ecosystem. 
Following the reexamination of the C&SF Project, the Restudy recommended a comprehensive plan that included 
structural and operational changes to the project in 1999.
94 
 
In response to the Restudy, Congress authorized the CERP in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000.
95 The 
CERP is a framework for modifications and operational changes to the C&SF Project that are necessary to restore, 
preserve, and protect the South Florida ecosystem, while providing for other water-related needs of the region, 
including water supply and flood protection.
96 The CERP contains over 68 individual components comprising more 
than 50 projects,
97 and the CERP covers around 18,000 square miles, including all or part of 18 counties in central 
and southern Florida.
98  
 
The federal legislation provides the framework for the CERP as a 50/50 cost-share program between the state and 
federal government.
99 The Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the federal sponsor for the partnership and the 
SFWMD is the lead non-federal sponsor.
100 The agencies track the cost-sharing based on their total respective 
spending on the CERP initiatives. In 2009, USACE and the SFWMD executed a Master Agreement, an umbrella 
agreement for CERP projects that established conditions for cost-sharing and for project partnership 
agreements.
101 Project partnership agreements establish project-specific responsibilities for the implementing 
agencies and provide project-specific credit to the SFWMD for its land acquisition and project construction efforts 
                                                            
89
 Id.  
90
 Id.  
91
 Ch. 1994-115, s. 1, L.O.F.; DEP, Everglades Forever Act, https://floridadep.gov/owper/eco-restoration/content/everglades-
forever-act-efa (last visited Mar. 11, 2025); Keith W. Rizzardi, Alligators and Litigators: A Recent History of Everglades 
Regulation and Litigation, The Florida Bar, vol. 75, no. 3, 18 (March 2001), https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-
journal/alligators-and-litigators-a-recent-history-of-everglades-regulation-and-litigation/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
92
 Section 373.4592(4)(a), F.S.  
93
 SFWMD and USACE, C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic 
Environmental Impact Statement, i, 1-3 (April 1999), available at 
https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/CENTRAL_AND_SOUTHERN_FLORIDA_PROJECT_COMPREHEN SIVE_
REVIEW_STUDY.pdf. 
94
 Id. at vii. 
95
 Water Resources Development Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-541, s. 601, 114 Stat. 2680 (2000); USACE, Central & Southern 
Florida (C&SF) Project, https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/About/Congressional-Fact-Sheets-2024/C-SF-Project-C/ (last visited 
Mar. 11, 2025).  
96
 National Park Service, Everglades: Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), 
https://www.nps.gov/ever/learn/nature/cerp.htm (last visited Mar. 11, 2025). 
97
 USACE, Central & Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/About/Congressional-Fact-Sheets-
2024/C-SF-Project-C/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025).  
98
 Id.  
99
 Water Resources Development Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-541, s. 601(e), 114 Stat. 2684 (2000). 
100
 USACE, Central & Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/About/Congressional-Fact-Sheets-
2024/C-SF-Project-C/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025).  
101
 See USACE, South Florida Ecosystem Restoration (SFER) Overview (C), 
https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/About/Congressional-Fact-Sheets-2024/South-Florida-Ecosystem-Restoration-SFER-
Overview-C-/ (last visited Mar. 11, 2025).  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	12 
completed prior to the agreement.
102 At the time of the agreement, the state and the SFWMD had invested 
approximately $2.4 billion for the CERP, including approximately $300 million for construction.
103 
 
South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force 
Congress established the intergovernmental South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force (task force) in 
1996.
104 The task force brings together federal, state, Tribal, and local agencies involved in Everglades 
restoration.
105 There are 15 members of the task force, including seven federal, two Tribal, and six state and local 
government representatives at the senior leadership level.
106 The task force’s role is to coordinate the 
conservation, restoration, and research efforts for the Everglades ecosystem.
107 To coordinate restoration projects, 
the task force compiles the Integrated Delivery Schedule.
108  
 
The Integrated Delivery Schedule lists Everglades restoration projects to reflect upcoming design and program 
schedules and programmatic costs.
109 The Integrated Delivery Schedule does not include the funding needed for 
completed work or land acquisition,
110 does not require agency action, and is not a decision document.
111 The 
Integrated Delivery Schedule serves the purpose of the Master Implementation Sequencing Plan described in the 
original CERP.
112 The CERP requires USACE and the SFWMD, in consultation with other federal, state, Tribal, and 
local agencies, to develop the Master Implementation Sequencing Plan, which provides sequencing and scheduling 
for the implementation of all included projects based on the best scientific, technical, funding, contracting, and 
other information available. USACE and the SFWMD must also consult with the task force in preparing the Master 
Implementation Sequencing Plan.
113 
 
State Funding for Everglades Restoration Projects 
Everglades restoration projects receive funding from the state through general appropriations and through the 
Land Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) within DEP.
114 The LATF is designated in the Florida Constitution to receive 
certain documentary stamp tax revenues.
115 For Fiscal Year 2023-2024, $1.1 billion was deposited into the LATF 
                                                            
102
 Id. 
103
 See SFWMD, News Release: Momentum for Everglades Restoration Continues with Historic State-Federal Agreements (Aug. 13, 
2009), available at https://www.sfwmd.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nr_2009_0813_master_agreement.pdf. (last 
visited Mar. 11, 2025).  
104
 Office of Everglades Restoration Initiatives, The South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force: About Us, 
https://www.evergladesrestoration.gov/overview (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
105
 Task Force, 2022 Biennial Report, i (Dec. 2022), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/63a493a62905c4171d028c83/1671730088082/Dec
ember+2022+Final+Biennial+Report.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
106
 Department of the Interior, South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Charter, 2-3 (Sept. 2023), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/651d6ab2891e7229053fdde4/1696426676989/Cha
rter.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
107
 Task Force, 2022 Biennial Report, i (Dec. 2022), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/63a493a62905c4171d028c83/1671730088082/Dec
ember+2022+Final+Biennial+Report.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
108
 Id. at 2.  
109
 Id.; Task Force, Integrated Delivery Schedule 2024 Update, 1 (2024), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/6759afacafb52e728f61dd9d/1733930924242/IDS_2
024.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
110
 USACE, Integrated Delivery Schedule, https://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Missions/Environmental/Ecosystem-
Restoration/Integrated-Delivery-Schedule/ (last visited Mar. 12, 2025).  
111
 Id.; Task Force, Integrated Delivery Schedule 2024 Update, 1 (2024), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/6759afacafb52e728f61dd9d/1733930924242/IDS_2
024.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
112
 Task Force, Integrated Delivery Schedule 2024 Update, 1 (2024), available at 
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5179e7e42ca1000117872f/t/6759afacafb52e728f61dd9d/1733930924242/IDS_2
024.pdf (last visited Mar. 12, 2025). 
113
 33 CFR §385.30 (2025).  
114
 Section 375.041, F.S. 
115
 Section 375.041(1), F.S.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	13 
from documentary stamp tax revenues.
116 Funds distributed into the LATF must be applied first to pay debt service 
or to fund debt service reserve funds, rebate obligations, or other amounts payable with respect to Florida Forever 
bonds.
117 Of the funds remaining, but before funds may be appropriated, pledged, or dedicated for other uses, a 
minimum of the lesser of 25 percent of the funds remaining after the payment of debt service or $200 million must 
be appropriated annually for Everglades projects that implement the CERP, the Long-Term Plan, or the Northern 
Everglades and Estuaries Protection Program, with priority given to Everglades restoration projects that reduce 
harmful discharges of water from Lake Okeechobee to the St. Lucie or Caloosahatchee estuaries in a timely 
manner.
118 
 
BILL HISTORY 
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE 
STAFF 
DIRECTOR/ 
POLICY CHIEF 
ANALYSIS 
PREPARED BY 
Natural Resources & Disasters 
Subcommittee 
16 Y, 0 N, As CS 4/1/2025 Moore Gawin 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Revised the estimated cost threshold for capital improvement projects 
for which a WMD must give preference to certain bids from $1 million 
to $20 million; 
 Revised the conditions under which a WMD must give a preference to 
certain bids; 
 Required the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force to 
specify if funds are recurring or nonrecurring state funds when making 
project recommendations for the IDS.  
 Removed the changes made to the Statewide Flooding and Sea Level 
Rise Resilience Plan and the Resilient Florida Trust Fund; and  
 Removed the appropriations from the bill. 
Ways & Means Committee 16 Y, 0 N, As CS 4/9/2025 Aldridge Berg 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Specified the resolution and referendum requirements related to the 
levy of ad valorem taxes. 
State Affairs Committee 19 Y, 7 N, As CS 4/22/2025 Williamson Gawin 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Repealed a section of law relating to WMD management review teams. 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
THIS BILL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THE CHANGES DESCRIBED ABOVE. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
                                                            
116
 Office of Economic and Demographic Research, Conference Results: Documentary Stamp Tax Collections and Distributions, 1 
(Aug. 2024), available at https://edr.state.fl.us/Content/conferences/docstamp/docstampresults.pdf. (last visited Mar. 12, 
2025). 
117
 Section 375.041(3)(a), F.S. 
118
 Section 375.041(3)(b)1., F.S.