Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida House Bill H1519 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/03/2025

                    STORAGE NAME: h1519c.SAC 
DATE: 4/3/2025 
 	1 
      
FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
BILL ANALYSIS 
This bill analysis was prepared by nonpartisan committee staff and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent. 
BILL #: CS/CS/HB 1519 
TITLE: Entities that Boycott Israel 
SPONSOR(S): Cassel 
COMPANION BILL: CS/SB 1678 (Leek) 
LINKED BILLS: None 
RELATED BILLS: None 
Committee References 
 Government Operations 
16 Y, 0 N, As CS 

State Affairs 
23 Y, 2 N, As CS 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Effect of the Bill: 
The bill expands Florida’s public investment and contracting prohibitions on entities that boycott Israel to include 
educational institutions, nonprofits, government entities, and academic boycotts. The bill also requires universities 
in the State University System to follow the same divestment and investment restrictions as the State Board of 
Administration with respect to companies and other entities that boycott Israel. Additionally, it imposes new 
compliance requirements for arts and cultural grants, with penalties and prohibitions for applicants who engage in 
boycotts or antisemitic discrimination.  
 
Fiscal or Economic Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on the state and local governments due to its public 
investment and contracting requirements, as well as new compliance and enforcement provisions for arts and 
cultural grants.  
 
  
JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 
ANALYSIS 
EFFECT OF THE BILL: 
The bill expands Florida’s public investment and contracting prohibitions on entities that boycott Israel to include 
not only companies that boycott Israel, but also educational institutions, nonprofits, executive branch agencies, 
local governments, and foreign governments. Actions that are deemed to boycott Israel for purposes of the 
investment and contracting prohibition now include academic boycotts where educational institutions enact 
restrictive policies or take actions that limit academic relationships based on ties to Israel or hold students and 
faculty collectively liable for alleged actions of the Israeli government. An educational institution is deemed to 
engage in an academic boycott of Israel if any of its departments, or in the case of foreign institutions, faculty 
unions, participate in such a boycott. Under current law companies are subject to the investment and contracting 
prohibitions in law; however, the bill narrows the definition of “company” by excluding natural persons and sole 
proprietorships and specifying that only business entities with more than 10 full-time employees qualify under 
these provisions. (Section 1) 
 
The bill requires the State Board of Administration (SBA) to determine which “other entities” boycott Israel and, if 
necessary, place them on the Scrutinized Companies or Other Entities that Boycott Israel List (Boycott Israel List). 
The bill defines “other entity” to mean an educational institution, a nonprofit organization, an agency, a local 
government, including any of its public investment funds, public pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, or other 
government-sponsored investment funds. (Section 1)  
 
The bill requires the Department of Management Services (DMS) to collaborate with the SBA to identify companies 
and other entities with which the state currently contracts or has a grant agreement. If any of those entities are 
placed on the Boycott Israel List, DMS must notify them that they may be barred from receiving future state 
contracts or grant awards. (Section 1) 
  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	2 
The bill prohibits the SBA and specified State University System (SUS) funds from acquiring or holding the debt of a 
foreign government or a foreign government controlled sovereign wealth fund if such government or fund is on the 
Boycott Israel List. The bill requires SUS university endowment and retirement funds to follow the same 
divestment and investment restrictions as the SBA with respect to companies and other entities on the Boycott 
Israel List. (Section 1)  
 
The bill modifies state and local government contracting and procurement restrictions by prohibiting contracts of 
$100,000 or more with companies or other entities engaged in a boycott of Israel. Contracts entered into or 
renewed on or after July 1, 2025, must contain a provision allowing for termination if a company or other entity is 
found to be engaged in such a boycott. (Section 3)  
 
The bill revises Florida’s arts and cultural grants process by adding new compliance and enforcement measures 
related to anti-boycott and antisemitism laws. Under the new provisions, grant applicants must certify that they 
comply with all relevant anti-discrimination laws, including the state’s anti-boycott of Israel statutes. Grant 
applicants must attest that they will not engage in antisemitic discrimination, including refusing to deal with 
another individual or entity based on their real or perceived connection to the State of Israel, or engage in 
antisemitic speech in conjunction with the program or project for which the grant is awarded. The bill grants 
individuals the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General (AG) if a violation occurs and the AG has not 
already acted within 90 days. The AG must respond to the complaint within 30 days. (Section 2)  
 
Any grant applicant found to have engaged in a boycott of Israel, antisemitic discrimination, or antisemitic speech 
in conjunction with a funded project will be disqualified from grant eligibility for 10 years. If a grant recipient is 
found to have engaged in such boycott or antisemitic activity during the duration of a funded project, he or she will 
be required to pay a penalty equal to three times the amount of the grant to the State Treasury. (Section 2)     
 
The effective date of the bill is July 1, 2025. (Section 4)  
 
FISCAL OR ECONOMIC IMPACT:  
STATE GOVERNMENT:  
The SBA will likely incur increased costs related to its expanded responsibilities to identify, monitor, and notify 
other entities placed on the Boycott Israel List. Additionally, the Department of State and AG may experience 
administrative costs relating to their responsibilities in reviewing, processing, or enforcing arts and cultural grants 
under the bill. DMS may also incur costs associated with identifying state contractors and grant recipients and 
issuing required notifications to those entities. However, these costs can likely be absorbed within existing 
resources.   
 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT:  
The bill may result in an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on local governments by prohibiting contracts of 
$100,000 or more with entities engaged in a boycott of Israel. This could result in higher prices for commodities or 
services if competitive bidders are disqualified. The fiscal impact is indeterminate at this time as it depends on the 
number and value of contracts that would have been awarded absent this restriction.    
 
RELEVANT INFORMATION 
SUBJECT OVERVIEW: 
Antisemitism 
In 2024, the Legislature adopted a definition of “antisemitism” that closely aligns with the working definition 
established by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
1 This definition was implemented to enhance 
the monitoring and reporting of antisemitic hate crimes and discrimination while also raising public awareness 
and combating such incidents. However, the law explicitly states that it cannot be interpreted in a way that 
diminishes or infringes upon First Amendment rights or conflicts with federal or state antidiscrimination laws.  
 
                                                            
1
 Ch. 2024-262, L.O.F., codified in s. 1.015, F.S.   JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	3 
Current law provides that “antisemitism” is a particular perception of Jewish individuals that can manifest as 
hatred toward them. Both rhetorical and physical expressions of antisemitism target Jewish and non-Jewish 
individuals, their property, and Jewish community institutions, including religious facilities. Examples of 
antisemitic behavior include: 
 Advocating for or justifying harm against Jewish individuals. 
 Spreading dehumanizing or stereotypical myths about Jewish people (e.g., allegations of global Jewish 
conspiracies or control over media, government, and financial institutions).  
 Falsely attributing collective blame to Jewish people for real or imagined offenses.  
 Denying or distorting the Holocaust. 
 Accusing Israel or Jewish people of having fabricated or exaggerated the Holocaust. 
 Claiming that Jewish individuals are more loyal to Israel than their home countries. 
 Denying Jewish people the right to self-determination by characterizing Israel as a racist endeavor.  
 Applying unfair double standards to Israel. 
 Using classic antisemitic imagery to depict Israel or Israelis. 
 Comparing Israeli policies to those of the Nazis.  
 Holding Jewish individuals collectively accountable for Israel’s actions.
2  
 
State Board of Administration 
The State Board of Administration (SBA) is established in the State Constitution and serves as the state’s 
investment arm.
3 The SBA is governed by the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Chief Financial Officer, 
sitting as its Board of Trustees, with the Governor serving as chair. The SBA is responsible for investing the assets 
of the Florida Retirement System (FRS) Pension Plan
4 and administering the FRS Investment Plan,
5 which 
combined represent approximately $220.1 billion, or approximately 81.4 percent, of the $270.4 billion in assets 
managed by the SBA.
6 The SBA also manages over 25 other investment portfolios, with combined assets of 
approximately $50.3 billion, including the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, the Florida Lottery Fund, the 
Florida Prepaid College Plan, and various debt-service accounts for state bond issues.  
 
Investment decisions for the pension plan are made by fiduciaries hired by the state. Under Florida law, an SBA 
fiduciary charged with an investment decision must act as a prudent expert would under similar circumstances, 
considering all relevant substantive factors. Investment decisions must be based exclusively on pecuniary factors, 
meaning only material effects on investment risk or returns may be considered. Nonpecuniary interests, such as 
social, political, or ideological objectives, cannot influence investment decisions.
7 A nine-member Investment 
Advisory Council provides recommendations to the SBA on investment policy, strategy, and procedures and serves 
as a resource to the Board of Trustees.
8 
 
The Legislature has established statutory exceptions to the SBA’s fiduciary standards, allowing the SBA to make 
investment decisions without regard to pecuniary factors in cases involving companies with certain business 
operations in Cuba, Syria, Venezuela, Sudan, Iran, or companies that are majority owned by China or that engage in 
an economic boycott against Israel.
9 These exceptions enable divestment from these “scrutinized companies,” a 
                                                            
2
 See s. 1.015(3), F.S.  
3
 Art. IV, s. 4(e), FLA. CONST.  
4
 S. 121.151, F.S. 
5
 S. 121.4501(8), F.S.; see also, r. 19-13.001, F.A.C. 
6
 SBA, Performance Report Month Ending: December 31, 2024 (last visited March 19, 2025).  
7
 S. 215.47(10), F.S.  
8
 S. 215.444(1), F.S.  
9
 S. 215.47(10)(b), F.S.   JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	4 
category that not only includes the company itself but also parent companies, majority-owned subsidiaries, and 
wholly-owned subsidiaries engaged in the specified activities.
10  
 
Companies that Boycott Israel 
In 2016, the Legislature prohibited the SBA from investing in companies that engage in a boycott against Israel,
11 
and in 2023, required the SBA to divest from such companies.
12 The law defines a boycott of Israel as actions taken 
to limit commercial relations with Israel or businesses operating in Israeli-controlled territories in a 
discriminatory manner.
13 This includes adverse financial actions intended to harm Israel, as well as trade practices 
prohibited under federal law.  
 
To enforce this requirement, the SBA must identify and compile a list of scrutinized companies engaged in such 
boycotts. This list must be updated quarterly based on information from nonprofit organizations, research firms, 
government entities, and asset managers. Companies identified as boycotting Israel receive written notice giving 
them 90 days to cease their boycott activities. If they fail to do so, the SBA must divest from all securities of those 
companies within 12 months and is prohibited from acquiring additional securities of those companies.
14  
 
The law includes exceptions for indirect holdings in commingled funds or exchange-traded funds, though the SBA 
must request that fund managers remove scrutinized companies or offer alternative investment options.
15 The SBA 
must report quarterly to the Board of Trustees, the Legislature, and the public, detailing engagement efforts, 
divestments, and compliance actions.
16  
 
Florida’s Arts and Cultural Grants 
The Department of State (DOS) oversees arts and cultural grants through its Division of Historical Resources, 
Division of Arts and Culture, and Division of Library and Information Services.
17 The Secretary of State, as the head 
of these divisions, is designated as Florida’s Chief Arts and Culture Officer and is encouraged to establish 
relationships with foreign governmental officials to promote Florida as a center of American creativity.
18  
 
The Division of Arts and Culture supports artistic and cultural activities that enhance the quality of life for 
Floridians. It administers grants for various programs, including arts education, local arts agencies, museums, 
theater, dance, folk art, literature, media arts, music, and visual arts. The division is responsible for adopting rules 
governing the grant review process, including criteria related to artistic quality, public benefit, fiscal stability, and 
nondiscrimination compliance. The Florida Arts and Cultural Act provides state support for Florida artists, arts 
organizations, and museums, with the Division of Arts and Culture responsible for overseeing related programs 
and adopting rules to administer funding. The Florida Council on Arts and Culture evaluates grant applications and 
submits recommendations for funding.
19  
 
To qualify for state arts and culture grants, applicants must meet specific eligibility criteria established by the 
Division of Arts and Culture. Eligible applicants include public entities and Florida-based nonprofits. Applicants 
must demonstrate at least one year of experience in arts and cultural programing, register as vendors with the 
Department of Financial Services, and comply with state and federal laws.  
                                                            
10
 See ss. 215.471, 215.4725, 215.473, and 215.4735, F.S. 
11
 Ch. 2016-36, L.O.F. 
12
 Ch. 2023-111, L.O.F.  
13
 See s. 215.4725(1)(a), F.S. 
14
 S. 215.4725(2) and (3), F.S.  
15
 See s. 215.4725(3)(d), F.S.  
16
 S. 215.4725(4), F.S.  
17
 See ch. 265, F.S.  
18
 S. 15.18, F.S.  
19
 Ss. 265.285 and 265.286, F.S.; see also DOS, Florida Division of Arts & Culture (last visited March 19, 2025).   JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	5 
 
Government Contracting and Procurement 
Current law requires a competitive solicitation
20 process when state agencies wish to procure commodities or 
contractual services that cost more than $35,000.
21 Depending on the type of contract and scope of work or goods 
sought, an agency may use one of three procurement methods:  
 Invitation to bid (ITB): An agency must use an ITB when the agency is capable of specifically defining the 
scope of work for which a contractual service is required or when the agency is capable of establishing 
precise specifications defining the actual commodity or group of commodities required.
22 
 Request for proposals (RFP): An agency must use an RFP when the purposes and uses for which the 
commodity, group of commodities, or contractual service being sought can be specifically defined and the 
agency is capable of identifying necessary deliverables.
23  
 Invitation to negotiate (ITN): An ITN is a solicitation used by an agency that is intended to determine the 
best method for achieving a specific goal or solving a particular problem and identifies one or more 
responsive vendors with which the agency may negotiate in order to receive the best value.
24 
 
The Department of Management Services (DMS) is statutorily designated as the primary state agency overseeing 
procurement
25 and its responsibilities include creating uniform agency procurement rules,
26 implementing the 
online procurement program,
27 and procuring state term contracts.
28 DMS is also responsible for registering 
vendors that wish to provide goods or services to the state
29 and maintaining lists of vendors who may not submit 
bids, proposals, or replies to agency solicitations.
30 
 
Contracting with Companies Engaged in a Boycott of Israel 
Current law prohibits state and local government entities from contracting with companies that engage in a 
boycott of Israel.
31 A company is ineligible to bid on, submit a proposal for, or enter into contracts of any amount if 
it is on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List (Boycott Israel List) or is otherwise determined to be 
engaged in a boycott of Israel. Contracts entered into or renewed on or after July 1, 2018, must contain a provision 
allowing for termination if a company is found to be engaged in such a boycott.
32  
 
Companies seeking government contracts must certify compliance with these requirements. If a company falsely 
certifies compliance, the contracting agency may bring a civil action, which can result in a penalty of $2 million or 
twice the contract amount, whichever is greater. Companies that submit false certifications are also barred from 
bidding on contracts for three years.
33  
 
State University System 
The State University System (SUS) of Florida consists of 12 public universities,
34 each governed by a board of 
trustees.
35 The Board of Governors (BOG) is responsible for overseeing, regulating, and managing the entire SUS.
36 
Through its authority, the BOG ensures affordable access to higher education, promotes articulation with other 
                                                            
20
 A “competitive solicitation” is the process of requesting and receiving two or more sealed bids, proposals, or replies 
submitted by responsive vendors in accordance with the terms of a competitive process, regardless of the method of 
procurement. S. 287.012(6), F.S.  
21
 Ss. 287.057 and 287.017, F.S. 
22
 S. 287.057(1)(a), F.S. 
23
 S. 287.057(1)(b), F.S. 
24
 S. 287.057(1)(c), F.S. 
25
 See ss. 287.032 and 287.042, F.S. 
26
 See ss. 287.032(2) and 287.042(3), (4), and (12), F.S.  
27
 See s. 287.057(24), F.S.  
28
 See ss. 287.042(2) and 287.056, F.S. 
29
 See ss. 287.032 and 287.042, F.S.; see also DMS, Vendor Registration and Vendor Lists (last visited March 19, 2025). 
30
 Ss 287.1351, 287.133, 287.134, and 287.137, F.S. 
31
 S. 287.135(2)(a), F.S.  
32
 S. 287.135(3)(b), F.S.  
33
 S. 287.135(5), F.S.  
34
 S. 1000.21(9), F.S.; see also State University System, Universities (last visited Feb. 26, 2025).  
35
 Art. IX, s. 7(b), FLA. CONST.; s. 1001.71, F.S.  
36
 See art. IX, s. 7(d), FLA. CONST.  JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	6 
educational institutions, and upholds fiscal responsibility and accountability across Florida’s public universities.
37 
The BOG consists of 17 members, 14 of which are citizens appointed by the Governor, subject to Senate 
confirmation.
38 The commissioner of education, the chair of the advisory council of faculty senates, and the 
president of the Florida student association are also members.
39 
 
SUS universities manage various endowment funds to support academic and institutional initiatives. These funds 
are typically invested to generate returns that finance scholarships, fellowships, research, professorships, and 
other educational purposes.
40  
 
For purposes of retirement, employees of the SUS participate in either the FRS or the State University System 
Optional Retirement Program (SUSORP), depending on their position and eligibility.
41 The SUSORP is a defined 
contribution plan managed through contracts with private investment providers selected by DMS.
42 SUS 
universities also offer voluntary, tax-advantaged savings plans that can be useful for supplementing core 
retirement benefits, such as 403(b) savings plans and the Florida Deferred Compensation Plan.
43 These plans allow 
employees to invest a portion of their salary through certain investment providers.  
 
RECENT LEGISLATION:  
 
YEAR BILL #  HOUSE SPONSOR(S) SENATE SPONSOR OTHER INFORMATION 
2024 HB 187 Gottlieb, Fine Berman The bill became law on July 1, 
2024. 
2023 CS/CS/SB 110 Stevenson 	Hooper The bill became law on May 
24, 2025. 
 
                                                            
37
 S. 20.155(4)(b), F.S.  
38
 Art. IX, s. 7(d), FLA. CONST.; see also s. 1001.70, F.S.  
39
 Art. IX, s. 7(d), FLA. CONST.  
40
 See Florida State University College of Fine Arts, Legacy Giving (last visited March 25, 2025); University of Florida College of 
Education, Alumni and Giving (last visited March 25, 2025).  
41
 Ss. 121.051(1) and 121.35(1) and (2), F.S.   
42
 S. 121.35(6), F.S.; see also DMS, State University System Optional Retirement Program (last visited March 25, 2025).   
43
 See Florida State University, Voluntary Retirement Plans (last visited March 26, 2015); University of South Florida, Voluntary 
Retirement Plans (last visited March 26, 2025); University of Central Florida, Retirement Benefits (last visited March 26, 2025); 
Florida International University, Benefits (last visited March 26, 2025); University of North Florida, Retirement Options (last 
visited March 26, 2025).   JUMP TO SUMMARY 	ANALYSIS RELEVANT INFORMATION BILL HISTORY 
 	7 
BILL HISTORY 
COMMITTEE REFERENCE ACTION DATE 
STAFF 
DIRECTOR/ 
POLICY CHIEF 
ANALYSIS 
PREPARED BY 
Government Operations 
Subcommittee 
16 Y, 0 N, As CS 3/25/2025 Toliver Villa 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Removed a requirement that the SBA determine the scrutinized entities 
with which the state has contracts or grant agreements.  
 Removed a requirement that the SBA divest from scrutinized entities 
until those entities make up 0.5 percent of the fund.  
 Prohibited the SBA and SUS endowment and retirement funds from 
holding debt of foreign governments on the Boycott Israel list. 
 Subjected SUS endowment and retirement funds to the same 
divestment requirements as the SBA with respect to the Boycott Israel 
List.  
 Removed a requirement banning certain contracts with foreign schools 
engaged in an Israel boycott, including study abroad tuition payments. 
State Affairs Committee 23 Y, 2 N, As CS 4/2/2025 Williamson Villa 
THE CHANGES ADOPTED BY THE 
COMMITTEE: 
 Required DMS to collaborate with the SBA to identify companies and 
other entities with which the state holds contracts or grant agreements, 
and to notify those entities, after their placement on the Boycott Israel 
List, that they may be barred from future state contract or grant 
awards. 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
THIS BILL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN UPDATED TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THE CHANGES DESCRIBED ABOVE. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------