Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S0818 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/26/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Regulated Industries  
 
BILL: SB 818 
INTRODUCER:  Senator McClain 
SUBJECT:  Utility Relocation 
DATE: March 24, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Schrader Imhof RI Favorable 
2.     TR  
3.     RC  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 818 amends the process under which utilities located within a public road or publicly-owned 
rail corridor must be relocated when such utility is found by an authority (Florida Department of 
Transportation and local government entities) to be unreasonably interfering in any way with the 
convenient, safe, or continuous use, or the maintenance, improvement, extension, or expansion, 
of such public road or publicly-owned rail corridor. It requires such owner to provide such 
authority with a relocation schedule within 30 days after the written notice and requires the 
owner to initiate the necessary work within 60 days after the written notice. 
 
The bill requires the authority to pay the entire expense for the relocation to the providers of 
broadband Internet service, cable service, or video service providers. The general requirement is 
that utility owners must pay for such relocation. 
 
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2025. 
 
II. Present Situation: 
Utility Use of Right of Way 
Florida law authorizes an authority, defined as the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 
and local governmental entities,
1
 with jurisdiction and control of public roads or publicly-owned 
rail corridors to prescribe and enforce reasonable rules or regulations regarding the placement 
 
1
 Section 334.03(13), F.S., defines the term “local governmental entity” to mean a unit of government with less than 
statewide jurisdiction, or any officially designated public agency or authority of such a unit of government, that has the 
responsibility for planning, construction, operation, or maintenance of, or jurisdiction over, a transportation facility; the term 
includes, but is not limited to, a county, an incorporated municipality, a metropolitan planning organization, an expressway or 
transportation authority, a road and bridge district, a special road and bridge district, and a regional governmental unit. 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 818   	Page 2 
 
and maintenance of utilities within their rights-of-way.
2
 For the purposes of this provision, 
“utility” means electric transmission, voice, telegraph, data, or other communications services 
lines or wireless facilities; pole lines; poles; railways; ditches; sewers; water, heat, or gas mains; 
pipelines; fences; gasoline tanks and pumps; or other structures.
3
 
 
An authority may grant such a utility the use of its right-of-way in accordance with its rules or 
regulations. A utility may not be installed, located, or relocated unless authorized by an 
authority-issued permit. However, for roads or rail corridors under FDOT’s jurisdiction, in lieu 
of a written permit, a utility relocation schedule and relocation agreement may be executed. A 
utility permit must require that the permitholder is responsible for any damage resulting from the 
issuance of such permit.
4
 
 
Payment for Moving or Removing Utilities and Exceptions 
Section 337.403(1), F.S., requires utilities to bear the cost of relocating utilities placed upon, 
under, over, or within the right-of-way limits of any public road or publicly-owned rail corridor 
which is found by the authority to be unreasonably interfering in any way with the convenient, 
safe, or continuous use, or the maintenance, improvement, extension, or expansion, of such 
public road or publicly-owned rail corridor. The requirements of s. 337.403(1), F.S., apply even 
if the utility is within a public utility easement and the utility owner has a franchise agreement 
with the authority, absent some other agreement to the contrary regarding costs of relocation.
5
 
Utility owners, upon 30 days’ written notice, must eliminate the unreasonable interference within 
a reasonable time or an agreed time, at their own expense. Numerous exceptions are provided to 
this provision, and are located in s. 337.403(1)(a)-(j), F.S. 
 
Broadband Services 
Broadband (or high-speed Internet) services allow users to access Internet and Internet-related 
services at speeds significantly higher than could be provided by traditional dial-up Internet 
services. The speeds that can be obtained through broadband service can vary significantly based 
on a number of factors including the technology used by the provider, infrastructure in place to 
provide service to a particular end user by that provider, and the level of broadband service 
ordered by that end user.
6
 
 
Types of broadband generally available include: 
• Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), which is a wireline transmission technology that allows data 
to be transmitted faster over copper-based telephone wires already installed in end-user 
locations. 
• Cable modem, which is a type of broadband provided through the same coaxial cable that 
delivers an end user’s cable television service. 
 
2
 Section 337.401(1)(a), F.S. 
3
 Id. 
4
 Section 337.401(2), F.S. 
5
 Lee County Electric Coop., Inc. v. City of Cape Coral, 159 So. 3d 126, 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). 
6
 Federal Communications Commission, Getting Broadband Q&A, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/getting-
broadband-qa (last accessed Mar. 21, 2025).  BILL: SB 818   	Page 3 
 
• Fiber, which is a fiber optic technology that converts to light electrical signals that carry data. 
This light is then sent through transparent glass fibers (these fibers are about the same 
diameter as a human hair). Fiber can transmit data at speeds far exceeding current DSL or 
cable modem speeds. 
• Wireless (WiFi), which is a technology that connects end-user devices to internet services 
through short-range wireless technology. Public “hotspots” use this technology. In addition, 
fixed wireless technologies with longer-range directional equipment can also be used to 
provide broadband service in sparsely populated or remote areas too costly to provide other 
types of broadband. Mobile wireless services are also available from mobile broadband 
service providers—however, this type of service is generally slower than wired or fixed 
wireless services. 
• Satellite, which is essentially another type of wireless broadband, where an end user receives 
broadband service connection through a fixed satellite mounted at their location transmitting 
data to a satellite internet modem. This type of connection, which requires a clear line of 
sight to the provider’s satellite, can be useful as well in providing broadband service to 
remote or sparsely populated areas.
7
 
 
Broadband in Florida 
Section 288.9961, F.S., establishes the Florida Office of Broadband within the Division of 
Community Development within the Florida Department of Commerce (DCM). The Office of 
Broadband “works with local and state government agencies, community organizations and 
private businesses to increase the availability and effectiveness of broadband internet throughout 
the state, specifically in small and rural communities.”
8
 The section defines “broadband internet 
service” as a service that offers a connection to the Internet with a capacity for transmission at a 
consistent speed of at least 25 megabits per second (mbps) downstream and 3 mbps upstream 
(25/3 mbps service). This 25/3 mbps service benchmark to be defined as broadband service was 
the same as that used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) since 2015. However, 
in 2024, the FCC increased that standard to 100 mbps downstream and 20 mbps upstream.
9
 
 
Currently, 91.8 percent of Floridians have access to 25/3 mbps service. Presently, there are 229 
internet service providers in Florida,
10
 including investor-owned companies and cooperative 
electric utilities.
11
 
 
 
7
 Id. 
8
 Florida Department of Commerce, Office of Broadband, https://www.floridajobs.org/community-planning-and-
development/broadband/office-of-broadband (last visited Jan. 22, 2024). 
9
 Federal Communications Commission, FCC Increases Broadband Speed Benchmark, Mar. 14, 2024 (available at 
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-401205A1.pdf). 
10
 Broadband Now, Internet Service Providers in Florida, https://broadbandnow.com/Florida (last accessed Mar. 21, 2025). 
11
 Section 425.04, F.S., provides that rural electric cooperatives may engage in the provision of broadband, pursuant to the 
requirement in s. 364.391, F.S. Section 364.391, F.S., provides that if a cooperative engages in the provision of broadband, 
all poles owned by the cooperative are subject to regulation under s. 366.04(8), F.S., on the same basis as if that cooperative 
were a public utility under that subsection. 
  BILL: SB 818   	Page 4 
 
Cable and Video Services in Florida 
Section 610.102, F.S., provides that the Florida Department of State is the franchising authority 
for state-issued franchises for the provision of cable or video service. The section provides that 
municipalities and counties may not grant new franchises for the provision of cable or video 
services within their jurisdictions. Section 610.103, F.S., which provides the definitions for ch. 
610, F.S., defines: 
• “Cable service” as the one-way transmission to subscribers of video programming or any 
other programming service and the subscriber interaction, if any, required for the selection or 
use of such service. 
• “Cable service provider” as a person that provides cable service over a cable system. 
• “Cable system” as a facility consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and associated 
signal generation, reception, and control equipment that is designed to provide cable service 
that includes video programming and that is provided to multiple subscribers within a 
community.
12
 
• “Video service” as video programming services, including cable services, provided through 
wireline facilities located at least in part in the public rights-of-way without regard to 
delivery technology, including Internet protocol technology.
13
 
• “Video service provider” as an entity providing video service. 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 of the bill amends s. 337.403, F.S., to revise the process under which utilities located 
within a public road or publicly-owned rail corridor must be relocated when such utility is found 
by an authority to be unreasonably interfering in any way with the convenient, safe, or 
continuous use, or the maintenance, improvement, extension, or expansion, of such public road 
or publicly-owned rail corridor. Specifically, the bill requires that when a utility owner receives 
written notice of such a finding by an authority (FDOT and local government entities), it must 
(within 30 days), provide such authority with a reasonable utility relocation schedule to expedite 
the completion of that authority’s construction or maintenance project identified in the notice. 
The bill also extends the time, from 30 days to 60 days, to initiate the work to alleviate the 
interference. 
 
In addition, the bill provides an exemption for broadband Internet providers,
14
 and cable service 
and video service providers,
15
 from the general requirement that utility owners bear the cost of 
 
12
 However, the term does not include 1) a facility serving only to retransmit the television signals of television broadcast 
stations; 2) a facility serving only subscribers in one or more multiple-unit dwellings under common ownership, control, or 
management (unless it does so using any public right-of-way); 3) a facility serving subscribers without using public right-of-
way; 4) a facility of a common carrier that is subject, in whole or in part, to the provisions of Title II of the federal 
Communications Act of 1934 (except that such facility is considered a cable system other than for purposes of 47 U.S.C. s. 
541(c) to the extent such facility is used in the transmission of video programming directly to subscribers, unless the extent of 
such use is solely to provide interactive on-demand services); 5) any facilities of any electric utility used solely for operating 
its electric utility systems; or 6) an open video system complying with 47 U.S.C. s. 573. 
13
 “Video service” does not, however, include any video programming provided by a commercial mobile service provider as 
defined in 47 U.S.C. s. 332(d), video programming provided as part of and via a service that enables end users to access 
content, information, electronic mail, or other services offered over the public Internet. 
14
 As defined in s. 288.9961(2), F.S. 
15
 As defined in s. 610.103, F.S.  BILL: SB 818   	Page 5 
 
relocating utilities placed upon, under, over, or within the right-of-way limits of any public road 
or publicly-owned rail corridor which is found by the authority to be unreasonably interfering in 
any way with the convenient, safe, or continuous use, or the maintenance, improvement, 
extension, or expansion, of such public road or publicly-owned rail corridor. The bill provides, 
instead, that the authority requiring such relocation must pay the entire expense of the relocation 
work. The general requirement is that the utility owner must pay for such relocation. 
 
Section 2 of the bill amends s. 125.42, F.S., to conform a cross-reference to amendments made 
by the bill. 
 
Section 3 of the bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2025. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
Art. VII, s. 18(a), of the Florida Constitution provides that a county or municipality may 
not be bound by any general law requiring such county or municipality to spend funds or 
to take an action requiring the expenditure of funds unless the legislature has determined 
that such law fulfills an important state interest and: 
• Funds have been appropriated that have been estimated at the time of enactment to be 
sufficient to fund such expenditure; 
• The legislature authorizes or has authorized a county or municipality to enact a 
funding source not available for such county or municipality on February 1, 1989, 
that can be used to generate the amount of funds to cover such expenditure;  
• The law requiring such expenditure is approved by two-thirds of the membership in 
each house of the legislature; 
• The expenditure is required to comply with a law that applies to all persons similarly 
situated, including the state and local governments; or 
• The law is either required to comply with a federal requirement or required for 
eligibility for a federal entitlement, which federal requirement specifically 
contemplates actions by counties or municipalities for compliance. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None.  BILL: SB 818   	Page 6 
 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
The bill eliminates utility relocation costs for providers of broadband Internet, cable 
service, and video service when such utilities are located within the right-of-way limits of 
roads and rail corridors under the jurisdiction and control of the FDOT or a local 
government entity. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The bill will have an indeterminate, but likely substantial, impact on state and local 
government expenditures when engaging in a transportation project requiring the 
relocation of a broadband Internet, cable service, and video service provider utility. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 337.403 of the Florida Statutes. 
This bill amends section 125.42 of the Florida Statutes to amend a cross-reference.   
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.