Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S0924 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/10/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability  
 
BILL: SB 924 
INTRODUCER:  Senator Calatayud 
SUBJECT:  Coverage for Fertility Preservation Services 
DATE: March 10, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. White McVaney GO Pre-meeting 
2.     BI  
3.     AP  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 924 requires all contracted state group health insurance plans issued on or after January 1, 
2026, to cover and pay for standard fertility preservation services for individuals undergoing 
medically necessary treatments that may result in iatrogenic infertility. The bill prohibits a state 
group health insurance plan from imposing any preauthorization requirements. 
 
The bill likely has a negative impact on state revenues and expenditures. The Division of State 
Group Insurance within the Department of Management Services estimates an annual fiscal 
impact of $813,000 to the state employee group health plan. 
 
The bill provides an effective date of July 1, 2025. 
II. Present Situation: 
Medical Treatments and Conditions Effecting Fertility 
Infertility can be caused by many different things.
1
 Numerous medical treatments may affect 
fertility or cause infertility in men and women; additionally, some individuals face potential 
infertility due to different medical conditions.  
 
Men and women’s fertility can be negatively impacted by necessary surgeries that cause damage 
or scaring, or that remove certain necessary reproductive organs or tissues. Medications have 
also been linked to infertility, such as those used to treat certain anti-inflammatory and 
autoimmune diseases, some steroids, and other various prescription drugs.
2
 
 
 
1
 National Health Services, Infertility: Causes, https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/infertility/causes/ (last visited Mar. 5, 2025).  
2
 National Health Services, Infertility: Causes, supra n. 1; James F. Buchanan & Larry Jay Davis, Drug-induced infertility, 
18(2) DRUG INTELL CLIN PHARM. 122, available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6141923/ (last visited Mar. 5, 2025). 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 924   	Page 2 
 
Cancer Specific 
Infertility is often a side effect of life-saving cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. 
Moreover, surgeries necessary to remove cancerous tissues and other cancer treating 
medications, such as hormone therapies, can affect a patient's fertility. The effects can be 
temporary or permanent. The likelihood that cancer treatment will harm fertility depends on the 
type and stage of cancer, the type of cancer treatment, and age at the time of treatment.
3
 
 
Fertility Preservation Services 
Fertility preservation is the practice of proactively helping patients to preserve their chances for 
future reproduction.
4
 Fertility preservation saves and protects embryos, eggs, sperm, and 
reproductive tissues to enable an individual to have a child sometime in the future. It is an option 
for adults and even some children of both sexes. Fertility preservation is common in people 
whose fertility is compromised due to health conditions or diseases (medically indicated 
preservation) or when someone wishes to delay having children for personal reasons (elective 
preservation).
5
 Medically indicative preservation is available to individuals affected by cancer, 
autoimmune disease, and other reproductive health conditions; as well as those facing medical 
treatments that may cause infertility.
6
 
 
State Employee Health Plan  
For state employees who participate in the state employee benefit program, the Department of 
Management Services (DMS) through the Division of State Group Insurance (DSGI) administers 
the state group health insurance program (program).
7
 The program is a cafeteria plan managed 
consistent with section 125 of the Internal Revenue Service Code.
8
 The program is an optional 
benefit for most state employees employed by state agencies, state universities, the court system, 
and the Legislature. The program provides health, life, dental, vision, disability, and other 
supplemental insurance benefits. To administer the program, DSGI contracts with third party 
administrators for self-insured plans, a fully insured HMO, and a pharmacy benefits manager for 
the state employees’ self-insured prescription drug program, pursuant to s. 110.12315, F.S. The 
DSGI, with prior approval by the Legislature, is responsible for determining the health benefits 
provided and the contributions to be required for the program.
9
 To achieve the “prior approval” 
 
3
 Mayo Clinic Staff, Fertility preservation: Understand your options before cancer treatment, 
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/getting-pregnant/in-depth/fertility-preservation/art-20047512 (last visited 
Mar. 5, 2025). 
4
 Yale Medicine, Fertility Preservation, https://www.yalemedicine.org/conditions/fertility-preservation (last visited Mar. 5, 
2025). 
5
 Cleveland Clinic, Fertility Preservation, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/17000-fertility-preservation (last 
visited Mar. 5, 2025). 
6
 Id.; Mayo Clinic, Fertility Preservation: Understand your options before cancer treatment, 
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/getting-pregnant/in-depth/fertility-preservation/art-20047512 (last visited 
Mar. 5, 2025). 
7
 Section 110.123, F.S; Department of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance, Legislative and Policy 
Resources, https://www.dms.myflorida.com/workforce_operations/state_group_insurance/legislative_and_policy_resources 
(last visited Mar. 7, 2025). 
8
 A section 125 cafeteria plan is a type of employer offered, flexible health insurance plan that provides employees a menu of 
pre-tax and taxable qualified benefits to choose from, but employees must be offered at least one taxable benefit such as cash, 
and one qualified benefit, such as a Health Savings Account. 
9
 Section 110.123(5)(a), F.S.  BILL: SB 924   	Page 3 
 
aspect, the Legislature directs the benefits to be offered each year in the general appropriations 
act. For example, in the 2024-2025 General Appropriations Act, the Legislature directed: 
 
For the period July 1, 2024, through June 30,2025, the benefits provided under 
each of the plans shall be those benefits as provided in the current State 
Employees’ PPO Plan Group Health Insurance Plan Booklet and Benefit 
Document, and current Health Maintenance Organization contracts and benefit 
documents, including any revisions to such health benefits approved by the 
Legislature.
10
 
 
Health Insurance Premiums and Revenues 
The health insurance benefit for active employees has premium rates for single, spouse 
program,
11
 or family coverage regardless of plan selection. These premiums cover both medical 
and pharmacy claims. Over 193,000 active and retired state employees and officers are expected 
to participate in the health insurance program during Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
12
 The estimated 
total revenues expected for FY 2024-25 is over $3.75 billion with an over $4.1 billion expected 
cash balance. Total expenses expected for FY 2024-25 is $3.9 billion.
13
  
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 amends 110.12303, F.S., to expand coverage under the state employee health 
insurance plan for policies issued on or after January 1, 2026, to include coverage for standard 
fertility preservation services where medically necessary treatment may cause iatrogenic 
infertility.  
 
Iatrogenic infertility is defined as the impairment of fertility directly or indirectly caused by 
surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or other medical treatment. Standard fertility preservation 
services is defined as oocyte and sperm preservation procedures and includes the cost of storing 
such material for up to three years. 
 
This new coverage extends to covered individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer for 
which necessary cancer treatment may directly or indirectly cause iatrogenic infertility and who 
are within a reproductive age range established by the American Society of Clinical Oncology or 
the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
14
  
 
 
10
 Chapter 2024-231, s. 8(3)(c)2, Laws of Fla. 
11
 The Spouse Program provides discounted rates for family coverage when both spouses work for the state. 
12
 Florida Legislature, Office of Economic and Demographic Research, State Employees’ Group Health Self-Insurance Trust 
Fund: Exhibit I Enrollment Outlook by Fiscal Year, in JULY AND AUGUST 2024 SELF-INSURANCE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE 
PUBLICATIONS (published by Florida Legislature, Office of Economic and Demographic Research), 2, available at 
https://edr.state.fl.us/content/conferences/healthinsurance/archives/240807healthins.pdf (last visited Mar. 7, 2024). 
13
 Florida Dep’t of Management Services, Division of State Group Insurance, State Employees’ Group Health Self-Insurance 
Trust Fund Report on Financial Outlook for the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 3034 through June 30, 3029 (Aug. 7, 2024), in 
JULY AND AUGUST 2024 SELF-INSURANCE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS (published by Florida Legislature, 
Office of Economic and Demographic Research), 8, available at 
https://edr.state.fl.us/content/conferences/healthinsurance/archives/240807healthins.pdf (last visited Mar. 7, 2024) (beginning 
on page 48 of collection). 
14
 But see VI. Technical Deficiencies infra.  BILL: SB 924   	Page 4 
 
The bill prohibits state group health insurance plans from requiring preauthorization for coverage 
of standard fertility preservation procedures. The coverage, however, may still be limited by 
provisions relating to maximum benefits, deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance.  
 
Section 2 provides that the bill takes effect  July 1, 2025.  
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
Not applicable. The mandate restrictions do not apply because the bill does not require 
counties and municipalities to spend funds, reduce the authority that counties or 
municipalities have to raise revenue in the aggregate, or reduce the percentage of state tax 
shared with counties and municipalities. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None identified. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None identified. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None identified. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None identified. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
The inclusion of coverage for fertility preservation services with cost sharing restrictions 
may positively impact physicians who likely will see an increased demand for their 
services as well as collateral and ancillary medical supports such as medical facilities that 
would store oocytes and sperm. 
  BILL: SB 924   	Page 5 
 
Most of the plans contracted with can implement this legislation without issue as they 
currently offer standard fertility preservation options for other entities. One contracted 
group indicated that this would be a new benefit that could require system coding.
15
  
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The bill has a negative impact on state revenue and expenditures. The DSGI within the 
DMS administers the Program. The DMS estimates the total annual fiscal impact as 
$813,000. Actual costs could, however, vary widely based on actual member utilization 
and the necessary level of utilization.
16
 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
Class of Patients Eligible for Covered Services  
The bill directs DMS to provide coverage for standard fertility preservation services when a 
medically necessary treatment may directly or indirectly cause iatrogenic infertility. This appears 
to mean any treatment – for cancer or any other condition. The bill says this new covered service 
“extends to covered individuals who have been diagnosed with cancer … and who are within 
reproductive age.” The limitation regarding reproductive age does not appear to apply to patients 
who have not been diagnosed with cancer. With these ambiguities, the bill should be modified to 
clearly address whether the new covered services must be available to all patients, regardless of 
underlying diagnosis and its treatment, and whether the reproductive age limitation applies to 
any or all of the covered patients. 
 
Line 29 limits the coverage to individuals “who are within reproductive age.” Lines 48 to 51 
define reproductive age to conform to the age range established by the American Society of 
Clinical Oncology or the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The American Society 
of Clinical Oncology defines reproductive age as 18 to 40 years of age for women, and 18 to 50 
years of age for men. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine does not have a clear 
age range of what reproductive age includes but does discuss different classes of fertility for 
women based on age, including qualifications starting at age 35. The use and subsequent 
definition of the term reproductive age may be both unnecessary and internally conflicting. 
Moreover, the term could lead to unintended consequences, such as excluding individuals and 
causing disparate impact on men and women.  
 
Covered Storage Services 
At lines 30-33, the bill provides that standard fertility preservation services include the costs 
associated with storing oocytes and sperm for up to 3 years. The bill also defines, at lines 52-57, 
standard fertility preservation services to include oocyte and sperm preservation procedures that 
are consistent with established medical practices or professional guidelines. This limitation is not 
included in lines 30-33. It is therefore unclear whether the medical standards required in lines 52-
57 apply to the storage services. 
 
15
 Dep’t of Management Services, Senate Bill 924 Analysis (Mar. 7, 2025) (on file with the Senate Committee on 
Government Oversight and Accountability). 
16
 Id.  BILL: SB 924   	Page 6 
 
 
Additionally, the 3-year time limitation on the storage of material may be ambiguous. It is 
unclear whether the 3-year clock begins at commencement of the standard fertility preservation 
service, once the oocytes or sperm are ready for storage, or some other period. It is unclear if the 
state health insurance plan must continue coverage of costs after an individual leaves the health 
insurance plan, whether through finding another job, no longer being able to work, or death or a 
change in insurance plan. It is also unclear whether coverage for the storage services continues if 
the covered individual ages out of “reproductive age” before the 3-year period ends.  
 
Differing Organizational Definition and Standards 
At numerous times the bill defers the definitions or standards relevant to those used by the 
“American Society of Clinical Oncology or the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.” 
These groups’ definitions and standards may differ and therefore may result in inconsistent 
application of the law.  
VII. Related Issues: 
None identified. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends section 110.12303 of the Florida Statutes.   
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.