Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1080 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 03/18/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Community Affairs  
 
BILL: SB 1080 
INTRODUCER:  Senator McClain 
SUBJECT:  Local Government Land Regulation 
DATE: March 14, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Hackett Fleming CA Favorable 
2.     JU  
3.     RC  
 
I. Summary: 
SB 1080 requires local governments to: 
• Specify the minimum information required for certain zoning applications; 
• Process an application for a development permit or development order within certain 
timeframes; 
• Not limit the number of quasi-judicial hearings or public hearings if such limitation causes 
delay in the consideration of an application; and 
• Issue a refund to an applicant if the local government fails to meet certain timeframes when 
processing an application. 
 
The bill also provides that comprehensive plan amendments are not required to be approved at 
the second public hearing in the amendment adoption process in order to avoid being deemed 
withdrawn. 
 
The bill takes effect October 1, 2025. 
II. Present Situation: 
The Community Planning Act 
Adopted in 1985, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development 
Regulation Act,
1
 also known as Florida’s Growth Management Act, was significantly revised in 
2011, becoming the Community Planning Act.
2
 The Community Planning Act governs how local 
governments create and adopt their local comprehensive plans. 
 
 
1
 See ch. 85-55, s. 1, Laws of Fla. 
2
 See ch. 2011-139, s. 17, Laws of Fla. 
REVISED:   BILL: SB 1080   	Page 2 
 
Local comprehensive plans must include principles, guidelines, standards, and strategies for the 
orderly and balanced future land development of the area and reflect community commitments to 
implement the plan. The Community Planning Act intends that local governments manage 
growth through comprehensive land use plans that facilitate adequate and efficient provision of 
transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing, and other 
requirements and services.
3
 A housing element is required as part of every comprehensive plan 
in the state. Among other things, the housing element must address “the creation or preservation 
of affordable housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the 
concentration of affordable housing units only in specific areas of the jurisdiction.”
4
  
 
Municipalities established after the effective date of the Community Planning Act must adopt a 
comprehensive plan within three years after the date of incorporation.
5
 The county 
comprehensive plan controls until a municipal comprehensive plan is adopted.
6
 
 
The comprehensive plan is implemented via land development regulations. Each county and 
municipality must adopt and enforce land development regulations, such as zoning or other 
housing-related ordinances, which are consistent with and implement their adopted 
comprehensive plan.
7
 
 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
 
Development that does not conform to the comprehensive plan may not be approved by a local 
government unless the local government amends its comprehensive plan first. State law requires 
a proposed comprehensive plan amendment to receive two public hearings, the first held by the 
local planning board, and subsequently by the governing board.
8
  
 
Any affected person may challenge whether a plan or plan amendment complies with the Act by 
petitioning the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) for a formal hearing.
9 An 
administrative law judge must hold a hearing in the affected local jurisdiction on whether the 
plan or plan amendment is in compliance.
10
 In challenges filed by an affected person, the 
comprehensive plan or plan amendment shall be determined to be in compliance if the local 
government’s determination of compliance is fairly debatable. If the administrative law judge 
recommends that the amendment be found in compliance, the judge shall submit the 
recommended order to the state land planning agency for a final order in its favor.
11 
 
 
3
 Section 163.3161(4), F.S. 
4
 Section 163.3177(6)(f)1.g., F.S. 
5
 Section 163.3167(3), F.S. 
6
 Id. 
7
 Section 163.3202, F.S. 
8
 Sections 163.3174(4)(a) and 163.3184, F.S. 
9
 Section 163.3184(5)(a), F.S. 
10
 Section 163.3184(5)(c), F.S. 
11
 Section 163.3184(5)(e), F.S.  BILL: SB 1080   	Page 3 
 
Issuing Development Orders and Permits 
Under the Community Planning Act, a development permit is any official action of a local 
government that has the effect of permitting the development of land including, but not limited 
to, building permits, zoning permits, subdivision approval, rezoning, certifications, special 
exceptions, and variances.
12
 A development order is issued by a local government and grants, 
denies, or grants with conditions an application for a development permit.
13
  
 
Within 30 days after receiving an application for approval of a development permit or 
development order, a municipality or county must review the application for completeness and 
issue a letter indicating that all required information is submitted or specify any areas that are 
deficient. If the application is deficient, the applicant has 30 days to address the deficiencies by 
submitting the required additional information.
14  
 
Within 120 days after the municipality or county has deemed the application complete, or 180 
days for applications that require final action through a quasi-judicial hearing or a public hearing, 
the county must approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for a development 
permit or development order.
15 Both the applicant and the local government may agree to a 
reasonable request for an extension of time, particularly in the event of an extraordinary 
circumstance.
16 An approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application for a 
development permit or development order must include written findings supporting the county’s 
decision.
17 However, these timeframes do not apply in an area of critical state concern.
18 
 
When reviewing an application for a development permit or development order, not including 
building permit applications, a county or municipality may not request additional information 
from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation in writing.
19
  
 
If a county or municipality makes a request for additional information from the applicant and the 
applicant provides the information within 30 days of receiving the request, the county or the 
municipality must:  
• Review the additional information and issue a letter to the applicant indicating that the 
application is complete or specify the remaining deficiencies within 30 days of receiving the 
information, if the request is the county or municipality’s first request.
20 
• Review the additional information and issue a letter to the applicant indicating that the 
application is complete or specify the remaining deficiencies within 10 days of receiving the 
additional information, if the request is the county or municipality’s second request.
21 
 
12
 Section 163.3164(16), F.S. 
13
 See ss. 125.022, 163.3164(15), and 166.033, F.S. 
14
 Sections 125.022(1) and 166.033(1), F.S. 
15
 Id. 
16
 Id. 
17
 Id. 
18
 Id. 
19
 Sections 125.022(2) and 166.033(2), F.S. 
20
 Section 125.022(2)(b) and Section 166.033(2)(b), F.S. 
21
 Section 125.022(2)(c) and Section 166(2)(c), F.S.  BILL: SB 1080   	Page 4 
 
• Deem the application complete within ten days of receiving the additional information or 
proceed to process the application for approval or denial unless the applicant waived the 
county or municipality’s time limitations in writing, if the request is the county or 
municipality’s third request. 
 
Before a third request for information, the applicant must be offered a meeting to attempt to 
resolve outstanding issues.
22
 If the applicant believes the request for additional information is not 
authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the applicant can request the 
county or municipality proceed to process the application for approval or denial.
23
 If denied, the 
county or municipality is required to give written notice to the applicant and must provide 
reference to the applicable legal authority for the denial of the permit.
24
  
 
Once an application is deemed complete, a county or municipality must approve, approve with 
conditions, or deny the application within 120 days or 180 days for applications that require final 
action through a quasi-judicial hearing or a public hearing.
25 
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Sections 1 and 3 amend ss. 125.022 and 166.033, F.S., to amend a variety of provisions related 
to county and municipality, respectively, operations surrounding development permits and 
orders. The amendments are listed by specific subject below. 
 
Minimum Information for Certain Zoning Applications  
The bill requires that a local government must specify in writing the minimum information that 
must be submitted in an application for a zoning approval, rezoning approval, subdivision 
approval, certification, special exception, or variance. Under the bill, the local government must:  
• Make the minimum information available for inspection and copying at the location where 
the local government receives applications for development permits and orders;  
• Provide the minimum information to the applicant at a preapplication meeting; or 
• Post the minimum information on the local government’s website. 
 
Timeframes for Processing an Application 
Within 5 business days after receiving an application for approval of a development permit or 
development order, the bill requires that a local government must confirm receipt of the 
application using the contact information provided by the applicant.  
 
The bill clarifies that, within 30 days after receiving an application for approval of a 
development permit or order, a local government must review the application for completeness 
and either: 
• Issue a written notification to the applicant indicating that all required information is 
submitted; or  
 
22
 Sections 125.022(2) and 166.033(2), F.S. 
23
 Id. 
24
 Id. 
25
 Id.   BILL: SB 1080   	Page 5 
 
• Specify, with particularity and in writing, any areas that are deficient.  
 
For an application for a development permit or order that does not require final action through a 
quasi-judicial hearing or public hearing, the bill requires a local government to, within 120 days 
after the local government has deemed the application complete:  
• Approve the application; 
• Approve the application with conditions; or  
• Deny the application.  
 
For an application for a development permit or order that does require final action through a 
quasi-judicial hearing or public hearing, the bill requires a local government to, within 180 days 
after the local government has deemed the application complete:  
• Approve the application; 
• Approve the application with conditions; or  
• Deny the application.  
 
The bill prohibits a local government from limiting the number of quasi-judicial hearings or 
public hearings held each month if such limitation causes any delay in the consideration of an 
application for approval of a development permit or order.  
 
Additionally, the bill clarifies that a local government and an applicant may agree in writing to 
an extension of time for processing an application, particularly in the event of a force majeure or 
other extraordinary circumstance.  
 
The bill provides that the foregoing timeframes restart if an applicant makes a substantive change 
to the application. The bill defines “substantive change” as an applicant-initiated change of 15 
percent or more in the proposed density, intensity, or square footage of a parcel.  
 
Requirement to Issue a Refund  
The bill requires a local government to issue a refund to an applicant equal to:  
• Ten percent of the application fee if the local government fails to issue written notification of 
completeness or written specification of areas of deficiency within 30 days after receiving the 
application. 
• Ten percent of the application fee if the local government fails to issue a written notification 
of completeness or written specification of areas of deficiency within 30 days after receiving 
the additional information pursuant to an initial request by the local government to furnish 
such additional information. 
• Twenty percent of the application fee if the local government fails to issue a written 
notification of completeness or written specification of areas of deficiency within 10 days 
after receiving the additional information pursuant to a second request by the local 
government to furnish such additional information. 
• Fifty percent of the application fee if the local government fails to approve, approve with 
conditions, or deny the application within 30 days after conclusion of the 120-day or 180-day 
timeframe specified above.  BILL: SB 1080   	Page 6 
 
• One hundred percent of the application fee if the local government fails to approve, approve 
with conditions, or deny an application 31 days or more after conclusion of the 120-day or 
180-day timeframe specified above.  
 
A local government is not required to issue a refund in any of the foregoing scenarios if: 
• The applicant and the local government agree to an extension of time; 
• The delay is caused by the applicant; or  
• The delay is attributable to a force majeure or other extraordinary circumstances. 
 
Section 2 amends s. 163.3184, F.S., to provide that comprehensive plan amendments are not 
required to be approved at the second public hearing in the process in order to avoid being 
deemed withdrawn. 
 
The bill takes effect October 1, 2025. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None identified. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate positive fiscal impact to the extent applicants receive 
refunds from counties and municipalities that fail to meet statutory deadlines relating to 
development permits and orders.  BILL: SB 1080   	Page 7 
 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The bill may have an indeterminate negative fiscal impact on local governments to the 
extent those governments must issue refunds for failing to meet statutory deadlines 
relating to development permits and orders. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends the following sections of the Florida Statutes: 125.022, 163.3184, 
and 166.033.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
None. 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.