Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1180 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/14/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice  
 
BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180 
INTRODUCER:  Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice, Criminal Justice Committee 
and Senator Gaetz 
SUBJECT:  Sexual Images 
DATE: April 11, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Parker Stokes CJ Fav/CS 
2. Atchley Harkness ACJ  Fav/CS 
3.     FP  
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/CS/SB 1180 provides guidance on proving actual or lewd exhibition and prohibits generation 
or possession of certain images. 
 
The bill creates s. 800.045, F.S., to provide offenses regarding lewd or lascivious images and 
defines the terms “identifiable minor”, “intentionally view”, “lewd or lascivious image”, and 
“promote”. 
 
The bill provides that it is a second degree felony for any person to possess with the intent to 
promote any photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, or other presentation 
which, in whole or in part includes a lewd or lascivious image. The bill provides an exception for 
any material solicited, possessed, controlled, or intentionally viewed as part of a law enforcement 
investigation. 
 
It also provides that it is third degree felony for any person to knowingly solicit, possess, control, 
or intentionally view a photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, 
computer depiction, or other presentation, in whole or in part, which he or she knows to include a 
lewd or lascivious image. The solicitation, possession, control, or intentional viewing of each 
such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, image, data, computer depiction, 
representation, or presentation is a separate offense. If such photograph, motion picture, 
exhibition, show, representation, image, data, computer depiction, or other presentation includes 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 2 
 
a lewd or lascivious image depicting more than one minor, each such minor in each such 
photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, computer depiction, or 
other presentation who is knowingly solicited, possessed, controlled, or intentionally viewed is a 
separate offense.  
 
The bill amends s. 827.071, F.S., to expand the definition of the term “sexual conduct” to include 
“anus”, and provide that the term “actual or simulated lewd exhibition of the genitals” may be 
evidenced by the overall content of an image, taking into account the age of the minor depicted 
and including, but not limited to, whether: 
• The focal point of the image is on the minor’s genitalia; 
• The setting of the image is sexually suggestive or in a place or pose generally associated with 
sexual conduct;  
• The minor is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of 
the minor;  
• The image suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual conduct; or  
• The image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.  
 
The bill creates s. 827.073, F.S., to create offenses related of altered sexual depiction of a minor 
and to define the terms “altered sexual depiction,” “generate”, “visual depiction”, “identifiable 
minor”, “intentionally view”, and “promote.” 
 
The bill provides that it is a third degree felony for a person to:  
• Knowingly possess, control, or intentionally view a visual depiction that, in whole or in part, 
he or she knows includes an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor.  
• Intentionally generate an altered sexual depiction of a minor.  
• Solicits an altered sexual depiction of a minor. 
 
The bill also provides that it is a second degree felony for a person who willfully and 
intentionally promotes an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor, without the consent 
of the identifiable minor, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual 
depiction was an altered sexual depiction. 
 
The bill amends s. 836.13, F.S., to define the term “generate.”  
 
The bill provides that it is a third degree felony for a person to:  
• Willfully generates an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without the consent 
of the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual 
depiction was an altered sexual depiction.  
• Solicit an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without the consent of the 
identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual 
depiction was an altered sexual depiction. 
 
The bill authorizes a person who is portrayed in an altered sexual depiction without his or her 
consent to initiate a civil cause of action against a person who willfully generates such an altered 
sexual depiction to obtain appropriate relief to prevent or remedy the generation of such a 
depiction, including:  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 3 
 
• Injunctive relief; 
• Monetary damages to include $10,000 or actual damages incurred; and  
• Reasonable attorney fees and costs. 
 
The bill amends 921.0022, F.S., to provide penalties for specified offenses regarding sexual 
images and related acts in the Offense Severity Ranking Chart (OSRC) of the Criminal 
Punishment Code. 
 
The bill may have a positive indeterminate fiscal impact (unquantifiable increase in prison beds) 
on the Department of Corrections. See Section V., Fiscal Impact Statement. 
 
The bill takes effect October 1, 2025. 
II. Present Situation: 
Altered Sexual Depictions 
Nonconsensual altered sexual depictions are distinguishable from consensual pornography as the 
person being depicted has not given his or her consent and did not actually engage in the sexual 
behavior he or she is depicted as doing. Such depictions may exploit the depicted person for 
other’s gratification and may cause emotional and reputational harm stemming from subsequent 
uses of the depiction and society’s response to the person depicted.
1
 
 
Section 836.13, F.S., defines “Altered sexual depiction” to mean any visual depiction that, as a 
result of any type of digital, electronic, mechanical, or other modification, alteration, or 
adaptation, depicts a realistic version of an identifiable person:
2
 
• With the nude body parts of another person as the nude body parts of the identifiable person; 
• With computer-generated nude body parts as the nude body parts of the identifiable person; 
or 
• Engaging in sexual conduct as defined in s. 847.001, F.S.,
3
 in which the identifiable person 
did not engage. 
 
 
1
 Mathew B. Kugler and Carly Pace, Deepfake Privacy: Attitudes and Regulation, Northwestern University Law Review, 
2021 Vol 116:611, p. 624-25, 
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1476&context=nulr (last visited March 19, 
2025). 
2
 Section 836.13(1)(b), F.S., defines “Identifiable person” to mean a person who is recognizable as an actual person by the 
person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark, or other recognizable feature. 
3
 Section 847.001(19), F.S., defines “Sexual conduct” to mean actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual 
intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse; actual or simulated lewd exhibition of the genitals; 
actual physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if such person is a female, 
breast with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of either party; or any act or conduct which constitutes sexual 
battery or simulates that sexual battery is being or will be committed. A mother’s breastfeeding of her baby does not under 
any circumstance constitute “sexual conduct.”   BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 4 
 
A person who willfully and maliciously promotes any altered sexual depiction of an identifiable 
person, without the consent of the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have 
known that such visual depiction was an altered sexual depiction, commits a third degree felony.
4
 
 
The presence of a disclaimer within an altered sexual depiction which notifies a viewer that the 
person or persons depicted did not consent to or participate in the creation or promotion of the 
material, or that the person or persons depicted did not actually perform the actions portrayed, is 
not a defense and does not relieve a person of criminal liability under this section.
5
 
 
A person who is portrayed in such an altered sexual depiction without his or her consent may 
initiate a civil cause of action against a person who willfully and maliciously promoted such 
depiction and may obtain appropriate relief to prevent or remedy the promotion, including: 
• Injunctive relief. 
• Monetary damages to include $10,000 or actual damages incurred. 
• Reasonable attorney fees and costs.
6
 
 
Child Pornography  
The law prohibits any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to 
transfer or distribute material that appears to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct 
and is deemed obscene.
7
 
 
Miller v. California established the test for determining obscenity, now known as the Miller
8
 
test, which outlines three criteria for material to be considered obscene. The three-prong test 
requires the trier of fact to consider the following factors to determine if something is obscene:  
• Whether “the average person, applying contemporary community standards” would find that 
the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; 
• Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct 
specifically defined by the applicable state law; and 
• Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific 
value.
9
 
 
The test for determining whether matter involving minors is obscene is a slightly lower threshold 
than the Miller test. Material involving minors can be considered obscene if:  
• It depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or 
masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse; and 
• The image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
10
 
 
 
4
 A third degree felony is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to 5 years and a $5,000 fine as provided in ss. 775.082, 
775.083, and 775.084, F.S. 
5
 Section 836.13(4), F.S. 
6
 Section 836.13(5), F.S. 
7
 18 U.S.C.A. s. 1466A. (2003). 
8
 Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 24 (1973). 
9
 Id. 
10
 Id.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 5 
 
The Court tends to grant greater protections to minors, routinely upholding state statutes that 
penalize those who possess or disseminate obscene material relating to minors. In New York v. 
Ferber, the defendant was convicted for distributing material that depicted a sexual performance 
by a minor under the age of 16 in violation of a state law that prohibited persons from knowingly 
promoting material that depicted such a performance.
11
 In Ferber, the Court held that the statute 
at issue did not violate the First Amendment, explaining that the states have a compelling 
interest, and thus are granted more leeway, in regulating pornographic depictions of children.
12
 
The Court reasoned that such material bears so heavily on the welfare of children engaged in its 
production that a balance of compelling interests are struck and, therefore, these materials are not 
afforded the protections of the First Amendment.
13
 
 
Present law defines child pornography to mean: 
• Any image depicting a minor engaged in sexual conduct; or  
• Any image that has been created, altered, adapted, or modified by electronic, mechanical, or 
other means, to portray an identifiable minor engaged in sexual conduct.
14
 
 
Sexual performance means, a person is guilty of the use of a child in a sexual performance if, 
knowing the character and content thereof, he or she employs, authorizes, or induces a child to 
engage in a sexual performance or, being a parent, legal guardian, or custodian of such child, 
consents to the participation by such child in a sexual performance. A person who violates this 
offense commits a second degree felony.
15,16
 
 
A person is guilty of promoting a sexual performance by a child when, knowing the character 
and content thereof, he or she produces, directs, or promotes any performance which includes 
sexual conduct by a child.
17
 A person who violates this offense commits a second degree felony.  
 
It is unlawful for any person to possess with the intent to promote
18
 any photograph, motion 
picture, exhibition, show, representation, or other presentation which, in whole or in part, 
includes child pornography. The possession of three or more copies of such photograph, motion 
picture, representation, or presentation is prima facie evidence of an intent to promote. A person 
who violates this offense commits a second degree felony. 
 
This provision does not apply to any material possessed, controlled, or intentionally viewed as 
part of a law enforcement investigation.  
 
 
11
 New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982). 
12
 Ferber, 458 U.S. at 756. 
13
 Id. at 747-48. 
14
 Section 827.071(1)(b), F.S. 
15
 Section 827.071(2), F.S. 
16
 A second degree felony is punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding 15 years and a fine up to $10,000, as 
provided in ss. 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084, F.S. 
17
 Section 827.071(3), F.S. 
18
 Section 836.13(4), F.S., defines “Promote” to mean to issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, 
transmute, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, send, post, share, or advertise or to offer or agree to do 
the same.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 6 
 
Courts have determined what criteria may be used in determining what is lewd exhibition of the 
genitals. In State v. Hubbs,
19
 the critical issue for the court to determine was whether the state 
proved the defendant knew photographs taken of a 14-year-old girl included “actual lewd 
exhibition of the genitals” by a child and were “lewd” in nature. To prove an “actual lewd 
exhibition of the genitals” by a child, the State will be required to prove the defendant knew the 
photographs of the child were “lewd” in nature.
20
 The Second District has specifically held that 
“the lewdness requirement may be satisfied by the intent of the person promoting the 
performance which included sexual conduct by the child.”
21
 The Brabson court also noted that 
lewdness may be evaluated based on the test in U.S. v. Dost. The court held that a trier of fact 
should consider the Dost factors in making a determination whether the exhibition of the child's 
genitals in the photographs was lewd in nature.
22
 
 
In U.S. v. Dost,
23
 the court opined that a determination of whether there was lascivious exhibition 
should be made on a case-by-case basis using general principles as a guide for analysis.  
 
The court held that a trier of fact should look at the following factors, among any others that may 
be relevant in a particular case, when determining whether a visual depiction of a minor 
constitutes lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area: 
• Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area; 
• Whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose 
generally associated with sexual activity;  
• Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the 
age of the child; 
• Whether the child is fully or partially clothed or nude; 
• Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual 
activity;  
• Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer. 
 
The court asserted that a visual depiction need not involve all of the above-listed factors to 
constitute lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area, but rather that, a determination 
should be made based on the overall content of the visual depiction, taking into account the age 
of the minor.
24
 
 
 
19
 State v. Hubbs, 377 So.3d 1162 (Fla. 4
th
 DCA 2023). 
20
 Section § 827.071(1)(h), (5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2019). 
21
 State v. Brabson, 7 So.3d 1119, 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). 
22
 Hubbs, at 1168. 
23
 U.S. v. Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. California 1986). 
24
 Dost, 636 F. Supp. At 832.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 7 
 
Offense Severity Ranking Chart 
Felony offenses which are subject to the Criminal Punishment Code
25
 are listed in a single 
OSRC, which uses 10 offense levels to rank felonies from least severe to most severe. Each 
felony offense listed in the OSRC is assigned a level according to the severity of the offense.
26,27
  
 
A person’s primary offense, any other current offenses, and prior convictions are scored using 
the points designated for the offense severity level of each offense. The final score calculation, 
following the scoresheet formula, determines the lowest permissible sentence that a trial court 
may impose, absent a valid reason for departure.
28
 
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
Section 1 creates s. 800.045, F.S., to define the following terms: 
• “Identifiable minor” means a person: 
o Who is younger than 16 years of age at the time the lewd or lascivious image was 
created, altered, adapted, or modified, or whose image was used in the creating, altering, 
adapting, or modifying of the lewd or lascivious image; and 
o Who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or any 
distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark, or any recognizable feature. 
o The term may not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the identifiable 
minor.  
• “Intentionally view” means to deliberately, purposefully, and voluntarily view. Proof of 
intentional viewing requires establishing more than a single image, motion picture, 
exhibition, show, image, data, computer depiction, representation, or other presentation over 
any period of time.
29
 
• “Lewd or lascivious image” means: 
o Any image depicting lewd or lascivious exhibition in violation of s. 800.04(7), F.S.,
30
; 
or 
o Any image that has been created, altered, adapted, or modified by electronic, 
mechanical, or other means to portray lewd or lascivious exhibition in violation of 
s. 800.04(7), F.S., committed in the presence of an identifiable minor.  
 
The bill creates offenses related to lewd or lascivious images, to provide that: 
• It is a second degree felony for any person to possess with the intent to promote any 
photograph, motion picture, exhibition, exhibition, show, representation, or other 
 
25
 All felony offenses, with the exception of capital felonies, committed on or after October 1, 1998, are subject to the 
Criminal Punishment Code. 
26
 Section 921.0022, F.S. 
27
 Section 921.0022(2), F.S. 
28
 Section 921.0024(2), F.S., provides that if a person scores more than 44 points, the lowest permissible sentence is a 
specified term of months in state prison, determined by a formula. If a person scores 44 points or fewer, the court may 
impose a nonprison sanction, such as a county jail sentence, probation, or community control. 
29
 Section 827.071(1)(f), F.S. 
30
 Section 800.04(7), F.S., Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition means a person who intentionally masturbates; intentionally 
exposes the genitals in a lewd or lascivious manner; or intentionally commits any other sexual act that does not involve actual 
physical or sexual contact with the victim, including, but not limited to sadomasochistic abuse, sexual bestiality, or the 
simulation of any act involving sexual activity in the presence of a victim who is less than 16 years of age.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 8 
 
presentation which, in whole or in part, includes a lewd or lascivious image. The possession 
of three or more copies of such photograph, motion picture, representation, or presentation is 
prima facie evidence of an intent to promote. This paragraph does not apply to any material 
solicited, possessed, controlled, or intentionally viewed as part of a law enforcement 
investigation. 
• It is a third degree felony for any person to knowingly solicit, possess, control, or 
intentionally view a photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, 
data, computer depiction, or other presentation, in whole or in part, which he or she knows to 
include a lewd or lascivious image. The solicitation, possession, control, or intentional 
viewing of each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, image, data, computer 
depiction, representation, or presentation is a separate offense. If such photograph, motion 
picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, computer depiction, or other 
presentation includes a lewd or lascivious image depicting more than one minor, each such 
minor in each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, image, data, 
computer depiction, or other presentation who is knowingly solicited, possessed, controlled, 
or intentionally viewed is a separate offense. 
 
Prosecution of a person for an offense under this section does not preclude prosecution of that 
person in this state for a violation of any other law of this state, including a law providing for 
greater penalties than prescribed in this section or any other crime punishing the sexual 
performance or the sexual exploitation of children. 
 
Section 2 amends s. 827.071, F.S., to define the terms: 
• “Sexual conduct” to mean actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, 
sexual bestiality, masturbation, or sadomasochistic abuse; actual or simulated lewd exhibition 
of the genitals or anus; actual physical contact with a person’s clothed or unclothed genitals, 
pubic area, buttocks, or, if such person is a female, breast, with the intent to arouse or gratify 
the sexual desire of either party; or any act or conduct which constitutes sexual battery or 
simulates that sexual battery is being or will be committed. A mother’s breastfeeding of her 
baby does not under any circumstance constitute “sexual conduct.”  
 
The bill provides that the term “actual or simulated lewd exhibition of the genitals” may be 
evidenced by the overall content of an image, taking into account the age of the minor depicted 
and including, but not limited to, whether: 
• The focal point of the image is on the minor’s genitals; 
• The setting of the image is sexually suggestive or in a place or pose generally associated with 
sexual conduct;  
• The minor is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of 
the minor;  
• The image suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual conduct; or  
• The image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.  
 
Section 3 creates s. 827.073, F.S., to define the terms: 
• “Altered sexual depiction” to mean any visual depiction that, as a result of any type of 
digital, electronic, mechanical, or other modification, alteration, or adaptation, depicts a 
realistic version of an identifiable person:  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 9 
 
o With the nude body parts of another person as the nude body parts of the 
identifiable person;  
o With computer-generated nude body parts as the nude body parts of the 
identifiable person; or  
o Engaging in sexual conduct as defined in s. 847.001, F.S., in which the 
identifiable person did not engage.
31
  
• “Generate” to mean to create, alter, adapt, or modify any image by electronic, mechanical, or 
other computer-generated means to portray an identifiable person or to offer or agree to do 
the same. 
• “Visual depiction" includes, but is not limited to, a photograph, picture, image, motion 
picture, film, video, or other visual representation.
32
 
• “Identifiable minor” to mean a person: 
o Who was a minor at the time the image was created, altered, adapted, or modified, 
or whose image as a minor was used in the creating, altering, adapting, or 
modifying of the image;
33
 and 
o Who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or other 
distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark, or other recognizable 
feature.
34
 
o The term may not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the 
identifiable minor. 
• “Intentionally view” to mean to deliberately, purposefully, and voluntarily view. Proof of 
intentional viewing requires establishing more than a single image, motion picture, 
exhibition, show, image, data, computer depiction, representation, or other presentation over 
any period of time.
35
 
• “Promote” to mean to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, 
transfer, transmit, transmute, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, send, 
post, share, or advertise or to offer or agree to do the same.
36
 
• “Possess” to mean to knowingly or intentionally keep, control, maintain, store, or own, 
physically or electronically, any altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without 
the consent of the identifiable person.  
 
The bill provides that it is a third degree felony for a person to knowingly possess, control, or 
intentionally view a visual depiction that, in whole or in part, he or she knows includes an altered 
sexual depiction of an identifiable minor. The possession or control of three or more copies of 
such visual depiction is prima facie evidence of an intent to promote. The possession, control, or 
intentional viewing of each visual depiction is a separate offense.  
 
The bill provides civil remedies for an aggrieved person against a person who violates the above 
provision.  
 
 
31
 Section 836.13(1)(a), F.S. 
32
 Section 836.13(1)(e), F.S. 
33
 Section 827.071(1)(e)1., F.S. 
34
 Section 827.071(1)(e)2., F.S. 
35
 Section 827.071(1)(f), F.S. 
36
 Section 827.071(1)(h), F.S.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 10 
 
Any offense under the above provisions does not include an act done for a bona fide medical, 
literary, academic or scientific purpose.  
 
A person who intentionally generates an altered sexual depiction of a minor commits a third 
degree felony. 
 
 A person who solicits an altered sexual depiction of a minor, without the consent of the 
identifiable minor, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual depiction 
was an altered sexual depiction commits a third degree felony. 
 
A person who willfully and intentionally promotes an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable 
minor, without the consent of the identifiable minor, and who knows or reasonably should have 
known that such visual depiction was an altered sexual depiction commits a second degree 
felony. 
 
Prosecution of a person for an offense under this section does not preclude prosecution of that 
person in this state for a violation of any other law of this state, including a law providing for 
greater penalties than prescribed in this section or any other crime punishing the sexual 
performance or the sexual exploitation of children. 
 
Section 4 amends s. 836.13, F.S., to be renamed to altered sexual depictions and to define the 
term “generate” to mean to create, alter, adapt, or modify any image by electronic, mechanical, 
or other computer-generated means to portray an identifiable person or to offer or agree to do the 
same.  
 
A person who willfully and maliciously promotes, or possesses with intent to promote, any 
altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without the consent of the identifiable person, 
and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual depiction was an altered 
sexual depiction, commits a third degree felony. 
 
A person who willfully generates an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without 
the consent of the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have known that 
such visual depiction was an altered sexual depiction commits a third degree felony. 
 
A person who solicits an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without the consent of 
the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual 
depiction was an altered sexual depiction commits a third degree felony. 
 
The bill provides that an act done for a bona fide medical, literary, academic, or scientific 
purpose is not a violation of this offense. 
 
The bill authorizes a person who is portrayed in an altered sexual depiction without his or her 
consent to initiate a civil cause of action against a person who willfully generates such an altered 
sexual depiction to obtain appropriate relief to prevent or remedy the generation of such a 
depiction, including: 
• Injunctive relief. 
• Monetary damages to include $10,000 or actual damages incurred.   BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 11 
 
• Reasonable attorney fees and costs. 
 
Section 5 amends s. 921.0022, F.S., to rank the following offenses: 
• Soliciting an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without consent is ranked a 
Level 2 on the OSRC. 
• Person who generates an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without consent is 
a Level 3 on the OSRC. 
• Person who solicits an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without consent is 
ranked a Level 3 on the OSRC. 
• Possession, control, or intentionally viewing an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable 
minor is ranked a Level 4 on the OSRC. 
• Generating an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor without consent is ranked a 
Level 4 on the OSRC. 
• Solicitation of an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor is ranked a Level 4 on the 
OSRC. Promotion of an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor is ranked a Level 4 
on the OSRC. 
 
The bill takes effect October 1, 2025. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
The bill does not appear to require cities and counties to expend funds or limit their 
authority to raise revenue or receive state-shared revenues as specified by Article VII, 
s. 18, of the State Constitution. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None. 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that, “Congress shall make no law 
… abridging the freedom of speech…” This language prohibits the government from 
having the ability to constrain the speech of citizens. However, materials that constitute 
child pornography, obscenity, or material harmful to minors may be restricted. Child 
pornography, obscenity, and material harmful to minors have been defined in 
ch. 847, F.S., and are consistent with federal law and the United States Supreme Court 
holdings regarding such laws. The bill makes the simple creation or possession of an  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 12 
 
altered sexual depiction a crime. This may be subject to challenges under the First 
Amendment.  
 
Additionally, the bill makes a computer-generated image of a nude child a crime, which 
may subject the bill to First Amendment challenges. It is not unlawful to possess or view 
an image of a nude child, unless such depiction constitutes child pornography. If the bill 
passes, a depiction that has not been altered, adapted, etc., of a nude child who is not 
engaging in sexual conduct, will be legal to possess; however possession of an image that 
has been altered, adapted, etc., will be unlawful.  
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
The Legislature’s Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) and the 
Criminal Justice Impact Conference, which provides the final, official estimate of the 
prison bed impact, if any, of legislation, has provided a preliminary estimate that the bill 
may have a positive indeterminate prison bed impact on the Department of Corrections 
(DOC). According to EDR: 
 
[The bill] adds two Level 3, 3rd degree felonies to the language. Currently, a Level 3, 
3rd degree felony exists for “a person who willfully and maliciously promotes any 
altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without the consent of the 
identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have known that such visual 
depiction was an altered sexual depiction.” The first of the new felonies involves “a 
person who willfully and maliciously generates any altered sexual depiction of an 
identifiable person, without the consent of the identifiable person, and who knows or 
reasonably should have known that such visual depiction was an altered sexual 
depiction.” The second of the new felonies involves “a person who willfully and 
maliciously possesses any altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person, without 
the consent of the identifiable person, and who knows or reasonably should have 
known that such visual depiction was an altered sexual depiction. Exceptions are 
added for all three for “an act done for a bona fide medical, literary, academic, or 
scientific purpose.”  
 
Per DOC, in FY 2023-24, there were 351 new commitments to prison for felony 
offenses committed under s. 827.071, F.S. However, is not known how many 
additional offenders there would be under this new language.  
  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 13 
 
Per DOC, since the current Level 3, 3rd degree felony under s. 836.16, F.S., went into 
effect on October 1, 2022, there have been no new commitments to prison. Per FDLE, 
in FY 23-24, since the current Level 3, 3rd degree felony under s. 836.16, F.S., went 
into effect on October 1, 2022, there have been 10 arrests, with one guilty/conviction 
charge. That one charge was sentenced to 30 days in jail. It is not known how many 
additional offenders there would be with the two new felonies. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
There is a technical deficiency as to lines 160 and 478 of the amendment. The newly created 
offense of promotion of an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable minor in s. 827.073(2)(d) is 
listed as a second degree felony on line 160, and a third degree felony on line 478 of the Offense 
Severity Ranking Chart.  
VII. Related Issues: 
This bill could potentially criminalize a parent for possessing a nude photo of their child taken 
without a prurient intent or prurient curiosity, if such image has been altered.  
 
The bill amends the definition of sexual conduct by including the term “anus” in s. 827.071, F.S., 
but does not amend the definition of sexual conduct in other sections of law.  
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends the following sections of the Florida Statutes: 827.071, 836.13, 
and 921.0022.  
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS/CS by Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice on April 9, 
2025: 
  The committee substitute: 
• Removes definitions for the terms “anus” and “male genitals.” 
• Removes language expanding the definition of the term “sexual conduct” to include 
masturbation by a person in the presence of a child or ejaculation on any part of a 
child’s body or clothing.  
• Removes malicious intent from generating, soliciting or possessing any altered sexual 
depiction of an identifiable person. 
• Provides criminal penalties for possession with intent to promote a lewd or lascivious 
image, and providing that a violation of this offense is a second degree unranked 
felony. 
• Provides criminal penalties for the solicitation, possession, control or intentionally 
viewing of a lewd or lascivious image is a third degree unranked felony.  BILL: CS/CS/SB 1180   	Page 14 
 
• Provides criminal penalties for knowingly possessing, controlling, or intentionally 
viewing, intentionally generating, or soliciting an altered sexual depiction of an 
identifiable minor is a third degree felony, ranked a Level 4 in the OSRC. 
• Providing criminal penalties for willfully and intentionally promoting an altered 
sexual depiction of a minor is a second degree felony, ranked a Level 4 in the OSRC. 
• Provides that soliciting an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person without 
consent is a third degree felony, ranked a Level 2 in the OSRC. 
 
CS by Criminal Justice on March 25, 2025: 
The committee substitute: 
• Removes language expanding the definition of “child pornography.” 
• Provides definitions for “anus”, “male genitals”, “generate”, and “possess”. 
• Revises the term “sexual conduct” to include masturbation by a person in the 
presence of a child or ejaculation on any part of a child’s body or clothing. 
• Provides criminal penalties for willfully and maliciously generating or possessing any 
altered sexual depiction with the consent of an identifiable person. Each violation is a 
separate offense that is a third degree felony, ranked a Level 3 in the OSRC. 
• Provides an exception for medical, literary, academic or scientific purposes, for 
crimes related to Altered Sexual Depiction. 
 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.