Florida 2025 2025 Regular Session

Florida Senate Bill S1470 Analysis / Analysis

Filed 04/01/2025

                    The Florida Senate 
BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT 
(This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) 
Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Fiscal Policy 
 
BILL: CS/SB 1470 
INTRODUCER:  Appropriations Committee on Pre-K - 12 Education and Senator Burgess 
SUBJECT:  School Safety 
DATE: April 1, 2025 
 
 ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR  REFERENCE  	ACTION 
1. Brick Bouck ED Favorable 
2. Gray Elwell AED  Fav/CS 
3. Brick Siples FP Pre-meeting 
 
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes 
 
I. Summary: 
CS/SB 1470 strengthens school safety measures, enhances behavioral threat management 
protocols, expands oversight of school security personnel, and clarifies campus security 
requirements. Specifically, the bill: 
• Aligns the training and certification requirements for school security guards with those for 
school guardians and requires that all security guards be trained and approved by a sheriff. 
• Clarifies participation in the school security guard program to private schools, ensuring they 
meet the same training and screening requirements as public schools. 
• Enhances reporting requirements for school security guards and safe-school officers, 
requiring employment and disciplinary actions to be reported to the Florida Department of 
Law Enforcement (FDLE). 
• Mandates that security guards submit the results of the required psychological evaluation to 
the sheriff for review. 
• Clarifies that locked campus requirements apply only during school supervision hours, rather 
than whenever students are present. 
• Expands the use of firearm detection canines by authorizing school districts, in addition to 
law enforcement agencies, to employ them for school security. 
• Establishes a formal partnership between OSS and the Florida Association of School Safety 
Specialists (FS3) to develop training and certification programs for school safety personnel. 
• Requires the Office of Safe Schools to convene a stakeholder work group to develop 
recommendations for the establishment of a Florida Institute of School Safety. 
REVISED:   BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 2 
 
• Requires the Department of Education to establish and maintain a centralized system that 
integrates panic alert systems and digital school maps used by public schools. 
 
This bill appropriates for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the sum of $450,000 in recurring general 
revenue funds to the Department of Education to implement the provisions of the centralized 
alert system. See Section V., Fiscal Impact Statement. 
 
The bill takes effect July 1, 2025 
II. Present Situation: 
Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program 
School Guardian Training 
Florida law requires sheriffs to assist district school boards, charter school governing boards, and 
private schools in exercising options for safe-school officers. Each sheriff must provide access to 
the Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program to aid in the 
prevention or abatement of active assailant incidents on school premises. 
 
A sheriff who establishes a guardian program must consult with the Florida Department of Law 
Enforcement (FDLE) on programmatic guiding principles, practices, and resources, and is 
responsible for certifying school employees as school guardians if they meet statutory 
qualifications, including: 
• Holding a license to carry a concealed weapon or concealed firearm. 
• Completing a 144-hour training program, consisting of 12 hours of training to improve the 
school guardian’s knowledge and skills necessary to respond to and de-escalate incidents on 
school premises and 132 total hours of comprehensive firearm safety and proficiency training 
conducted by Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission-certified instructors. 
• Passing a psychological evaluation. 
• Submitting to and passing an initial drug test and subsequent random drug tests. 
• Successfully completing ongoing annual training, weapon inspection, and firearm 
qualification.
1
 
 
A sheriff who conducts the training or waives training requirements must issue a school guardian 
certificate and maintain detailed records of training, inspections, and certifications.
2
 
 
Permitless Carry and Guardian Training Eligibility 
A sheriff may only certify school employees as school guardians if they hold a concealed 
weapon or concealed firearm license under s. 790.06, F.S.
3
 However, in 2023, Florida enacted 
permitless concealed carry under s. 790.01(1), F.S., allowing individuals to carry a concealed 
firearm without obtaining a license under s. 790.06, F.S.
4
 Current law does not explicitly 
 
1
 Section 30.15(1), F.S. 
2
 Id. authorizes a sheriff to waive the guardian training requirements for a person who meets specified statutory criminal 
justice training standards and law enforcement qualifications. 
3
 Id. 
4
 Section 790.01(1), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 3 
 
authorize sheriffs to provide guardian training to individuals who are legally permitted to carry 
under Chapter 790, F.S., without a license.  
 
Sheriff and School Guardian Reporting Requirements 
Sheriff Reporting Responsibilities 
A sheriff who issues a school guardian certificate must report to FDLE the name, date of birth, 
and certification date of the school guardian within 30 days. Additionally, each sheriff must 
submit quarterly reports to FDLE detailing: 
• Upcoming school guardian training schedules. 
• Training dates, locations, and registration contacts. 
• Class capacity for training programs. 
 
The FDLE must publish and update these reports at least quarterly on its website. 
 
Sheriffs who fail to comply with these reporting requirements are ineligible to receive 
reimbursement from the Department of Education (DOE) for school guardian training expenses. 
However, upon submission of the required reports, sheriffs regain eligibility.
5
  
 
School District, Charter School, and Private School Reporting Requirements 
By February 1 and September 1 of each school year, each school district, charter school, and 
private school must report to the FDLE: 
• The name, date of birth, and appointment date of each school guardian. 
• The date of separation for any school guardian no longer serving in that capacity. 
 
Failure to comply prohibits the school from operating a school guardian program in the 
following school year unless missing information is submitted.
6
  
 
The FDLE Responsibilities and Enforcement 
The FDLE must maintain a statewide list of all school guardians. This list must include: 
• The guardian's name, certification date, and appointment date. 
• The name of the appointing school district, charter school, or private school. 
• Any additional information regarding misconduct or firearm discharges, except those 
occurring during training. 
• The date a guardian separated from their appointment, if applicable.
7
 
 
The FDLE must remove from the list any school guardian whose training has expired.  
 
By March 1 and October 1 of each school year, the FDLE must notify the Department of 
Education of any sheriff, school district, charter school, or private school that has failed to 
comply with these reporting requirements. 
 
 
5
 Section 30.15, F.S. 
6
 Id. 
7
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 4 
 
The FDLE is authorized to adopt rules to implement these reporting requirements and may 
require additional identifying information as necessary to ensure accurate record-keeping of 
school guardians.
8
  
 
Currently, 53 counties participate in the Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel 
Guardian Program.
9
  
 
Behavioral Threat Management and School Safety Oversight 
Florida law establishes the Office of Safe Schools (OSS) within the DOE to serve as the central 
authority for school safety, overseeing training standards, best practices, and compliance 
measures.
10
  
 
The OSS develops, administers, and ensures compliance with Florida’s statewide behavioral 
threat management framework, which includes a standardized threat assessment process, a 
digital reporting portal, and oversight of school-based and district-level threat management 
teams.
11
 
 
The OSS is also required to develop and implement a School Safety Specialist Training Program 
for school safety specialists, based on national and state best practices on school safety and 
security and must include active shooter training.
12
 
 
Behavioral Threat Management Operational Process 
The OSS is responsible for developing a statewide behavioral threat management operational 
process to assist school districts, charter school governing boards, and individual schools in 
identifying, assessing, managing, and monitoring potential threats. This process includes: 
• Establishing and defining the duties of threat management teams.  
• Developing criteria for behavioral risk and threat assessment.  
• Implementing intervention, school support, and community services procedures.  
• Providing guidelines for law enforcement intervention and risk management procedures. 
• Establishing monitoring mechanisms for ongoing threats and interventions.  
• Requiring schools to use the Florida-specific behavioral threat assessment instrument to 
coordinate interventions for students who may pose a threat. 
 
Each school district, charter school governing board, and individual school must use the 
statewide behavioral threat management operational process upon its availability.
13
  
 
 
8
 Id. 
9
 Florida Department of Education, Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, & Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program, 
https://www.fldoe.org/safe-schools/guardian-program.stml (last visited Mar. 14, 2025). 
10
 Section 1001.212, F.S. 
11
 Florida Department of Education, Florida Harm Prevention and Threat Management Manual, Rule 6A-1.0019, F.A.C., 
available at https://flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=6A-1.0019. 
12
 Section 1001.212(4), F.S. 
13
 Section 1001.212(11)(a), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 5 
 
Florida-Specific Behavioral Threat Assessment Instrument 
The OSS is required to develop the Florida-specific behavioral threat assessment instrument, 
which school districts, charter schools, and governing boards must use to evaluate student threats 
and coordinate intervention services. The assessment instrument: 
• Includes a standardized threat assessment report containing documentation of evaluations, 
interventions, and ongoing monitoring.  
• Establishes procedures for assessing student, family, school, and social dynamics when 
determining threat levels.  
• Outlines requirements for school responses, law enforcement engagement, and mental health 
provider coordination in response to threats.  
• Is integrated into the statewide digital threat management portal, where records are retained 
in accordance with State Board of Education (SBE) rules.
14
  
 
Threat Management Portal and Data Access Restrictions 
The OSS is responsible for developing, maintaining, and administering a statewide digital threat 
management portal to support behavioral threat assessment and intervention efforts. The portal 
digitizes the Florida-specific behavioral threat assessment instrument and is used by school 
districts, charter schools, and school governing boards for reporting, documentation, and 
coordination of student threat assessments.
15
  
 
Florida law strictly regulates access to records maintained in the portal: 
• The OSS and its system administrators may not access a threat assessment report, its 
corresponding documentation, or any other information stored in the portal.  
• School districts and charter school governing boards may not access education records within 
the portal unless authorized by SBE rule.  
• Parents may access their own child’s education records in the portal but are not permitted 
direct access to the portal itself.  
• The portal must have security controls that alert system administrators to any unauthorized 
access attempts.  
 
Florida law further requires: 
• Education records stored in the portal to be retained, maintained, and transferred only in 
compliance with SBE rule.  
• A quarterly portal access review audit process to be developed and implemented by the OSS.  
• Annual role-based training for authorized users of the portal to be provided by the OSS 
beginning August 1, 2025.  
• Any unauthorized access, use, or release of an education record in the portal to be punishable 
by a fine of up to $2,000.
16
  
 
 
14
 Section 1001.212(11)(b), F.S. 
15
 Section 1001.212(11)(c), F.S. 
16
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 6 
 
Federal and State Privacy Protections for Student Records 
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, is the primary 
federal law governing access to student education records. FERPA prohibits the disclosure of 
personally identifiable information (PII) from student education records without prior written 
parental consent, unless an exception applies.
17
  
 
FERPA applies to any educational institution receiving federal funds, including Florida’s public 
schools, charter schools, and state education agencies.
18
 Education records include records that 
are directly related to a student and maintained by an educational agency or institution.
19
  
 
Florida law further aligns with FERPA by stating that education records may not be disclosed 
without consent except as authorized by FERPA or other federal regulations.
20
 
 
Exceptions to FERPA’s General Prohibition on Disclosure 
State Program Audits and Compliance Monitoring 
FERPA authorizes the disclosure of student records without parental consent to state and local 
educational authorities for the purpose of audits, program evaluations, and compliance 
monitoring related to state-supported education programs.
21
 This exception could permit the OSS 
to access threat assessment records if the access is necessary to monitor compliance with state 
safety policies. 
 
Student Safety and Health Exceptions 
FERPA’s health or safety emergency exception allows schools to disclose student education 
records without parental consent when necessary to protect the health or safety of the student or 
other individuals.
22
 Disclosure under this provision must be limited to appropriate parties, such 
as law enforcement, school officials, or state safety agencies, who require the information to 
address an imminent threat.
23
  
 
This exception may justify the OSS’s access to student threat assessment records if the access is 
necessary to protect student safety and prevent school violence. However, disclosures under the 
health or safety emergency exception must be limited to the duration of the emergency, and 
routine access to records would not be justified under this exception alone.
24
  
 
 
17
 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 C.F.R. § 99.30. 
18
 34 C.F.R. § 99.1. 
19
 34 C.F.R. § 99.3. 
20
 Section 1002.221, F.S. 
21
 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 C.F.R. § 99.31. 
22
 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 C.F.R. § 99.36. 
23
 34 C.F.R. § 99.36(b). 
24
 34 C.F.R. § 99.36(c).  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 7 
 
District School Board Responsibilities for School Safety 
Emergency Alert Procedures 
Each public school, including charter schools, is required to implement a mobile panic alert 
system capable of connecting diverse emergency services technologies to ensure real-time 
coordination between multiple first responder agencies. Such system, known as “Alyssa's Alert,” 
integrates with local public safety answering point infrastructure to transmit 911 calls and mobile 
activations.
25
 
 
A public school district may also implement additional strategies or systems to ensure real-time 
coordination between multiple first responder agencies in a school security emergency.
26
 
 
Emergency Alert Procedures 
Each district school board is required to provide for the control, safety, and welfare of students 
on school campuses, including implementing security measures to prevent violence and 
unauthorized access. Each district school superintendent must establish policies and procedures 
for preventing violence on school grounds, including assessing and intervening with individuals 
who may pose a threat.
27
  
 
Florida law also establishes specific locked campus requirements to regulate access to school 
buildings, classrooms, and campus gates. Each school district and charter school governing 
board must comply with statewide school safety requirements, which mandate: 
• Locking all gates and access points that restrict ingress to or egress from a school campus 
when students are on campus, unless actively staffed, permitted under a shared-use 
agreement, or exempted by the school safety specialist based on other security measures.  
• Keeping all school classroom doors and instructional spaces locked when occupied by 
students, except between class periods or when actively staffed at the door.  
• Securing all campus access doors, gates, and entry points to school buildings at all times to 
prevent unauthorized ingress, unless a person is actively entering or exiting, or an exemption 
has been documented by the school safety specialist.  
• Clearly marking the safest areas for sheltering in place within each classroom and 
instructional space, with students being notified of these locations within the first 10 days of 
the school year.
28
  
 
Enforcement and Compliance 
Each school district and charter school must document compliance with these requirements 
through the Florida Safe Schools Assessment Tool (FSSAT),
29
 maintained by the OSS. The OSS 
 
25
 Section 1006.07(4)(c), F.S. 
26
 Section 1006.07(4)(d), F.S. 
27
 Section 1006.07, F.S. 
28
 Section 1006.07(6), F.S. 
29
 Section 1006.1493, F.S. The Florida Safe Schools Assessment Tool (FSSAT) is a statewide risk assessment and 
compliance monitoring system used by school districts and charter schools to evaluate school safety, identify security 
vulnerabilities, and document compliance with statutory safety requirements.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 8 
 
is authorized to conduct compliance visits to verify whether school safety specialists have 
appropriately documented exemptions or security adjustments.
30
  
 
Safe-School Officer Requirements 
Florida law requires each public school, including charter schools, to have at least one safe-
school officer assigned to its facility. School districts may partner with law enforcement agencies 
or private security agencies to meet this requirement through any combination of the following 
safe-school officer options: 
• School resource officers (sworn law enforcement officers).  
• School safety officers (sworn law enforcement officers who are employed by the school 
district).  
• School guardians (trained school personnel or volunteers who complete guardian program 
training).  
• School security guards (contracted private security personnel meeting state training and 
screening requirements).
31
  
 
School Security Guards and Required Screening 
A school district or charter school governing board may contract with a licensed security agency 
to employ a school security guard to fulfill the safe-school officer requirement. To serve in this 
role, an individual must:
32
 
• Hold a valid Class “D” (unarmed security) and Class “G” (armed security) license under 
Chapter 493, F.S.
33
  
• Complete 144 hours of required guardian program training.
34
  
• Pass a psychological evaluation administered by a licensed psychologist, with the results 
submitted to the sheriff’s office, school district, or charter school governing board.  
• Submit to and pass an initial drug test and subsequent random drug tests, following state 
drug-free workplace regulations and applicable school district policies.  
• Complete ongoing annual training, weapon inspections, and firearm qualifications, providing 
documentation to the appropriate contracting entity.
35
  
 
Additionally, contracts between a school district, charter school, or private security agency must 
specify who is responsible for training, inspection, and record maintenance related to school 
security guard qualifications.
36
  
 
Florida Safe Schools Canine Program 
Florida law establishes the Florida Safe Schools Canine Program under the OSS within the DOE 
to support the use of firearm detection canines in K-12 schools. The program was created to: 
 
30
 Section 1001.212(14), F.S. 
31
 Section 1006.12, F.S. 
32
 Section 1006.12(4), F.S. 
33
 Section 493.6101(18), F.S. 
34
 Section 30.15(1), F.S. 
35
 Section 1006.12, F.S. 
36
 Id.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 9 
 
• Encourage partnerships between schools, businesses, and law enforcement agencies to fund 
the acquisition, training, and care of firearm detection canines.  
• Enhance school safety by increasing the presence of firearm detection canines in schools, 
reinforcing public confidence in law enforcement’s role in school security.
37
  
 
A firearm detection canine is defined as any canine that is owned or the service of which is 
employed by a law enforcement agency for use in K-12 schools for the primary purpose of 
detecting firearms and ammunition.
38
 These canines must be trained to interact with children and 
may also be trained as animal-assisted therapy canines.
39
  
III. Effect of Proposed Changes: 
This bill strengthens school safety measures, enhances behavioral threat management protocols, 
expands oversight of school security personnel, and clarifies campus security requirements.  
 
Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program 
The bill amends s. 30.15, F.S., to modify training, certification, and oversight requirements for 
school guardians and school security guards. Specifically, the bill: 
• Aligns the training and certification requirements for school security guards with those for 
school guardians, establishing consistent standards across both roles. 
• Requires a sheriff to establish a school guardian program if a school board, charter school, or 
private school contracts for the use of school security guards. 
• Authorizes private schools to contract for school security guards and allows a sheriff to 
establish a guardian program to provide training for private school security guards. 
• Clarifies that security agencies are responsible for all training and screening-related costs for 
school security guards, which may not be waived by sheriffs, preventing the use of state 
funds for private security agency expenses. The bill clarifies that the fee a sheriff may charge 
a security agency for guardian training may not exceed the actual cost incurred by the sheriff 
to provide the training. 
• Requires sheriffs to maintain documentation of training, certification, weapon inspection, and 
firearm qualification records for each certified school security guard. 
• Specifies that a school security guard who has completed the guardian training program is 
not required to complete another guardian training program unless there has been at least a 
one-year break in appointment as a school guardian or employment as a school security 
guard. 
• Authorizes a sheriff to provide guardian training to individuals who are legally permitted to 
possess or carry a concealed firearm under Florida law, aligning with the state’s permitless 
carry provisions. 
• Requires a sheriff to provide guardian training only to individuals who have already satisfied 
all background screening, psychological evaluation, and drug test requirements. 
• Requires a sheriff to issue a school security guard certificate to individuals who meet all 
statutory screening, training, and experience requirements and to maintain documentation of 
 
37
 Section 1006.121(1), F.S. 
38
 Section 1006.121(2), F.S. 
39
 Section 1006.121(3), F.S.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 10 
 
weapon and equipment inspections, training, certification, and qualification records for each 
certified school security guard. 
 
Sheriff and School Guardian Reporting Requirements 
To streamline reporting processes and enhance oversight, the bill aligns school security guard 
reporting requirements with those for school guardians. Specifically, the bill: 
• Aligns school security guard reporting and recordkeeping requirements with those for school 
guardians and mandates that security agencies report to the FDLE the date a school security 
guard was last employed in a school. 
• Clarifies that the fee a sheriff may charge a security agency for guardian training may not 
exceed the actual cost incurred by the sheriff to provide the training. 
• Specifies that if no guardian or security guard training sessions are scheduled, the sheriff is 
not required to submit a quarterly training report to the FDLE. 
• Removes outdated reporting requirements for sheriffs, school districts, charter schools, and 
private schools regarding school guardian certifications and appointments. 
 
Behavioral Threat Management and School Safety Oversight 
The bill amends s. 1001.212, F.S., to modify the duties of the OSS related to threat assessment 
processes and security exceptions. Specifically, the bill: 
• Clarifies that the OSS is responsible for maintaining the statewide behavioral threat 
management operational process and the Florida-specific behavioral threat assessment 
instrument. 
• Authorizes the State Board of Education to establish in rule when the OSS or its system 
administrators may access a threat assessment report, related documentation, or any other 
information required by the Florida-specific behavioral threat assessment instrument 
maintained in the portal. Access must comply with state and federal privacy laws. 
• Requires the OSS to convene a stakeholder work group to develop recommendations for the 
establishment of a Florida Institute of School Safety. The work group must include 
representatives from postsecondary institutions, law enforcement, fire and emergency 
medical services, emergency management, school facilities staff, school safety specialists, 
school administrators, superintendents, school-based mental health professionals, and threat 
management practitioners. The recommendations must address potential programs and 
functions to enhance school safety. The Office must submit its finding and recommendations 
to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
by January 1, 2026. 
 
The bill amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to require the Department of Education to establish and 
maintain a centralized system that integrates panic alert systems and digital school maps used by 
public schools, charter schools, and other educational institutions. The centralized system must: 
• Receive and process alerts from Department-approved panic alert systems. 
• Integrate digital maps to provide real-time situational awareness for law enforcement and 
emergency responders. 
• Store and provide access to historical alert data for authorized state agencies. 
 
The bill also requires that:  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 11 
 
All public and charter schools connect their panic alert systems to the centralized system. 
• Panic alert systems be interoperable with the centralized system to ensure seamless 
communication with emergency personnel. 
• Digital maps required under s. 1013.13, F.S., be integrated into the centralized system to 
support emergency response coordination. 
 
District School Board Responsibilities for School Safety 
The bill also amends s. 1006.07, F.S., to modify locked campus and building requirements to 
apply only during school supervision hours rather than whenever students are present. It also 
clarifies when certain access points may remain unlocked. Specifically, the bill: 
• Authorizes an exception to the requirement that campus areas and school buildings remain 
locked, permitting an access point to be unlocked if another closed and locked gate or access 
point separates it from areas occupied by students for campus areas, or if another closed and 
locked door, gate, or access point prevents access to a school building. 
• Defines "school supervision hours" as the hours of the school day plus a reasonable time 
immediately before and after school when student supervision is available, as determined by 
school district policy. 
• Clarifies that the exception allowing an access point to remain unlocked when it is actively 
staffed applies not only to campus entry points but also to school buildings when staffed by 
school personnel. 
• Defines the terms “exclusive zone” and “nonexclusive zone” to clarify where locked access 
point requirements apply on a school campus. The exclusive zone refers to the interior 
portion of a campus that lies beyond a secured gate or door limiting access to a single point 
of entry. Locked access point requirements apply to this zone. 
• Defines the nonexclusive zone as the area outside of the exclusive zone but still located on 
school property. These areas may include, but are not limited to, parking lots, athletic fields 
and stadiums, mechanical buildings, playgrounds, bus ramps, agricultural spaces, and other 
locations that do not provide direct, unimpeded access to the exclusive zone. The bill 
expressly states that locked access point requirements do not apply to nonexclusive zones. 
 
The bill provides specific exemptions to the requirement that all school classrooms and other 
instructional spaces remain locked to prevent ingress when occupied by students. The bill allows 
a classroom or instructional space used for a career and technical education (CTE) program to 
remain unlocked if locking the space would pose a health or safety risk to students. In such 
cases, the school safety specialist, or his or her designee, must document in the Florida Safe 
Schools Assessment Tool (FSSAT) that the space is used for CTE and that other safety measures 
are in place to prevent authorized access.  
 
The bill also exempts common areas such as cafeterias, media centers, and auditoriums from the 
locked classroom requirement, except when those spaces are being used for instructional time or 
student testing.  
 
The bill requires that each substitute teacher be provided with all school safety protocols and 
policies before their first day of substitute teaching at a school. 
  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 12 
 
Safe-School Officer Requirements 
The bill amends s. 1006.12, F.S., to clarify participation in the school security guard program 
and increase oversight of security guard training, certification, and reporting requirements. 
Specifically, the bill: 
• Clarifies private school authority to contract with security agencies for school security 
guards. 
• Requires private schools contracting for security guards to adhere to all training and 
screening requirements applicable to public schools. 
• Requires that all school security guards be trained by a sheriff pursuant to the training 
requirements of the Chris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian 
Program. 
• Mandates that security guards be approved by the sheriff of each county in which the school 
security guard will be assigned to a school before being assigned to a school in that county. 
• Requires that school security guards submit the results of the required psychological 
evaluation to the sheriff for review. 
• Mandates that all ongoing training, weapon inspections, and firearm qualifications for school 
security guards be conducted by a sheriff or through a sheriff-approved program. 
 
The bill adds private school administrators to the notification requirements concerning safe-
school officer misconduct and firearm discharges, supporting uniform reporting across all 
schools utilizing safe-school officers. The bill requires the OSS to provide the FDLE with any 
information it receives from a district school superintendent or charter school administrator, 
private school administrator, or respective designee concerning a school security guard who: 
• Is dismissed for misconduct or is otherwise disciplined. 
• Discharges his or her firearm in the exercise of the school security guard’s duties, other than 
for training purposes. 
 
Florida Safe Schools Canine Program 
The bill expands the definition of the term "firearm detection canine" in s. 1006.121(2), F.S., to 
authorize school districts, rather than just law enforcement agencies, to employ firearm detection 
canines and specify that only sworn law enforcement officers may use the canines in K-12 
schools.  
 
The bill takes effect July 1, 2025. 
IV. Constitutional Issues: 
A. Municipality/County Mandates Restrictions: 
None. 
B. Public Records/Open Meetings Issues: 
None.  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 13 
 
C. Trust Funds Restrictions: 
None. 
D. State Tax or Fee Increases: 
None. 
E. Other Constitutional Issues: 
None. 
V. Fiscal Impact Statement: 
A. Tax/Fee Issues: 
None. 
B. Private Sector Impact: 
None. 
C. Government Sector Impact: 
This bill appropriates, for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the sum of $450,000 in recurring 
general revenue funds, to the Department of Education to implement the centralized 
system to integrate all panic alert systems and digital school maps used by public schools, 
charter schools, and other educational institutions, and for schools to connect their panic 
alert systems to the centralized system. 
VI. Technical Deficiencies: 
None. 
VII. Related Issues: 
None. 
VIII. Statutes Affected: 
This bill substantially amends the following sections of the Florida Statutes: 30.15, 1001.212, 
1006.07, 1006.12, and 1006.121.   
IX. Additional Information: 
A. Committee Substitute – Statement of Substantial Changes: 
(Summarizing differences between the Committee Substitute and the prior version of the bill.) 
CS by Appropriations Committee on Pre-K - 12 Education on March 24, 2025:  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 14 
 
The committee substitute: 
• Clarifies that the fee a sheriff may charge a security agency for guardian training may 
not exceed the actual cost incurred by the sheriff to provide the training. 
• Replaces the provision requiring the Office of Safe Schools (OSS) to partner with the 
Florida Association of School Safety Specialists with a requirement that the OSS 
convene a stakeholder workgroup to develop recommendations for establishing a 
Florida Institute of School Safety, with findings due to the Governor and Legislature 
by January 1, 2026. 
• Removes the requirement for OSS to maintain a list of exceptions to locked access 
point requirements. 
• Defines the terms “exclusive zone” and “non-exclusive zone” and applies locked 
access point requirements only to the exclusive zone. 
• Removes the provision authorizing the OSS to recognize exceptions to locked 
classroom requirements. 
• Adds specific exceptions to locked classroom requirements for certain career and 
technical education (CTE) instructional spaces and common areas. 
• Applies locked school building requirements to schools that do not have a secure 
exclusive zone, as a conforming change. 
• Requires substitute teachers to be provided with all school safety protocols and 
policies before their first day of substitute teaching. 
 
The committee substitute requires the Department of Education (DOE) to establish and 
maintain a centralized system that integrates panic alert systems and digital school maps 
used by public schools, charter schools, and other educational institutions. The 
centralized system must: 
• Receive and process alerts from DOE-approved panic alert systems. 
• Integrate digital maps to provide real-time situational awareness for law enforcement 
and emergency responders. 
• Store and provide access to historical alert data for authorized state agencies. 
 
The committee substitute also requires that: 
• All public and charter schools connect their panic alert systems to the centralized 
system. 
• Panic alert systems be interoperable with the centralized system to ensure seamless 
communication with emergency personnel. 
• Digital maps required under s. 1013.13, F.S., be integrated into the centralized system 
to support emergency response coordination. 
 
The committee substitute appropriates, for the 2025-2026 fiscal year, the sum of 
$450,000 in recurring funds from the General Revenue Fund to the DOE to implement a 
centralized system to integrate all panic alert systems and digital school maps used by  BILL: CS/SB 1470   	Page 15 
 
public schools, charter schools, and other educational institutions, and for schools to 
connect their panic alert systems to the centralized system. 
 
B. Amendments: 
None. 
This Senate Bill Analysis does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill’s introducer or the Florida Senate.