Georgia House Bill HB1120

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/24

Caption

Ad valorem tax; post-appeal valuation freeze; exclude certain residential properties

Impact

If enacted, HB 1120 is likely to have substantial implications on the procedures by which residential property taxes are assessed in Georgia. The legislation seeks to protect homeowners who successfully appeal their property assessments by freezing their valuation for the following two fiscal years, fostering predictability and fairness in the property tax system. This is particularly important for taxpayers who may otherwise face fluctuating property values and taxes during times of economic uncertainty.

Summary

House Bill 1120 proposes amendments to the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, specifically targeting the way property valuations are handled post-appeals. The bill introduces a valuation freeze for residential properties that have undergone successful appeals, prohibiting the board of tax assessors from increasing their values for the next two years unless specific conditions are met. These conditions include mutual written agreement or significant changes to the property, which could affect its market value. This amendment aims to provide property owners with greater stability in their tax assessments following a successful appeal, shielding them from abrupt increases in property values.

Contention

Debate around HB 1120 may center on its potential for unintended consequences, particularly how the valuation freeze could impact local revenue generation for municipalities. Critics might argue that while the bill offers protection for homeowners, it could also limit the ability of local governments to adjust property taxes according to current market conditions. Moreover, there may be concerns regarding the exceptions outlined in the bill that allow for valuation reassessment under certain circumstances, creating potential loopholes that could be exploited. The balance between protecting taxpayer rights and ensuring sufficient funding for local services is likely to be a prominent point of contention among legislators.