Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB259

Introduced
2/27/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Introduced
2/27/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  

Caption

Superior Court of Banks County; move from the Piedmont Judicial Circuit to the Mountain Judicial Circuit

Impact

The implications of SB 259 on state laws are significant as it directly affects the structure and jurisdiction of the judicial system in Georgia. By relocating Banks County to another judicial circuit, the bill aims to streamline operations and potentially enhance the efficiency of legal proceedings in the area. This shift may also influence how other counties are restructured regarding their judicial circuits in future legislative discussions. Overall, the bill is designed to ensure smoother management of court resources across the affected circuits.

Summary

Senate Bill 259 seeks to transfer Banks County from the Piedmont Judicial Circuit to the Mountain Judicial Circuit. This legislative action will come into effect on January 1, 2025, and includes specific provisions to handle the transition of all ongoing legal proceedings from the Piedmont to the Mountain circuit. The bill outlines the requirements for intergovernmental agreements necessary to address cost allocations related to the operation of the respective judicial circuits, impacting both civil and criminal cases currently filed in Banks County.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 259 appears to be generally favorable, with support from legislators who view it as a necessary adjustment to improve judicial efficiency. However, some concerns may be raised regarding the resource allocation aspects and the complexities related to transitioning ongoing cases. Lawmakers seem to be framing this bill as a practical solution to enhance legal services in Banks County, aiming for better local governance within the judicial system.

Contention

While there may not be substantial opposition raised against SB 259, potential points of contention include how swiftly and effectively the intergovernmental agreements can be established and whether all financial aspects of the transition will be adequately addressed. The necessity for operational agreements between the new and old circuits could lead to discussions surrounding budgetary impacts and the allocation of judicial resources, which are critical for maintaining service levels as the transfer takes place.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

GA HB368

Banks County; Superior Court; move from Piedmont Judicial Circuit to Mountain Judicial Circuit

GA HB592

Courts; change name of Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit to DeKalb Judicial Circuit

GA HB158

Courts; change name of Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit to DeKalb Judicial Circuit

GA SB88

Douglas Judicial Circuit; a fourth judge of the superior courts; provide

GA SB327

Clayton Judicial Circuit; sixth judge of the superior courts; provide

GA SB145

Augusta Judicial Circuit; a sixth judge of the superior courts; provide

GA SB66

Superior Courts; Atlantic Judicial Circuit; additional judge; provide

GA SB10

Superior Courts of the Alapaha Judicial Circuit; additional judge; provide

GA HB243

Coweta Judicial Circuit; superior court; provide eighth judge

GA SB347

Tallapoosa Judicial Circuit; additional judge of the superior courts; provide

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.