Georgia Senate Bill SB388

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Report Pass: 2/15/24
• Engrossed: 2/7/24
• Enrolled: 2/16/24
• Chaptered: 2/19/24
• Passed: 2/19/24

Caption

Cherokee County School District; full value exemption for senior and disabled residents; provide

Impact

The passage of SB388 would significantly benefit eligible senior and disabled residents by alleviating their financial burden associated with property taxes for educational purposes. This could enhance the ability of these residents to remain in their homes by addressing common financial challenges faced during retirement or due to disabilities. Furthermore, the bill mandates a referendum to ensure community input, as the effectiveness of the exemption ultimately depends on voter approval in a forthcoming election.

Summary

Senate Bill 388 proposes to amend existing laws concerning ad valorem taxes within the Cherokee County School District in Georgia. It aims to provide a full-value exemption from educational taxes for residents who are senior citizens or disabled, contingent upon a five-year residency requirement and compliance with certain constitutional mandates. The bill specifically adapts previous legislation to better serve the needs of low-income elderly and disabled residents, offering them financial relief from school district taxes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB388 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocacy groups dedicated to assisting senior citizens and disabled individuals. Such measures are often viewed favorably as they provide necessary financial protection for vulnerable populations. However, there may also be voices of concern regarding the implications for school funding, as waiving ad valorem taxes could impact the district’s overall budget for educational services.

Contention

Despite its benefits, SB388 might face criticism based on potential repercussions on the funding levels for schools within the Cherokee County School District. Opponents may argue that while supporting vulnerable populations is essential, the loss of tax revenue could hinder educational resources for all students. This aspect of the bill highlights the broader ongoing debate between adequately supporting senior and disabled populations while ensuring sufficient funding for public education.