Hawaii House Bill HCR173

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/22
• Refer: 3/14/22

Caption

Requesting The United States Congress To Take Action Regarding The Separation Of Commercial And Investment Banking Functions Through The Reinstatement Of The Glass-steagall Act Of 1933 Or Similar Legislation.

Impact

If Congress were to enact such legislation, it could significantly reshape the landscape of banking regulation in the United States. The reinstatement would separate commercial and investment banking roles, aiming to mitigate risks associated with combining these functions, which have been shown to lead to conflicts of interest and overly risky financial practices. By reinforcing such regulations, the resolution seeks to protect consumers and ensure a more stable financial system that works in the public interest.

Summary

HCR173 is a House Concurrent Resolution from the Thirty-first Legislature of Hawaii that requests the United States Congress to take action regarding the separation of commercial and investment banking functions by reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 or similar legislation. The Glass-Steagall Act historically aimed to prevent excessive risks within the banking system by prohibiting commercial banks from engaging in investment activities, thus protecting consumer deposits and ensuring financial stability. Following its repeal in 1999, various financial crises, including the Great Recession, have raised concerns about the lack of protective measures for consumers and the economy at large.

Contention

Debate surrounding HCR173 reflects broader discussions about financial regulation, where proponents argue that reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act would serve as a bulwark against the kind of excessive speculation that led to previous economic downturns. Critics, however, may contend that the financial sector has evolved since the act was last in effect, suggesting that while reforms are necessary, the complete reinstatement of old regulatory frameworks may not be suitable for today’s diverse banking environment. The discussions emphasize the need for a balance between reasonable oversight and allowing institutions the flexibility to operate effectively.