Hawaii House Bill HCR37

Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Report Pass: 3/29/22
• Refer: 3/29/22

Caption

Requesting The University Of Hawaii To Establish A Reliable, Independent, And Transparent Methodology To Assess Effects Of Radio Frequency Emissions Generated By Wireless Antenna Sites.

Impact

If implemented, HCR37 could significantly affect public health and safety laws related to wireless communications. The proposed methodology would provide a means of ensuring that the expansion of wireless technologies adheres to safety regulations protecting communities from excessive radio frequency exposure. Moreover, it highlights the need for a structured approach to manage the expanding network of wireless facilities, emphasizing the necessity for transparency and independent assessments of potential health impacts.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 37 (HCR37) requests that the University of Hawaii develop an independent and transparent methodology to assess the effects of radio frequency emissions from wireless antenna sites. The resolution recognizes the rapid deployment of 5G technology in Hawaii, following the passage of Act 49 in 2018, which has led to an increase in wireless antennas throughout communities, schools, and workplaces. The aim of establishing a reliable methodology is to ensure compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding human exposure to radio frequency emissions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR37 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders emphasizing the importance of safety and public health. The discussion around the bill reflects a collective recognition of the concerns posed by increased radio frequency emissions and the urgency to have credible assessments to guide future implementations of wireless technology. However, some may see it as an added bureaucratic layer that could slow down the deployment of beneficial technology.

Contention

One notable point of contention in the discussions around HCR37 could arise from debates on the balance between technological advancement and health safety. Stakeholders worried about the stringent regulations stemming from the study might fear it could deter investments in new communication technologies or slow down the implementation of needed infrastructure. The bill therefore embodies a tension between fostering technological growth and ensuring that such growth does not compromise public safety.